With the huge gear change in the last 3 weeks with regards to the number of fans actually starting to voice and almost be heard about their pure frustration/anger/disbelief with what is happening ? or more appropriately NOT happening ? I did a very small amount of ?lazy Googling? and found out the following, I for one found this VERY interesting!
Everton?s Board of Directors
After over a decade of success in the gaming industry, he sold Ocean Software to French company Infogrames in April 1996 for US$100 million.
Woods has been a non-executive director at Everton Football Club since March 2000. He is known to shy away from media attention at Everton and never comments publicly on current affairs at the club. He is the third largest shareholder in the club and one of only four directors.
A leading figure in the hospitality and food & beverage industries, Robert Ian Earl is the founder and CEO of Planet Hollywood International, Inc and the chairman of the Planet Hollywood Resort & Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada. Earl is also an Everton director.
A lifetime entrepreneur, Earl founded President Entertainment in 1977, a company specializing in theme restaurants that grew from a modest start-up to a company valued at more than $100 million when he agreed to sell the company to Pleasurama in 1998.
On 20 October 2006, Earl the sandwich king bought shares in Everton from major shareholders Paul and Anita Gregg, they resigned from the board following the sale. The deal was brokered by Philip Green. Earl underwrote bank loans to help sign players and extend existing borrowings at Everton.
He indicated that he has no intention of taking over the club:"It's an endorsement of Bill Kenwright, an endorsement of David Moyes ? it is not a takeover. Anything that helps the economic model, and in turn gives David a better pool of talent, is something we want to do."
His most high profile involvement with the club has been inviting his friend and business partner Sylvester Stallone to Goodison Park.
Sir Philip David Carter CBE
Scottish-born football director, life president of Everton Football Club and a former director of Littlewoods. He joined Littlewoods as a 21-year-old in 1948 and 28 years later he was installed as the Managing Director.
He has had three spells with Everton Football Club. His first began in 1976 when he joined the board of directors. Two years later he was installed as Chairman.
Carter was involved with the formation of the Premier League. He along with four others were invited to dinner with ITV to discuss a break-away league that would feature the five largest clubs in the country at the time (Arsenal, Everton, Liverpool, Manchester United and Tottenham Hotspur) more frequently than any other teams thus those five clubs would receive more money than the others. He responded favourably.
When Peter Johnson purchased the club, Carter vacated his position only to be asked to return for a second spell by Johnson's buyer Bill Kenwright in 1998, where he remained in the position for six years before opting to retire, aged 78.
In 2008, he was brought back to the board of directors for a second time by Bill Kenwright, this time because an Extraordinary General Meeting had been called and there were not enough available directors to attend (a minimum of three is needed) following the resignation of Keith Wyness.
Sir Philip Carter has voiced his approval of Everton FC relocating out of the city of Liverpool. He was awarded a CBE in 1982 and a knighthood.
Now, if I am not mistaken, within this ?information? there is mention of two of our directors being worth over £100m each. I appreciate (having watched Dragons Den twice) that investors only invest to get profit out; however, I for one would have thought the old adage, spend to accumulate would be the perfect underscore of Everton at present... but none of the above want to put their hands in their pockets ? so this raises the question: if they don?t want to do, then why would anyone else??
And then of course there is the Chairman ? Bill Kenwright.
Now I was very pleased to see the back of Peter Johnson ? the man who sold Duncan Ferguson, without the manager knowing about it ? showed just what sort of future we would have had. When I heard a ?true Evertonian? was taking over, I was very pleased.
I for one have been living in the ?Everton bubble?, understanding the restrictions to spending, keeping the books tight, prudent management and the like; however, over the last 2 years, even I am looking at the overall picture and I am VERY worried.
So many failiures:?
* The collapse of the King's Dock project * NTL subsidiary PremiumTV were close to purchasing shares Everton ? never materialised * Destination Kirby
And then, in July 2009, Kenwright explained the club's financial position under his stewardship: "Our debt is a big debt and a worrying debt, but it is manageable because of our performance on the field."
That statement alone is enough to give me palpitations!! One bad season (10th or lower) and we would be in serious financial strife!
With all this in mind, I am not convinced that Bill and the board HAVE been making any positive steps to find a buyer for our beloved club. At present, there are over 20 people in the world with over £20billion in the back pocket ? so there IS cash out there...
Something simply needs to be done!
How??? ? Well, that?s the £160m Euro-winning question... Moyes will go if this situation does not change in the next 12 months, and the ?best squad? we have had in years will vanish ? to be replaced by what?? The likes of Paul Holmes, Earl Barrett and Stuart Barlow??? that for me is too much!!!
Si Harwood, Posted 09/07/2011 at 09:08:52
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
1 Posted 09/07/2011 at 15:41:22
I suggest you join the People's Group on Facebook and read their recent letter... An absolutely excellent piece: http://www.themerseyjuror.co.uk/2011/07/06/efc-exclusive-the-peoples-group/
2 Posted 09/07/2011 at 16:28:57
3 Posted 09/07/2011 at 16:40:19
4 Posted 09/07/2011 at 16:48:44
Why is an Everton fan group publishing this on a Liverpool website?
It is a good letter though, listing plenty of the issues with Kenwright many on here have been banging the drum about for a long, long time. It remains to be seen how successful a direct mailing to the media will be in changing anything...
5 Posted 09/07/2011 at 17:13:51
6 Posted 09/07/2011 at 17:30:13
7 Posted 09/07/2011 at 17:39:13
I heard Ian Snodin before fleetingly say something on Radio City along the lines of Everton couldn't buy anybody "at the moment" with great emphasis on the "at the moment" with I hope a view that things may change. Am I clutching at straws?
8 Posted 09/07/2011 at 17:37:28
David Moyes has kept our football club on the straight and narrow. If it wasn't for Moyes then Kenwright and his equally inept board would have been ran out of Liverpool a long time ago. The responses to that shite article by David Prentice at the Red Echo shows most sensible supporters are starting to realise that the 5th place finishes of a few years back will not happen again. Unless the egomaniac who is slowly killing our football club is stopped, we will be dropping down the league even further to a position that is more suited to our spending of around 14th.
If you seriously think Moyes is the problem and Kenwright and his old boys' network Board are not then god help you and Everton football club.
Look at the have-nots and the haves in the Premier League. United take £100 million in commercial activities alone, Man City have just signed a deal worth up to £400 million pounds (!).
What do we have? A skint shithouse of a chairman who claims he has been searching 24/7 for investment (I don't believe it for one minute... and actually we have documented proof from the Kirkby enquiries that none of the major shareholders have any interest in selling their shares). We have a ground that is falling to bits, no net spend in 4 seasons, trying to sell players just to pay bank loans...
I really think a bad start this season and we will have riots at Goodison. Seeing teams like Stoke, Leicester, Brighton all out-spending EFC is absolutely shocking and Kenwright should hold his head in shame.
But do you know what: he won't. Because the status of owning EFC is what it is all about for him.
OUT-SPENT BY BRIGHTON, STOKE AND LEICESTER.... FUCKING SHAMEFUL!!
KENWRIGHT, DO ONE!!!
9 Posted 09/07/2011 at 17:55:33
I don't have to see those blasted things coz I edit the pages from behind as it were... out of sight, out of mind... but fair does, I'll hold my hand up.
I guess I'd had my mind set by reading today many of the brilliant comments on Ben Jones's mailbag item, which are summed up perfectly for me by Scott Hamilton:
I think a few of us have found this thread quite cathartic. Hate is an emotion that I rarely feel and, when I do, it's normally fleeting. I can honestly say that I hate Liverpool FC, 99.99% of their fans and everything that they stand for.Given that, it truly sickens me to see this lad 'Scotty' in bed with a bunch of fucking redshite bastards on t'internet. That's my gut reaction.
He also needs a good editor to sort out some of his glaring gaffs... so I will unreservedly offer to host all his posts on this EVERTON website. Scotty! Get yer arse over here!!!
10 Posted 09/07/2011 at 18:01:37
11 Posted 09/07/2011 at 17:55:41
We already have "men of significant means" that own our beautiful football club yet no money is being spent. That is a curious scenario to which we have had no explanation.
I guess the only true addressing of the issue were BK's comments about Premier League football being for billionaires rather than millionaires, his point being that, although our shareholders have significant personal wealth, it is a drop in the ocean compared to what is required.
Who knows! It is always interesting to be reminded of who actually owns this club though and to speculate from there.
12 Posted 09/07/2011 at 18:17:23
13 Posted 09/07/2011 at 20:12:14
14 Posted 09/07/2011 at 20:23:02
A plea for media investigation
15 Posted 09/07/2011 at 20:42:04
Hopefully you weren't being ironic and I missed it... I hate that!
16 Posted 09/07/2011 at 21:22:51
(Note to Self: how embbarasing... Get neow spel-chequer...)
17 Posted 09/07/2011 at 23:05:18
We only beat three of the bottom ten at home last season. Teams that came to play football, we beat. Those that came to defend, we didn't have a clue against. We had the usual one up front and then, when we were losing, we brought another forward on in the second half.
Tactics obvious game after game. No pace, no width, no inspiration.
Does Kenwright decide we play these tactics?
We have no money. All our income goes on wages. Deal with it.
18 Posted 10/07/2011 at 10:41:07
But the real point here is £100m is probably not enough now to play the Premier League club ownership game! Whatever your thoughts of BK, he was nail-on-head when he said you words to the effect of you don't need millionaire owners now, but billionaires.
Many have asked about the business model for football, and whether there is one! I've always believed that the rationale behind the fuckery that is EPL was to do with the media rights. Sky is part of a global media company, and the real growth has been in overseas broadcasting with affiliate broadcasters and third party buyers.
10 years ago, companies in the Middle East and Asia didn't give a shit about branding. They just made and sold shit. Now, as they push their influence globally, they've cottoned on to all this marketing speak that has been spouted in the west for the last 2 decades.
Suddenly, a number of things happen:-
- Overseas, most EPL games are now on live. This will increase with content-sharing between pay TV platforms (EPL/NewsCorp don't like this, but until they start running governments, they can't stop it... Ooops)
- Suddenly the global reach of the premier league increases and companies with money to spend on branding can see a real return on investment
- Foreign sponsorship of EPL teams is up, as is the value of the sponsorship for the most-hyped (Liverpool, Man U £20m/year shirt deals!) Even the companies behind this seasons new deals at WBA and Villa are either Asian-owned or affiliated.
For Everton, we are too dependent on broadcasting revenue - it's too much of a proportion of total. Matchday revenue is limited due to the ground capacity, and limited corporate facilities.
Everton don't believe they have much of an overseas fanbase to commercialise the brand (through licensing, not merchandise sales per se). Also, we've not made any attempt to break the Asian market by signing a top Asian player (more Park Ji Sung than Li Weifang). The UK work permit rules don't help this, but the impact would be huge if done as successfully (proportionately) as Park for Man U.
Most clubs in the Prem are in a similar position. Our deal with Thai Bev is £2.6m per annum, and I think is up for renewal this year. I believe Thai Bev have successfully launched their product in the UK off the back of that deal, will they want to stay? Pay more? Go somewhere else?
I don't envy the challenge the clubs face. Where all the clubs have made a rod for their own backs is by allowing wages / transfer fees to go mental. Transfer fees may come down under FFP, but as long as one club is willing to pay stupid money, it screws it up for everyone else.
19 Posted 14/07/2011 at 20:20:01
Would you honestly put your own cash-money in to a venture that will yield no return whatsoever.....?!?!?!?
We need to get out of that fuckin' ground and start makin' some cash from other activities other than footie; ultimately ATTRACT NEW INVESTORS.
No one in the right mind would buy Everton FC mate - that's the issue here.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.