Young Blues and England held again

, 26 June, 19comments  |  Jump to most recent
Ross Barkley provided an assist and completed 90 minutes alongside fellow Blue John Stones as England came from behind to earn a draw with Chile in their second group game at the Fifa U20 World Cup.

Luke Garbutt, Chris Long and John Lundstram were unused substitutes for Peter Taylor's side.

Barkley set up striker Harry Kane with an impressive surging run to cancel out Castillo's first-half penalty.

It was England's second draw of the tournament after they finished 2-2 with Iraq on Sunday and they will have the opportunity to book passage to the next phase if they can beat Egypt on Saturday.  



Reader Comments (19)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Ross Edwards
1 Posted 26/06/2013 at 19:32:30
Oh dear. English football is sliding further into the nadir. A draw with Chile. Changes must be made NOW.
Phil Sammon
2 Posted 26/06/2013 at 20:05:41
England were diabolical. Barkley was very good in patches but the rest of the team were seriously poor and the tactics literally had me laughing out loud.

From a kick-off we had two players stood on the left touchline. The ball was rolled back to a centre midfielder who launched it at the corner flag for the two wingers to run onto. We used to do that in our year 6 school team...and we were utterly shit.

Oh and Lundstram wasn't unused. He came on with a minute or so to go.

Paul Thompson
3 Posted 26/06/2013 at 20:14:47
The best you could say was the second half was a lot better than the first in which England were completely outplayed by a good Chile side. Whilst he was utterly anonymous in the first, Barkley was again England's creative spark in the second. He's great on the ball, but when he hasn't got it, his movement is poor. At the moment he could only be played in the hole behind in the striker for Everton - just hasn't got the mobility and discipline to do anything else. But in the hole, he could be sensational. As for Stones, he looked pretty solid and certainly better than Flanagan (who he replaced). He seems to be comfortable with both feet.
Graham Coldron
4 Posted 26/06/2013 at 21:07:02
Not seen the game and to be honest I'd sooner see Berkley playing well for Everton rather than England.

On a separate note it's about time we bought some new players especially as the R.S are making a few moves in the transfer market.

Wayne Smyth
5 Posted 26/06/2013 at 21:16:57
Paul, Barkley has got mobility, you see it in spades when he has the ball and gets forward. Whether he has the discipline or willingness to work back is another matter.

To be fair to him, he may be under instructions not to work too hard on the defensive side and save himself for his forward runs, on the other hand it could be he's a lazy Le Tissier type who's not pulling his weight. Only the coaches know I think.

Jon Withey
6 Posted 26/06/2013 at 22:04:35
Stones is quite a big athletic lad, thought he was decent. Some nice play from Barkley at times, the most creative player in the team.
Ian Bennett
7 Posted 26/06/2013 at 22:07:54
Peter Taylor rather Dave Sexton I think. From what I saw the team continue to give away cheaply, like us in Europe. Basic stuff really.
James Martin
8 Posted 26/06/2013 at 22:13:12
Barkley suffers from his position on the pitch. The RS Coady didn't look to thread one ball through to him all game. he justs pent the entire match walking from side to side trying to show for the ball. I think he would be more suited to a midfield three like Chelsea played with Lampard or like we did with Gravesen which allows runners from midfield rather than the common midfielder as a number ten role which has Barkley with his back to goal for too long.

Stones looked good, didn't absolutely panic when under the slightest pressure which set him apart from the majority of the England side.

Phil Sammon
9 Posted 26/06/2013 at 22:35:21
I think people are looking at Stones through blue tinted glasses. I don't doubt his potential but he was poor today. He let a simple ball run under his foot in our own 6 yard box that could very easily have been tapped home by the nearby attacker. Like every other England defender he was far too keen to lump it aimlessly.

Good player I'm sure, but not today.

Sam Hoare
10 Posted 27/06/2013 at 10:27:00
Was stones playing at RB or CB? I presume the former.

Any good Chileans we should be tapping up?

Will be interesting to see how many youngsters get serious playing time under RM. I suspect it will not be quite as many as people think.

Harold Matthews
11 Posted 27/06/2013 at 10:19:30
Yeah. Stones wasn't brilliant but he will definitely make it. Two-footed and probably more of a centre-half. Got knackered in the heat late on and needs fill out a bit.

Barkley went up a gear in the last half-hour and caused Chile all sorts of problems. Unfortunately, his less talented team-mates were more of a hindrance than the Chilean defence.

Always keen to receive the ball, he makes little effort to chase and win it. At Leeds, he was the same, but I don't think it's laziness. He's a big lad, still growing into his frame and his all-round ability will improve with experience.

One thing is certain: the richer clubs throughout Europe will have his name in their notebooks.

Kev Johnson
12 Posted 27/06/2013 at 11:15:42
Harold – what is it, then, if it's not laziness?

Incidentally, the heat is not an excuse for English players to run out of steam – it's a perfectly good reason. Football is just not a summer game!

Dave Lawley
13 Posted 27/06/2013 at 10:43:14
I saw the game just to watch our lads play, I thought Stones did ok but if he didn't play for EFC I wouldn't have noticed him, pretty average on the night.

As for Barkley, besides three good aggressive penetrating runs into the Chile half, he looked below average at most other aspects of a footballers game, heading, tackling, positional play (didn't mark or track back, didn't find space enough going forward), most worryingly is the amount of times he lost the ball when played into his feet. His passing was okay but nothing special, I had hoped for more from both of them, Stones costing £3 mil and Barkley now having the benefit of years of coaching 'alongside the first team' at finch farm and a few loan deals in the lower leagues, Martinez, on this evidence, will need to work some magic to get these lads into the first team.

Lundstram however looked good in the first game, a CM played on the right wing, with shit service from the RS Flanagan, I thought he had a good game, neat, tidy, doesn't give the ball away, intelligent passing.

Barkley looks really good running at pace with the ball at his feet, but that's it, Lundstram seems to have most aspects to his game nailed down and is starting to look better than most as this level.

Lundstram is my tip for prolonged future success at the top end of the game (hopefully with us). Fuck knows how Coady gets in the centre of midfield ahead of him, he plays like Pip Neville.

Phil Sammon
14 Posted 27/06/2013 at 11:22:33
Lundstram was completely average in the first game and stuck out of position, it's easy to see why. Though more dynamic, it was like putting Darron Gibson on the wing. Lundstram is just not that sort of player.

As for Barkley not tracking back, yes he probably could have done more – but he was playing as our most advanced midfielder. He was expected to support Kane and start attacks, not harry down players in his own half.

He did get caught in possession a few times and misplaced a few passes, but he was the shining light amongst an otherwise dismal England side. Whenever he received the ball he had one option: run with it. He's not the finished article, nobody would say that, but I don't think you can really criticise the lad after those two performances.

And yes, Conner Coady is utter shite.

Barry Rathbone
15 Posted 27/06/2013 at 11:30:28
British players haven't got the basics of controlling and passing, they're forever fighting to get the thing under control.

if you haven't got the tools, you won't build anything. Lord knows what's happened to kids in this country... the Latins and Hispanics still have lads who can play – we haven't.

Mind you, if we class a fella who can't go past people, head or tackle but takes corners and poses in his undies as "great" is it any wonder?

Tom Bowers
16 Posted 27/06/2013 at 12:40:15
It is correct to state that many teams at any level do not play in the way The Spanish squads have mastered and that is close knitted packs with the emphasis on quick ball control and teamwork. Many teams still play the ''old way'' and struggle.

I remember the old Spurs team of the early sixties who dominated because they had the close first-touch passing routine off to a fine art, which is what Spain has today. Of course, speed of thought and keeping possession are a must but the key is not trying to make difficult passes unnecessarily which many players think they have the ability to do but can't.

Spain are patient and they don't need a big central striker like most teams use which just commands use of the big boot in the air and dead ball situations from wide positions. People like Taylor, Sexton and Pierce grew up on this tired style of play and are teaching it to the young English players hence the poor performances. If they don't change then many smaller footie nations will overtake us if they haven't already.

Harold Matthews
17 Posted 27/06/2013 at 15:12:16
Kev. Wishful thinking on my part I must confess.
I also face the same problem with Gibson.
Michael Winstanley
18 Posted 29/06/2013 at 19:47:06
Watching England vs Egypt.
Stones is cool as fuck.
Barkley is the best player on the pitch by a country mile.
Jack Farrell
19 Posted 01/07/2013 at 10:44:25
I thought Stones looked a real class act against Egypt. Comfortable on the ball, quick, a good crosser of the ball and seems to have a good engine on him. One for the near future I think.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads

© ToffeeWeb