Financial pain = no gain
I read with no little amount of schaudenfreude (hope I?ve spelt it correctly !) of the financial straits our red neighbours are getting themselves into. The article is on the Daily Telegraph?s website if you want a proper read. It would appear that Laurel and Hardy (Gillette and Hicks), rather than being the ?White Knights? who would dig deep to fund a Premier League title, have actually been borrowing heavily against the club (as opposed to using their own cash) to fund both their takeover and the subsequent purchase of players. They are going to borrow a further £60M to start the ground redevelopment, but have no guarantee they can raise the rest of the cash.
In any case, the stadium, if it is built, will be to a reduced specification and the borrowings will (again) be against the club not the owners. All this is likely to leave Beneathus with little or no money to invest in more players and a first EPL title still a distant dream.
There are now a significant number of EPL clubs in a similar position to Liverpool; foreign owners milking the TV money whilst in reality investing little in the club they have bought; apart from a few expensive signings to keep the fans happy (and the tills ringing in the club shop).
Now I know Everton are not exactly the most profitable of organisations and we do have debts of our own to contend with. However, they are at manageable levels and clearly not on the breath taking scale of those at Man Utd (£600M +) or Liverpool (see above). Nor would we want them to be.
Given where we now find ourselves at the Club, I think that, in the long term, we could actually find ourselves in a much healthier position than many of our competitors both on and off the field by pursuing our current strategies. I?m not suggesting that the likes of Man Utd (or Liverpool unfortunately) are about to implode. However, the strategy of attracting foreign investment clearly comes at a cost which is potentially high risk for the club in question; as it assumes continuing success on the pitch to fund high levels of debt. A large fan base alone will never suffice. Leeds United is a classic example of this strategy and if it has happened once it can happen again.
We were in this position not too long ago when Agent Johnson had the reins. Relegation at that time would have taken us into oblivion. It has taken the best part of ten years to get the Club moving in the right direction again and Kenwright deserves a lot of the credit for this. We all have our views on his motives, but I err on the side of those who see him as a true Evertonian who, unlike us, was able to put his money in at a critical time for the Club and has since created a support network of Directors and others with whom he has been able to steady the ship and gradually start to move it forward. We have a manager who Kenwright has supported with funds and who is now starting to repay his Chairman with results and the fans with performances we relish. Success in terms of trophies is tangible now, where a little whole ago such talk would have been laughable.
So, for me, I do not look forward to the day when some American / Russian / Rest of the World money man comes knocking on Kenwright?s door. I don?t think we need them and, whilst Bill Kenwright would make a few bob, our Club would be hung out to dry.
Reader Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
How long before he gets his much deserved knighthood for services to sport on Merseyside?
This situation is what has created the casm between most English clubs who still find it expensive to borrow money and therefore buy players and the big four who can guarantee future revenue streams and allowed to borrow much more at a lower interest rate.
Of course each of the big four would have the similar troubles to Leeds if they were to fail to qualify for the Champions League regularly.
EFC has posted losses for 7 of the last 9 years as this very good articles by Joe Beardwood show:
http://www.toffeeweb.com/club/business/Finances07.pdf
and
http://toffeeweb.com/season/07-08/news/071115a.asp
The debt is up to 70m;in 1999 EFC had net assets of £18m now net liabilities of £10.3m; and the club is keeping either outsorcing activities or selling assets and they cant still achive break eevn point which is really worrying
I think the plan to lease a new stadium rather than take on all that outright ownership involves is a master-stroke. Believe me ,Everton are in very safe hands.
Vladimir Putin, apparently, has a fortune estimated as at least £20 billion, banked in Switzerland. The Russian president and former KGB officer has spent eight years saving up his kopeks carefully to become the richest man in Europe. I think he should buy the rs who would then officially become the redshiteski. Such an obvious public benefactor could do great things there - salt mines, assassinations and mysterious disappearances.
Sounds good to me.
Bill Kenwright has made up investors to keep his own arse in charge and has sought to keep his role on the board against any investment, who in their right mind would invest their hard earned into a business and not get the top chair at the table?
Unfortunately, that?s not the way it goes. Clubs like Utd and Liverpool and Chelsea get to spend obscene amounts of other people?s money to buy up all the best players, and then basically bulldoze their way to success. How do they get away with it? Glamour and pedigree. Liverpool and Utd have this huge tradition that they can bank on. Every investor and large scale banker wants to get involved with a club like them. They are only too willing to provide large amounts of cash into what is perceived, rightly or wrongly, to be a cash cow.
Also, all the best players, as well as their agents,are only too willing to buy into the pomp and the glamour of it all. (Well, that as much as they do the huge wage packets. )Would you turn down the opportunity to earn a fortune and a trophy cabinet if offered it by these teams? For myself, I would find it hard to say no. Clubs like Everton and Blackburn and Portsmouth, who are trying to do things on the business acumen model, just don?t get a look in.
Yet again the classic must be a ..... (fill in the gap) supporter - classic shite muppet. The site isn’t owned by you or I or BK or KW it’s independent and as such a place where anyone can post be it my thoughts or yours - funny that isn’t it?
We should all have taken the johnson era as one hell of a warning and I believe that Kenwright has learnt from this mistake.
If abramovich walked out on Chelsea where would that leave them? I doubt he’s paid for every single player up front (like Johnson didn’t), even if he has the likelehood is that it’s been spent with loans secured against the club (again like Johnson) and even if this wasn’t true, there’d still be the sky high wages to pay. The same can be said about Man Utd or Liverpool.
The arse fell out of most of English football with the ITV digital fiasco. You ask any supporter in the lower leagues (who actually has some sense to talk about the financial implications since the collapse of this deal) and they’ll tell you it was one of the worst things that could possibly have happened to English football. Clubs spent money which they believed they would be getting the next year through tv income and when they didn’t an untold number of talented footballers found themselves on the scrapheap either cos their clubs couldn’t afford them, or because they priced themselves out of clubs with their wage demands. In turn this lead to wealthy proprieters calling time on some of Englands league teams.
I live in Oldham now and this club was borderline bust because of this reason. A previous owner not so long ago did the same as Johnson, and when itv digital collapsed there was no revenue for the club. Fitz Hall was sold for around £75,000 at the time when an offer of around £500,000 would have been more realistic.
My point being, the arse fell out of the football league with the collapse of tv revenue, there’s no reason why it can’t happen to the premier league. After all, the italian league was untouchable 10 years ago.
When this happens it’s club’s like Everton who don’t rely on heavy outside investment to secure loans who will prosper.
There is a huge tax advantage when operating in debt. Many large companys actually operate in debt by either loaning money and investing all the profits because interest rates are lower and obviously you pay less tax. Debt managment is also normally negotiable wheras paying interest on equity isnt. There is also slightly less risk for investors as shareholders have to queue behind creditors for reimbursement if the company does go bankrupt. If the company is confident that cashflows will stay strong enough to meet interest obligations and avoid intervention by the creditor, then negotiated debt can usually undercut the cost of equivalent equity in the early stages of a company?s development. In away its a scam because your cheating the tax man...but who ever cared about that.


1 Posted 21/12/2007 at 06:25:27
Report abuse