FA fine Everton for breaching football agent regulations

, 22 January, 35comments  |  Jump to most recent
Everton have been fined £45,000 for an illegal approach in 2010 for Nottingham Forest defender Jamaal Lascelles, the Football Association have announced.

The club were found to have breached the FA's football agent regulations and Andy Niedzwiecki, the agent who was representing Lascelles at the time, has also been fined £10,000 and warned as to his conduct.

An Everton spokesman said: “Everton Football Club accepts the findings of the FA inquiry."  



Reader Comments (35)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Ajay Gopal
1 Posted 22/01/2014 at 11:46:50
"Everton fined by FA for unauthorised approach for Forest player"
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11671/9128105/everton-fined-by-fa-for-unauthorised-approach-for-forest-player

"Everton have been fined £45,000 and warned as to their future conduct after breaching the FA's football agent regulations.

"The breach relates to the club's unauthorised approach to Jamaal Lascelles whilst the player was under a scholarship agreement at Nottingham Forest in the latter part of 2010.

"Andy Niedzwiecki, the football agent who was representing Mr Lascelles at the time, has been fined and Jamaal Lascelles, who also admitted his part in the affair, has been severely warned as to his future conduct.

"The time-frame for any appeal has passed."

Shane Corcoran
2 Posted 22/01/2014 at 12:56:41
I've just seen the illegal approach story on Sky and I hope some posters will be furious with this revelation as they were to Moyes's approach for Baines last summer. I know it's not the same thing but both are worthy of condemnation.
Patrick Murphy
3 Posted 22/01/2014 at 13:09:47
Shane, and who was the manager of Everton at the time of the illegal approach? But you're correct it isn't the way that Everton should be doing business but how come the story has only come to light now? How many other clubs are being investigated for similar deeds?
Ray Roche
4 Posted 22/01/2014 at 13:05:14
Shane Corcoran @ 421

Shane, I'm not sure that you can compare the Baines/Moyes and Jamaal Lascelles / Moyes situation. As far as we know Baines was not personally involved with any skullduggery regarding a move to Utd. Utd and Moyes came after him. Lascelles and his agent, Niedzwiecki, the ex Wrexham goalie, were involved in attempting to get a move to Everton for Lascelles. Not quite the same thing, but embarrassing and not worthy of Everton FC. There is a common denominator. OFM.

Shane Corcoran
5 Posted 22/01/2014 at 13:51:55
Patrick and Ray, just for the record, I'm not defending Moyes but I think it's good to look at yourself (us, Everton) in the same light at others.

As you both point out, it isn't something we should be associated with but the common denominator thing, although accurate, would suggest that Moyes was the main man in both cases which isn't necessarily true.

Ray Roche
6 Posted 22/01/2014 at 14:15:54
Yes, Shane, it can be a sobering experience, seeing our selves as others see us. It may not necessarily be true that Moyes was the guilty party but he is, as suggested, the common denominator and as we can see from the Baines case, it's not something that he would shy away from. I also think that there was a similar furore regarding the pursuit of Garbutt from Leeds which resulted in some bad feelings on the Leeds side and us having to pay 𧼐,000 , a fee fixed by a tribunal. Moyes was instrumental in that, too, so let's not let the truth get in the way of a good story. It IS Toffeeweb, after all.
James Hughes
7 Posted 22/01/2014 at 15:08:25
I see we have just been fined £45,000 over an unauthorised approach for the player, Jamaal Lascelles, in 2010.

Two questions:

1. Who the bloody hell is he?

2. What took the FA so bloody long?

And if it takes 4 years to sort that out are they fit to run the game

Richard Reeves
8 Posted 22/01/2014 at 15:16:02
Another two questions.

Are the people who were involved still working at the club and who are they?

Dominic Tonge
9 Posted 22/01/2014 at 15:17:30
Does that mean in 2017 we get some compo off Man Utd for them tapping up Moyes?
Eugene Ruane
10 Posted 22/01/2014 at 15:18:03
Sneaky United manager blackens good name of Everton (or..something)
Chris Wilson
11 Posted 22/01/2014 at 15:30:01
Conveniently, because the FA ruling comes 3-4 years after the incident, the statute of limitations has passed and we cannot appeal the decision. Dirty, greedy FA money tactic.
Dave Roberts
12 Posted 22/01/2014 at 15:27:48
Something I've always wondered.....when clubs, managers or players are fined for one reason or another where does the money go? If it goes to promoting grass roots football or something equally worthwhile I'd be happy with that but if it goes into some FA fatcat's back pocket or off the Wembley debt I would be furious!
Barry Rathbone
13 Posted 22/01/2014 at 15:54:55
Love us being gangsters.... "Evertony Soprano"

Are we bad or what?

Linda Morrison
14 Posted 22/01/2014 at 16:13:56
I think legally here Everton should seek a judicial review of this decision on a number of grounds.

1) It is against Natural Justice to deny victims the opportunity to appeal just because the governing body could not get to a decision in the correct time frame.

2) This is not the first time such instances have occurred and the financial penalty was less.

3) The main player on behalf of the club, Moyes is no longer employed by Everton making it impossible for the club to implement their own disciplinary procedure.

ps: Keep all the copies of what happened over Man Utd, Moyes and Baines and wait for 2017...

Brian Wilkinson
15 Posted 22/01/2014 at 17:26:31
If it has taken 4 years then still time for the old farts to collect another £45 grand for Nick Barmby's tap up. I also agree something should be done about the Moyes tap up but we know neither will by the FA's little darlings.
Mark Wilson
16 Posted 22/01/2014 at 17:33:32
Makes it rather hard for us to continue to take the moral high ground when in fact we are now one of the few top clubs to have been fined this much for tapping up? How Moyes ever had the cheek to complain about other clubs behaviour ie Man City is beyond me. Our reaction seems like a guilty child caught red handed, albeit years after the event. Disappointing.
Brian Wilkinson
18 Posted 22/01/2014 at 17:57:23
I go back to Nick Barmby, he suddenly comes out and says he wants to play for Liverpool.

He knew, we knew and everyone knew the player was tapped up.

What player would say that with the prospect of looking silly if the other team said nah not interested in the player, you don't just say it unless you know for sure the other team wants you.

Colin Glassar
19 Posted 22/01/2014 at 19:21:38
BK should hand the bill to ginger. We shouldn't pay this.
Callum McNab
20 Posted 22/01/2014 at 19:55:13
What about Rooney to United or even the ginger prick to United . You have ferguson telling the world in his book all about his approach for him, and telling him not to sign a new contract, and he ends up being there manager. Absolute joke.
Dominic Virgo
21 Posted 22/01/2014 at 20:09:32
This is an absolute joke and the FA need need to sort themselves out. How can it take 4 years to sort out? I agree with the whole Moyes going to Man U comments. He was definitely tapped up but teams like Man U and the Sky faves are untouchable while a club like ours which mostly does things right gets punished.
Denis Richardson
22 Posted 22/01/2014 at 20:17:57
This is a joke on many levels. Firstly every single club is guilty of 'tapping up' players. I find the whole concept a bit stupid tbh as unless the club AND the player agree to the transfer, it wont happen.

Granted a player can throw his toys out of the pram to try and force a move if the club says no, but that happens anyway as soon as it's public a club is interested in the player. There are a million ways for a club/manager to find out if a player would be intersted in a move without contacting the player directly, so the whole tapping up rule is fankly nonsense.

Secondly, as mentioned, htf can it take 4 years to come to a ruling. They cannot have spent that entire time on 'enquiries' surely. I guess it probably was forgotten about until recently.

Htf is he anyway, never heard of him and he'sy doesn't seem to have made any great leap in the last 4 years, so probably dodged a bullet not signing him! Not surprisingly he's a defender!

Chris Wilson
23 Posted 22/01/2014 at 20:10:52
Would love to see us add 45,000 to any purchase Moyes attempts to make. "Absolutely, Leighton Baines is for sale. That'll be 18 million and 45 thousand quid please. Cash."

We should also add a retro tap-up penalty for Rooney. Go to the Euros surrounded by Man U players? I'm sure not one of Fergie's "agents" sounded Rooney out towards his feelings about being a Man U player.

Eugene Ruane
24 Posted 22/01/2014 at 20:51:21
Chris (625) - "Would love to see us add 45,000 to any purchase Moyes attempts to make. "Absolutely, Leighton Baines is for sale. That'll be 18 million and 45 thousand quid please. Cash."

Great idea, would really shove it up the F.A.

Brent Stephens
25 Posted 22/01/2014 at 20:48:48
I guess we'll be feeling a little less holier than thou, now. I'm no defender of the Scottish Manager but my guess is that any behaviour in this on his part would not have been unknown to others in our club.

Tony McNulty
26 Posted 22/01/2014 at 21:04:42
I wouldn't condone this but is there any other major club NOT guilty of ever trying on something like this?
Richard Harris
27 Posted 22/01/2014 at 22:26:55
There's something odd about the timing of this and the fact that it has taken so long that there is no right of appeal. Do the FA really expect us to believe that we are the only club to have done this ? Or maybe the other players, agents and clubs are more high profile and have friends where it matters.....
Pat Finegan
28 Posted 22/01/2014 at 22:28:22
There is certainly a degree of naiveity on the part of the FA regarding the tapping up rule. That doesn't make it acceptable to illegally approach players.

So long as the rule is duly enforced toward every club, I have no problem with Everton accepting this (relatively small) fine. That being said, I have my doubts as to whether it is the case that this rule is evenly enforced.

I, admittedly, haven't read the rule but based on the understanding that I have of it, how do you enforce it? A rule that can't be enforced is not worth having.

Sondre Haga
29 Posted 23/01/2014 at 00:08:33
That's a major blow for BK. No more signings this window then..
Anto Byrne
30 Posted 23/01/2014 at 00:25:57
Just watched the dour dull defensive get done by Sundland. Tried to defend a goal difference advantage and blew it. Some things are set in stone.
Mick Davies
31 Posted 23/01/2014 at 00:45:23
What is tapping up? Is it splashing an interest in a player all over the media, or sneaking round to his home at night in a wig, shades and false moustache? I just can't see the difference. Chelsea weren't punished over Ashley Cole, but Cole was fined £100,000, so why are we getting punished even though we never even signed the fucking player???
Patrick Murphy
32 Posted 23/01/2014 at 01:45:18
This lad was around 17 years of age at the time of the tapping up so perhaps that is why the FA got so upset about it. Arsenal put in a bid of £5m for the lad 3 years ago in January 2011 but Forest refused to sell. He also played on loan at Stevenage, I'm not being paranoid but......

Jim Lloyd
33 Posted 23/01/2014 at 12:46:36
Nice one Chris!

I'd also like to know why they decided to make it public that we'd been naughty (in 2010ffs) but not give the deatils. If they have enouigh evidence to fine the club, the FA (aptly named bunch of tossers) did not appear to level that criticism at any individual employee of EFC?

Brian Wilkinson
34 Posted 23/01/2014 at 14:45:18
How on earth can they say too late to appeal, even Dick Turpin at least wore a mask. If we have acted this way, fair play, but surely even if we lose the appeal, we should have least have the right to appeal, it is not Everton's fault the FA took 4 years to bring this up.
Roger Helm
35 Posted 23/01/2014 at 16:16:50
It's obvious the FA did not follow its own procedures properly - there was no due process. This is the penalty and because we arsed around so long it's too late to appeal it? Ridiculous! The club should refuse to pay and challenge the FA to take us to court if they want the money.
Phil Gardner
36 Posted 24/01/2014 at 21:19:31
Non story on Talk Sport, curiously given more coverage than the 'Liverpool FC fans racially abuse and violently threaten TS commentator and former player' headline that should have been.....with the Suarez and Mark Halsey incidents as evidence of previous....but then again....

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads

© ToffeeWeb