No resolution of Lukaku situation until after the World Cup

, 7 May, 64comments  |  Jump to most recent
‘It's going to take a bit of time’
Roberto Martinez says that if the Belgian is to leave Chelsea this summer as speculation suggests he will, he doesn't expect any movement on Romelu Lukaku's future until after the World Cup.

The manager has made no secret of his desire to sign the striker on a permanent basis this summer but he will likely have to wait to see what happens with Lukaku's parent club's own transfer dealings first.

“Chelsea, are delighted with his progress and the player has developed an incredible relationship with our fans," Martinez says in the Liverpool Echo. “His memories will never evaporate, but we will see what's next.

“We'll see what's the best thing for everyone. But everything will be in stages: how Chelsea are doing in their own squad and how that frees some players. It's going to take a bit of time and I don't think Romelu's situation is going to be resolved before the World Cup, in truth.

“I think it will be after the World Cup.”

The biggest obstacle for the Blues will be the transfer fee with media speculation suggesting the Londoners will be looking for at least £20m and if there is any truth to the reports, there will be plenty of potential suitors for the 20 year-old, particularly if he does well in Brazil.

“We are too close to Romelu to hope he has a poor tournament! We hope he has a really, really good World Cup . . . and then decides to come to us,” Martinez says.

And the Spaniard is typically gracious towards Lukaku in dealing with the issue of the fee.

“I don't think [a ~£20m fee] is my worry. The worry would be that if the deal was a cheap one, it would be because he has had a torrid time and hasn't fulfilled his potential.

“The reason Romelu came to Everton was for him to take a big role, take a lot of responsibility, to start playing 90 minutes and be a real brain in that forward line, and he has done that so we couldn't be happier.”

Quotes sourced from Liverpool Echo



Reader Comments (64)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Brian Williams
2 Posted 07/05/2014 at 16:41:16
Roberto....what an inspiration he is.
Jim Harrison
4 Posted 07/05/2014 at 16:39:55
If he plays at the world cup like he did against City we could get him on a free!!! Great potential, but needs to learn from his predecessor at Chelsea Drogba, not the diving, but the relentless work rate and gut busting commitment. If he can play like he did against Arsenal at home more often, he will be great. More of the dross he served up last match and he will be an upgraded Anichebe!!! That said, in a shit performance he still notched up a well taken goal.
Tony Draper
5 Posted 07/05/2014 at 16:47:23
Agreed Brian

First time in a VERY long age that I look to the manager and do not think that I know better than Roberto does.

As a little aside, when I renewed my season ticket I was chatting with the girl who took the details, what she said about Roberto was awe inspiring
She openly said that everybody loves him to pieces, he’s warm, polite and wherever he goes there’s a buzz of excitement
When I asked about the predecessor, she simply said "Roberto always smiles at EVERYONE, not avoids their gaze"

The overwhelming impression was simply that Roberto isn’t showing up for the cameras.......it’s just who he is

Superb chat with someone who ADORES Everton and works for Everton
THAT convo alone was worth the season card fee

Steve Brown
6 Posted 07/05/2014 at 17:09:07
Done great Tony but not infallible. Some great signings but also some poor ones - Alcaraz, Robles, Kone? Think he has gained more confidence in going to market to source players now rather than relying on his ex-players.
Steavey Buckley
7 Posted 07/05/2014 at 17:15:50
Without Lukaku, Everton would start next season with more footballing commitments with the Europa league without a proving striker. Top clubs have at least 3, Everton will be going into next season with 0. And Evertonians should recognise what happened last season without a real striker, Everton drew their first 3 games, 2 of them, Cardiff and Norwich will be relegated, while WBA just survived. Those 6 points lost cost Everton dearly at the end of the season.
Tony Draper
8 Posted 07/05/2014 at 17:15:27
Agreed Steve, incredible but not infallible

Alcaraz, as a free I thought was worth a spin, who knows what John Stones may have learned from him in training ? We have all like and also winced at his performances

Kone, has to rate as disappointing so far and hasn’t many more "top seasons" left in his armoury

Robles, well as ’Keepers go 24 is still a rookie. However, when he arrived I was quite encouraged, I felt he had promise, pretty sure that I don’t feel that any longer

Overall these 3 weren’t hideously expensive IF they all prove to be mistakes

But, I do think that James McCarthy has justified his fee, tireless & understated. Half a dozen goals a season and we’d be looking at a 25-30M player

Frank Crewe
9 Posted 07/05/2014 at 17:21:15
@Steve Brown.

Since Alcaraz cost nothing I can’t complain. Personally I think we’ll bin him in the summer. Kone hasn’t played so lets wait and see. As for Robles. Well sub goalies are exactly that, sub goalies. You can’t keep a top class goalie on the bench so the sub is always second best. Although as far as I know he’s still the only player in the squad with a cup winners medal.

I would have problems with McGeady though. He’s a born bench warmer and I hope RM will be looking a better quality players than him this summer.

James Stewart
10 Posted 07/05/2014 at 17:33:39
Good hopefully he has gone elsewhere by then. No way we should be blowing £20m on him. Horribly one footed and has looked more like Heskey of late. A big pass.
Robin Cannon
11 Posted 07/05/2014 at 17:46:14
He’s shown inconsistency, but he’s still very young. I think he’s a must buy if we can pull together the £20m. While at times he’s been poor, at times he’s also been unplayable, and our record in terms of goals and points with him in the team versus when he’s been absent is huge.

He also, barring injury or a complete disaster in terms of loss of form, offers a good financial bet. Even if he doesn’t completely work out, in 2-3 years time he’s still going to be a young striker with a very high resale value - i.e. his value is likely to at worst stay the same as a purchase price, and at best increase significantly.

Ian Bennett
12 Posted 07/05/2014 at 17:29:10
My take is that Alcaraz is 4th choice and will normally not be called upon. Good enough cover, just not the big games. Think Jonny Evans, Kolo Toure et al.

Robles looks uncertain, although again is not first choice. Good enough backup, well we have had a lot worst. I’d be comfortable we could recover part or all of the transfer fee when we come to get a real No1. Like Begovic.

Kone, just not seen enough. He got injured early days before we got up and running also, so I can’t see he’s a dead loss just yet. Imagine he will be from the bench next season, and could be a decent option next to a Lukaku type.

So these 3 are squad fillers at an outlay of what ~£9m. I just hope to see Roberto sign 2 or 3 players that go straight in, through the spine of the side.

Brian Hill
13 Posted 07/05/2014 at 17:51:08
Frank Crewe @9. I think you’ll find that McCarthy and Kone have Cup winners medals as well as Robles.......
Kevin Rowlands
14 Posted 07/05/2014 at 17:58:08
If it was another season on loan, then I would be in the Yes camp, but for £20 mill not for me, way too inconsistent.

If we’re going to spend that kind of money, I’d rather bring in Wilfred Bony.

Ian Jones
15 Posted 07/05/2014 at 17:52:07
The Evening Standard in London practically reproduces the text from the above Liverpool Echo article re Lukaku but also suggests that ’it would be difficult for Everton to afford the £20 million asking price but Chelsea have a long-standing interest in their England midfielder Ross Barkley and have also been monitoring defender John Stones and that could pave the way for the transfer to take place’.

Not sure how we would feel about Roberto if any deal was done involving either or both players.

But I expect Everton players and Roberto to be linked all over the place for a long time.

Colin Glassar
16 Posted 07/05/2014 at 18:00:50
I don’t know what all the negativity about Alcaraz is all about. Yes, he’s made mistakes but so has everyone else. Yes, he had a shocker against the rs but so did everyone else. Yes, I prefer Distin (despite his age) but I still think Alcaraz is a more than capable deputy.

As for the other lads, well Robles is a young keeper who will only get better with experience. And Kone, ohhhhhh Kone. Have we seen enough of him in a blue shirt to make a sound judgement? I don’t think so.

Sorry, I forgot this was about Lukaku. We all know Roberto loves him and rates him very highly but how long will Roberto wait until his situation becomes clear? Can we afford to wait until late July for example? Don’t we need a guarantee from the player and his club for us to wait so long? We could end up without Lukaku, Bony and Remy if we wait too long.

Ian Jones
17 Posted 07/05/2014 at 18:10:53
Frank @9

Tim Howard and Gareth Barry (if we can count him) also have FA Cup winners medals.

That’s almost half a team, managed by a cup-winning one. McGeady probably also won cup in Scotland.

We are a team of winners!

Keith Glazzard
18 Posted 07/05/2014 at 18:07:23
James @10 - ’horribly one-footed’. Do you apply that to the 70% of players who can only stand on their left foot?
Ian Jones
19 Posted 07/05/2014 at 18:20:28
I think Lukaku has also indicated he would like to play in Champions League which is fair enough and shows ambition. However he may need to revise his opinion of his current ability and just work on his all round game first and then move up. At 20 or 21 he has plenty of time on his side. Hopefully he can fulfil his ambitions over time and not succumb to injuries etc. Happy to see him for another year on loan.
Peter Warren
20 Posted 07/05/2014 at 18:35:04
He’s 20, leads the line himself usually scores goals, rarely gets injured or booked and I suspect his goal to league game time ratio is around 1:2.

£20m this day and age seems good price to me.

Raymond Fox
21 Posted 07/05/2014 at 17:56:42
Let’s have criticism where its due, Kone scored 13 goals for Wigan last season for which he played 32 games, he got very little playing time this year before his knee ligament injury put him out for the season

Robles due to Howards good form has also not had many chances, he’s only 24 and although he flapped at a cross or two in one game, he also made some excellent full length saves. Cant remember a goal that you could blame him for.

Alcaraz if you look again at the matches he’s played in he was no worse defensively than Jags and Stones, I think hes been made to carry the can on here, because Jags is skipper and Stones can do no wrong!

Martinez had these players for at least 1 season maybe longer so he should know what their capabilities are, + as Brien says all 3 + McCarthy have Cup winners medals from last year, so lets not be so hasty to slag them off.

Stephen Coles
22 Posted 07/05/2014 at 18:44:08
I just hope we don’t break the bank to sign him. At the start of the season he looked a £20m player, but as the season has gone on he now looks more like a £12m player. He may snub us anyway as he wants Champion League football, the only way I see him getting Champions League football is playing abroad. Also, Delboy can pee back off to Barça!
Linda Morrison
23 Posted 07/05/2014 at 18:49:15
I think we will sign Lukaka; he will be a great asset. My worry is Barry. He is 33 and, as far as I am concerned, he could be given a short term contract at Man City due to the mess they have got themselves in with Uefa.

I would like Barry but he is not worth the wages he was on at City. I hope they win tonight though!

Frank Crewe
24 Posted 07/05/2014 at 18:44:47
To those who pointed out the various medal winners in the squad I stand corrected.

Getting back to Lukaku. He isn’t worth £20M even if we could afford to spend that much on a single player. Didn’t I see an article on here regarding Traore? Is there some movement on that front. Could he not be a cheaper alternative to Lukaku?

Linda Morrison
25 Posted 07/05/2014 at 19:07:03
Frank, no he isn’t; Lukaka is an all round player... not sure about the bean pole though.
Raymond Fox
26 Posted 07/05/2014 at 18:46:54

Lukaku is worth all of £20m in my opinion, because physically he’s also a powerhouse, he’s only 20 and so has time to work on his control etc and improve a great deal.

It depends how much RM has to spend this summer though, chances are he wont have the luxury of spending £20m on one player. Oh to be an Everton supporter.

Somehow I don’t think we will see him in Everton colours next year, love to be wrong, but I fear he’ll get a better offer off some money bags club.

Jon Ferguson
27 Posted 07/05/2014 at 19:06:01
Don’t get me wrong, I think we’d have finished a few places down the league without Lukaku this season. Some games he looks unplayable. But for £20 mil I want consistency. He needs to be up for Crystal Pallace as well as Chelsea. When he’s off the boil it’s like we’be got a brick wall up front.

I know he’s young and maybe he’ll develop further, but I worry that if he’s not hungry for those games now, will he been in a few years time? He’s thinking about the future and where he thinks he belongs (I.e. the Champions League) instead of concentrating on where he is now and what he should be doing. £20 mil is too much for my liking.

Colin Glassar
28 Posted 07/05/2014 at 19:14:19
Raymond, I can see Lukaku getting his dream move to a big CL team and after a disastrous season, for all parties involved, see him coming back to us for £5m. A bit like Pienaar.
Phil Sammon
29 Posted 07/05/2014 at 19:19:28
Linda Morrison,

Are you thick? Or do you deliberately misspell the man’s name every time you write it?

It’s more than a misspelling actually, you just get his name wrong every single time you comment on him. I’m convinced you do it just to wind people up... and it works.

Oliver Molloy
30 Posted 07/05/2014 at 19:08:07
Raymond Fox @ 21

You’re bang on. How can anyone criticise Kone when he has hardly kicked a ball is beyond me. This guy will be like a new signing for next season.

Alcaraz, in my opinion, is a good footballer. If he is given the time and space, he has an eye for a pass, but you don’t get the time in the Premier League. The downside is his age, the fitness problems, and he has no speed. He looks like he has not got the toughness required to play for a club that is challenging to break into the top 4.

Robles will get better, I’m sure with game time. Next season will be a lot tougher for Martinez, he will know this and so should all of us Evertonians; I cannot wait!

Brent Stephens
31 Posted 07/05/2014 at 19:26:53
Phil, you’re sounding like a keyboard worrier!
Tony Draper
32 Posted 07/05/2014 at 19:22:16
Lukaku is 20... TWENTY!!!!

These days, £20 Mil is not megabucks for a PROVEN Premier League striker, let alone one with a decade plus ahead of him.

Shake off the "teaspoon to a bunfight" mentality and dare to believe... Just give it a go for 24 hrs.

Chris Wilson
33 Posted 07/05/2014 at 18:53:42
Roberto talks like he has inside intel. Probably not, but you got to love his optimism.

I for one would be interested in Lukaku. There HAS been some inconsistency in his game from time to time but I chalk that up to this being his first real season of playing week in and week out. I know he played a full season at WBA, but I think someone on this board said he made a lot of substitute appearances; and if that’s the case-those minutes add up and it takes time to physically develop the endurance able to sustain consistent form in such a physically demanding league. I think we’ve seen that with Barkley. It’s his first full season on the senior squad and some games he was unstoppable, while in others he’s hardly noticeable.

But with regard to Romelu; as much as I would love to see it happen, I can’t imagine a feasible scenario where it would. 20 million is the reported fee (could be crap but probably in the ballpark), he’s 20 years old and will be leading the line for a Belgium team that could do some serious damage in Brazil. If he has a successful World Cup, they’ll be so much money thrown at Chelsea for his services. I don’t know what the revenue is for some of these teams, but you’d have to figure that Juventus could come up with the money, the Milan clubs, Monaco wouldn’t need him but might still want him, Borussia Dortmund, etc. Unless Roberto has secretly stashed 20 million in the ground somewhere, or Romelu has some contractual escape clause or high influence which is highly unlikely; I just don’t see this coming off and I’d worry that Roberto might miss out on other targets waiting for this one.

Jamie Crowley
34 Posted 07/05/2014 at 19:23:24
He’s the modern day Samson.

If he grows his hair back find 20 million and get him in.

If he goes high and tight then send him back to Chelsea.

The boy needs his hair back. It was directly tied to his mojo.

Keith Glazzard
35 Posted 07/05/2014 at 19:28:47
Best to read Roberto’s words. One spin that could be put on them is - we can’t afford him, but might have the money by then.

Should Sheikh Yamoney turn up in the next few weeks, I think he’ll be a certainty. Otherwise, most unlikely. And why a certainty? I went to YouTube to remind myself, and boy, was I reminded.

Eugene Ruane
36 Posted 07/05/2014 at 19:37:13
Think Phil Salmon is being a little harsh regarding Linda’s spelling of Lukakko.
Andrew Hawes
37 Posted 07/05/2014 at 19:29:46
Martinez is playing this very well, blowing smoke up Lukaku’s ass: He’s our leader, our brains up front, it’s not about the fee etc etc!

So now he has two choices: play for a club that has taken him to their hearts, be the main man, progress his career, and improve as a footballer under a manager who really rates him.

Or follow the money trail??

If he goes for the second option, we’re better off without him!

Phil Sammon
38 Posted 07/05/2014 at 19:46:37
You, Jean, may well have a point.
Kieran Riding
39 Posted 07/05/2014 at 19:57:43
As we were offered the choice of Lukaku or Ba on loan, I just have a niggling feeling that, if Lukaku isn’t a goer on a permanent deal, we will take the ’cheaper’ option of loaning Ba.

The loan fee we are paying for Lukaku is pretty big; Ba maybe cheaper. This is ’net spend’ Everton still, and how I’d love to be proven wrong.

Denis Richardson
40 Posted 07/05/2014 at 19:53:14
Hope he stays but I cannot see it happening now; were it to happen, it would already have been sorted out imo.

As it is, Chelsea are no mugs, being on the world stage at the World Cup will increase his profile and value, even if he doesn’t score, and Chelsea want to get as much cash for him as possible so will only do business once Belgium are knocked out.

I can see him being sold abroad or to a club like Spurs for £15m+.... even if we could match the transfer fee, I doubt we could match the wages...

In saying that, we were all over the moon to see Roberto Martinez bring him unexpectedly to Goodison Park last August and I expect Roberto to bring another striker of that quality in again – be it a Michu type permanent signing of another loanee.

James Stewart
41 Posted 07/05/2014 at 20:18:54
I would take Ba over Lukaku at present any day. Lukaku has been woeful in the majority of his performances for us. He does have the uncanny knack of sniffing a goal while playing badly, like against Man City, but I can see exactly why Chelsea want rid. He barely looks interested most of the time and doesn’t hold the ball up at all. Perhaps some on here are right and he will improve but that’s a hell of a risk to take at £20m plus.
Si Cooper
43 Posted 07/05/2014 at 22:12:38
In my opinion, Lukaku’s faults tend to be somewhat exaggerated whilst his attributes are too readily overlooked (the same may be true for Alcaraz, but he needs a run of games when undoubtedly fully fit to determine that) but £20 million for him is still a gamble, and one we can ill afford to lose.

All transfers are gambles of one sort or another. Bony does seem like a better deal if he is available for less money, but Lukaku could surpass him if he continues to learn / develop and Bony may not fit into our system or click with he manager as well.

At some stage you just have to trust that the manager does the best he can with whatever options the board are able to present him with. I am hoping that the quiet January window was a deal between the manager and the board in order to give him significant funds to spend without having to sell any assets other than those who are deemed surplus to requirements.

Peter Cummings
44 Posted 07/05/2014 at 22:09:47
Lukaku is a striker yet he played all over the place in the last few games instead of in his role as a centre forward. I made this point to my son and said he was getting little or no service from the wings. The point came home when he scored against Man City with a header from a crossball, However, I don’t think RM should go for him again for next season, even on a loan basis,

We will need to strengthen our defence to combat injuries so, if possible, I would like to see Lescott come back. As for strikers, what about giving Vellios a go? Like Barkley, he is big and strong and not without skills,

I would just like to commiserate with the fans of Tranmere... I very much hope Rovers can get back ’up there’ and give their loyal following the type of football they deserve when Dixie was playing for them.

Kieran Riding
45 Posted 07/05/2014 at 23:46:52
Well my earlier post #39 was supposed to be subtly a bit ITK.. It appears BK just confirmed it at the awards do FFS.
Si Cooper
46 Posted 08/05/2014 at 00:01:51
What exactly has been confirmed at this stage Kieran?

That Lukaku on a permanent is a no-goer and we are taking Ba on loan instead, and / or that Everton are still a ’net spend’ outfit?

Kieran Riding
47 Posted 08/05/2014 at 00:14:47
Si, let’s just let BK enjoy his night, wear Bobby’s Brown Shoes for his good lady in the hotel room and hope it all comes good.

I just find it bizarre that he said in public tonight that he was after Ba originally, but jumped at the chance of Lukaku when offered.

Si Cooper
48 Posted 08/05/2014 at 00:19:44
Don’t see the harm in confirming what happened last September, Kieran.

I think most people at the time thought Ba may be available on loan because Chelsea would actually be making use of Lukaku, so I don’t think anyone will be too surprised at the actual turn of events.

Kieran Riding
49 Posted 08/05/2014 at 00:30:42
Indeed Si, but in my opinion, there is a big ’what if?’.

What if we’re stuck with Kone and Vellios come August? We’d bite Chelsea’s hand off for Ba.

Lukaku could smash it in Brazil, Benteke is injured so he could play a fair bit, and let’s say for example Juve bid cash for him? Silly season is coming, and I hope we get lucky again if we loan.

Surely a new kit released in time with a big name on the back is just pie in the sky?

Trevor Whyte
50 Posted 08/05/2014 at 01:01:24
Plenty of Cup Winners in our squad at the minute: Howard, Robles, Distin, Alcaraz, Barry, McCarthy, Lukaku, Kone all have an FA Cup medal in their locker. Also Gibson has a couple of League Cup medals; plenty of players with the right mentality, for winning in the squad. We now just want them to double on their tally wearing the Everton shirt! COYB!
John Audsley
51 Posted 08/05/2014 at 08:58:22
Raymond Fox nails it.

Alcaraz isn't a regular and is a pretty good CB, his ball playing skills are far better than Jags and Distin. It does seem that Jags gets away with alot. He isn't vocal, is often caught out of position and seems beyond criticism. Stones has had a brilliant season but has been sluggish of late and was woeful at Southampton.

Lukaku at £15m would be an excellent purchase but we arent cash rich and Roberto has to get the transfers right. Kone is an unknown as of yet, Robles will never get the game time to find out about and Macca has been superb for us this season.

I don't see him coming unless he has a poor World Cup and Jose wants rid on the cheap.

Robert Collins
52 Posted 08/05/2014 at 11:13:36
If Jose thought he would be even half a Drogba he'd have him back at Chelski like lightning, but he doesn't and I'm hoping Roberto sees this as well.

Lukaku is not too far off his full potential as he is now (that's probably Jose's opinion), he's not worth the gamble at £15m plus.

Come on Roberto kill this one now and move on.

Trevor Lynes
53 Posted 08/05/2014 at 11:55:01
Does anyone agree with me that I see Alcaraz as a rotation player with Barry? If Barry stays that is!! The man has the experience to help McCarthy develop as well as Stones. The position Barry plays is one that the likes of Alcaraz should revel in. We unfortunately cannot count on Gibson over a full season based on past experiences both with us and also Man Utd.

Talk of Vellios being given yet another chance is ridiculous. He could not get a game in a very poor Blackpool team and his attitude has been less than acceptable. We must move on from these sort of players and I want to see the backs of Vellios, Junior and Gueye, none of whom would get a game in any other Premier League club. We need real players who can excite the fans and bring proper optimism and entertainment.

Robert Collins
54 Posted 08/05/2014 at 11:57:07
James Stewart @ 10

"Good hopefully he has gone elsewhere by then. No way we should be blowing £20m on him. Horribly one footed and has looked more like Heskey of late. A big pass. "

He reminded me of someone, but I just couldn't pull it out.

No way should we be paying £20m plus, we could probably get Bony for that much and he looks much more of a complete player, there's no gamble with him.

Brian Wilkinson
56 Posted 08/05/2014 at 14:22:20
Jesus Phil, if a slight spelling mistake winds you up from Linda god help the rest of us, we all know who Linda means.

Anyway back to Lukaku, theres no doubt the guy has got talent but for me his work rate has to be much better.

Steve Naismith, what a guy, always making runs, runs through brick walls for the team and never gives up, what he lacks in overall skill he more than makes up for with determination.

It's no coincidence when Naismith is on the bench, Lukaku doesn't seem to put as much effort in, I am not sure if seeing Naismith come on and gets stuck in either inspires or embarresses Lukaku, he seems to step up a gear the moment Naismith is on the pitch.

I would be tempted to get Winifred Bony if we cannot agree a decent price for Lukaku.

Let's hope my writing meets approval by most, do not fancy doing 100 lines.

James Marshall
57 Posted 08/05/2014 at 14:46:05
All this talk of Mourinho keeping Lukaku etc is just that, talk. Don't forget, Mourinho didn't even sign Lukaku, AVB did so why would he want to keep him for any given reason?

I'd actually be pretty surprised if Chelsea keep him, and think they're more likely to buy Diego Costa and sell Lukaku.

He's just not a Mourinho type player - he definitely doesn't work hard enough or track back enough, which was the biggest reason Mourinho flogged Mata to Utd. Yes they might get other offers for him, and if a CL club comes in then perhaps we're scuppered, but if he's available we should definitely sign the kid. He's 20, knows the club, clearly enjoys it with us and knows he'll get a game and score goals.

So what if his touch is a bit shit at times, he just scored 14 goals in one of the toughest leagues in the world. At 20.

I'd bite their hands off at £20m in todays market. He'll also have plenty of resale value if we keep him for 3 or 4 years = good business.

Ian Burns
58 Posted 08/05/2014 at 15:30:20
£20m is not such a bad price if you have it to spare. If we have any largesse it needs spreading over 4 or 5 quality players given we are in the EL this coming season.

Surely Bony will come at less than £20m?

Steve Brown
59 Posted 08/05/2014 at 16:26:23
Ian, not sure you'd get much change out of £20m for Bony now. He cost Swansea £12m and has got 20 goals this season, plus why would they want to sign him? When he is on it, Lukaku is a really dynamic forward and has bags of potential. Sure his performance drops off sometimes but that is because he is young.
Jim Knightley
60 Posted 08/05/2014 at 16:36:41
It's amazing that so many people are critiquing Lukaku, whilst Robert's claim that he is not far off his potential, is pure baseless supposition. How many players peak at 20? Lukaku has clear technical failings in his game which will improve with time. He is 20 years old, and has 14 goals in 30 Premier League appearances for us. Last season he got 17 in 35 appearances. His record is astonishing for his age. There is far more love for Bony on these forums, but he has only managed a marginally better record in the league this season (15 in 33) and has scored 4 pens. But we would be willing to shell out 20mill for a guy with 11 goals from open play in the league this season, and not the same for a guy with 14 who is 5 years younger? And it's hardly as if Bony is not supported by decent attacking players either, whilst we often haven't played to Lukaku's strengths this season.

If we have a 30million budget, then I'd willingly see us spend 15-20mil of it on Lukaku. We can't spend it all, because our squad is too small. But I'd have him in a minute. And as far as the suggestion that he is not good enough because Jose let him go out on loan....really? This is the same Jose who has criticised his remaining strikers all season. The same Jose who let Mata, Chelski's best attacking player for the last two seasons, leave, because of his preference for Oscar, who has been in and out of the team since January, and has not performed this year (fatigue reasons admitted). The same Jose, who has failed time and time again to break down attacking teams despite an array of attacking midfielders at his disposal. The same Jose who decided it was a good idea to criticise Chelsea's most valuable asset, and who left him on the bench for the must win game against Norwich. Jose is a tactical genius, but he has made plenty of dodgy decisions with regards to attacking players in his time, and has also failed to get the best out of certain strikers.

Lukaku's worth is there in goals. 31 Premier league goals in the last 2 seasons, and he isn't even 21.

Raymond Fox
61 Posted 08/05/2014 at 17:18:25
Agree with Jim about Lukaku, he's well worth £20m, he's only 20 and wet behind the ears yet.
How much more improvement could RM get out of him in 5-10yrs time, he has the potential to scare the living daylights out of PL defences.

What about crosses into the box, he has scored a few this season with his head, but its a part of his game that could be exploited a lot more in my opinion, he will mature into a physical monster in a year or two.
Roberto doesn't seem to favour the ball off the ground I know but I'm sure we could exploit crosses more in the future.

As far as Bony is concerned if your only seeing him on highlights programmes, they can make me look good on them and it takes me 5mins to get up the stairs.
Not disputing that he seems a decent player, but a better buy than Lukaku, no way.

Peter Z Jones
62 Posted 08/05/2014 at 17:37:57
I don't get the Lukaku bashing either Jim. The kid is a monster and probably the best young striker in the world. Sturridge, Suarez, and Rooney are the only players with more goals the last 2 seasons I think. I'm just praying Mourinho is seriously dumb enough to sell him.
Robert Collins
63 Posted 08/05/2014 at 19:33:55
Jim Knightley @ 60

"It's amazing that so many people are critiquing Lukaku, whilst Robert's claim that he is not far off his potential, is pure baseless supposition. How many players peak at 20?"

In the professional game top managers generally have a very good Idea of how far a player can go at age 20, I know Jose does (that's why he's won what he has). I'll go with Jose on this one (and I think that's where the smart money is also), Roberto will not pay big money for him and wants him at realistic price (12-15m to mitigate the risk), but he won't get him.

Before you start claiming that other people are making baseless suppositions and then go off on a grandiloquent speech full of baseless suppositions of your own, you should read the posts properly next time. If you had you'd have seen I said he's close to his peak and not there yet.

Me thinks you should take off your rose tinted specs and have a good look at £20-30m Lukaku who just about got into double figures in a very good attacking team as the lead striker. Had Roberto have played Naismith as much as Lukaku, I think Naismith would have found the net more often this season,

Jim Knightley
64 Posted 08/05/2014 at 21:00:51
Robert...I'm well aware about your close to his peak claim. That's the point of my post. Hence my comment: 'Robert's claim that he is not far off his potential'. What exactly do you think 'not far off' means? I think you should apply the close reading critiques to yourself.

Next. How do know that Jose does not rate Lukaku's potential? Have you been speaking with him recently? Does letting a player go out on loan to a top premier league team, where he outscores every Chelski striker, mean he doesn't believe he has potential? Or does it mean he believes he is not ready for the first team?

Lukaku scores goals. It's as simple as that. He did it Belgium, and he did it for two successive seasons in the Premier League. He scored 17 for WBA, from 20 starts. He has weaknesses to his game, and these are obvious. He has a rawness to him. But these are exactly the qualities that can improve him.

Funnily enough, this rawness was also an aspect of Drogba's game. The same Drogba who in his 8 seasons with Chelski scored over 14 Premier League goals in only two of them. He was a beast. Unplayable at times. But he was raw, he was inconsistent, and he was was criticised. Do not let the retrospective highlights fool you.

Some of us are squabbling over Lukaku on here. He is 20. Try not to forget that. How many 20 years old led the line for top clubs? How many 20 year olds have scored better than 1 in 2 top league starts before the age of 21? With the physical strength, and speed, to not just be as good as Drogba, but better than Drogba.

It's incredible how some of us on here keep forgetting he is 20. He is playing now because of his physical strength, and his brilliance. But the majority of players are not complete at 20, and Lukaku is no exception.

Si Cooper
65 Posted 08/05/2014 at 22:37:06
"I'll go with Jose on this one" – yeah, because he's totally above spinning a situation to make himself look infallible isn't he!
Jack Cross
66 Posted 08/05/2014 at 23:21:44
Does anyone really know how much we will have to spend because I hear everyone bandying about 20 mil for Lukaku or Bony then Barry and so on. I think we should be looking down the lower leagues as I have said on several post. Get a young un whose scoring regular and let Roberto bring him or them on. I can think of several players that can fit into our set up.

I don't think 13 or 14 goals a season is anything to be to worried about even from a lower league player. Because the players I have already mentioned have scored double that amount. Be it in a lower division, they still know where the net is.

Give them a chance, and then call them if they don't succeed. But one things for sure we won't have wasted millions on someone we thought should have scored just because their Premier strikers.

Jim Knightley
67 Posted 09/05/2014 at 00:14:07
The problem Jack, is that lower league players go for silly amounts too, if they are any good. Rhodes is a great example. If lower league players easily hit 13 or 14 in a Prem season, then Premierleague clubs would be signing them. This season, Steven Gerrard, Remy, Lukaku, Hazard, Rodriguez, Bony, Giroud, Dzeko, Rooney, Yaya, Sturridge and Suarez have hit 13 goals or more. It's a talented list, and of those, only Rodriguez has come from the lower leagues. And Southampton had to pay 7million for him and develop him. The money each one cost in general, save for those developed at their clubs, indicates the kind of money a team needs to spend to get a good scorer in this league. It's aksi notable that one of those, Remy, is on the move this summer in all probability...and I think he'd do well for us.

I think buying abroad is cheaper honestly, and has a better success rate now English football has become more 'European'. He is the wrong end of 20 now, but I'd love to see how Jonathan Soriano would do in England, and I'd doubt he'd cost more than a few million, and 40,000 in wages. Barca and Real's B team's have concealed alot of really useful players before they've emerged at other clubs.

Jack Cross
68 Posted 09/05/2014 at 02:22:02
Jim. The point I'm making, we don't have the funds to compete with the top six. So I can never understand why people on here always talk about players out of our reach. It's good conversation but it's more like being in fantasy land. The lower division strikers mightn't come dirt cheap but I'd say £5 to 7 million is affordable for us to take that kind of risk.

There's a striker Assombolonga at Peterborough United (might have spelt it wrong), scored 21 goals. Now I think he could do a job for us. (I'm repeating myself.) I've followed him for a couple of seasons now and I like him. And Liam Moore, a defender at Leicester – watch him next season.

There are lots of players around that could do a job for us and affordable to us to. Jim, you're right about Barca and Real's B team so why aren't we checking them out then? Is Sharpy still scouting for us? Do you ever write in to the scouts with suggestions on players? I've done it.

Our kid lives in Aussie and watches Brisbane Roar. You heard of them? I watch them on BT sometimes, good side. I sent a couple of names in to them from BR. I didn't even get a reply saying piss off. I'd like to ask a scout, what do they see that we don't?


Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads

© ToffeeWeb