England hanging by a thread after Uruguay defeat

, 19 June, 138comments  |  Jump to most recent
Uruguay 2 - 1 England
Leighton Baines and Phil Jagielka both started England's second Group D game against Uruguay in Sao Paulo today which ended in more disappointment for the Three Lions.

Though the formation was altered, Roy Hodgson ignored the clamour for personnel changes by naming an unchanged team from the one that lost to Italy.

That meant Ross Barkley starting on the bench again for a match that England were expected to win despite Luis Suarez returning for a Uruguay team that was beaten comprehensively by Costa Rica last Saturday.

Wayne Rooney pulled rank over Baines for a 10th-minute direct free kick that drifted inches over the bar as England tried to make early inroads following a Godin handball.

Uruguay's first chance came as the result of a miscued touch by Jagielka that led to Cristian Rodriguez going very close with a smashed shot from the angle.

Edinson Cavani went similarly close in the 27th minute with a first-time snapshot as Hodgson's men struggled to impose themselves on a cagey encounter.

Danny Welbeck's pace started to cause Uruguay more problems as the half-hour mark approached and when he won a free kick off Caceres, Rooney headed Steven Gerrard's set-piece against the angle of crossbar and post, the former Everton forward inches away from finally breaking his World Cup duck at the 10th attempt.

The South Americans struck just when England appeared to be applying some pressure, though, when they broke and Cavani's chipped cross floated over Jagielka's head and Suarez nodded it beyond Joe Hart to make it 1-0 to Uruguay six minutes before half time.

Cavani missed badly when put in on Hart as England started the second half poorly but Rooney then had the Three Lions' best chance off Baines' low cross but he shot too close to Muslera in the Uruguay goal and it was beaten away.

Barkley made his belated entrance in the 64th minute when he came on for Raheem Sterling and the space started to open up for England in forward areas.

Great work by Glen Johnson set up Rooney and he side-footed home from close range to make it 1-1 and Sturridge could have turned the game on its head soon afterwards but couldn't get enough power to guide it past the keeper.

When Gerrard put his head on a long clearance by the keeper, he inadvertently put Suarez in the clear, though, and the striker predictably made no mistake as he lashed it past Hart for the winner.

Barkley was peripheral as England pressed in vain for an equaliser and the game petered out to its conclusion that leaves Hodgson's side having to beat Costa Rica by a two goals and hoping that Italy beat both the Central Americans and Uruguay in their games if they are to progress.

 

Reader Comments (138)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Derek Knox
1 Posted 19/06/2014 at 19:08:51
Think Baines will get forward more, and hopefully have some assistance on the left in this game!

Hope Ross gets a few minutes in the second half too!

Dave Owen
2 Posted 19/06/2014 at 19:08:18
Couple of scenarios here methinks.

Suarez plays a blinder.
Yeah I know, what he is capable of.

Same England selection for redemption by the sounds of it.
Why, as they really should put Uraguay to bed surely?

A certain manager is a stubborn fool and will play this same team again should they prevail and go through.

Wanna carry on?

Ian McDowell
3 Posted 19/06/2014 at 19:27:59
Rooney fails to score on his final World Cup appearance.
Christopher Kelly
4 Posted 19/06/2014 at 19:38:07
What a daft old lady England have as manager!!
Dean Adams
5 Posted 19/06/2014 at 19:47:37
One thing for sure, Roy knows next to nothing about football and just loves his redshite bum boys.
Gavin Ramejkis
6 Posted 19/06/2014 at 20:11:43
Woy’s calamity faves line up for another kicking, will RS Engerland fans behave if ratboy comes on and scores the winner? Will Stevie Creasehead and his fellow RS forget to pass only to fellow RS, will Baines get the blame again when no one passes the ball back to him, come on Uruguay send this shower for an early flight home.
Tom Bowers
7 Posted 19/06/2014 at 20:25:04
Uruguay showing more intensity. England no change in tactics or players from the Italy game hence Hodgson has no Plan ’B’.

Not looking good at present.

Brent Stephens
8 Posted 19/06/2014 at 20:39:44
Oh, Jags.
Gavin Ramejkis
9 Posted 19/06/2014 at 20:15:43
Ratboy it is, Wellard to blame bet you it's only Jags that gets slaughtered.
Jim Bennings
10 Posted 19/06/2014 at 20:47:13
Watching England really is like watching Moyes Everton teams, all gusto but evidently fucking clueless.

I have been saying it for ages about Phil"I never win a header" Jagielka and I will continue to say it next season when we look total shite at defending any type of high balls into the box.

He is too small for a centre half especially in the Premier League and he never wins headers, he is not commanding.

Watched that big Colombian central defender Yepes, won every header, that’s how to do it.

John Pickles
11 Posted 19/06/2014 at 20:53:11
Well we needn’t worry about Jags or Baines getting poached if they play like that in the second half. I wouldn’t take any one of that team on a free transfer on this performance so far. Do they always just underperform when it really matters or do we just not ever have any truly world class players in this country? 45 mins to save ourselves from joke nation status.
Andy Finigan
12 Posted 19/06/2014 at 21:53:21
Hate to say it but that is how you take a chance when it comes. Looking at our game and we are just not good enough.

Too many oval pegs in round holes. Too labored. Just hope we have a change of the full English management after the last game.

Paul Andrews
13 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:02:55
Congratulations to Stevie G.

The Prem and the World Cup in a few weeks.

Jim Bennings
14 Posted 19/06/2014 at 21:56:31
Well that was a typical pile of shite from the overpaid mercenaries wasn't it?

Bet the FA are now cursing that shite European Championship group that starts in September.

A group that includes Lithuania and Slovenia, they won't even half fill Wembley for them, they may aswell play them around the country at the likes of Stoke or Sunderland.

Shite players and agree with the above post I wouldn't sign any of them, Welbeck shite, Rooney scored but average, Gerrard needs to retire now, Baines will do well to keep Oviedo out next year...don't even get me started again on Jagielka.

Utter bollocks.

James Martin
15 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:05:17
Shows how important Suarez was to Liverpool. Sturridge Gerrard Johnson Henderson all looked woeful without him carrying them. Wilshere, Milner, Lampard, Lambert, Lallana all barely used. Thought it was going to be all about the squad in the heat of Brazil? Evidently not as pensioner Gerrard is out there at the end knackered doing his usual failure routine. England won't win anything until they get a manager who puts playing football above hobnobbing the media. How many Liverpool/Man Utd players can I get in this England side... said every England manager since Glen Hoddle.

Roll on the next World Cup only for the fact that Gerrard won't be playing in it and people won't be calling for Rio Terry and Ashley Cole to come back every second of the day.

Jim Bennings
16 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:09:13
Everything that is wrong with English football??

Its noting to do with a foreign invasion (we haven't won a trophy since 1966) the foreigners only came in the 90's in flocks.

Its a lack of passion for wanting to play football the right way in our youth, it's too easy for British youth to be lazy, be boozers or just turn to crime rather than pick a ball up and just play like South Americans do.

We have destroyed ourselves.

Raymond Fox
17 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:05:08
They came up trumps again, bloody well humiliated the country once more.

How to stop England, guaranteed, press them and don't give them any space and time on the ball. That's worked for 50 years, and we still haven't sufficient ball skill to overcome that tactic.

Italy did give us room to play and we flattered to deceive once more.

Ian Bennett
18 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:21:39
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/worldcup2014/article-2662961/Luis-Suarez-scored-six-goals-six-games-against-Phil-Jagielka-double-Uruguay-2-1-victory-England-World-Cup-2014.html

Luis Suarez was Phil Jagielka's worst nightmare as he twice fired Uruguay in front against England on Thursday night – and it's not the first time. The Everton defender has now conceded six goals in as many games against the striker who plays for Merseyside rivals Liverpool following his double in Uruguay's 2-1 win in World Cup Group D.
Here, Sportsmail looks back at Jagielka's horror show.

Roger Helm
19 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:16:29
They think they are better than they are - not trying hard enough, jogging not running when they lose the ball, which they do all the time, poor control and passing, no energy.

Just compare their effort with Chile, or Uruguay tonight. Overpaid, soft, mentally weak, too up themselves to improve their technique with practice. Look how Suarez, one month after knee surgery, was pressing by the corner flag towards the end of the game.

Good riddance, now we can watch some proper teams.

Charles Brewer
20 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:21:01
Maybe if they had decided to play Lampard and Barkley instead of shithouse Gerrard and useless Henderson...
Jim Bennings
21 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:16:33
It's not just about creasehead though, yes both he and Lampard need to retire now Internationally but look at the rest?

Milner
Welbeck
Jagielka
Baines
Johnson
Henderson

His many of them would get in Argentina's, Brazil's, Italy's, Colombia's, Chile's or Holland's, France's or Germany's squads?

Even Wilshere and Lallana are not world class, Lallana is 26 and if Liverpool pay over £20 million for him they will be fleeced..

Lambert? Not the future

Rooney?? Not world class anymore, maybe never was, yes he scored but what has he done in three World Cups now?

English football is in the gutter.

Mike Hughes
22 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:11:01
It's like Ground Hog Day watching England.

Over-hyped build-up.
Arrogant fans and pundits.
Insipid football.

As with the last World Cup, the most memorable thing will be the after-match phone-ins.

I hope either Chile or Ecuador win it.
Chile - as they have an Everton connection.
Ecuador - as I sponsor a little kid who lives there.

Got a funny feeling the Hun are going to do it though.

Patrick Murphy
23 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:25:54
The problem is we give average players or players who fail at tournaments too many caps, how many England players have got to over 50+ caps in the last 10 years. Germany and other countries constantly recycle their squads unless somebody like Lahm is exceptional, and there lies the problem most of the players don't have to play themselves into the squad they think they have a divine right to be in it.
Anthony Jones
24 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:23:41
Jim Bennings, what are you on about? Blaming the yoof subculture for England having a poor World Cup? Utter nonsense. Made me laugh though. Look on the bright side. Stevie Me blew the league title and any chance of the World Cup this year, and he is on his way out. Unlucky Stevie.
Trevor Lynes
25 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:23:18
What is all this blaming Jags for not stopping Suarez? The first goal was a wonderful cross Suarez headed home and the second goal was from a Gerrard error and Cahill could not get to Suarez.

Uruguay have a population like Wales and have won the trophy twice. The difference was Suarez who is a truly great player and Liverpool will have a hell of a job holding onto him. We do not have any English or British player to compare with him.

Kevin Tully
26 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:22:56
One substitution sums up the whole ethos of English football, even after all these years.

Bring on the big number 9 and hoof it into the box if all else fails.

It would be funny if it wasn't so fucking predictable. When it comes down to playing the game, Italy looked technically head and shoulders above this current crop.

Until they are prepared to admit the likes of Rooney, Gerrard, Lampard and the rest are made to look better than they actually are by playing alongside foreign stars, the cycle will continue.

The players with the high profiles rule the roost in these England sides - it's been one big clique and advertising opportunity for many years now.

I'm sorry, but anyone who let's themselves get wrapped up in the hype needs to look at what football is all about. It's Everton FC for me, and always has been.

Ian Bennett
27 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:30:26
Jim - Bring back national service, we fought a war for them ungrateful gitz innit.
Brin Williams
28 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:34:03
I hate the man, but today I just luv him. U2E1.
Peter Laing
29 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:35:08
Germany failed to get out of their group in the Euros in 2004, took a collective breath nationally and invested in the infrastructure of youth football and coaching which has paid huge dividends.

England continue to under-invest in grassroots football with the FA turning a blind eye to the Premier League not paying for the development of kids football, and a media obsessed culture that is infatuated with average English players who earn obscene wages. You reap what you sow.

James Stewart
30 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:35:11
Same old England. Too many so-called "world class" players way past their sell by date. Gerrard, Lampard etc Managed by McClaren Mk 2.

Should have gone with a young progressive manager who would have blooded the likes of Clyne, Stones, Barkley, Stirling.

Kevin Tully
31 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:44:45
Shearer & Ferdinand blaming Jagielka for both goals. Note a peep about how many misplaced passes from the rest of the side.
Tony Abrahams
32 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:25:07
Agree with that quote Jim, English football is really in the gutter! No style, no guile, no specific way of playing, everything is so rushed, and the midfield was very pedestrian. Henderson tried but no way would this type of midfielder be selected by many nations.

If you're not taught to enjoy the ball, then I'm afraid you will always struggle at the highest level, but why do England teams always look so nervous?

We can't keep blaming the manager, but not since Hoddle was in charge have England had a team that was really worth watching.

Peter Morris
33 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:43:49
The press will have the field day I predicted on Jags, and whilst I know he didn't play well, he was far from alone. It was Cahill, not Jagielka, who got skinned by Suarez for the second goal, but that will get forgotten.

And anyway, if either of the centre backs had played Suarez onside from a Uruguayan flick on, they would have got slaughtered. He was in an offside position and was just lucky that the ball skinned off Gerrard into his path. Luck did play a part!

Lots of individuals played poorly or average, and we're just not good enough overall. Best league in the world (which results in vastly overpaid players), but not the best players by some distance.

Mike Allison
34 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:40:51
But Lambert isn't even that type of player. If we wanted to do that we should have picked Andy Carroll.

"It's like Ground Hog Day watching England."

Its like Groundhog Day watching the same reactions come out when England fail. Ask the foreign players who play alongside Gerrard, Lampard and Rooney if they think they make them look better. Only the self-hating English think this is true, the rest of the world thinks we have good players. Our problems are different, and have been for a long time.

England have spent twenty years making sure their players have the technique to match the other international sides and they've completely ignored the mental side of the game.

We lack intelligence and are mentally weak. Gerrard and Rooney are absolutely prime culprits in this.

Tonight we were making Uruguayan fouls like dives by flicking heels and arms up in the air. This continued even after it became clear the referee wasn't going to give us them. Our midfield still don't offer for the ball when a team-mate is in possession, and we even managed to knock one of their players out, then completely failed to test him within the next five minutes to see if he was up to it. Godin was on a yellow card the whole game, and apart from when he should have got another, we never got at him.

The idea that English fans and media are arrogant is ridiculous. What is it based on? I'm born and brought up in England and all I've ever heard is that we're not as good as foreigners and we've got no chance. There are numerous examples on this thread already. Everybody has had low expectations for this tournament, and we're constantly told how much better foreign players are, but we still expected that our players would be able to pass the ball to each other, cross the ball without skying 40 yards in the air, and kick it in the goal from eight yards out. But we're arrogant? Have you met any Germans, Brazilians or Frenchmen? That's arrogance.

People seem to confuse fans getting excited about a tournament and wanting to believe their team can do well with arrogance. What's the point of supporting a team if you're not allowed to dream and kid yourself that they might do well? We didn't even do that this time and the know-it-alls are still out in force telling us we're arrogant.

Jim Bennings
35 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:46:59
Kev,

It was Jagielka primarily for the goals.

The first displays why he is too short for centre half, a 6ft-3in guy reaches that cross before it gets to Suarez.

The second, yes, it flicks off Gerrard's creasehead but Jagielka is merely in no-man's land marking space and exposed Cahill to Ratboy.

He is shit, have said for ages, Lescott used to bail him out when he was here.

You just watch us win sod all inside boxes in the air again next season. I still haven't forgotten his non-existent marking in the Goodison 3-3 Derby last year, three set-pieces and Jags, the captain nowhere, on any of them.

Jay Richo
36 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:43:01
I think the Premier League and the money it generates has completely destroyed the English game. There simply isn't enough talent coming through because clubs cannot afford to take the chance of letting kids go out and express themselves because the risk factor is too high.

Now, instead of blooding youngsters through, the easy alternative is to go abroad and buy a player who can already do the job and so eliminates a lot of the risk factor. Worrying thing is... as the money gets bigger, so does the problem of not enough English kids getting the chance.

Peter Morris
37 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:53:51
Jim(35) did you see little Gary Medel ,5'8", at centre half for Chile. height didn't seem to hold him or them back!
Dave Williams
38 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:44:45
Roy tried to replicate RS from last season. Problem was Rooney is no substitute for Suarez and all last season RS had to score a number of goals to win games because their defence and centre midfield could not defend. Gerrard and Henderson gave our defence no cover at all and Gerrard has seldom played well for England even though the media fawn all over him.

The guy on the ITV news just said that Roy did at least give youth a chance! I clearly missed this – he started with one teenager who he replaced with another and brought on a 26-year-old and another 30-something journeyman striker.

This should be the end for Gerrard; Jags doesn't look match fit; Rooney looks burnt out to me – Sturridge, however, looks class.

Who cares? ... Roll on July and COYB!

Ste Traverse
39 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:59:55
Jagielka and particulary Baines being scapegoated on Talksport by Collymore and Saggers.
John Malone
40 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:54:49
Glen Hoddle back in charge asap.
Jim Bennings
41 Posted 19/06/2014 at 23:09:31
Peter

But Medel didn't play there in the Premier League for Cardiff he played midfield, because they knew that in English football you cannot get away with playing a short arse in central defence who never wins headers..remember John Heitinga??

Patrick Murphy
42 Posted 19/06/2014 at 23:06:22
Ste - that's what's wrong with the whole football set-up in this country - it needs to blame an individual for a collective failing. You would think that ex-Internationals would remember how it felt and whilst rightly criticizing bad performances or individual errors they point out the good parts or offer up a solution but of course they don't.

After a disppointing performance in South Africa by a team for which the nation had high hopes to do well in the tournament, due to the age of several members of the team, this will perhaps have been the last chance at World Cup glory for a number of England players. By the time the next World Cup Finals come around in Brazil in 2014 it is expected there will be a number of different faces in the team. So another World Cup campaign is over, but just around the corner, qualification begins for Euro 2012. Something to look forward to after the players catch their breath after a long and hard season.

ENGLAND:
James #1, Johnson #2 (Wright-Phillips 87 mins - #17), Upson #15, Terry #6, A Cole #3, Milner #16 (J Cole 64 mins - #11), Lampard #8, Barry #14, Gerrard #4 - Captain, Defoe #19 (Heskey 71 mins - #21), Rooney #10.
Subs Not Used: Green #12, Crouch #9, Carragher #18, Carrick #22, King #20, Dawson #5, Warnock #13, Lennon #7, Hart #23.

South Africa England 1 USA 1; England 0 Algeria 0; England 1 Slovenia 0 and Germany 4 England 1

We've come a long way in four years.

Mike Hughes
43 Posted 19/06/2014 at 23:02:50
Mike #34

Yep Ground Hog Day.
That's what I said and exactly what it feels like tonight. (Not that I care as much as I would if it was Everton).

But I'm a know-it-all for saying so.

Funny that, cos this build-up, media hype and subsequent performance could have been 4 years ago or 4 years before that etc.

Ground Hog Day.

And I'm speaking from experience. I lived abroad for 2 years and worked across Europe for 7 years. We're as arrogant as any you care to mention.

If you want to read 'know-it-all' take a look at your post again.

Ground Hog Day again.

Gary Reeves
44 Posted 19/06/2014 at 23:10:20
Writing was on the wall early on in that game. Wrong shape, not clever enough and not enough quality. Wouldn't bother posting except I can't believe Sturridge isn't getting called out for that performance. He was absolutely dogshit. I'm mean absolutely dogshit. Was I seeing things or did anyone else notice.
Kevin Tully
45 Posted 19/06/2014 at 23:14:49
France, Italy, Germany and Spain have all produced one, two or even three great International sides in the past 30 years.

If this doesn't convince England fans there is something drastically wrong, then nothing said or written for the next 30 years would.

Mike Allison
46 Posted 19/06/2014 at 23:21:35
You don't think the media & fans' expectations have been different this time?
Patrick Murphy
47 Posted 19/06/2014 at 23:22:01
The real indictment of English players is how few of them have plied their trade on foreign soil. Hargreaves, Gascoigne, Lineker, Steven, Waddle there's probably a few more but not many.
Mike Hughes
48 Posted 19/06/2014 at 23:23:17
I'll give you they've been slightly different - less car flags.

But I've still heard many in pubs saying we can get to the quarters and 'that Costa Rica - if we can't beat them' etc.

And nearly every TV pundit was expecting us to have at least 4 points after 2 games.

And the insipid football has been there for around 20 years.

Same old, same old. Boring.

Kevin Tully
49 Posted 19/06/2014 at 23:28:49
I would say the fact that the majority of that England side are multi-millionaires certainly takes the hunger away from some of these players.

Too many are playing for personal glory - with the next sponsorship deal for Rooney or Gerrard being as important as the match itself.

I did laugh when I saw the advert at half-time featuring Rooney, Messi and Ronaldo. One has just been to the World Cup and stunk the place out for two games. Bad joke.

Mike Hughes
50 Posted 19/06/2014 at 23:37:28
Kevin - I saw that ad and thought the same thing. Arrogant, over-hyped gets.
Andrew Hawes
51 Posted 19/06/2014 at 23:25:08
Jagielka had a stinker tonight! Watching him constantly out of position and flapping about made me think I was back at Anfield a few months ago!!

Some players rely on a quick footballing brain; some rely on pure guts throwing themselves about... Jagielka is the latter!!

I keep saying it: we won't appreciate Distin till he's gone: His speed, timing and positioning is what makes Jagielka a player.

Mike Hughes
52 Posted 19/06/2014 at 23:39:06
... Then there was the pre-trailer 6 players with arms crossed moniker featuring Rooney et al in defiant pose.

I have to say I feel nothing like I did when we lost the FA Cup semi to the shite. Or drew with Norwich last season to be fair. Can't get passionate about international footy as with the Mighty Blues.

Patrick Murphy
53 Posted 19/06/2014 at 23:39:55
In Germany in 2006 at least England got out of the group and failed heroically but the lack of depth in the squad was the same as it is now and the last time they took part in South Africa - the one notable difference is that their are more younger players who may perhaps grow into exceptional players.

Heartbreak again for England in a penalty shoot-out. Having played for almost an hour with 10 men with so much heart and determination, England did not deserve to lose this match. At some point luck has to be on England's side in a penalty shoot-out (Ricardo became the first goalkeeper in World Cup history to save three penalties in a shoot-out). With another trophy campaign having come to a devastating end, England will return home believing they could have gone all the way had they won this match. The manner in which Rooney was sent off will cloud the game and it would seem that Ronaldo will not be welcome by fans in England should he return to Manchester United to play club football. Apparently Ronaldo wants a move to Real Madrid but it remains to be seen if the club wants him.

Post match note: Beckham resigned as England captain the day after England's elimination from the World Cup. Rooney was given a 2 match ban for his red card.

ENGLAND:
Robinson #1, G Neville #2 (captain when Beckham substituted), Ferdinand #5, Terry #6, A Cole #3, Beckham #7 - captain (Lennon 51 mins- #19 (Carragher 118 mins - #15)), Lampard #8, Hargreaves #16, Gerrard #4, J Cole #11 (Crouch 65 mins - #21), Rooney #9.
Subs Not Used: James #13, Carson #22, Campbell #12, Bridge #14, Carrick #18, Jenas #17, Downing #20, Walcott #23. (Full Squad)

Mind you if Italy do beat Uruguay and Costa Rica it may not yet be over, but what's the betting Italy draw both their remaining matches?

Richard Reeves
54 Posted 19/06/2014 at 22:52:14
Jim Bennings #10, "Watching England really is like watching Moyes's Everton teams: all gusto but evidently fucking clueless." — Spot on with that.

I'm not even arsed about it, there's a repetitiveness about England where certain players will be accommodated into the team irrespective of form or the fact that they are just shite in certain positions, just like the Beckham scenario (probably something to do with sponsorships or misguided loyalty) and players huffing and puffing without an end-product due to poor tactics.

I only watch these games at home on the telly but it's the paying fan that I feel slightly sorry for... Pretty much the whole nation wanted Redknapp for the manager's job and we end up with (as Christopher Kelly says) a daft old lady. If the useless suits at the FA aren't going to listen to the public, then the public shouldn't bother paying to travel and watch. That would send a clear message to the FA: England need a new manager because Woy is definitely the weak link.

I can't see it being much different in four years time. The last half-decent England manager was Hoddle and it's obvious he would love to be given the chance again. I suspect, though, that we will hear about being unlucky and how this is a building process for the next World Cup and how Woy has brought through some of the younger players for the future but ultimately it will be a waste of time with the same outcome.

Mike Green
55 Posted 19/06/2014 at 23:27:50
The national side outside of the two big competitions are an inconvenience to both club and player, playing two bit sides for the interim whilst total focus is on club competition.

They then rock up at the sharp end looking like they were thrown together at the last minute, try and play like they think a World Cup side ought to play rather than the way they know to play, chuck the kitchen sink at the opposition like schoolgirls at a tea party whilst the other side sit back, pick their nails, smell our desperation, hold firm and turn us over.

Uruguay had to win that game as much as we did, as did Italy, but we smash all our cards on the table, go all in and walk away with nothing - again.

I don't doubt their desire, or their effort, but as a national team we look confused and fragmented, with no confidence whatsoever. You then look at the likes of Chile and see a real team, with a plan, who are playing because this for them is THE pinnacle.

Our lot instead will be on a plane home checking out which of their opening fixtures are going to be moved to Sky so they can get their hair sorted for the cameras.

Si Cooper
56 Posted 19/06/2014 at 23:28:17
I agree with Hoddle and Dixon on ITV. It was failure to deliver in the last third of the pitch that cost us against both Italy and Uruguay. Two draws or even England shading both games and no-one would see it as an injustice.

Wellbeck is not a winger and completely failed to move himself or the defenders so that Baines could get into the game on a consistent basis, and Sterling was equally ineffective. I had hoped to see Oxlade-Chamberlain tonight as I think he would have put real pressure on their defenders.

Cavani's cross for their first was absolute top drawer and took Jags out of contention (he needed to get tight to Sewerat and stay with him) and BOTH central defenders failed to anticipate Gerrard missing his header. Sewerat does that all the time, got 'lucky' again and finished it as well as anyone could have.

I wasn't expecting much from England anyway, but I don't think they have embarrassed themselves with their performances thus far. Just not good enough to capitalise on the chances they created.

Sam Hoare
57 Posted 19/06/2014 at 23:54:50
Mike Green (55) – I don't believe that at all. The guys looked absolutely gutted. They care a great deal. Perhaps too much and nerves definitely played a part tonight.

Ultimately it's been quite fine margins and I actually think we have played and looked better than at previous tournaments. I would say 2 points from those two games would not be undeserved at all but as it is we are heading home bar a minor miracle. Little point in attributing individual blame.

Mike Green
58 Posted 20/06/2014 at 00:11:10
Sam - I didn't say they didn't care or attribute individual blame, I think because of the riches of the EPL and CL they only really care when it comes to the big stage, and by that point it's too late as they've not spent the interim working to build an effective team that can win things because they're too obsessed with club football. The national side plays second fiddle to club football, and as such will always play a bum tune.
Tom Bowers
59 Posted 20/06/2014 at 00:16:13
As soon as the draw was made, I knew England would struggle to get beyond the group and recent warm-up games endorsed that belief.

England haven't had a world class striker since Alan Shearer. Welbeck has had a poor season with Man Utd so why was he selected? Others were playing because some were injured such as Kyle Walker and Oxlade-Chamberlain. Sterling is totally over-rated.

Hodgson should have made changes after the Italy game; however, they may still have fallen foul of class forwards like Cavani and Suarez in the end. If, come next week, they are still mathematically in with a chance, what will Hodge-podge do?

Paul Hewitt
60 Posted 20/06/2014 at 00:42:08
Everton forever!
Sean Kelly
61 Posted 20/06/2014 at 00:31:09
The sooner the British media, both print and TV, stop calling it the best league in the world, the better. There are too many over-priced average British and Irish players in the league and they are not good enough for international football.

You have to ask the question: Which of the 23 in the squad would get into a Madrid or Barca team? Not many, I fear. The legs are gone in Gerrard. Henderson is shite. Fergie was right about him. Rooney is weighed down by his salary. Johnson is tripe and Welbeck just doesn't give a fuck.

Let's face it, folks – the standard of British and Irish players has fallen so low, it's embarrassing.

Patrick Murphy
62 Posted 20/06/2014 at 01:17:05
Only Buck-Tooth could say his goals against England brought him retribution against his critics in England. He said "Before the game too many people in England laughed about my attitude over the last few years. "This is a very good time for me. I want to see what they say now."

Unbelievable — a fawning worshiping home crowd, a fawning worshiping media, and he still feels that he is the victim of a witch-hunt. If he wants to know what a witch-hunt is like. just ask Phil Jagielka and Leighton Baines.

The only consolation is that he might be playing elsewhere next season but what a total horrible self-centred individual with no humility and no remorse. Jags and Baines may not be world class footballers, but give me their personalities every day of the week and hopefully the Premier League won't have to suffer from one of the most disrespectful footballers ever to ply his trade in England.

Tony J Williams
63 Posted 20/06/2014 at 01:52:33
I see the no foreheaded one is getting away with it again and Jags is getting the blame.

Suarez was offside for their second... if it had come off a Uruguayan head... bit harsh to blame the defender for that.

Our great captain was again anonymous and once again no-one wanted to pass to Baines.

I thought the ref was strong and we can all see how much of a hypocrite Sturridge is now. Diving everywhere even after it was obvious the ref wasn't falling for it.

Jamie Crowley
64 Posted 20/06/2014 at 01:47:07
Can you plan or position yourself properly when the Godfather of English football glances a header IN THE WRONG DIRECTION?

England did not play that poorly. That one play IMO let them down. That was a game where the result changed with one poor - very poor - execution of a basic task.

Head the ball forward ya stupid fuck.

Everything I need to know I learned in Kindergarden...

Paul Ferry
65 Posted 20/06/2014 at 02:02:13
Far more gutted by Rik Mayall's death and when Palace turned us over at The Old Lady than by this latest England cock-up.

How many of this England team would get into the first eleven at Sheik City? Answer: Hart, possibly possibly Rooney, and I think that's it. Without Suarez, the Shite are.... well, shite... and that's why an England team with five from the Shite in it look like they did today.

Putting the blame on Jaghowler's lightweight shoulders is all well and good – best of all mong Murphy: the centre backs are to blame for that goal because they SHOULD NOT HAVE EXPECTED Me Me Me Me to make contact with his head (even though it was a long punt and the Racist was offside until his team-mate kindly put it on plate for him with a flick of his DJ hating head).

But this so-called highly-rated team that thinks a lot about itself started with Johnson, Henderson, Wellbeck wide, Bart Simpson who always seems like a disaster waiting to happen, who had 36 touches today, no goals, zero assists, and 80% pass completion, as well as Jaghowler who is nowhere near international class, nowhere near.

That post before moaning about moaning – 34 - did make me laugh. So I was born in England – wasn't my choice, I quite fancied Iceland – but there is no rule that says I can't moan about a performance like the shite out-of-depth Hodgson's boys served up today or that I have to be potty patriotic about Engerlaund FC who serve a similar purpose in my life as the royal family: good for a laugh, often embarrassing, paid too much, don't do enough, good at extra-marital. Land of Hope and Glory for me is The Old Lady and its Evertonians who never never will be slaves.

Back to Jaghowler. I've been saying for a while now that he is the weak link at the back for us. If anyone like the Gooners is prepared to splash over £10million on him then I'd take it in a heartbeat. The key for me over the next couple of years is finding the right partner for John Stones. Jags cannot read the game at anywhere near to a satisfactory level and he ought to be exceptional, his positioning is school playground, he doesn't bark enough, we could do with a couple of inches on him, and so on....

So, to sum up: dickead Redshite warped pundits, a very dodgy England and Everton centre-half, an England team nowhere near the quality of the team who won the English title, a gaffer who does a good Graham Taylor impression, and a national footie side and royal family who give us the gift of wry mirth.

Dennis Stevens
66 Posted 20/06/2014 at 01:57:36
It seems to me that, since the days of Alf Ramsey, England have rarely looked like a team rather than an odd collection of individual players. Robson seemed to manage it somewhat inadvertently about half way through each of his World Cup Finals jaunts & Venables also achieved this feat in Euro 96. England haven't been top class for over 40 years & I can't see it changing anytime soon.

As regards tonight, wasn't our illustrious Captain meant to be a defensive midfielder in this team? Apart from heading the ball neatly into Suarez's path for the winner, he also gave the ball away cheaply to start the move leading to their opening goal, if I remember correctly.

Some interesting points re Jagielka. When we originally signed him, had he not been playing primarily as a defensive midfielder for Sheffield United? Perhaps Martinez should try him there if we don't secure Barry's signature.

Anto Byrne
67 Posted 20/06/2014 at 02:07:53
Fuck me, Rooney had three glorious chances and should have buried them. What the fuck was he doing out so wide? And why, oh why, did we not change it at half time?

Baines looked lost without his little mate Pienaar and, if Jags is the best centre half in England, god help us. Young Stones would have got his head on that cross and would have waltzed out of defence.

Can't take anything any away from Suarez the guy is an absolute freak scoring two brilliant goals.

Let's retire the old brigade and bring in the future crop and how about a football-playing manager as well? Not playing Barkley or Lallana from the start says it all really.

James Shipton
68 Posted 20/06/2014 at 02:27:42
I remember being in Portugal in '04 and watching 4 games, 10 England goals & Rooney being the player of the tournament at that point, but unfortunately getting injured.

This is the first tournament since then where I have been excited and surprised by our play. The young lads who attack and lose the ball 50% of the time will mature and flip it to 25% next tournament.

We will get better.... but I pray we keep the philosophy.

Chris Wilson
69 Posted 20/06/2014 at 03:09:31
Absolutely love Chris Waddle's rant..
http://www.101greatgoals.com/blog/chris-waddles-brilliant-rant-on-england-we-never-ever-ever-learn-audio/

Which is apparently similar to the rant in 2010...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/world_cup_2010/8767443.stm

Dennis Ng
70 Posted 20/06/2014 at 03:44:31
Chris, great link. Disappointed that Hodgson didn't have the guts to gamble on playing Barkley more.
Craig Fletcher
71 Posted 20/06/2014 at 03:49:54
As a non-Englishman, it's hard to fathom the English football team on the world stage. There's no doubting the individual talent is there – international observers constantly talk about the world class players involved in the England set-up – but I think a large part of it is the mental side of their game.

There is massive pressure on the English team, yes, but quite a few English players are lacking the mental strength to perform on the big stage.

Leadership is another factor: Would the current team be motivated to find that extra gear by Gerrard? Even Beckham, bless him, while a 'limited' footballer, often led by example – the game against Greece in 2001 to qualify for the 2002 World Cup is a case in point.

Gerrard, once again, was conspicuous by his absence today, while on the other side Godin and Suarez were constantly talking to their players, hand-slaps on backs, encouraging, pointing to where they wanted their players to be. They were a presence. A young England side needed their senior players to stand up and be counted - Jags unfortunately was also culpable here.

I hate to say it, but from a neutral standpoint it seemed Uruguay simply were more hungry and wanted it more. Further, Woy's tactics were in some cases baffling. We all know Jags is better on the right side of the centre-back position – not left... and he's better served by having someone pacey as his centre-back partner.

Baines was given absolutely no protection ahead of him in both games, though also it must be said, his defensive side of his game can also be suspect in one-vs-one situations. Gerrard and Henderson were simply awful as a midfield combination. Wellbeck is no winger. Sterling was shown up to be as average as I've thought him to be, and Rooney was typically poor on the big stage (more a fragile mental state of mind than anything else I suspect). Joe Hart, also seemed almost scared at times.

Anyways. Back to Blighty for Bainesy, Jags and Ross, and prepare for next season.

Sharabi Singh
72 Posted 20/06/2014 at 04:06:11
Grass roots, grass roots, grass roots...

England are a product of what they have invested in. As much as I hate the Liverpool side as much as the next man, they are what England is best at producing at the moment. I honestly don't blame any of them. We know Jagielka is shit but who the feck else do we have? Clearly youth needs a chance but we all know no England manager will have the balls to play them. It's easier blaming the old guard like it has been for the last 30 years.

Maybe the problem is the old gits at the top who haven't a clue (Capello) – and haven't for the last God knows how long.

Anto Byrne
73 Posted 20/06/2014 at 04:16:58
Worryingly Jagielka is the captain of Everton. 'Nuff said.
David Ellis
74 Posted 20/06/2014 at 05:58:28
Any sadness I could feel at an England defeat was wrung out of me after the 96 semi-final defeat to Germany.

As for last night, I thought Baines had a good game, stopped crosses coming over defensively and also was a good supplier of crosses himself, particularly in the second half.

The real weakness in the England team was the central defensive 4 (with an honorable exception perhaps to Cahill). They are just not comfortable enough on the ball and Henderson and Gerrard did not show enough for the ball, leaving Cahill and Jags no option but to hoof it or pass back to the strangely dodgy keeper Hart. Lots of panicky clearances at the beginning of the second half – I am no longer used to seeing teams play that way – Everton don't.

Maybe Stones will develop into the ball-playing centre half we really need. Pity McCarthy is Irish.

Sam Hoare
75 Posted 20/06/2014 at 07:02:51
As others have pointed out, Jags is getting a lot of criticism for the second goal where actually all is he is doing is holding the defensive line. Suarez is miles offside and if Jags had dropped back then he would be playing him onside, creating lots of space behind a broken line for Suarez to run into.

What you can't account for us your own player flicking on a perfect through ball, thus negating the offside rule. How experienced defender pundits cannot point this out is beyond me.

Mark Melton
76 Posted 20/06/2014 at 07:34:19
I think that Greg Dyke throat slitting gesture, back when the draw was made, summed it up really. The Group of Death. In our hearts, we all feared we just wouldn't have the guile to get out of it. That fear was proved right last night.
Anto Byrne
77 Posted 20/06/2014 at 04:42:16
Reading the punditry clowns, it's all down to Baines and Jagielka for their schoolboy football. Stevie Gee is faultless playing Suarez onside because at this level defenders need to anticipate mistakes and attack the ball. To single those two out for both goals and call for John Terry and Cole... well, what the fuck do you expect? Someone has to be the whipping boys.
Peter Barry
78 Posted 20/06/2014 at 07:35:46
The whole England team from the manager on down needs to be thrown on the scrap heap, they are not fit for purpose. But how many more reminders do we need to get that having a Premier League full of FOREIGN players does absolutely nothing for the quality of English football.
Mike Hughes
79 Posted 20/06/2014 at 07:54:11
Don't forget that shit never sticks to Gerrard and never will.

And for the next 20 - 30 years we'll be enjoying his 'expert' opinion as a pundit.

More loathsome than Suarez yet still a media darling.

Paul Andrews
80 Posted 20/06/2014 at 07:59:17
Sam,

Spot on. But if they did point it out they wouldn't be able to deflect the attention from El Capitano.

Colin Glassar
81 Posted 20/06/2014 at 08:06:28
The cover-up has started. Jags and Baines are the guilty party for the defeat against Uruguay, Gerard and Rooney are untouchable in their eyes so someone's got to carry the can and it will be our two lads.
Patrick Murphy
82 Posted 20/06/2014 at 08:03:40
Sam,

Obviously Alan "I'm a Legend" Shearer doesn't agree with you as he labelled the England defending as amateurish – but as you say if the Uruguayan had got his head to the ball Ratboy would've been offside.

Those that think the likes of Shearer don't have any real influence and should be ignored should reconsider the power of the media, they decide who should be the heroes or villains and millions of people tend to agree with whatever views they have. Everton are after-all an overachieving club and any top players should be looking to advance their careers by leaving Goodison to join an elite club.

Trevor Thompson
83 Posted 20/06/2014 at 08:12:50
England need to just concentrate on youth now, and forget the likes of Gerrard, Lampard and Rooney. There are no individuals that can win games on their own.

England have to play as a team and also stop trying to fit in players just because they have a name. How many times have England tried to fit in players like Lampard and Gerrard in a system just to have them play together?

Gerrard and Henderson aren't defensive midfielders, Wellbeck isn't a left midfielder. We need to start all over again.

Brian Harrison
84 Posted 20/06/2014 at 08:30:55
I don't think either Italy or Uruguay were in general play any better than England; the difference was that both sides maximised what chances they had and we didn't.

There will of course be hours spent saying who was to blame, but England have under-achieved for over 40 years. We have had English managers and supposedly top foreign managers in charge yet we still never look like getting anywhere near a final. Compare us to Germany who on most occasions always put up a good show, and they have done this on a regular basis.

Bob Skelton
85 Posted 20/06/2014 at 09:05:12
I thought that Uruguay were a pretty average side who got their tactics right. They pushed their forwards onto the two centre-halves whose control of the ball is suspect and stopped them rolling the ball to each other.

I've watched Jags for too long now and I appreciate the fact that he is no 'footballer', so pressure him and you can see the panic set in. His normal reaction is his a scything hoof up-field or he becomes delusional and tries to play football which normally results in catastrophe. Everton counter this by having Barry available as cover; England had Gerrard and Henderson giving us no cover at all, therefore we become totally exposed.

My overriding feeling last night is how many times I have been upset by a RS player whose major asset appears to be able to run unopposed in between our centre-halves (à la Rush, Suarez...) and cause absolute havoc. Why can't we ever find someone to do the same?

Ah well... bring on the new season so I can at least watch our Blue boys make me smile... COYB

Brin Williams
86 Posted 20/06/2014 at 09:35:51
For Jags 2014, read Heitinga 2010 – shite and we all know what sort of season he had after that and where he ended up after spending most of his last season warming the bench and taking the money.

Sell now otherwise it'll be a free in a couple of years.

Charles Brewer
87 Posted 20/06/2014 at 09:30:25
The good news is that there are no injuries to Everton players, and after the press vilification of Baines and Jagielka, and the non-appearance of Barkley and Stones not replacing Oxlade-Chamberlain, it is unlikely that there will be silly bids for any of our players.

On other matters, Ratboy will certainly be on his bike, and Gerrard can look forward to a season of creative abuse, although I think Henderson deserves it even more.

And I doubt if Hodgson's inventive 4-0-3-1 formation will be adopted widely.

Colin Malone
88 Posted 20/06/2014 at 09:52:34
Henderson? WTF. Better than Gareth Barry? Henderson is at best a very average player.

Sterling? One-trick pony.

Brent Stephens
89 Posted 20/06/2014 at 09:54:08
Not all the media are leaving Gerrard out of the criticism. The Guardian slates him today – "has reached end of the road".

Having said that, a defence's role is to expect the ball to come through at any time, in any way. So when the ball came off Gerrard's head (not enough creases to stop the ball?) the defence should have been expecting the unexpected.

Goodbye, Gerrard. What a shit end to a Premier League season and an international career. Tee-hee.

Sue Brown
90 Posted 20/06/2014 at 09:35:18
It'll be interesting to see if Woy has the balls to change his team for the Costa Rica game after last night. He might have taken some youth to Brazil but, apart from Sterling, hasn't had faith in starting them. In both games so far, the difference when Ross came on was noticeable, moving the play and making space for others to come forward. I'd like to see him and Wilshere start. Sterling has done okay but is greedy.

And maybe Rooney and Gerrard could finally step away from free kicks and let Bainsey have a go. Twice in the Italy game and again last night chances were wasted and I'm sure Baines would have buried the ball but again the glory hunters screwed up.

Christopher Timmins
91 Posted 20/06/2014 at 10:44:53
From the outside looking in it, appears that changes must be made in the following areas for the final game:

Two central midfielders to depart;
Rooney to move into the middle;
Sterling to start out wide;
The Man Utd reserve to depart.

If there is nothing riding on the game then nobody who is unlikely to be around in 2018 should start. That would result in additional changes at the back.

Thank God Stones was not involved!

Ray Roche
92 Posted 20/06/2014 at 11:26:25
Brent, the back four had pushed up leaving Suarez offside.

Saying "a defence's role is to expect the ball to come through at any time, in any way. So when the ball came off Gerrard's head (not enough creases to stop the ball?) the defence should have been expecting the unexpected." misses the point... A defences role is to stop the opposition scoring which they would have done if Suarez had been left offside.

And as for Sterling, I thought he stunk the gaff out. Greedy, as is Sturridge, and prone to run up blind alleys.

Sam Hoare
93 Posted 20/06/2014 at 11:27:58
I don't see that Woy does need to change the game for Costa Rica. To be honest, in both games so far we have created more chances than the opposition but have just not taken them as well. I don't see anyone on the bench who I really think could have made a considerable difference. Barkley or Lallana perhaps but neither is prolific. Perhaps Lambert for Sturridge but that is easy to suggest in retrospect and would have been a bold call.

If Costa Rica is a dead rubber then put in Shaw for Baines, Jones for Jagielka, Wilshere for Gerrard, Oxlade-Chamberlain for Welbeck and Barkley for Rooney. If not, I'd probably play the same team.

Mike Hughes
94 Posted 20/06/2014 at 11:40:38
Danny Mills on R5L:

"The second goal was shocking, it was a flick-on from Gerrard, there was nothing he could do, but Baines, Jagielka and Cahill were all over the shop. There was no defensive shape or organisation at all."

Shit never sticks to Gerrard when, as I saw it, he virtually handed both goals to Suarez.

Brent Stephens
95 Posted 20/06/2014 at 11:32:35
Ray, must admit I haven't looked at the offside aspect of that goal, mate. If the defence had pushed up to leave Suarez offside, was he then in an offside position when the ball was played through? You seem to be saying he wasn't left offside. Who left him onside? A defender? If so, I'd suggest that when coming out as a back line to play offside, you still keep an eye on your other defenders in case the unexpected happens – i.e. they don't come out with you.

And I think if they were trying to play Suarez offside, they should still have been looking for the ball coming over Gerrard – in fact, playing somebody offside implies you are expecting the ball to come through.

I'm just saying a defence has to be open to all the unexpected – fellow defenders not keeping the line, a ball skimming through or being deflected etc.
Or maybe I misunderstand the point.

Kevin Tully
96 Posted 20/06/2014 at 11:23:45
Chris Wilson # 69 – That audio clip of Waddle should be played on every radio station in the country. Who would have thought that a guy who cannot pronounce the word 'pelanty' would be the only pundit to have the balls and common sense to speak the truth.

Overrated, overhyped, overpaid, and made to look better than they are by foreign stars in their club sides. Every manager is scared of the press to try anything new – correct. Who would have the balls to drop Gerrard, or Rooney?

Then he goes on to say that just because they play for Man Utd, or Liverpool it doesn't mean they will make a successful International footballer – Fucking bang on and it's first time anyone has had the bollocks to come out publicly with the truth.

Waddler – you are my new hero.

Brent Stephens
97 Posted 20/06/2014 at 11:45:55
Mike #94, I don't get this idea of a goal being one person's fault, unless in circumstances where, for example, it's the last man in defence, there's absolutely no danger, but he cocks it up (Gary Sprake, throws ball into own net; Distin back pass in semi-final, etc).

Midfielders fail to win the ball or give the ball away loads of times; that's what a defence is there for – to come to the defence of...

Gerrard should have got the header in, the defence shouldn't have let Suarez onto the ball that came through. All to blame.

Paul Tran
98 Posted 20/06/2014 at 11:49:58
A few things were clear in the first few minutes:

Uruguay were really pumped up from the kick off. They looked physically stronger, better organised and guess what - they all knew what they were meant to be doing. They moved much better than the England players. There are way too many coaches/pundits/fans in England who confuse movement with running. The England midfield and back four were constantly outwitted by the Uruguayan movement.

I watched the game and am reading the post-mortems without blue-tinged glasses. I'm reading plenty of criticism for Gerrard. On those two displays I don't think Baines and Jagielka are international class. I'm looking forward to seeing the suggestion that Martinez has ruined them!

I hope that like at Everton, the people in charge of England have the balls to change the method of play and ignore the claims of individuals who were better served by a failed system.

As suggested earlier, I want Martinez to find at least one mobile centre-back who can read the game and play with some thought. One to partner Stones, one for cover until Distin hangs up his boots.

Kevin Tully
99 Posted 20/06/2014 at 11:55:08
Consider this, David Bentley has just retired from the game at 29 (played his last game at 28). He said he'd had enough of all the stats and how 'boring' the modern game had become.

Here is very average player, who can retire safe in the knowledge he is financially secure for the rest of his life, living like a blinged-up lottery winner. That is one of many reasons why this, or any future England side lack the desire to win. All the glory & money is at club level, you are on the back pages every week lauded as superman and paid millions.

Mike Hughes
100 Posted 20/06/2014 at 12:01:30
Brent #97 - you are spot on.

However, as Gerrard appears to be getting none of the blame, I'm just trying to redress the balance.

Raymond Fox
101 Posted 20/06/2014 at 11:35:09
Please don't look for excuses for these bums that play for our country.

I've watched the same scenario for 50 years, I'm still in shocked that we won the World Cup in 1966, that was some kind of miracle!

Individually we still don't produce players that have the ball skills as good as the best teams in the world; this has been apparent since 1966. If this does not change, we will continue to have results like our two loses in this competition.

I said as much in an earlier post, the opposition only need to mark our players closely and hound them when we have the ball and we are guaranteed to give them the ball! Italy gave us much more time on the ball and that was the reason we looked decent, even though we still contrived to lose that game also.

Patrick Murphy
102 Posted 20/06/2014 at 12:37:23
Forgetting about who is and who is not to blame, Suarez was offside when the Uruguayan initially pumped the ball up the pitch but the inadvertent header by Stevie Me meant that he was played onside.

Yes, the defenders could have reacted quicker but sometimes it's just one of those things and to blame the defence as a whole misses the point. The team are supposed to attack as a team and defend as a team; unfortunately a few England stars enjoy the limelight but don't think they deserve criticism – no matter what they have done on the pitch.

I'm so glad I'm a Blue because at least our players always try and give their best, even if sometimes it proves inadequate.

Brent Stephens
103 Posted 20/06/2014 at 13:10:07
Mike #100 = all for that! The Guardian slammed him today, at least.
Mike Allison
104 Posted 20/06/2014 at 13:14:31
Patrick that isn't true. I don't know if he was on or offside when the keeper kicked it, but if he was offside, a touch off a defensive player doesn't make him onside if he receives the ball from the original pass, which he did.

From what I can remember I didn't think he was offside anyway.

Patrick Murphy
105 Posted 20/06/2014 at 13:28:42
That's what you get for listening to the commentator and bloody Phil Neville – of course you are right, as I have just watched it again.
Andrew Ellams
106 Posted 20/06/2014 at 13:25:55
Ironically, Jagielka and Baines are both in danger of losing their first-team places at Everton this season.

I don’t care one bit if any Everton players are good enough to play international football as long as they are good enough to take Everton forwards. The quality in the Premier League is poor, full stop – with the exception of a handful of overseas players (Suarez, RvP, Hazard).

Our best players are all Irish anyway.

Patrick Murphy
107 Posted 20/06/2014 at 13:39:15
This Brazilian newspaper is going to feel pretty silly if England somehow manage to negotiate the group stage and go on to win the trophy! But as that's unlikely to happen it's quite a clever picture.

Scroll down to 13:35pm on the link to see the picture:

Abbey Road or the End of the road?

Craig Walker
108 Posted 20/06/2014 at 13:49:26
Let's remind ourselves how many international medals Shearer, Mills, Murphy, Wright, Ferdinand, Phil Neville, Savage etc. have between them?

The facts are that England played better than they have done in recent tournaments. They kept the ball better and attacked with some purpose. We have good players in this country but no more than that. We can see exciting games, week-in & week-out, because we like end-to-end attacking football and drama. For this reason, our national team are unable to play at a tempo other than 100 miles an hour. If you watch the truly great teams, they can slow games down and attack at pace. It's nothing new.

We've had good players down the years: Brooking, Hoddle, Beardsley, Gascoigne, Scholes etc... but the outcome is the same. Our media build up their reputation and they fail to play well against proper football nations. We are okay against the likes of Moldova in qualifying but pit us against a genuine football nation and we know the outcome.

I'll never understand though why a manager complains about not having enough time with his squad, as every England manager does, that when he gets the opportunity to play a warm-up session in Miami to mimic conditions etc, he goes and plays his B-team. Why? Surely you would take the opportunity to play your starting XI as often as possible and work on moves and understanding with each other. Why play John Stones in such a game and then send him home on the next plane?

Andrew Clare
109 Posted 20/06/2014 at 13:54:37
Let's face it, most of us knew that it was unlikely that England would get out of the group stage and we also new that certain players were either past it or not international quality.

I would say 7 out of every 10 of the best players in the world today hail from South America and a great deal of them play in Spain. If you look at the intensity and skill in La Liga, it is quite easy to see that our players are not in the same department. The true world greats play at a high standard week-in & week-out. Not now and again like some of our so-called top players.

A radical change is required at grass roots to improve the situation.

Rick Tarleton
110 Posted 20/06/2014 at 13:53:25
The issue of whether Jagielka and Cahill were to blame is secondary. What does matter is the way we play.

European and South American teams (viz Chile no-one over 5' 11") are organised so that the defenders and midfielders press and press. In England we play so that giant centre-backs (and equally big centre-forwards) are fed a plethora of high balls.

Heitinga or Medel are useless in England – not because they are useless, but because of the nature of our game. Equally foreign teams can play the ball out from the centre of defence.

Cahill and Jagielka used the English method either shove it to the full-back or holding midfielder and Gerrard last night showed he is past his sell-by date at the highest level, or they hoof it long. Never do they break and cause teams to back off as they set up a counter-attack.

Despite the number of foreigners in our game, we convert them to our kind of game. Exciting, yes; skilful, rarely. We as fans don't like the slower tempo, but that's how Italy etc play and that's why they are successful and we are not.

I refer you to the best book on football produced this century, "Why England Lose and Other Curious Football Phenomena Explained" by Simon Kuper and Stefan Szymanski – two British academics who've done the job scientifically, not just blustered.

Ray Roche
111 Posted 20/06/2014 at 13:54:01
Mike, Brent, I have watched the goal again and still think Suarez WAS offside.

Mike, you say "a touch off a defensive player doesn't make him onside if he receives the ball from the original pass", but it wasn't so much a "touch" but could even be interpreted as a backpass in as much as Gerrard was actually attempting to head the ball and was not just struck by the ball.

The law states that: "Gaining an advantage by being in an offside position" and goes on to state "having been in an offside position or playing a ball that rebounds to him off an opponent having been in an offside position." So, whichever way you look at it, that appears to suggest that Suarez was offside if he was beyond the last man when the ball was played to him.

Anyway, the sun is shining and the golf course beckons... adios , amigos.

Patrick Murphy
112 Posted 20/06/2014 at 14:17:41
Ray, I apologised to Mike in an earlier post. Suarez was onside when the goalkeeper kicked the ball and he ran into an offside position when the ball neared Gerrard and the other Uruguayan player.

Had the Uruguayan knocked the ball towards Suarez, he most definitely would have been offside; however, because Gerrard helped it on its way, Suarez was onside from the original kick from the Goalkeeper – I hope that is helpful.

Si Cooper
113 Posted 20/06/2014 at 13:46:06
You can be within touching distance of an attacker and still playing him offside; one or both of Jags and Cahill should have shadowed Ratboy's speculative run and at least put some pressure on him when he first reached the ball. Cahill was the one originally tracking him, so for me the onus is on him to ensure he doesn't end up on his own in a potentially dangerous area of the pitch.

That doesn't change the fact that, overall, it wasn't defensive problems that really undid England's challenge last night. The BBC seems to be leading the charge with this misdirected clap-trap, once again bemoaning the absence of Cashley on their news programmes! You would have to know next to nothing about football to think that he would have made any positive difference to the game as it played out.

Ray Roche
114 Posted 20/06/2014 at 14:25:04
Thanks, Patrick, he looked offside on the version I watched, although the quality wasn't great, but the fact that the ball came off Gerrard would have played him onside. Anyway, whatever, Gerrard's still a prick. As I say.......the sun is shining etc...
Paul Andrews
115 Posted 20/06/2014 at 14:25:36
Fact is, Suarez gambled. If his own player headed on, he was offside. An England player headed on so he wasn't offside and scored. It's what the best forwards do. Pure instinct.
Paul Andrews
116 Posted 20/06/2014 at 14:28:29
Si,

I can see where you are coming from. In theory, using this game as an example.

As I see it, it depends on the manager's instructions to Baines. If he wanted his left back to defend rather than use him as an attacking option, as he did in the first half, Cole would be the choice in my opinion. If he wanted his left back to be more attacking, as he did in the second half, Baines would be the choice.

Si Cooper
117 Posted 20/06/2014 at 14:26:07
Ray - you can only be offside from a ball played forward from one of your own players. If, like Suarez on this occasion, you run into an 'offside' position whilst the ball is in the air and the ball is next touched by an opposition player you are not, and never will be, offside.
Mark Boulle
118 Posted 20/06/2014 at 14:35:25
Gav Ram and a few others - I'm genuinely interested to know what motivates you actively to support the team playing against England? I hate the farce the England team has become in recent years, with selection bias in favour of the media darling teams etc, as much as the next man, but it's still England, with Everton players in the team. Why would you want them to lose? It's not as though they directly affect our beloved Blues in any way – we have to wait another two months for them to play, so might as well get behind our country in the meantime.

On another note, I think there is a valid comparison between EFC and England, in that England are now trying to play the in-vogue 4-2-3-1 formation. Unfortunately, we pick two midfielders as the '2' in that who entirely lack the tactical acumen and intelligence to play that role. Gerrard has never had an ounce of positional sense, but he's never had to develop it. For years, until age started to catch up with him, his role was unrestricted at the Shite, as he had licence to charge around the pitch while others filled in for him. Yes, last year he was playing a more disciplined role with some degree of success, but the reality is, without Suarez last season, Liverpool would have been nowhere.

Henderson likewise. People said his fitness would be a plus in the Brazilian heat. He may well be able to motor up and down for 90 minutes where others flag, but he too hasn't got a clue where he needs to be / what gaps to fill etc.

Contrast with EFC, whose '2' in that role seemed to understand instinctively when to go forward, when to cover each other or our marauding full backs. Barry and McCarthy are suited to that screening role, Gerrard and Henderson manifestly aren't.

Speaking of tactical acumen and intelligence, look at the way Phillip Lahm (a brilliant full back) has now been converted to an equally brilliant DCM. When was the last time (if ever) an English player had the brains and tactical awareness to adapt to a new position like that? That says it all for me really.

Si Cooper
119 Posted 20/06/2014 at 14:38:16
Paul, why do you think we needed to defend more in the first half? They had two shots on target and probably their best period was the 10 minutes after half-time when we struggled to make effective clearances.

Other than that, I thought the defence was relatively comfortable for the majority of the game and the biggest problem we had was turning our possession into clear cut chances. Welbeck played as if he was the main attacking threat on our left instead of as an equal partner with Baines.

There were many occasions when Baines had the ball that you could see him gesturing for someone to make something more than a token effort to either get into space or at least make a run to keep a defender occupied and open up a channel. Too many times he received it hard up against the touchline with no space to work in.

Trevor Lynes
120 Posted 20/06/2014 at 14:48:54
Jags is getting far worse condemnation on here not by the national media. He has been an integral part of one of the most consistent defences in the Premier League. The EFC defence carried us for years and I cannot stand the absolute abuse Jags is getting. None of the defence defended well and even Hart was awful and seemed jittery to me. Jags normally plays right side so why did he play left ?

Our best attacking threat going forward was Baines although this has not been mentioned. Rooney missed five good chances over the two matches and that made one hell of a difference. Suarez is world class and, after the demolition job he did on us, I cannot see him staying at Liverpool as he will be booed everywhere he plays in the Premier League next season.

Let’s face facts, we have been beaten by a team that is assembled from a country with just over 3 million people. We do not produce home grown players of world class. We still allow top teams to get away with not having at least half of their squad required to be British. Spain and Germany will always be ahead of us so long as our league is totally dominated by ready-made foreign stars at the expense of home-grown talent.

All the home nations have suffered and all are heading down the rankings. Everton do at least have a decent percentage of British players as do Liverpool, but teams like Chelsea, Man City and Co. provide hardly any top class British players.

Paul Andrews
121 Posted 20/06/2014 at 16:42:04
Si,

The manager's instructions, I would have thought. He had Baines playing more offensively in the second half.

To be honest, I thought at times the back four was all over the place.

Ray Roche
122 Posted 20/06/2014 at 19:11:38
Si @117,

Yes, Si, I realise that, however, he looked offside as the ball was played from the keeper which would put him offside.

The fact is that Hodgson was and the England team were lauded after their performance in the second half against Italy, yet Hodgson picked the same side that underperformed in the first half against Italy. He obviously learnt nothing.

Jim Lloyd
123 Posted 20/06/2014 at 20:25:34
I don't think Suarez being onside or offside really matters in the debate about the perceived weaknesses in the English team. As it was, I thought it was a great pass by Captain fuckin Marvel to Suarez. He just forgot Suarez was on the opposite side last night.

I've always thought that Jags is a poor passer of the ball and quite often he is caught out of position. He's a great one for last ditch tackles and I think his passing has improved but I still think he's a good, solid "hoofer" type player, as is Cahill. If they are going to play, then we should play to their strengths. It seemed to me that, too many times, the gaps between the so-called defensive midfielders and the defence were gaping holes, which gave Suarez and Co loads of room.

I thought Captain bloody Marvel was poor, and Henderson wasn't much better... but he at least did more running. I thought Gareth Barry would be too old to be picked for this World Cup. How wrong I was. He is more effective at providing defensive cover and spreading the ball from midfield. Selfishly, I'm glad he didn't go and that Stonesy was sent home, as they would have had even more suitors after their signatures.

To me, Sturridge and Sterling are too big-headed and were poncing about and trying to dribble through the whole defence, rather than looking to open it up.. I didn't think Welbeck played bad at all and wouldn't mind at all if we got him.

I think Rooney still has a part to play in the England side but maybe that is a bit of residual respect for what a good player he is.

The majority of the press seem to have an overly optimistic fixation over the Red Jessies' contribution to the English team, well maybe now Captain bloody Marvel can ride off into the sunset and become another boring Redshite "expert summariser" for the Beeb.

Mike Allison
124 Posted 20/06/2014 at 21:04:26
Did we all watch Italy earlier and realise other countries can be just as bad as us and it doesn't mean everything about football in that country is wrong?

To be honest, you could argue we've been slightly better than Brazil and Spain.

Tony Draper
125 Posted 20/06/2014 at 22:13:40
Jim 123, you sum up pretty well my thoughts, but I really hadn't realised that Stevie Fruitbat was likely to swap his international appearances for those as a TV pundit.... Dear God, please not.

I'm finding the sheer hypocrisy of the pundits, experts and journos utterly vomit worthy. On the approach to the World Cup Final tournament, all the talk was about giving fresh up-coming and in-form "talent" the freedom to express.

Then after the "narrow defeat" to Italy, they almost unanimously began bleating that Terry & Cole should have been first choices!

Meanwhile, despite some of the most appalling performances ever as an England fullback, Johnson's utter ineptitude is swept aside because he made "one or two positive attacking contributions".

He (Johnson) was selected as basically "the least shit right back available"; brilliant.

Henderson ranks just below Carlton Palmer as one of the all time headshaking selections in England's midfield. Then, Stevie (sympathy vote), a completely unimaginitive selection as a deep central midfielder.... I cannot recall a single laudable contribution from this has-NOT-been.

Then of the "untouchables", there's Sterling (he of the "possessed arms" waggling bizarrely like some possessed conjuror or sign linguist whenever he runs with the ball) and he wasn't bad for a kid.

Adam Lallana (26), still viewed as a youngster, BUT Wayne Rooney (28) as failing to fulfill his youthful potential! Hurry up, Adam 'cos you have just 2 years to catch up and supercede Rooney!

Joe Hart nearly gets caught out from a corner from "George Formby" which he bats away, then when "George" takes another corner.....does he post anyone on the front post ?
Why does a guy as big as JH try to save with his feet ?

With 20 PL clubs AND anywhere else England had:

No recognised Left Winger (Ox being injured);
A right back who is an accident waiting to happen;
No "Kingpin" deep centre mid... just some old "past the sell-by".

The biggest laugh of all was when the pundits, experts and journos finally discovered that Rooneys best position is.... traditional No 10, FFS!

Whilst I don't think that Hodgson is a great England manager, I'm bloody grateful to see the end of the perpetual underachievers.... and I'm assuming now that "The Odd Couple" (Frankie & The Fuitbat) are finished.

Peter Bell
126 Posted 20/06/2014 at 23:07:18
Fed up with all this. I can remember 1975 and a Holland team coming to Wembley and beating us 2-0 with goals by a player called Peters. The TV and press were full of all this "England need a full review from grass roots level, young players, coaching shit" etc... We're still waiting, whilst the South Americans and Africans have caught up with us.

We will never do anything with an FA who know nothing about football. As Cloughie once said: "They give the job to the one with the best smile and who looks best in the Blazer."

Si Cooper
127 Posted 21/06/2014 at 00:29:23
Jim Lloyd (123) – what did Welbeck do that impressed you? I thought he effectively stymied Leighton Baines throughout the game by often occupying the space he wanted to move into and not working hard enough to give him an option for the pass-and-go he is so adept at. He has pace and power but little footballing brain, in my opinion.

I actually thought Sturridge did okay, trying to link up play and bring others into the game. Sadly his finishing was not up to the required standard against Uruguay.

Lee Courtliff
128 Posted 21/06/2014 at 06:10:04
I thought Sturridge looked really good. Great first touch.
Welbeck just isn't international class.

It's funny how we all see each game so very, very differently.

Bob Parrington
129 Posted 21/06/2014 at 08:45:19
Let's face it, Suarez was the only RS player who turned up for this game. The rest of them were still asleep after half-time.

As far as blaming Jagielka for Suarez's goals, OK, he might have been caught out by a precision cross for the first goal but to blame him for the second is more than far-fetched.

Truth is, England were not good enough to win either game. Back to the drawing board!

Paul Andrews
130 Posted 21/06/2014 at 09:10:52

LUIS SUAREZ: MY GOALS AGAINST ENGLAND WERE REVENGE FOR ALL THE CRITICISM I HAVE TAKEN

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/barcelona-join-rivals-real-madrid-3734116#ixzz35G8YlVE7

Love him or hate him, Liverpool will definitely be weakened when he goes.

James Hughes
131 Posted 21/06/2014 at 09:16:45
From BBC gossip column:

England captain Steven Gerrard's display against Uruguay was so bad, according to Spanish newspaper AS, they did not give the midfielder, 34, a rating for his performance.

Michael Penley
132 Posted 21/06/2014 at 09:19:34
Revenge? Sigh. I don't think young Luis is too bright. Luis mate, your criticism wasn't for being a bad footballer but all your diving, biting, racism and blatant cheating. Playing a good game against England will hardly change any of the criticism, except in your head.
Ray Roche
133 Posted 21/06/2014 at 09:18:56
Bob, if Gerrard had sent that cross to Sturridge's head we'd have been told it was a world class pass from a world class player.

Because it was AGAINST England, it's Jagielka's fault for not cutting it out.

Ray Roche
134 Posted 21/06/2014 at 09:23:22
Oh, and if I ever see that buck-toothed twat Suarez again I hope it's by his hospital bed with his grieving family.
Paul Andrews
135 Posted 21/06/2014 at 09:29:43
Michael,

It is his opening shot in his quest for a transfer to Spain.

Jim Lloyd
136 Posted 21/06/2014 at 09:22:36
Si,

I thought Welbeck would be a good player for us because he would have Robbie boy coaching him. What I saw of him is he's strong running and clever on the ball. I think the problem with him, as you see it, is that they haven't played enough together to gel. I don't see why they couldn't.

In the second game, I thought Sterling was more of a hindrance than a help and was running up blind alleys on and around the left wing, without a thought of passing. I think Sturridge is a good player but against Uruguay, I don't think he released the ball often enough when he had an opportunity to do so.

Tony (125) I can see it now. I don't buy the Mail because of Carra La and I like the Mirror, but what waits in the so-called sports pages... bloody King Kenny! I bet they are all falling over themselves to get Captain bloody Marvel on board.

Paul Andrews
137 Posted 21/06/2014 at 16:29:23
Hodgson has done a job in wasting Baines's talents. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

The common consensus at this World Cup is that Roy Hodgson has broken the habit of a lifetime and swapped caution for adventure. This Roy 2.0, a souped-up super manager, intent on playing gung-ho football with his merry band of teenage talents.

England's Leighton Baines (right) and Uruguay's Alvaro Gonzalez battle for the ball.

The reality, of course, is rather different. And if England's misery in Brazil has shown anything, it is that Roy Hodgson will always be Roy Hodgson. And Roy Hodgson's teams will always reflect that.

Hodgson has created an environment with England where players' strengths are used against them, turned into weaknesses.

Leighton Baines, for example, has established himself as the outstanding left-back in the Premier League over the last four seasons. His best attributes? An ability to feed, overlap and link-up with his wide midfielder, and the quality of his delivery in the final third.

Having waited behind Ashley Cole, Baines has earned his status as England's first-choice. Yet what does he find once he gets there? A system which leaves him alone, exposed defensively, and unable to venture forward for fear of the gaps he will leave behind him.

Is it a coincidence that, when England have gone behind, when they have needed to throw caution to the wind, Baines has been their most effective outlet? The Everton man was one of his country's better players in the second half against Uruguay, and improved similarly against Italy after a slow start.

The key to good management is devising a system which gets the best from the players within it. It is why Roberto Martinez has had so much success at Goodison Park – he doesn't ask his players to do things with which they are uncomfortable.

Hodgson, it seems, creates a system, then shoehorns players into it. Baines has suffered, like Wayne Rooney has suffered and Danny Welbeck has suffered.

It is time the FA made a big call. If this group of young players is as talented as we are led to believe, is Hodgson the man to ensure they reach their full potential?

Nail on the head re Baines.

Paul Andrews
138 Posted 21/06/2014 at 16:30:40
Article in Liverpool Echo that above

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads

© ToffeeWeb