25/03/2026 29comments  |  Jump to last

The Friedkin Group are thought to be looking at another £100M in net player investment during this coming summer, if claims in The i Paper are to be believed.  

That may of course be contingent on achieving the current Holy Grail of qualification for European football -- which would underline the remarkable turnaround seen since David Moyes returned to the club in January 2025. 

Unnamed sources suggest that qualification for Europe could be highly consequential for Everton's future trajectory under the low-key leadership of their relatively new American owners. The Friedkin Group is said to be ready to once again provide significant investment to take the club forward.

A steady stream of new commercial deals and agreements have been put in place to bolster the club's sources of income, with the spectre of new Squad Cost Ratio targets to be met for fear of financial sanctions. Just how much was achieved last season should become clearer this month when Everton's Annual Report and Accounts (covering 2024-25) should be revealed. 

While the accounts are expected to show a small loss, commercial income is likely to set a new record that will be further enhanced during the current season, with this Financial Year ending in June 2026.

And where all this background financial stuff really matters is in the transfer market, with Jack Grealish still the biggest potential prize, despite his long injury layoff and advancing years. 

Having forked out around £10M in wages and fees to secure what should have been a season-long loan deal, Everton’s current valuation of Grealish is thought to be around the £20M mark -- well down from the original highly inflated quote of £50M.

The i Paper claims that Everton are also looking to bring in another centre-back and are considering Arsenal’s Ben White, with his status at the Emirates uncertain going forward.

Also, they have rekindled the rumoured pursuit of Bournemouth’s Marcos Senesi, the 28-year-old who will be a free agent this summer.

» Read the full article at The i Paper


//

Reader Comments (29)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()


Eddie Palin
1 Posted 25/03/2026 at 15:52:53
Any chance of a right back?
Mark Murphy
2 Posted 25/03/2026 at 21:57:27
Someone on TPF has posted a link suggesting Jack is interested in going back to Villa.
John Collins
3 Posted 25/03/2026 at 22:17:08
Eddie, 1

Ben White?

6 foot three full back,not getting a game, right up David's street.

Ian Wilkins
4 Posted 26/03/2026 at 00:22:13
If Grealish is part of the plan then we must pick him up for not much more than his book value at City, reported to be circa £12m.

£100m doesn’t go far these days, shopping in the £20- £30m bracket and less.

Loans, quality loans, will be important again.

Eric Myles
5 Posted 26/03/2026 at 01:38:30
We seem to be doing quite well without Grealish at the moment so for £50 million and £12 million in wages then no thanks.

If the Club can reduce both costs then then need to spend the savings on an overlapping left back unless Aznou / Alcaraz both step up.

Paul Griffiths
6 Posted 26/03/2026 at 02:51:09
White is a right back Eddie (1).

£100 million is fuck all these days if that is all the Saint Daniel the Absent is prepared to cough up. Wonder how much he has in mind for Roma? Bless, his mind is probably on the Padres these days.

Steve Brown
7 Posted 26/03/2026 at 02:52:34
Another one-year loan to take him to the end of his contract with City, with Everton covering his wages in full. That would be a reasonable agreement.
Steve Brown
8 Posted 26/03/2026 at 02:57:43
7 clubs spent more than £100M in 2025-26 season, including Everton.

Not sure that level of investment is going to change things dramatically.

Unless of course TFG plan to cash in on one of our assets, like Ndiaye and Branthwaite.

Alan J Thompson
9 Posted 26/03/2026 at 03:26:18
I suppose it might depend on a deal over the transfer fee and wages but, with Ndiaye, McNeil, George, Alcaraz and possibly Dibling, do we really need Grealish -- even allowing for personal opinion on ability or age???

Eric @5, I don't think it matters how good you think a left back is at overlapping if we keep playing as we do with Grealish feeding Dewsbury-Hall and/or Garner either moving wide or taking the inside run and Gana another 10 yards further right/inside.

Then add to that Beto and Barry never taking the same position or run in the box.

Mykolenko takes up position on the touchline about 10 yards behind Grealish so as not to get in the way. He got beyond that far more often against Chelsea plus he is more than adequate defending.

Also, we have Aznou in reserve... but is Mykolenko's contract up for renewal next year?

Stu Gre
10 Posted 26/03/2026 at 06:23:11
Can the current transfer setup be trusted with £100M?

The starting 11 against Chelsea had only Dewsbury-Hall from the players they brought in.

Eric Myles
11 Posted 26/03/2026 at 06:42:35
Alan J, as you say, Grealish plays the ball inside and there is nobody making a run outside left, Mykolenko being primarily defensive and behind Grealish.

I just think we need some crosses in from the left byline to change things around a bit... if we keep Grealish.

Derek Thomas
13 Posted 26/03/2026 at 07:00:20
I'm still not sure that putting a good proportion of your eggs in a soon-to-be-31 Grealish-shaped basket is the way to go.

What about a 1-year loan?

Mark Murphy
14 Posted 26/03/2026 at 07:23:12
“With Ndiaye, McNeil, George, Alcaraz and possibly Dibling.”

We haven't got George -- he's on loan; and the way he's being treated, I would be very surprised to see him agree to sign for us next season.

McNeil was on the verge of a move -- that will happen in the summer.

Alcaraz isn't a wide player... and Dibling doesn't actually exist.

Ian Bennett
15 Posted 26/03/2026 at 07:39:11
I've said for a long period of time that Everton would not be paying more than £15-20M for Grealish. With 1 year left on his contract, Man City will want him off their books, as they've already bought his replacements in Semenyo and Doku, and have other players to play in that role, including Foden.

I can still see us bringing him on loan, and paying the £10m or so in wages. He's happy here, lives locally, so I'd be surprised if he doesn't re-sign.

He might be nearly 31, but the lad created 8 goal involvements in 20 games, and is still 2nd in the Premier League with key passes per 90.

His chances created on average: 2.1 chances per 90. That might sound rubbish, but it is seriously good. Ndiaye in comparison had 0.6 last season.

And the lad can play. He keeps possession, wins fouls, and can run the clock down, which could be vital for 3 points or, heaven forbid, a cup final.! He must be incredibly frustrating to play against as an opposition player.

I do prefer Ndiaye on the left, but Grealish could easily come in for him, and play hopefully a European campaign, cup games, Christmas period games, and give Ndiaye the rest without a drop off in quality.

Everton need a squad, and that includes players that can deliver in the here and now -- not in 4 years time.

Dave Abrahams
16 Posted 26/03/2026 at 09:34:06
Ndiaye is often mentioned on here... as is Grealish. We know Grealish is on £300,000 a week; I'd like to know how much Ndiaye is on and how much Garner was on before he got his recent rise — also, how much is Dibling on now?

My point being that Ndiaye and Garner were massively underpaid considering the amount of quality they bring to the team.

Nick West
17 Posted 26/03/2026 at 09:55:07
No way should we be paying any fee for Grealish, and let's face it, £300,000 a week is an insane amount to be paying for what he actually delivers in terms of goals, assists and (unfortunately given his very bad injury) appearances.

I assume we'll take him on loan again, but if we were paying 100% of his wages this season, that should be significantly reduced next season.

All that said, if Man City are wanting too much, then we'd be just as well to move on and give game time to players (like Dibling) who are actually on our books.

Eric Myles
18 Posted 26/03/2026 at 10:50:57
Dave #16, for what it's worth:

Capology

Salarysport

SalaryLeaks

Michael Kenrick
20 Posted 26/03/2026 at 11:09:46
Sorry, Eric, we seem to have another legacy edit issue with embedded links created in posts.

I've fixed the original links @18 and they all should work now. Thanks for posting them, as there's a few I did not know.

Martin Berry
21 Posted 26/03/2026 at 12:09:00
I would bet my last breath that Jack will be with us next season, he wants it, the Manager wants it and so do the fans.

His transfer fee and wages wont be an issue, because he wants to stay and City want to get shut so a deal will be done.

Forget the £50m transfer and £300,000 per week that is mentioned, both will come down, and wages will have incentives I am sure.

Jacks family have a box at Everton and they didnt have a deal for him not too be seen.

One thing I am certain of is that TFG will make funds available that David Moyes has probably not had in his Managerial career before. I expect him to use it wisely, hence not diving in during the winter window.

Raymond Fox
22 Posted 26/03/2026 at 12:49:28
The club will want him to stay, but he's a professional and his agent will be fishing around for the biggest contract he can get. Grealish will have the last word of course and the club seems a very good fit for him at this stage of his career.

I don't think it's a certainty he will be with us next season but I think he probably will be, I hope so.

The negative Dave mentions above is paying Grealish £300k a week, some players are bound to ask: "Why am I only getting x amount?"

Dave Abrahams
23 Posted 26/03/2026 at 13:28:38
Eric (18) Thanks very much for those figures — very interesting !

Grealish has got another year at City guareanteed £300,000 for that year; will Everton offer him a contract for 2 or 3 years?

If they do, I think it would be more than foolish to offer him more than £100,000 a week. Being honest, if it was up to me, I wouldn't be offering him another contract.

Anyway, if he got offered a 3-year deal off Everton at £100,000 a week why would he take it when he could earn the same money in 1 year with Man City?

Peter Gorman
24 Posted 26/03/2026 at 13:39:44
Does this figure include what we are supposedly obliged to pay for Röhl and George at the end of the season?
Brendan McLaughlin
25 Posted 26/03/2026 at 14:13:08
Peter #24

The fee for those two players will be spread over whatever lengths of contract are agreed for both players, so it shouldn't be an unduly significant cost for next season.

I saw something recently that Everton were going to pass on the option to sign George.

John Collins
26 Posted 26/03/2026 at 14:20:42
That decision is one taken very quickly, Brendan.

It can't be based on the 20 minutes George has played for us.

Brendan McLaughlin
27 Posted 26/03/2026 at 14:31:07
TBF, John #26,

It was a clickbait site as far as I recall.

Perhaps it's a negotiating ploy straight out of the TFG playbook.

John Collins
28 Posted 26/03/2026 at 15:06:28
I hope it is, Brendan.

We need to get as snide as other clubs -- sharpish.

Dave Abrahams
29 Posted 26/03/2026 at 21:30:09
I hope Everton make a good effort to sign Harry Wilson from Fulham on a free transfer.

That should leave quite a few pounds to offer him a good signing-on fee and a wage to convince him to come nearer home, to his family.

Martin Reppion
30 Posted 26/03/2026 at 22:07:20
It's still silly season for transfer news. Nothing can happen until June. Most clubs will, at least publicly, keep their powder dry.

In all the pre-season polls, most people believed that a top 10 finish would represent progress and another summer to build. Now we've had our appetite whetted, anything less than European football would feel like a let-down and the knives will be out for Moyes.

We will also risk losing players to clubs who qualify for Europe. Realistically, we face two scenarios:

Qualify for Europe, we need to add strength in depth. This will mean keeping everyone, or replacing ageing players with match ready, younger options (Stones for Keane?). Whilst adding to the squad in all the usually mentioned areas. Full backs, both sides, central striker, and a bit of quality here and there. If we are not in Europe, we will need to ensure that the squad improves by replacing the ageing, and not good enoughs, with marginal gains.

On the "glass half-full" side, despite the much-reported high average age of the side, this is bloated by having Keane, Tarkowski and Gana. Bring in Branthwaite and O'Brien at centre-back, and play Rohl or Iroegbunam in midfield and we are much younger and leaner without buying anything more than a right-back (and we already have Garner!).

Harrison Armstrong looks ready to be a fully fledged Premier League squad player. It's not that bad a situation to start from, compared to where we have been.

And finally, back on thread. Of course I want to see Jack in an Everton shirt again!

Andrew Bentley
31 Posted 26/03/2026 at 22:48:05
The plan for the close season has to be keep the same squad, for starters. The only reasonable player I would sell is McNeil as he has some value now. Then we need to keep everyone else as we need more depth to this squad if we are genuinely going to try and play European football each week.

Outside of the Top 4, look at the impact playing in Europe has had this season on a number of teams and their Premier League performances. We need to be able to rotate a lot more next season and almost have 2 starting elevens.

Minimise outgoings -- apart from McNeil, and maybe Barry max as he will be worth a bob or 2 -- and, with the noise around him, I'd rather keep Beto. Then start to add numbers for each position.

Ben White plus an actual out-and-out right-back gives us plenty of options at right-back and centre-back. Then we need a left-back to play instead of Mykolenko, and then suddenly our defensive depth looks really good.

A midfielder, the likes of Harry Wilson on a free and Grealish (on loan), and then a central midfielder who can be first choice alongside Jimmy Garner and Dewsbury-Hall. Then we start to look like a quality squad with the blend of youth and experienced players.

Then it's just saving the cash for a proven out-and-out striker to take us to the next level.


Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


How to get rid of these ads and support TW

© ToffeeWeb