
Since 1996, I’ve been a bit of a glutton for punishment. Back then, I started tracking "The Reserves" — as they were quaintly known — before expanding my watch to the FA Youth Cup and the various iterations of the Everton Academy seniors.
Naively, I thought the fanbase would be clamouring for news on the next generation of stars. I was wrong. Aside from a dedicated band of brothers who’ve stuck with me, there has always been a noticeable apathy toward the goings-on at Finch Farm. But if you look at the cold, hard numbers, that lack of interest isn't just understandable — it’s statistically justified.
The Long and Winding Road to Nowhere
For the young players inside Category 1 Academies, the statistics are a brutal wake-up call. We currently have 29 clubs operating at this elite level, each carrying roughly 20 players in their U21 sides. That’s around 600 "elite" youngsters currently dreaming of the big time.
The reality? It’s a funnel with a blocked exit:
-
The 1% Club: Of those who sign a scholarship at 16, fewer than 1% will ever make a living in the Premier League.
-
The Glass Ceiling: The jump from PL2 to the first team is the ultimate "glass ceiling" — shatterproof for almost everyone.
-
The Survival Rate: Only 3% to 5% manage to sustain a professional career across the top four divisions. Most are "released" into the wild, dropping down the pyramid to find minutes.
-
The Age 21 Cliff: By the time they reach 21, 97% of those scholarship kids are no longer playing top-flight football.
So, why invest emotionally in a kid who, statistically, has a better chance of winning the lottery than starting at Bramley-Moore Dock?
"Remember the Name..."
Every once in a generation, however, the funnel produces a freak of nature. We had one: Wayne Rooney.
But even Rooney’s supreme talent felt the weight of the "Everton way." It was only when he escaped the rigid tutelage of David Moyes to join Sir Alex Ferguson that he truly exploded, scoring a Champions League hat-trick on his debut and embarking on a journey to become United’s record goalscorer.
His exit remains a shadow on the legacy of Bill Kenwright. The man who once boasted he wouldn’t sell Rooney for £50M eventually accepted a bargain-bin fee of £27M. That’s ancient history now, but it set a precedent: even when we find a "generational" talent, we either sell them or stifle them.
The Curious Case of Tyler Dibling
Fast forward to today, and we see the same pattern repeating with Tyler Dibling.
Everton paid an eye-watering £40M — nearly a club record — to pry him away from Southampton. His former manager, Russell Martin, called him the "most talented player I’ve ever worked with." He was supposed to be the jewel in the crown of the new era under David Moyes at the Hill Dickinson Stadium.
Instead, the 20-year-old’s development has hit a brick wall. Dibling has spent the season as a spectator, starting only four Premier League games and logging a measly 513 minutes. First, it was the arrival of Jack Grealish on loan; then it was the "need" to play Ndiaye. There is always an excuse for why the "flair" player must sit.
"He’ll have to do better in his work and training," Moyes says, echoing the same "defensive-first" rhetoric we heard twenty years ago. "We brought in Tyrique George for competition... we want Tyler to step up."
Even club legend Leon Osman has waded in to defend this stagnation, citing the "weight of the price tag" and the need for Dibling to learn the defensive side of the game. Osman argues that in a Moyes side, what you do off the ball is more important than what you do on it.
Education or Stagnation?
Last week, Moyes doubled down on his "frugal" management of youth, claiming that "sitting back for the best part of the season" will do the likes of Dibling and Merlin Rohl no harm:
“Merlin, we like, Tyler, we like. Tyler, we’re giving more time to because of his age.
“Merlin could have easily been involved in some more games and played a little bit more time.
“It’ll do him no harm to have sat back for the best part of the season and looked at it. No, we like them, they’re both good boys.”
I couldn't disagree more. At 20 years old, a player needs grass under his boots, not a view from the dugout. We are witnessing enforced stagnation at a critical juncture. If Dibling fails to become the superstar his talent suggests, the club will point to those 99% failure statistics and say the odds were always against him.
But sometimes, it’s not the player who isn't ready for the stage — it’s the manager who’s too afraid to give them the freedom to perform and allow their on-field skills to flourish in front of a passionate Hill Dickinson Stadium crowd. I am convinced that is what would bring the best out of these young players.
Reader Comments (40)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 04/05/2026 at 10:29:26
Must train better and work harder.
Jeez hes been with us a year, and we still cant get him training properly.
Theres something wrong here…
3 Posted 04/05/2026 at 12:35:13
What every single player does off the ball, has got to be uppermost in the thoughts of every single manager, who is worth his salt, imo, but if you take a natural footballer, and start trying to work on the things that maybe dont come so natural, then my own opinion is that you arent going to get a good success rate.
Its why I disagreed that Lookman failed, because my own view is that at least a very conservative 75% of managers and coaches within the professional game, find it difficult trying to integrate very talented footballers, into their team, because most of these very talented kids are only really interested in the attacking side of the game, but this is not enough (except for the chosen few) for most coaches, in the professional game.
4 Posted 04/05/2026 at 14:13:08
5 Posted 04/05/2026 at 16:47:30
6 Posted 04/05/2026 at 17:16:00
A bit of a Malapropism there?
7 Posted 04/05/2026 at 17:16:39
The video of his exploits at Southampton is there for all to see. Are we really saying this guy is a dud at this point?
Loan him out, let him get playing time and experience because he certainly won't get it at Everton right now.
8 Posted 04/05/2026 at 17:56:24
Moyes has now told us publicly, twice, that Dibling simply hasn't shown the required performance levels in training to deserve time on the pitch. Osman's comments have supported that conclusion.
And, tellingly, not one senior player has ever publicly complimented Dibling's work rate or habits on the training pitch. Beto, Barry, George, even O'Brien last season when he was ignored by Dyche... all were mentioned by other players in interviews. Of Dibling, not one word from anybody. Silence. Does Michael K not wonder why that is?
O'Brien, BTW, is worthy of mention again and again whenever somebody insists that Moyes won't take a chance on a young player. We have a budding star on the pitch (albeit out of position) because Moyes was willing to instantly commit to a long-ignored youngster. Jake had played exactly 41 minutes in five months under Dyche. He has barely missed a minute since.
Tony #3, nobody cheered louder for Lookman than I did. I was constantly calling for him off the bench. And when he got out there, he was... ineffectual. All those gifts, all that talent, and he accomplished nothing for Everton. That's failure.
He got chances from several more managers at several more clubs, and there was still little return -- until the player himself grew up. I guess we will forever disagree on Lookman, except that we can both appreciate what he is accomplishing now.
Let's hope Dibling matures more quickly.
9 Posted 04/05/2026 at 18:00:10
That said, we were in a bad spot in the summer, a number of key departures, an unbalanced squad to begin with, a new recruitment team, and limited time to make things right.
However, Angus ‘thingimie Bob' is the CEO isn't he? Therefore senior to David Moyes? To be honest, I don't see either of them going. Angus CEO is surely TFG's man and Moyes has done enough this season to get another.
But I would be asking questions about the number of young players who haven't had a chance this season if I was the owner. A big outlay and they've had a handful of starts between all of them.
If Moyes doesn't have full control over incomings and outgoings, he doesn't like it. See Kevin Thelwell; he also fell out with the DoF at West Ham over it.
I really hope Moyes hasn't frozen out these younger players because he didn't sign them -- that's cutting off your nose to spite your face.
10 Posted 04/05/2026 at 18:05:56
Only one way to find out.
11 Posted 04/05/2026 at 18:34:59
There's a key difference between Dibling and O'Brien that your analysis ignores.
One's a defender... and one isn't. Moyes was a defender. He has shown he can only look at the game, can only look at players, especailly young flair players, with the sad old eyes of a defender, who only knows defending, and little else.
12 Posted 04/05/2026 at 18:35:21
But he didn't freeze him out because of it.
13 Posted 04/05/2026 at 18:35:31
Spot on.
Its all very well saying a Manager is stifling and holding back talent, if that talent is there it should be shown in training. The best 11 get the starting spots on what they have shown.
Both Rohl and Dibling are young players, they will get there chance, more likely the former presently from the Managers comments.
The Manager will nurture these players and if there good enough they will play, simple as that.
The comments from Leon Osman should be taken on board, a bit of tough love from Moyes didnt do him any harm.
14 Posted 04/05/2026 at 18:49:14
But do you not wonder at all why Dibling has elicited not one compliment from anyone else in the club? I mean, when Barry hit the skids Keane even went out of his way to say that Barry had earned the senior squad's respect for his work in training. But there hasn't been so much as a positive whisper about Dibling.
There has to be a reason for that, doesn't there?
15 Posted 04/05/2026 at 18:52:52
The kid who got the winner for Man United against the shite yesterday was frozen out by a stubborn manager too. That manager was fucked off and the kid looks like one of the better players in the league.
You wont see Dibling's full potential until Mr Brightside fucks off and makes way for a manager with a pair of bollocks
16 Posted 04/05/2026 at 18:57:14
It's not like you to demonstrate naivety when it comes to what players (and ex-player pundits like Osman) would say when it comes to Dibling.
Do you really think anyone in the game would come out and have the balls to say Moyes is ruining a fabulous young talent by denying him playing time?
Not gonna happen.
17 Posted 04/05/2026 at 19:00:33
Defending, that's a different story. Moyes has told us twice now that Dibling doesn't do enough in training... Enough what? Is it not enough effort, or not enough defensive effort? I suspect the latter.
Moyes isn't known for playing too many flair players unless they show the requisite defensive nous too.
A leopard doesn't change his spots, does he?
18 Posted 04/05/2026 at 19:04:48
The lad was obviously hugely gifted but, like Mike G has pointed out, was one such player that just didn't do enough on the pitch. He left for less than he cost us, a snip at £1.5M.
Who is responsible? Easy to say that a struggling team is no place for a developing talent but Dibling showed his worth at relegated Southampton.
Not saying they are the same person but, given Oster's lack of achievement given his talent, I note the following incidents from his professional career:
Sunderland - accidentally shot reserve team player Mark Maley with an air-gun.
Leeds United - suspended by the club for misbehaving at the club's Christmas party.
Sunderland - contract was terminated after he was arrested for assault outside a Durham nightclub.
Not a massive leap to conclude that he might not have been mature enough for Everton at the start of his career. He was 18 years old after all. Is this the manager's fault?
Merlin I feel more sorry for because, as we keep bringing up, he was dropped after his best game, a great performance. But he is never likely to get ahead of our current midfield starters when they're all available.
19 Posted 04/05/2026 at 19:09:34
I'm caught between the 2 sides. Moyes has this undoubtedly gifted player, on a long contract, with a big fee who hasn't produced with the time he's been afforded.
But the lad won't get any better on the bench, not even making sub appearances, now we've signed George and he's even further down the order.
That must have been a big dent to the lads confidence, but the good players rise to challenges, they thrive on the competition, they see it as a fuel to get better, work harder and show the manager he's wrong.
He's only 1 year older than Armstrong who was continuing his development on loan, I don't think Dibling ever went on loan, so I do think he may just need a longer bedding in period, off the pitch as much as on it.
I think a short-term loan in January once we signed George would've been a good plan.
Just go and play without the price tag, get your mojo back, and come back with a spring in his step.
He's young and time is on his side, but he has to show he has the fire to compete for a blue jersey.
20 Posted 04/05/2026 at 19:20:05
I want to say Dibling did have a spell on loan -- at Chelsea... but it was actually a transfer that went tits up!
This was while he was at Southampton. After a video of him scoring a hat-trick of near-identical goals against Newcastle U21s went viral, Dibling became one of the most sought-after teenagers in England. Chelsea won the race for his signature in July 2022, paying a compensation fee of around £1.7M.
Despite joining the club he supported as a boy, Dibling struggled significantly with the move. Living away from his family in Devon/Hampshire for the first time proved difficult. He made only two appearances for Chelseas Under-18 side.
During a youth match against his former club Southampton, Dibling reportedly broke down and admitted to his former coaches that he had made a mistake and was unhappy.
In a rare move for a young prospect, Chelsea allowed him to leave just weeks after arriving. He officially rejoined Southampton on 1 September 2022, describing the club as his "second home". Because he returned so quickly, many fans mistakenly remember it as a short-term loan rather than a permanent move that was immediately reversed.
Not many people know that!
21 Posted 04/05/2026 at 19:25:31
How do you get to 6000. ??
22 Posted 04/05/2026 at 19:27:19
You should be happy today, as I am, to see Rohl in the 11.
23 Posted 04/05/2026 at 19:29:10
Good to know.
Not something many know I bet. Because doesn't come up in searching his past.
Points to the lad himself being more of the issue though don't you think ?
Maybe he's having them same thoughts now?
Which I always thought myself, that maybe he can't settle, misses home, his club etc.
Shouldn't it have been a red flag when we were looking at him though?
24 Posted 04/05/2026 at 22:44:15
I have not heard the same excitement from people here when Dibling has played. 4 starts and 2 hooked at halftime.
Not sure the manager is at fault. Doesn't seem to be a grabbing the chance with both hands. Perhaps he should have played more and we could have been 10v11 and had a few more defeats and only now be struggling to reach 40 points.
25 Posted 04/05/2026 at 23:11:09
Get what we can while we can and enjoy playing against him in a few years when he is at Preston.
26 Posted 04/05/2026 at 00:50:30
27 Posted 04/05/2026 at 00:58:16
67 appearances in 2 seasons out of a possible 76.
28 Posted 05/05/2026 at 05:43:54
For me the lad we were linked with but actually went to Southampton, Tom Fellows, looks to have been a better more cheaper option, fast and direct winger when I've seen him play.
We probably paid £20 million too much for Tyler Dibling and I remember thinking and saying as much last summer when our bids kept getting knocked back.
Time will tell but I've not seen that dedication or real application yet to convince me much will change even next term and for a wide player, what concerns me most is he's not really got any pace.
29 Posted 05/05/2026 at 09:10:11
Nearer 600, not 6000! My arithmetic is mental!
30 Posted 05/05/2026 at 11:46:33
Southampton have thrived without him; we should bite the bullet and get shut. Nothing to do with Moyes, no manager would play a player who cannot contribute, unless they had no one else to put in.
The truth is, if Dibling had come through the ranks at Everton and was being selected, the anti-Moyes crowd would be on his back for playing him.
Sadly some people believe, because he cost money, he must be the best thing since sliced bread, but whoever deided this lad was worth the money, should stand up and explain why.
31 Posted 05/05/2026 at 11:50:11
32 Posted 05/05/2026 at 12:16:24
My underlying point is that Moyes was in charge of transfers (his words) when Dibling was signed. But clearly he couldn't have been in charge of the Dibling signing as the lad never gets selected!
Not that I'm criticising Moyes for that if he thinks he's not good enough, but logic strongly suggests Moyes therefore didn't sign him. Dibling must have been ‘a club signing'.
I hope the manager and recruitment team are more aligned in the summer as it would seem Moyes didn't particularly want this player. Facts bear this one out!
33 Posted 05/05/2026 at 12:36:28
Southampton finished 5th in the Championship, so may or may not gain promotion via the playoffs, and sacked the manager they brought in during the summer before Christmas.
Not sure 'thriving' is the word.
34 Posted 05/05/2026 at 12:40:23
Moyes signed off on Dibling and, in the weeks before he joined, was practically begging for players. The only fact we have is Moyes saying he has final say on transfers. Moyes has brought in loads of players down the years and not played them, for various reasons.
I just don't buy that Moyes didn't agree to sign these players. In fact, he said himself he does. The rest is conjecture.
Although Dibling has hardly pushed his chances in the time he has had on the field, either with his performances or his body language.
35 Posted 05/05/2026 at 13:06:31
Yes Moyes said he has final say on transfers but that's not the only fact we have; Dibling never gets a game, that's another fact.
It's obvious he doesn't rate him. I don't know how much clearer it could be.
36 Posted 05/05/2026 at 13:18:39
Worth reading the Chelsea Chronicle and why he left Chelsea.
Stats for the 2024/25 PL.
He played 33 games.
Scored 2 goals.
Assists Zero.
You could argue he was playing in a poor team, but I am sure we have players on our books with a better record than that.
37 Posted 05/05/2026 at 13:38:30
He is still young, has ability and needs development, which he wont get sat on the bench for another season.
We should loan him to a club in Europe next season, as we did with Branthwaite. The Dutch Eredivise clubs know how to nurture technical young players.
38 Posted 05/05/2026 at 14:10:53
He didnt rate Per Koldrup, for example, and only played him once, but it was still Moyes who signed him for £5M?
39 Posted 05/05/2026 at 15:41:38
All signings are gambles, Moyes may have been the one pushing for him, and just not liked what he's bought, for loads of reasons, but no one can say the lads been hard done by for performance related issues, he's not got going at all.
The suggestions of secret meetings of the club to sign a 40m player without the managers knowledge, in some cloak a nd danger fashion, seems like some people are looking for reasons to think there's a split in the club, when the only real reason he's not played much is because when he has he's been shite !
40 Posted 05/05/2026 at 18:51:49
He must be truly terrible considering the current alternative to Mykolenko would most likely be Garner, leaving an even bigger hole in midfield.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW


1 Posted 04/05/2026 at 09:07:10
Time will tell.
Link