VIEW FROM THE BLUE
Thanks, But No Thanks
The more real the prospect of Kirkby becomes, the more sick I feel about it. The more detail that emerges about "Destination Kirkby", the more artist's impressions and slick promotional videos that are released, and the more I hear the likes of Alan Stubbs try and sell this version of the future to me, the less it all feels like the Everton Football Club I know and the more I want to turn the other way and pretend this nightmare isn't happening.
This plastic vision of symmetrical, prefab-looking stands and bright blue facades emblazoned with so many Everton crests that you'd think subtelty had gone out of style, of "New Everton", of a "new chapter" and of "new" Everton fans suddenly springing up out of a four-million strong catchment area (a predominantly rugby-following catchment area shared by Bolton, Wigan, Liverpool and Blackburn, Mr Wyness)... well, that's not my Everton.
My Everton is the Everton portrayed at the beginning of this promotional video: the packed familiarity of Goodison Road, the walk down narrow streets steeped in more history than the majority of football clubs can even dream, the scenes of jubilation from within Goodison Park, one of the last remaining great old stadia in England.
The promo is a tool no doubt designed to sell you on "New Everton" ? with the vote won among the Everton fans the daylight photos of Tesco right next door to the stadium are clearly designed to win over the Kirkby residents (you'll remember the original overheard plans had the two separated by a car park and a dividing wall/hedge) ? but as the scenes morph from the Goodison we know and love to Mr Stubbs superimposed against computer-generated stands in a stadium in which he'll never actually play, it merely underscores for this Evertonian just how much that manufactured vision of our future belongs to someone else and offers painful reminders of what we'd be leaving behind if this ever comes to fruition.
We all went through the trauma of the stadium debate this summer and the arguments for and against were beaten to death. In the near vacuum of discussion on the topic and opportunity for reflection since, my mind has not changed one bit. There is nothing about the increasing inevitability of the move to Kirkby and the opportunity to resign oneself to it that has made it any more attractive or even more palatable.

Is this your Everton?
What's our name? Coventry City? A picture they wouldn't have dared to use during the ballot.
I feel as strongly and intransigently as I did when news first came of the ballot and the conduct of the club hierarchy during the voting period only served to deepen my revulsion for the whole idea. Keith Wyness's desperate attempts to undermine any alternative to his "meal ticket" drove home to me more than anything that this wasn't the best move for Everton FC ? Bill Kenwright's silence on the issue indicated that he knows it ? it's just the best that this CEO and this Board can deliver.
For me, it was never solely about arbitrary municipal boundaries or Kirkby itself. Even if I could contemplate tearing the club away from its roots in Everton and Walton wards and moving it 6 miles down the road, I strongly believe that at a time when Liverpool is undergoing unprecedented regeneration on a scale probably unmatched anywhere else in Europe moving further away and abandoning the city to Liverpool would be a grave error of judgement.
And if it could be clearly demonstrated to me that the club has no choice but to move outside the city, I would probably accept that reality if it didn't mean plonking a cheap-looking structure in the middle of a retail development on the back end of Tesco's car park and, at a stroke, changing the entire character of the match-going experience to one of park-and-rides, motorway traffic jams, packed trains and ambles past trollies and weekend shoppers as you approach what is supposed to be your footballing Mecca.
I've heard all the accusations of an unmotivated Liverpool City Council, that we have no choice but to move from Goodison Park, and that we can't afford to build a new ground without Tesco's help and while they all may have some validity, I still can't help feeling that this whole Kirkby venture is wrong on so many levels. The need to keep selling it to us is proof enough.
The aforementioned clip starts with Stubbs saying, "we all know Everton means to us." The thing is, I don't think we do. Because I don't want synthetic "New Everton" and some outsider's version of my club's future. I fell in love with the old Everton, the vintage version that built its reputation and has carved out a rich history in North Liverpool, and that continues to represent the City of Liverpool better in Europe than the club that actually bears its name. The one renowned for innovation and a list if "firsts" ? many of them related to the club's stadium ? so impressive they made a plaque for it.
Funny how just when this club looks like getting back to something more akin to its traditions on the pitch we should be thinking about transitioning to something that is, to these eyes, so utterly out of character with our history.
Oh, it'll be a "new chapter" alright, Alan, but who says it'll be a better one?
Reader Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
The problem is, as you say we seem to be moving in the right direction on the pitch, its off the pitch we have trouble. Every Tom, Dick and Harry club have big money investors sniffing round and most of them are very average teams (there are quite a few in the EPL at the mo) but we never seem to get linked with any of the money men.
I have seen it written that we would be a bad choice for investment as a lot of money would need to be spent (new stadium etc) before anyone could expect to start making a half decent return on their investment and with us doing quite well at the moment Blue Bill and the rest aren’t going to let their shares go cheaply.
I feel that the next 3 or 4 years will be make or break time for most of the Premiership, the gap between the top 3 and the rest of us is growing every year and if great clubs like ours can’t find a way to keep money flowing in (without becoming a selling club) then we just won’t have the financial clout to keep in touch with the big boys.
I’m not a big fan of moving to Kirkby, I’m just saying maybe its a necessary evil.
thanks for a heart felt piece of mature writing that doesnt sink to name calling.
I think a move away from goodison will destroy the club.
I will still support the club but it will be the end of the " FRIENDLY DERBY " as we might as well be any other club in twenty or thirty years time we will be lost in the wilderness with no identity.
thanks but no thanks
The way forward is not always what is new but what is correct and proper. Tell that to slough or croyden who in the 60’s ended up with a town full of new futuristic building that ended up a laughing stock and an eyesore to the next generation. Lets not make the same mistake.
The future is about the right choices, not about having no choice at all, which is what we have been left with by the short sighted board. Peope voted for kirkby or decided not to vote because there was no other choice.
You don’t want to go to Kirkby. That’s fine. Therefore,even if Tesco were helping us to build a palace of marble upon which the sun forever shone and that glinted majestically all blue and bronze on frosty winter mornings...... you would still find a reason not to like it. If you would really like to despair at a view, try standing by the Dixie Statue and looking down Goodison Road at the dilapidation surrounding Goodison nowadays. Now there really is a sight for sore eyes!
For the sake of balance however, I would like to mention the conduct of KEIOC during the campaign. You speak of the conduct of the club hierarchy during the voting period, which you suggest "only served to deepen my revulsion for the whole idea" - an emotion I and many others felt upon learning of the hooligan footage shown by KEIOC and KRAG, in an attempt to turn local residents against the idea of a move.
Would you not agree that this conduct shames the club and its support far more than the actions of the board or the employees of the club?
I have to say that the picture above is absolutely frightening. Not only is the stadium to be outside the city, it?s not even going to look like a proper stand alone stadium. Our ground will be a shopping centre/ retail park first, a football ground second.
Like alot of people, I?ve had mixed feelings about the move. Having read Lyndon?s article, and seen the picture, which is Board approved spin by the way, I am moving more towards the no camp.
I know its hard, but opening up old wounds isnt a good idea.
Where do the No-camp live now and what is the point of them? Haven?t you heard? The Yes-camp won the vote!
Join the Scouts, you?ll have a better sense of purpose.
The reason not to like it would be that it is outside f Liverpool but, as I said in the article above, I could accept it ? and really like it if it was a truly magnificent stadium in the right surroundings ? if it wasn?t going to be right next door to a super market. Remember, I was a vociferous supporter of PJ's Hamperdome and that was going to be outside the city as well.
It?s not just one problem that is my and others? issue with the Kirkby Project, it?s a number of them, chief among them the look, feel and environs of the place we will be asked to call "home". IMO, it?s a step down from Goodison and I?d take those delapidated buildings on Goodison Road over Tesco car park every day of the week!
Kieran: I don?t know the city of liverpool at all, which means I don?t know how much better the Bestways site is. ( I would be grateful to know.) What worries me is that as Bestways is obviously a large retail chain as well, how much better overall will their proposed stadium/shopping centre be?
Kierran, I suspect that even though Everton officials have met with Bestway at least once and LCC at least twice since the ballot result was announced the Bestway proposal will be moot until or unless the Kirkby plan collapses.
But, to answer your question, their plan didn't involve a supermarket or retail development on the site or right next to the proposed stadium. They were getting land to the east in exchange for the Loop site on which to develop commercial and leisure properties as their "enabling project." Under their plan, the stadium would be on its own, if only because of the nature and dimensions of the Loop itself.
This whole thing actually makes me feel sick. I cannot believe what Wyness is going to do to our club - we will be nothing, we will disappear, without our history we have no future. The images released today are horrifying. Lyndon, you are a skilled writer, use it and send it to anyone and everyone you know at the club, around the club, anything, we must get our voices heard. Send it to the KEIOC guys to put on the website, send it to the echo, send it to the council, WE MUST BE HEARD, KIRKBY CANNOT HAPPEN IT WILL DESTROY OUR BELOVED CLUB.
As I say, you will always find a reason not to like it.
I am however, not the future of the Club.
Just feel that if a move if necessary, and it is, then do something cool , not this sterile bollocks.
They monitor ToffeeWeb at EFC anyway. They know how many of us feel but Kirkby is "deliverable" and achievable for Mr Wyness so it?s a no-brainer for him. We?re going unless it falls on its arse of Evertonians suddenly have a vocal change of heart. I understand that but it doesn?t mean I have to like it or accept it.
Dave Roberts: For you, as I recall, the argument was always the leaving of Liverpool and the resulting extinction of our fanbase and handing the city over to our neighbours. WAS IT NOT?
It was always one of the biggest arguments, Dave, but if you read back through my articles and responses on the subject, it was always about all the negatives taken as a whole: outside Liverpool; abandoning the city; sub-standard stadium (although I initially liked the design, it just looks worse and worse the more I see of it); the fact that the figures kept changing and never added up; the way it was being railroaded through; the fact that there was NO PLAN B and when two were presented they were shot to pieces by club-employed "experts"; the crap about 4m catchment area; only 1,000 parking spaces; mixed messaging about rail stations; the one-sided brochure the fact that we were tagging along on Tesco's coat-tails... Dave it was a pretty long list, should I go on?
What Lyndon omitted to say in his response to you was that Bestway are NOT a large retail chain. They are quite a small company in fact and there has always been doubt as to how they could assist Everton as Tesco are doing.
As for the Loop site itself, it was previously rejected by Liverpool FC as being too small for a stadium for 60,000 and a 55,000 seater would suffer likewise. There are considerable infrastructure problems with the site involving transport and safety issues and ANY stadium design of the size envisaged to be incorporated there would need to overhang the surrounding roads on stilts. Even KEIOC admit this now. While this would not be impossible, it would be incredibly expensive especially as access bridges for pedestrians traveling to the ground (and we would all be pedestrians as there is no room for parking) would also need to be constructed. The Loop is a non-starter...a distraction.
Yes please do carry on. Especially the bit about you liking the stadium once! Keep digging!
When I drove past Pride Park a few years ago, I shook my head and was thankful that we had our "Old Lady" and were planning to move to another world-class arena in the form of the Kings Dock.
Now? It?s a Tesco car park. The younger fans decades from now might not really know what they?re missing but those fans in their 20s, 30s and 40s now will. If you?re OK with the new designs and the location, then who I am to tell you you?re wrong? This article is a forum to express my personal opinion and, to be honest, as a fan of a "Grand Old Team" it breaks my heart that it?s come to this...
It is not a ground we support, but the team & club!
Do we want to go £500 million in debt just to fund a new stadium that looks like a tin of corned beef!
Where?er the Toffeemen have played,
We?ve followed in their trail ?
Exulted when they?ve triumphed,
And wept tears when they?ve failed.
We?ve shadowed them the length and breadth
Of this green, pleasant Land.
But we won?t go to Kirkby,
We say ?No? to a man.
We want to stay at Goodison,
Our Mersey hearth and home.
For how could we leave Goodison ?
This great Club?s heart and soul?
Tradition, Legend, History,
Should count a little more
Than schemes cooked up by Tesco,
Or some such Chain of Stores.
Chairmen, Players and Managers,
They come and then they go.
While we the loyal fans remain,
Who love the Blueshirts so.
It?s we the fans who should decide
Where Everton will play.
We fans should have the casting vote,
And this is what we say:
We?ve been to Prague and Bucharest,
We?ve been to Rotterdam.
But we won?t go to Kirkby?
So shelve this harebrained plan!
21/3/07
There is no soul, passion or quality in this project. What’s the saying? ’Pay peanuts you get monkeys.’ Well I just wish we were paying peanuts, because the true cost of this is going to be far more than the £50m EFC indicate, and we still end up with something that Wigan, Reading et al wouldn’t be proud of!
But I guess, as a firm critic of the Kirkby plans, I suppose I would always feel this way. Out of interest, I showed the renderings to a colleague who was firmly in the yes camp. His sole recation was:
’Oh!’ then silence.
Enough said.
I’ve always believed that there are far more twists and turn in this road and it is far from certain that it will end in Kirkby. Please EFC deliver further plans, because with each one, dissention grows stronger.
Maybe, at long last, a few pennies are starting to drop.
The whole complex makes the ground look like a multiplex cinema complex with football being the latest blockbuster.
The major problem with that is simple. Any new stadium - even one built on the much-talked about ’Loop’ - would NOT be ’the Everton you love’. We are going to lose all that in any move, to whatever destination. It’s called progress.
You said ’Bill Kenwright’s silence on the issue indicated that he knows it’ - incorrect. There was a series of video blogs from Kenwright on the official site during the summer, pushing the idea of the new stadium, with him giving his total support to the plans. This was before the voting results were known, so he wasn’t hedging his bets either. He has publicly given his support. Just because he’s not giving soundbites every five minutes (and if he was, he’d be criticised by some, wouldn’t he, so he can’t win!) doesn’t mean he isn’t backing it.
You describe the stadium move as ’utterly out of character with our history’ - I’m not surprised - we haven’t moved in more than 115 years! A new facility won’t change our history. Last Thursday was one of my best days in going the match in nearly 25 years of match going. And that was in Nuremberg, Germany, in a brand new, thoroughly modern 47,000 capacity stadium. Inside, there wasn’t an obstructed view in sight, and outside, there wasn’t a cramped, horsemuck filled street directly outside the ground, nor was there lots of intimate pre-1960s style pubs immediately outside the ground either. But ask anyone who went if the matchgoing experience was all the poorer for it, and they will say it no, it wasn’t, far from it.
Why are you shocked? We were told all this months ago.
I take all your other points (although I disagree with them) but I’m genuinely baffled as to why a guy like you, who seemed to have his finger on the pro-pulse all the way through the "yes" v "no" debate during the summer is now self-confessedly shocked to see a shopping centre right next to the ground.
The amount of "yes" voting Blues I’ve encountered today who have said they were similarly shocked / saddened/gutted etc on seeing these ghastly images has astounded me.
"Which team will they choose to sponsor and which stadium will they want to have their name associated with?"
Now, be honest when Kirkby is done and the New Anfield is built ask the same question. A new stadium in a traditional environment, close to the City Center, or a cheap (at least half the price of NA) out of town stadium where your clients will battle to park with the Tesco shoppers?
That is why Kirkby is a no go.
How anyone can truely believe that Kirkby (and that awful flat packed excuse for a stadium) is the way forward for our great club is beyond me.
As a fan who has put in 45 years I’m sad to say that I wouldn’t put a foot inside any new ground in Kirkby. That would be betraying my beloved football club and all it stands for.
After enjoying the football lately they are making my stomach churn again. Please Please come too your senses.
Maybe they think whilst we are enjoying a good run it is time to let out the bad news..
To answer your question where the corporate money will go when LFC have built their new stadium - well it will be to a football club close to those values that they hold dear - alignment with local communities that they are all striving to attract to their businesses, close to Liverpool City Centre that is going through such an unprecidented sustained period of growth and rennaisance - it most certainly won’t be to Kirkby. We could build as many corporate boxes as the Kirkby site would take and we still wouldn’t sell many.
You see, the question isn’t new stadium with new facilities or tired Goodison, it is ... location, location, location.
I am all for the Bestway site, there only argument against it is the traffic, have you see the state of the access they have included in the Kirkby plans? It is going to be impossible to get through, especially as many people are off work on saturday and sumday and will be wanting to do their shopping in there local Tesco. It doesn?t bare thinking about.
I am disgusted that Kenwright hasn?t thought "hang on, should we really do a deal with a corporation that just wants to take advantage of our strong foothold in the Asian market?" because that is the only reason Tesco has an interest in Everton FC.
As for Wyness, I just do not trust him one bit, he?s slimy and cunning, he only wants to line his own pockets.
Please think about this project in some depth an after a good long think, watch Everton?s Official History DVD, because it had a lump in my throat and watwer in my eyes.
KEEP EVERTON IN OUR CITY- If Mr Kenwright doesn?t do the right thing, he will never forgive himself, I will never forgive him either!
We could build a new stadium on any site in Liverpool in fact, and in direct competition with LFC’s new stadium, any sponsor, having to choose between the two facilities, would likely choose LFC every time.
Whether or not we move to Kirkby wouldn’t change that, so it’s an irrelevant point, and as such, shouldn’t be used as a strike against Kirkby.
That other lot across the park apply once and the Council are bending over backwards to accomodate their every whim, practically asking which way they would like it facing, and still we are told there is no favouritism within the ranks of the Council. Don't make me laugh, the whole shower are red through and through, if not red WHY the change of tune for that lot? Isnt Stanley Park a recreational area now.
OK if its going to be used for football purposes, why not go the whole hog and let us (Everton) also build in the park? It certainly is big enough, and how many major cities around the world could boast not one but two top stadiums of two major clubs built in landscaped parkland?
Also the cost of car parks would be shared by both clubs as its very rare both are home on the same afternoon. Just a thought, but I am absolutely livid that they have the very spot of ground that the original club in this city should be housed, its as if we are being booted out of the very area that saw the birth of football in this city by what is to my mind ( THE VERY SPAWN OF OUR CASTOFFS.) WE belong, they dont.
Sorry if ive gone on a bit.
You’re just plain wrong. If you were right then EFC would currently have NO corporate hangers on. The fact that we do have them when we provide woefully inadequate facilities shows that we can compete with LFC - not necessarily on the same scale - but competition all the same.
But if we are taken outside of the City geography, away from the area that the corporate money men hold dear, that competitive edge will have been mortally wounded. Quickly followed by our great club.
Keep backtracking all you want - eventually you may reach where the majority of the people who posted on this site are.
Bottom line: You said:
’as much as it is a shock to see a shopping center around the stadium’
Don’t insult us and make an ass of yourself by trying to insist you didn’t say it!
Oh yeah... and what makes a stadium is the fans inside of it on a matchday and the atmosphere they create, not the look of the stadium.... and finally, as one of te contributorssaid.. Nurembergs stadium in the middle of nowhere, did it devalue your matchday experience?!
Lyndon, everybody loves Goodison end of argument, but the majority voted YES.
Any future development regarding any potential ground move to any location would have involved some sort of retail partnership, even the Kings Dock.
That?s what is paying for the thing.
Also the club are in the ?selling game? re the potential move, so the slick video is no suprise.
At least they didn?t produce the ?horror show? that was the KEIOC effort portraying civil unrest on a major scale if the new stadium went ahead.
All I believe you have achieved by your article is to re-open old wounds on a wave of sentimentatlity.
Take a breath and learn how to do a little thing called analytical thinking. If you would finish the rest of what I wrote I went on to explain the need to not be so shocked at such a thing, that it is all part of change and progression. I’m not exactly sure what I’m back tracking from. I am saying that I believe we need to move to a new stadium and that I am in favor of the move to Kirkby. Is that back tracking to you. And I hope to God I never reach where the majority of people posting on this site are. This site does not represent a majority of Evertonians, it represents a small portion, as can be proven by the fact that the majority of those voting voted yes, while the majority on this specific site said no. Do the match and you will see where the majority is. As I said, I would love for us to be able to redevelop Goodison but that is not going to happen so there is no point in holding on to that dream. You can’t just magically get the LCC to give permission to tear down the buildings that would need to go down in order to expand Goodison. Given this fact and that the Loop site is not a viable or financial option, I am in favor of this proposal to move to Kirkby as part of the major regeneration of the Kirkby city center. Things change, it happens. If LCC can provide a better option that is financially achievable and closer to Liverpool city center then I would be in favor of that, but if that was going to happen it would have done so already.
Everthing an anti Move piece should be
Just as I was thinking what is happening on the stadium front, any plans yet from Bestway? up pops these promo?s... talk about a saturn return.
New Everton is yahoo?d, well I?m old Everton.
I?m also Old Labour...New Labour was the big thing and look what happened to that!
OOh!, a bit of politics, goodnight I?m Derek Thomas.
Your article sums up my feelings exactly.
I was born in Everton, brought up in Everton and have Everton on my birth certificate not Liverpool (Brougham Terrace was the regisrty office for Everton births).
This does not make me a better fan but it does mean that I will be nearly 60 when we move.
Having supported Everton since I first went at 5 years of age and having had a season ticket since 1967 it guts me to say that I won’t be going to Kirkby cos I won’t feel any affiliatiion with the club that plays there.
I dont like it. Tescodome, souless, uninspired, bland, ikea’d....all correct.
Madejski, Pride Park, JJB, Reebok Stadium, Riverside. If you’ve been to any of them stadiums tell me thats what you want for Everton??
It looks shit
I’m not arsed about the politics, I’m gonna fight this tooth and nail. The location, the stadium...its all wrong. No-on, and I mean NO-ONE has come up with a list of proven guranteed positives that outweigh the negatives.
It looks shit.
It was said further up but United, Liverpool, Tottenahm, Arsenal, Newcastle all have excellent stadiums & none of them had to move very far or sell out so bad. We are as big as them so why are we?
It looks shite.
If the people in charge of this club cannot organise or convince this city of our importance & deliver us a stadium ina location we deserve then they should step aside before they are removed, simple as.
It looks shit.
Thanks for the article. I’m a 47 year old Evertonian, season ticket holder, who travels over with a group of Scouse exiles from Sheffield.
The idea of moving to a plastic stadium within a retail park makes me feel sick. I passed by a similar stadium the other day, Doncaster Rovers, bang in the middle of a retail development on the outskirts of Doncaster. No sense of history or any character whatsoever. If we make this Kirkby move we will be the same and it certainly won’t be my Everton any longer.
Those people shouting down any objections to the move - Dave Roberts for one - must support a different club. What he fails to factor into his bright new future is that he’ll be sitting in a half empty stadium watching Championship football because myself and thousands of others won’t be there.
But i really expected more from the new stadium. I think alot of people who are against moving to Kirkby would have been swayed more towards going there if the stadium had been a ground breaking one, sadly, it isnt.
Im looking for 4 things from a new stadium.
1. Ease of access, be it by public or personal transport, im not 100% but im pretty sure getting to the new Kirkby stadium will be easier than getting to Goodison. (if only for me, an out of towner)
2. Better parking. The only option available at Goodison at the moment that is of any validity for me is the car park on the far side of Stanley Park. Even I could do a better job of working out new parking facilities at the new stadium, so here is hoping the developers have.
3.A nice stadium, easy on the eye so to speak. Now Goodison isnt exactly this, but the new square box effort in Kirkby isnt either. One thing you cant deny, is that with Goodison, as you come through the small 2 storey houses surrounding it and catch a glimpse of the monolith in the distance towering above everything else around it, your first reaction is usually "wow". I want that from Kirkby, I want to be driving up to it, parking and walking towards it thinking, "awesome, they have really done us proud". if the designs stay the same, i have to say, ill be deeply dissapointed.
4. Better Seating and facilities, of course, any new stadium is going to achieve this, thats pretty much a no brainer.
So in summary, 3 out of 4 boxes ticked for me, but the one that isnt ticked is the decider unfortunately, there is no denying, that in this modern age, with modern acrhitecture reaching able to achieve breath taking results, we are getting a very cheap looking box. The stadium just isnt good enough.
Thanks for stoking-up the stadium debate just when we were starting to acknowledge the decision. For some weeks now the mood has been positive and the debate focused on the performance of the team in the CCup, Europe and the Premiership.
Now I?m afraid we may need to dig-out our tin hats as the arguments on Kirkby will now re-start.
Unfortunatley i have come to the conclusions after reading the article about the clubs finances we simply cannot afford to build a stadium of our own.
Also if the bestway site is such a great piece of land, why are bestway moving out? Also I have not heard any other financial proposals from KEIOC or Bestway.
To be honest i have now accepted that Kirkby is going to happen and that KEIOC/Bestway are putting a very limp counter proposal together.
I’m not sure who is designing the scheme and to what brief but as an icon for Everton Football Club, it is a soulless, heavy block that looks to me like a revamped Lansdowne Road that has recently been demolished.
Whatever the arguments on moving, we really did have a fantastic opportunity to produce a stadium to be proud of - an opportunity that has already been lost.
For those of you that have ever been to Pride Park or the Stadium of Light then it is the supporters & the team that make the stadium not the building itself.
THe reason the JJB and Reebok have no atmosphere is because they are half empty.
I was at Pride Park a few weeks ago, and I work in Derby. Their supporters didn?y want to leave the Baseball Ground but realised they had to. They now think Pride Park is an excellent stadium, fill it every week and create a good atmosphere for all their home games (even when their team is struggling).
The fact is very few people are going to like images of Kirkby as
a) it isn?t Goodison Park
b) its new
c) No-one has been there to experience it on a match night when the atmosphere turn somewhere failry normal into an emotional experience.
I realise people are attached to Goodison, but the football club is the people not the building and this can easily be transported to wherever it needs to be to secure its long term future.
Not at the latest "artists impressions" or computer generated images...but at the fact that every time the club release any information on the (proposed) move,the same old tripe comes out time and time again..
Certain things are going to happen, the club is (eventually ) going to move,probably to Kirkby.
We wont be building a 400 million pound statium..
We may have a stadium , than could look similiar to The Reebok,Riverside,Madjeski..etc
We wont have 10,15 or 20,000 comatose..Bolton,Boro or Reading fans inside....
We wont be traipsing thru piles of dogshit going to or from the stadium..
We may...actually be able to get served in a well lit ,clean modern purpose built bar before the game in under 30 minutes..
I wont have to miss half the game if I want a piss,a coffee or a hotdog..
I wont be leaving my soul behind at the grand old lady..
I will take my memories with me...and I will take my voice,I will still shout and sing just as loud...safe in the knowledge that wherever I sit I will see the game that cost me around about £100 every time I take myself and my sons to watch.
I will have to add on an extra 30 or so minutes to my journey to the ground...
I may have to pay a little extra...
But it will all be worth it, because once that whistle goes I will be watching Everton Football Club....The club I have and always will support all my life.
They dont always treat me well..sometimes even badly..but I love them..I always have...And if its concrete instead of bricks..just as it was once sitting over standing...I will move on..take my place..and continue to love them.
If anybody decides that they no longer love them..so be it..move on , thank you for the time you have given us and the money you have spent...somebody else will take your place.. Nobody will take mine
Erm, everton have played less European games in the past 10 years than Liverpool have in the past 10 months. everton are virtually unheard of in Europe and have achieved virtually nothing, the likes of Aberdeen and Ipswich Town have a better European pedigree than everton.
In contrast, Liverpool are by far and away the most successful British club in Europe, the 3rd most successful club in Europe overall, and have represented our city hundreds of times with honour, whilst putting Liverpool firmly on the map. What have everton done in Europe?Virtually nothing really.
An interesting stat emerged last week; Rafael Benitez was involved in his 51st game in Europe whilst manager of LFC, achieved in just over 3 years. Two days later, everton also played their 51st game in Europe ... in their entire history. No doubt the usual ’lets blame all out failures on Heysel’ crap will come back from you lot.
In summary, once again Lyndon Lloyd, you prove you haven’t got a clue what you’re talking about, no wonder you chose to support everton. Where are you from again?
Yes your statistics are correct on your clubs trophy winning success..however I believe Everton have represented the city and the country far better on our sparse (compared to yours) European adventures..simply by virtue of the fact that we have manged not to murder anybody..not storm a stadium because our blag tickets had caused overcrowding..managed not to fight with police..and managed not to drop paving slabs onto innocent bulgarians...But I suppose its all about the trophies really...
You’re quite right. The mood around Evertonia has been incredibly upbeat of late since the Derby - and with good reason.
Might this be why the Club/Tesco have released these images now? They knew they had to at some point. What better time than when the delirious post-Nuremberg fan base has been suitably softened-up and there’s a great feelgood factor around?
Not only that, but by releasing them yesterday they know that there’s another 10 days before the Evertonian collective re-assembles and they are probably hoping that the widespread fury at just how dire these images are might well have dissipated by then.
You know the old PR adage to pick your time carefully to "bury bad news" (I seem to remember a government spin doctor getting the bullet for releasing bad news on 9/11 in the hope that no-one would notice)?
Well I can just hear the strategy meeting now. "Look, we’re on a great run, the fans are chuffed, we’ll announce that AJ has re-signed, also let it slip that Moyesie and Lescott are in talks too, we’ll release the quality stats site on the OS and we’ll get the Official History DVD out there to a big fanfare and then we’ll slip these Tesco images into the fray in the middle of all that.
"There’s no game for another 10 days so by then they’ll have blown out of their own steam and we’ll just crack on".
Must think we’re thick.
By all means, John, if you’re pro the move and pro the images then fair dos - each to his own - but don’t suggest that Lyndon has started the debate again when it was EFC so clearly trading on the big balloon of optimism that pervades Evertonia right now.
What you’re effectively saying is that we shouldn’t have a right of reply to the Club, especially when it unleashes guff like this on us, purely because the team is doing well.
EFC is surely the whole package. If the team’s doing well, then great. But that shouldn’t preclude us having a simultaneous debate about any off-field matters any more than the team doing poorly should stop us.
Things happen when they happen. Or do they?
For I’m reliably informed that these images and videos have been ready for weeks (hence why there’s no action on the Stubbs video later than the Pienaar goal in the Boro game on September 30th...strange that there’s no Larissa, Derby, Luton, Birmingham, Nuremberg and Chelsea footage isn’t it? I mean surely the scenes after the Carsley equaliser are better to show, in Stubbs’ scally words "what Everton means", than the Pienaar goal v Boro? Yes, of course they are. As would the tremendous Nuremberg scenes. But they couldn’t use that footage could they? Because the truth is that this video and those images have been ready for weeks. For some reason EFC/Tesco decided to launch them on the fanbase this week probably in the hope that we’ll all still be lying on our happy backs after the Nuremberg and Chelsea game happy to have our tums tickled).
The stadium debate is back - and trust me, I’m as tired of it as you are - but it wasn’t Lyndon that restarted it.
Everton have always represented the city with courtesty abroad, and have enver been involved in any trouble at any of their games to my recollection.
Liverpool on the other hand have been involved in numerous instances over the past few years, including at the last European Cup FInal. So yes, they?ve palyed more games but quantity doesn?t always amount to quality.
I may have to pay a little extra..."
What kind of business would expect a bigger turnout given just these two little observations.
and...."If anybody decides that they no longer love them..so be it..move on , thank you for the time you have given us and the money you have spent...somebody else will take your place.. Nobody will take mine "
Lets get something seriously straight here..... there aren’t thousands of blues on our waiting lists ready to take anyone’s place. We barely fill 40,000 seats now, and that’s with the best side we have had in years, so where do you think all these new regulars are going to come from is beyond me. ..... and even then why would you want those who currently stay away, wouldn’t you prefer those that have watched us through thick and thin for years? This inverted arrogance is astounding. Make no mistake, we need every Evertonian that there is to attend, we crtainly don’t need to make it more difficult for them to get there, we don’t need to completely rearrange the matchday experience of thousands of regular blues. These people who just drive upto the match, watch the game then go home straight after need to realise that thousands make an afternoon/day of it. There will be nothing in kirkby to entice these especially when most games are shown live these days, they will simply vote with their feet.
Some people have made reference to the Nuremberg experience..... firstly Nuremberg was probably the poorest of the world cup stadia, and incidentally isn’t that new, so god knows what you would have made of the other stadia which are far superior. Out of town stadia are predominently a thing of the past. In the US they are shoehorning them into downtown areas and knocking all the out of town ones down. They can only ever work (and this is disregarding identity issues) with a comprehensive mass public transport network serving them. This is the case in Germany, it will never be so in Kirkby even with 1 tram line. Personally, I found being in the upper tier behind the goal, and approx 170m from the far goal not that great. Thankfully, a coach was laid on to take me home after the game, I don’t think there’s similar plans for everyone at Kirkby. On top of all that remember that this is the cheapest possible stadium that we could get at Kirkby. It’s a basic off the shelf design from Barr...... hardly in keeping with our stadium building traditions. Despite this....according to Wyness this stadium will cost EFC a minimum of £50m...... some figures indicate more like £80m+. Not bad for a stadium for "parctically nothing" as was promised before the ballot. £50m could completely transform Goodison Park. £80m would literally turn it into the newest and most Historic stadium in the world. Why weren’t these figures released before the vote? Because basically, they wouldn’t have got anyone voting for Kirkby, and BK/KW would not have had Tesco doing all his work for them...... blind alley anyone?
Taking the moral high ground because you haven?t caused any trouble in Europe is ridiculous, it isn?t hard to not cause trouble when you?re not there. Turning it round, LFC have had far more incident free games in Europe than everton. Claiming everton have represented OUR city in Europe better than LFC is wrong, it?s like Man City fans claiming they?ve represented Manchester better then United, or West Ham fans claiming they?ve represented London better than Arsenal, simply because they?ve had less incidents as a result of playing far less games.
I hope 15000 of us are happy about it, the rest of us will just have to live with it.
All you have done is given Wyness the moral high ground to state after every sentance regarding the move "we are following a mandate from our fans"
This board were always going to do what they wanted one way or another, if a better business site became available in Maghul or any other town outside Liverpool we would be on our way there instead.
But we are not purely a business are we?
Take a trip to Warrington and have a look at the ground because this is what we’re getting.
The new images didn’t surprise me as I took the previous "artists impressions" night views of the new stadium with a pinch of salt.
The close proxcimity of the Tesco store will be a major problem. What are the major lines these days for any supermarket? Ale is the answer to my own question. So how long will supporters be able to enter the Tescos and buy 6 cans / 4 bottles and a pie etc before the police are refusing permission for grown men to enter a supermarket?
Given the lack of ale houses near by how long before supporters start drinking clubs in the tesco carpark?
Call me old fashioned but i can see some good old new labour anti social behaviour legislation being put in place very quickly - how long until the carparks and immediate are are put under a drink free zone order.
Tescos will also soon realise that shoppers don’t go to Tescos Kirkby on a Saturday during the football season (running from August to May remember) when Everton play at home or during the mid week nights when Everton are at home. This potential 40 -50 million shortfall will I ’m sure result in them trying to exact somekind of football exclusion to their "zone" of the retail park. What do we do then?
This is a half arsed project based upon the -"we’ve spun them so many lies that we must be seen to do something school of running a football club"
The only glimmer of light I see is that the dark side’s stadium price rises each week and now the yanks appear to be arguing over how to finance it given the tightening of international capital following the sub - prime mortgage explosion. Is it possible they may have to think again? If so a sensible stadium design and well timed approach to the council could see Goodison being rebuilt on site and using only one tenth of the land in the park that the pinkies want or am I just dreaming?
When Mrs T won the election in ’79- the first at which I was eligible to vote-it wasn’t a case of yes Mrs Thatcher,No Mrs Thatcher 3 bags full Mrs Thatcher. The debate continued and those who opposed expressed their opinions.
We have every right to express our views if we disagree with the move.For some of us the words to the song "If you know ya History" are more than just mere words.Everton’s history is precious and must be protected and cherished.
I would accept the move if it was to a site within the city boundaries or if I was convinced that the possibilities of redeveloping Goodison had been fully explored and I mean fully explored.
I must also add the final point - I would accept a move more readily if we had a little less vitriol from those who voted Yes whenever the opposite view is expressed. Most of the name calling and bitterness seems to come from those who voted Yes.
I accept the vote - but they must also accept the right of people to express an opposing opinion.
" These people who just drive upto the match, watch the game then go home straight after need to realise that thousands make an afternoon/day of it. There will be nothing in kirkby to entice these especially when most games are shown live these days, they will simply vote with their feet."
Please show me the delights I have missed out on in the four years I spent living in Walton....If I had known of all the tourist attractions..I may well have rented my spare room out...!!!
"Lets get something seriously straight here..... there aren?t thousands of blues on our waiting lists ready to take anyone?s place. We barely fill 40,000 seats now, and that?s with the best side we have had in years, so where do you think all these new regulars are going to come from is beyond me. .."
They will come from the same place they have always come from......and my reference to "30 minutes longer journey" and "paying a bit more"..for the extra comfort it will be worth it..and it may be further away for me as I live in the city centre now..but for many people its easier to get to ...
I don’t have any objections to moving. Goodison is past its sell by date and howevery much we try and convince ourselves too tricky to re-develop.
I also don’t object to moving to Kirkby. Yes it won’t be as easy to get to and it is further away than ideal, but it is not like we’re going to be the next MK Dons.
My objection is Tesco and this is confirmed by these new videos on the official site. Its the vision of "New Goodison" sitting alongside a Tesco Megastore, a JJB sports, a Mcdonalds drive through with a Carpet Right on the doorstep. Its a soulless embarrassment and our club deserves better.
Ask yourself this: which do you prefer, Craven Cottage or The Reebok? Fratton Park or The Riverside? Everyone hates those identikit flat pack stadiums and that is exactly what we will have.
The only time a new stadium works is when they befit a clubs tradion - The Emirates is a case in point.
Did I vote ’yes’? No. Were we blackmailed into it by mr Wyness? Yes. Its not too late? I hope not. LCC over to you.
Liverpool is a part of MERSEYSIDE which is what it will become politically in due course. Ever heard of Greater Manchester It is only the pathetic self interest of Liverpool Councillors which keeps the City so inward looking and small minded. Everton is a club, not a piece of land. Manchester United do not draw their support from Salford.
As George Harrison pronounced..all things must pass..This includes Goodison, Anfield and everywhere else. The world moves on and I hope Everton do not do it twenty years too late like Liverpool City Council always do.
If we do not move then resign yourself to being a small time yo-yo club like Sheffield United. If you are succesful on the field you need the space and facilities to profit from it or we will never have a hope of staying there.
Stating
?I would accept a move more readily if we had a little less vitriol from those who voted Yes whenever the opposite view is expressed. Most of the name calling and bitterness seems to come from those who voted Yes.
I accept the vote - but they must also accept the right of people to express an opposing opinion.?
seems a bit off.
I didn?t get a vote, but used to be a season ticket holder for a number of years. I will be sad to leave Goodison but am happy to accept the decision has been made in the best itnerests of the club.
As for Kirkby, well as I?ve mentioned previously, there are a number of new stadiums that I have very much enjoyed visiting Pride Park, City of Manchester Stadium & the Stadium of Light amongs them.
It is the supporters & club who make the stadium what it is, not the building itself.
Once again I have trawled through all the responses of "another" Kirkby (Best make sure I spell that correctly or someone will tell me my opinion doesn’t matter) debate.
There have been many excellent posts and of course the dross still pops up intermittently.
I am still surprised by all the fans who state they will never go to Kirkby, are they season ticket holders or once a season fans? Why are you turning your back on such a big piece of your life just because it is moving out of an imagined boundary?
The fact remains, we can be as nostalgic as we want and say how the atmosphere leading up to the ground will diminish, guess what? It will anywhere we move to, there will never be a situation where we can build a new ground in the same cramp but excellent settings where Goodison is. It will be in open ground for accessability etc.
I will continue to support the club I love and will continue to renew my season ticket and am flabergasted as those who are turning their backs because they don’t like the look of the ground.
I don’t give two fooks what the ground looks like outside, as long as I can get a seat inside and watch my beloved Everton play and get a pint of warm flat piss at half time.
I support Everton FC and this will not be affected if the new stadium is a shit hole, they can still have my money.
"I support Everton FC and this will not be affected if the new stadium is a shit hole, they can still have my money."
Gerard Madden suggests that the people voicing their opinions on here and elsewhere are just a whinging minority, but I think what you espouse in that one statement actually says far more about a fundamental diference among Evertonians, and you see it in any gathering. There are those who will accept anything the club does, who support them blindly, and will continue to fork over their money.
And there are those who won?t. It only needed 15,000 of the former to vote by rote, while the more thoughtful ones struggled with what is to my mind an extremely difficult question. Your simple approach to the problem helps me understand that a lot better. Thanks!
Fans won’t go to kirkby because its going against what they believe, how much will tickets cost for kirkby £45 say, £600 for a season ticket say, are you asking people who are completely against kirkby to fork out this amount of money to watch everton at a stadium they don’t want?
Would you invest money into something you were completely against?
Problem is the same as it has been for years....that, simply, is NOT an option that we have. Everton Football Club CAN NOT stay at Goodison Park.
Even if the funds could be found to make the necessary reconstruction we would be tied up in planning authority red-tape beyond the point at which the Old Lady would be economically viable anyway. there is simply too much encroachment on the surrounding residential area. Even KEOIC have defacto accepted this with their pipe-dream of the ’Loop’.
This, unfortunately, is where the whole emotive thing falls down...its good to love the club, its good to want its heritage to go unchanged for another 100 years so our kids and grandkids can experience the same feelings as we’ve had, BUT, if that option doesnt exist you cannot stick your head under the pillow and just wish really hard that the world was the way you want it to be.
Children do that and children should stay in kindergarten whilst the adults deal with the real world. If true Evertonians want to be taken seriously in their position that the Kirkby move should be fought then they have to provide a genuinely viable alternative. It is, by this point, not enough to heckle or naysay...its time for something more constructive from the no lobby.
That sounds suspiciously like you’re saying some Evertonians are more pure than others - in other words more of a REAL blue. You will be in for a final warning very soon me thinks...
Do you all want to sit in the shadow of the new Kopite stadium ?
Because if we do not move you WILL, and they will be laughing forever more at us.....Wake up to the 21st century.
I am of the view that EFC are merely progressing the outcome of the vote by releasing more information on the topic.
But in my opinion, and illustrated by the length of this chain, Lyndon has started the whole ?FOR? and ?AGAINST? dialogue.
I can remember a universal EFC fan view being that once the vote was taken and the decision made then we should just move-on.
Resurrecting the subject is not moving-on. Mind you everyone is entitled to their opinion, however, I was hopeful that the painful period prior to the vote was behind us.
What about that Cahill goal on Sunday, didn?t it just make you remember the 80s when we never gave up and always threatened the goal? That?s what I want the future to be.
And there are those who won?t. It only needed 15,000 of the former to vote by rote, while the more thoughtful ones struggled with what is to my mind an extremely difficult question. Your simple approach to the problem helps me understand that a lot better. Thanks!"
Michael, is it at all possible that many of those who voted yes also thought long and hard about the decision, looked at all the informaton available and still thought the idea was worth supporting? Or is it easier for you just to brand those who didn’t vote no as sheep?
You keep going on about respecting all viewpoints on here, then come out with the above statement. Kind of makes it tough to take any of your sermonizing seriously.
Basically I am not satisfied that the possibility of redeveloping Goodison has been properly looked into. Personally I think the comments our CEO re the matter of the club investigating plans to redevelop Goodison as half hearted.
I have to say I was not too impressed by the "there is no alternative" line that Mr Wyness was giving us at the time of the vote.
If there is no alternative fine - but I don’t believe that we have adequately looked at the alternatives.
One thing I would ask in addition to a bit less bitterness - please don’t refer to our ground as a dump/shithole etc.it’s none of those things.
I read a crticism of Goodison from a West Brom fan - refering to parts of the ground as being wooden - personally I would rather parts of the stadium to be wooden than parts of the team!!
We’ll be in the shadow of a big f**K off tesco it does’nt get any worse than that, thats why were a laughing stock, id rather be in the shadow of a football stadium than a supermarket.
Yes we need to upgrade our facilities, no we absolutely do NOT need to sell out to the first corporate vulture. There has to be a solution - Liverpool is being rebuilt, there is derelict land all over it that could be "re-developed", investment is pouring in, city of culture etc etc and we are leaving it to go to Kirkby. How can that make business sense?
Funny how the link to the promo video no longer works. Perhaps those at EFC "monitoring toffeeweb" have realised it’s doing their case more harm than good. Anyone know how we can get it onto youtube?!
Surely the ballot result might have been somewhat different if these pictures had been released prior to the vote being taken.
You said:
---------------------------------------------
Yes we need to upgrade our facilities, no we absolutely do NOT need to sell out to the first corporate vulture. There has to be a solution - Liverpool is being rebuilt, there is derelict land all over it that could be "re-developed", investment is pouring in, city of culture etc etc and we are leaving it to go to Kirkby.
-----------------------------------------------
This is entirely the problem...this is NOT the first corporate vulture its been going on since before the Kings Dock fiasco. Also there really isn’t derelict land ’all over’ suitable for the purposes of building a 55,000 seater stadium on.
We’ve been looking for years and the Red scum have been doing the same....both clubs have been offered the same sites and both have determined that they were crap. They got license to build on Stanley Park and we didnt...there’s no point whinging about that now either cos it helps no-one.
Fact is, despite YEARS of going through this, not one acceptable, practical, viable and affordable site has been proposed that has offered a solution within the city. No matter how many bleat and whinge about the sad state of affairs that has brought us to this point that fact remains.
Its time for the naysayers to either shit or get off the potty!.
Walton has dozens of pubs, cafes, chippies etc, and millions of hours of Evertonian memories wrapped in its fabric. It has 10 times tha public transport capacity of Kirkby. It is a 10 minute ride to town and all its amenities, and major transport hubs and networks. That is why Grosvenor et al are spending Literally billions on central Liverpool and not trying to displace it to Kirkby, because the vast majority of Merseyside’s residents have a direct bus/train route to it. Hardly any Merseyside districts are directly connected to Kirkby by bus or train. I live in South Liverpool, and I would argue just as vehemently against Speke for the same reasons, and I could walk there.
You make me laugh when you say the majority have " have fallen for it" as though we who voted to move are somehow less intelligent than your good self. You are no doubt very well informed on this matter, but if in a few years you are sitting in the new ground with 50,000 fanatical blues, with a chance of the Premiership title, you may eat your words.
I’m not a whinger or a naysayer, I want the best for the club. In the city or not. It’s not that it’s Kirkby it’s just that it is crap.
I happen to think that a more capable Board of Directors/Chairman could have done better.
Let’s face it they have a lot to work with. Everton is one of the "biggest" clubs, with one of the top 10 fan-bases in the most popular and lucrative football league in the world. It has a rich, successful heritage. It is located in a city which markets it’s football club heritage as a key part of it’s "tourism portfolio" and is undergoing massive redevelopment and investment (and government funding). Yet they still can’t do any better than a few million help from Tesco and a cheap, tin-pot identi-dome in the car-park of a generic retail park.
I can’t believe there aren’t people with money to spend who could do better. I don’t want us to be taken over by some American but surely somebody can market all that the club can offer and get us a better deal.
"LCC planning department have said that there is nothing of any substance to restrict planning permission for redevelopment of GP."
Of course there isnt anything of substance yet because no moves have been made to to gain planning permission to redevelop Goodison!. Thats just spin.
"This amount of money could do great things at our historic home..... with zero effects to our history and identity, and without the disenchantment of a large proportion of our support, so how can anyone still say Kirkby is the only option?"
...because redeveloping Goodison is not feasible within its existing footprint something at least two reports have independently verified - the first commissioned at the time of Kings Dock as an alternate option.
For the rest of the reasoning why, as things stand there are NO other options, there has been NO site identified within the city as suitable. Not one and this Loop thing is the biggest joke I’ve ever seen!.
Now you may want to obfuscate the issue by engaging in this conspiracy theory bollocks that various personalities have vested interests in seeing us in Kirkby, but, its not only EFC who’ve rejected these sites but LFC as well. If those sites aren’t good enough for the RS what makes them good enough for us?.
As to the funding and the finance...yes those facts are very illuminating...and pointless. The fact is that Goodison is rapidly becoming a liability. The fact is that, barring a minor miracle, its not feasible to redevelop on that land. The fact is that we need a new stadium and the fact is that two Premier league clubs have now rejected the alternate sites proposed by LCC.
Your other option is?. You could get 40,000 fans to stump up 3 grand each and get the club to round out to £150 million I guess. Good luck!
I don’t think it’s a laughing matter actually, but there you go. This is the entire future of our football club. Fact is, I’m desperate to see a plus side to moving to Kirkby, and I’m desperate to even see something good in the stadium design, but I can’t. I’m not questioning anyone’s intelligence, just posed a few questions. Have a go at me if you like, but make sure you at least attempt to answer the question to prove you haven’t "fallen for it!!" BTW, What part of challenging for the premiership is exclusive to Kirkby?
"I happen to think that a more capable Board of Directors/Chairman could have done better."
Might suprise you to know I agree with you!. there was a very good article on here about the refinancing we took out around Kings Dock time and, if we’d taken on about £30 mill more then, we’d have been in the Kings Dock and laughing!.
Point is though saying that means nothing now. We are in the situation we’re in. Getting rid of the board now might make a lot of people feel better...but...it makes no difference to the stadium issue. Goodison is still unviable without an upgrade we can’t afford and may not get through even if we could.
"I can?t believe there aren?t people with money to spend who could do better. I don?t want us to be taken over by some American but surely somebody can market all that the club can offer and get us a better deal."
Same thing. Maybe there are people to blame for the limited investment EFC has had, we’ll never be able to prove it without someone blowing the whistle from the inside, fact is that no-one has come forward and no-one is likely to for the smaller team in a city that needs £150 million spending on a new ground and has to compete as a brand with the RS. Fact!.
"Of course there isnt anything of substance yet because no moves have been made to to gain planning permission to redevelop Goodison!. Thats just spin."
The planning office does not need an application to anounce that there are no significant planning restraints, they simply looked at the site, and stated the obvious.
"...because redeveloping Goodison is not feasible within its existing footprint something at least two reports have independently verified - the first commissioned at the time of Kings Dock as an alternate option."
Sorry to disappoint, but there are no such reports. There has never been a full feasibility study carried out by the club. I am a shareholder and as such have asked to see them..... they simply don?t exist. Meanwhile, I completed full concept plans based on the existing site, as has Trevor Skempton. Mine were created using full site plans and are to scale...... basically scale drawings disprove your assertion.
"For the rest of the reasoning why, as things stand there are NO other options, there has been NO site identified within the city as suitable. Not one and this Loop thing is the biggest joke I?ve ever seen!."
Is "biggest Joke" a technical term based on full engineered assessment of that site? HOK the biggest stadium design company in the world would beg to differ I?m affraid.
"As to the funding and the finance...yes those facts are very illuminating...and pointless. The fact is that Goodison is rapidly becoming a liability. The fact is that, barring a minor miracle, its not feasible to redevelop on that land. The fact is that we need a new stadium and the fact is that two Premier league clubs have now rejected the alternate sites proposed by LCC."
I?m sorry, I can?t make it any more simple than: before Kirkby was supposed to cost us "practically nothing", now it could cost us £80m. Have you any idea what that could do for us at GP? If not, you really cannot say Kirkby is the ONLY option
"Your other option is?. You could get 40,000 fans to stump up 3 grand each and get the club to round out to £150 million I guess. Good luck!"
Where have I said that? Does the same apply to finding £80m for Kirkby, or have you got that stashed?
So the Liverpool County Council planning office staff are so prescient that they can predict public opposition without recourse to public consultation...impressive.
We could never do that in Wirral Borough Council...we always had to do these tedious things like advertising planning requests etc to ensure there would be no opposition. I think you’ll find that LCC’s comments on this one may need to be examined under the light of actual planning legislation.
"Sorry to disappoint, but there are no such reports. There has never been a full feasibility study carried out by the club."
One report was even online that detailed the extent of the encroachment on the neighbouring school and residential area. Admittedly its been a while since I studied the building regs and planning legislation, but, it seemed fairly comprehensive.
"Meanwhile, I completed full concept plans based on the existing site, as has Trevor Skempton. Mine were created using full site plans and are to scale...... basically scale drawings disprove your assertion."
You have managed to fit 55,000 into the same stadium footprint, without raising the stands roofline and affecting the environmental conditions of the neighbouring residential area?. You developed a traffic plan to accomodate the additional 15,000 people and their vehicles. I am impressed!. Is this available for evaluation anywhere?.
"I?m sorry, I can?t make it any more simple than: before Kirkby was supposed to cost us "practically nothing", now it could cost us £80m. Have you any idea what that could do for us at GP? If not, you really cannot say Kirkby is the ONLY option"
So essentially your alternate option is to redevelop Goodison and thats that?. Despite the fact that the club has rejected that option twice...despite the fact it WOULD be the cheapest option if feasible?.
OK.
Andy Mckenzie
you must be a kopite to make a remark like that.....
"HERITAGE, TRADITION, WE WERE IN THE f*CKIN CITY 1st obviously means f*ck all nowadays"
You do understand that Heritage, tradition and the fact that we were in the city first DOES MEAN F*CK ALL dont you?.
You cant buy your Didier Drogba’s or Shaun Wright Phillips’s with heritage and tradition.
Talk to Leeds and Forest fans how much of their tradition they’d swap for Premiership football week-in-week out?!. Then ask a Chelsea fan if his clubs values are the same now with Abrahamovitch as before.
Lastly you talk to an old gooner about the Arsenal team of today incorporating the fewest British players of any top flight team and then compare what he says to what a young fan says about the same team. the old guy despairs about what his club has become...the young guy sees a team of winners winning. see the point?!
I don’t care where the team play I will follow the team EVERTON wherever they may end up playing.
I have followed Everton for forty years and the grand old lady Goodison Park is ready to be put to rest.
No more stinking toilets and crappy obstructed views. History thats all it is, forget the past and look to the future away from the dump we call home.
To the majority of moaners out there we know its only the local boozers you are worried about missing. "get a life"" get a taxi" its only 10 minutes up the road.
COYB.
LCC have seen the plans, as have architects and there was only one issue of light infringement with the plans as they stood. The footprint for the one option that was shown on various websites and in the Echo (there are several in the same package) included bridging Bullens Road and just over 1m into the carpark of the school (another stayed within the footprint on that side. No-one can exclude the prospect of objections etc, but general planning constraints are no more prohibitive at the current site than they are in say Kirkby...... How many houses/carehomes/schools are going to be affected? I can only speak about the option I worked on, so I’m not sure about "that being that" or whatever that’s supposed to mean, but the Loop is also far more appealing than KIrkby. As far as transport studies I find that quite a farcical statement considering the peripheral location of Kirkby. I worked there for 6 years and also worked on the merseytram design..... there is simply no comparison between Walton and Kirkby in terms of local transport capacities and networks. There never can be. LFC seem to have satisfied the planning department regarding transport issues for a 60,000 seater (with the prospect of 75,000) only a few hundred yards away so why wouldn’t our 50-55,000 seater? They are also paying for all the new infrastructure, which is nice of them. Meanwhile the initial transport sudies for Kirkby were particularly damning and prompted the club to flag up the prospect of pushing for trams to Kirkby. I ask again.... do you know what can be done at GP for £50-80m ? Because quite frankly everything else works there, it has done for over 100 years. No one can say the same for Kirkby.
"... but general planning constraints are no more prohibitive at the current site than they are in say Kirkby...... How many houses/carehomes/schools are going to be affected?"
Yep I agree with that you are dead right. The huge and glaring flaw with Kirkby is that it is far from the done deal that the top brass make it out to be.
Added to that now, thanks to the actions of a minority, we may get the worst of both worlds. A delay to a ground that was only really acceptable because it offered a ground in the timeframe we needed one.
" but the Loop is also far more appealing than KIrkby."
The Loop may be technically just about feasible by, by god, it is going to be expensive. Not just in initial aquisition either - in year on year costs maintaining the overflying infrastructure to DoT specs in face of huge vibration issues in, and around, the foundations are going to make the costs of running Goodison pale into insignificance!.
Then we get to the emergency access issues of having a stadium of 55,000 on a mutated roundabout!. Just the thought of the Loop as a site for a ground holding north of 50k people makes the civil engineer in me shudder.
The transport issues to Kirkby from the city are going to require some serious attention, but, the site does have the one advantage. It no longer obliges the many fans who come from the periphery of Liverpool to go into the city then get across to the ground. The traffic volume inside the city should actually drop, in the near term, as fans from farther afield go round the East Lancs or along the M57 and reduce the pressure.
"I ask again.... do you know what can be done at GP for £50-80m ? Because quite frankly everything else works there, it has done for over 100 years. No one can say the same for Kirkby."
Unfortunately whilst you cant say that Kirkby has ever sufficed as a venue for a stadium you cannot say that Goodison can be upgraded even if this £80 million you suggest the club is going to have to find can be reinvested.
There?s a very good reason why that banner of theirs at the Clattenburg derby read "Just Go".
If we have to endure some "shadow" existence (what?s new?) for a while longer then we?ll all have to decide how embarrassed we want to feel. Embarrassment is a state of mind. Rather than be embarrassed in the face of their franchise, I?d actually be defiant in the face of adversity and stand proud - which is what being a Blue in this city is all about. If and when we do have to leave the area then surely we have to leave it for something better on offer than this Tesco dross?
Steve,
"The Loop may be technically just about feasible by, by god, it is going to be expensive. Not just in initial aquisition either - in year on year costs maintaining the overflying infrastructure to DoT specs in face of huge vibration issues in, and around, the foundations are going to make the costs of running Goodison pale into insignificance!."
All superstructure foundations will sit on solid ground, retaining walls need not be compromised given the size of the site which is actually bigger in stadium terms than the Emirates. The rest is a simple cut and cover exercise, without the need to do the "cut" since it is already there.
"Then we get to the emergency access issues of having a stadium of 55,000 on a mutated roundabout!. Just the thought of the Loop as a site for a ground holding north of 50k people makes the civil engineer in me shudder."
The Emirates also sits on an island in that it is bound by 2 railway lines, and is more physically isolated than the loop site which will be fully accessible from two full sides at least. The Millenium stadium is up against the river, and with tight city blocks on the remaining sides. I use these as 2 modern examples where loop-like issues have been resolved. There are a multitude of similarly confined modern stadia. Meanwhile Kirkby has only a limited access from the main conurbation and all its emergency services, with the major Hospital being as distant as it can be.
"The transport issues to Kirkby from the city are going to require some serious attention, but, the site does have the one advantage. It no longer obliges the many fans who come from the periphery of Liverpool to go into the city then get across to the ground. The traffic volume inside the city should actually drop, in the near term, as fans from farther afield go round the East Lancs or along the M57 and reduce the pressure. "
This is true, externally based fans will be able to skirt around the city, but I believe the club’s support is more locally based than any other major club. Therefore the majority of matchgoing fans will have to channel through the seriously limited number of routes out to Kirkby and back, whereas at present they travel to Walton from all directions, and Walton lies on the confluence of several arterial road, bus and rail routes, as well as being adjacent to the inner ring road.
"Unfortunately whilst you cant say that Kirkby has ever sufficed as a venue for a stadium you cannot say that Goodison can be upgraded even if this £80 million you suggest the club is going to have to find can be reinvested"
If the cash is available then surely you can redevelop. If LFC can build on a listed Victorian Park, if Tesco can flatten dozens of homes/school/care home etc.
Actually, I didn’t suggest anything. Wyness recently stated that the costs to the club will be a minimum of £50m at a shareholders meeting. Further querries have revealed an £80m+ cost and this was supposed to cost us next to nowt!!!
So...what are we to do ? Or more importantly what is Blue Bill going to do. I don?t blame him or the board for deciding on a ground move. It is clear from even the most rudimentary sketches that the Kirby stadium is less than a grand design but it is better than Goodison Park. Goodison has only one thing going for it, the history that seeps from every crack in its sorry facade. So if the move takes place it will then be up to every player,fan and board member to make sure we fill the new stadium with new epic tales of sadness and glory.
its gonna be cheap... its gonna be souless...
Nil satis nisi optimum... i got it tattoed on my body... pity the Board of EFC didnt think its meaning before selling out to Tesco and it second rate plan...
shame on all you yes voters....
KEIOC
There is no co-incidence that Kenwright, Wyness etc wont look for investment, as the share prices will drastically increase once a new home has been built. And what do you think will happen once the home is built? The club will be sold, just like the fans who will be watching their team on an industrial estate whilst the reds continue to prosper as a one team city during the regeneration for the captial of culture.
I never said sack the board I’m just questioning what they’ve done.
Of course I will support them blindly, it is Everton and it has been in my soul for over 30 years.
To me it is about and has only ever been about the football, nothing else. I don’t want to argue politics about imaginary boundaries, blag loopy sites and my personal favourite "The souless bowl", Do you know what would make it souless? The fans, or lack of because some don’t want to go to a different post code.
I will follow Everton - The football team until my dying day and if you want to try and win points and say I am a sheep, well so be it, I will not lose any sleep over it. I will simply go and watch the team I love play football and God willing enjoy it.
Baaaa
It’s not the same arguments going round and round at all...... Wyness himself has now admitted that Kirkby will cost the club at least £50m. This is a completely different scenario to the one balloted on. The other issues remain regarding identity/history and tradition, but the whole deliverability goal posts have been moved significantly. This basic admission necessitates a reassessment of the "options", by definition it in no way agrees with the notion of a "NO PLAN B"! As far as being an attractive option even Blue bill exclaimed its beauty only the other day. Most clubs have redeveloped rather than moved, so there must be some attraction. I am sure most of your aspirations can still be satisfied in L4, and certainly more so in the capital of culture, than in some overspill estate.
Trevor Wroughton: "The major problem with that is simple. Any new stadium - even one built on the much-talked about ?Loop? - would NOT be ?the Everton you love?. We are going to lose all that in any move, to whatever destination. It?s called progress."
But Trevor, we could still move and build a stadium that is desiged and located in environs that are in accordance with both the club?s traditions and our famous old motto. Of course, leaving Goodison to any new ground will change the character of the match-going experience but ? and I realise we are talking about vastly different budgets here ? I think most fans would agree that Arsenal?s move was successful within those parameters.
Similarly, the Kings Dock project was, in my opinion, befitting ?the Everton I love? ? a world-class stadium in a world-class location, an improvement on Goodison rather than a backwards step six miles further away from town on the arse-end of a Tesco superstore.
I realise that we are in a beggars-can?t-be-choosers situation here because of the financial realities under the current Board but the reason why bring all this up again is because the ignominy of being beholden to a supermarket chain has been compounded by the fact that rather than being completely separate from the proposed Tesco, either by a dividing berm, tall hedge, wall or even a row of trees, the new stadium is going to be plonked right there in a flipping shopping precinct. That was not in the artist?s renderings in the brochure and it was not how the layout looked in the initial overhead plans that were first shown to Kirkby residents earlier this year.
"You said ?Bill Kenwright?s silence on the issue indicated that he knows it? - incorrect. There was a series of video blogs from Kenwright on the official site during the summer, pushing the idea of the new stadium, with him giving his total support to the plans."
As far as I recall (and I?m happy to be corrected) the Official Site showed one Kenwright interview a couple of days before the ballot was due to close, by which time the Board knew which way the vote had gone as they were being given vague indications by the Electoral Reform Society. I remember there being regular criticism on the web forums that Kenwright was being completely silent and letting Wyness drive the train at a time when the fanbase was at verbal war with itself.
Steve Hogan: "Any future development regarding any potential ground move to any location would have involved some sort of retail partnership, even the Kings Dock."
Steve, there?s a difference between there being a "retail partnership" as an financial enabler for our stadium and us looking like an after-thought to a Tesco-driven retail park. There doesn?t appear to have been any attempt made to visually separate the stadium from the rest of the development, to give our new home some kind of identity of its own.
John Sheron: "Thanks for stoking-up the stadium debate just when we were starting to acknowledge the decision"
John, if this Kirkby move is going to happen come hell or high water, should the fans not have a voice in making sure that the best is made from a less than optimal situation and that if we feel that these new artists?s impressions are not acceptable that they should know about it?
I know there were plenty of people who voted "No" but were prepared to accept the decision and then work to make sure that we ended up with the best stadium we could. If you think that those who don?t like what we?re being shown should just keep quiet and just deal with whatever ends up being built to keep the peace then think you?re doing a massive disservice to those fans and the club in general.
Patty Beasley: Now look what you have done Lyndon... the great stadium debate has kicked off again all because of you."
Yes, it?s all my fault, Patty. I released those new artist renderings that revealed the true location of the proposed stadium as opposed to the night-time impressions that made every voting fan think that the stadium for which they were voting would at least be surrounded by car parks, not juxtapositioned right next to Tesco.
Silly me, I should just accept that while we?re getting back to a "big five" club on the pitch, we?re on a par with Reading and Coventry City when it comes to our stadium. Nil Satis...?
People, this whole debate is no longer about voting Yes or No, it is about ensuring that we get the best stadium possible wherever we go. You can still be critical of the plans even if you voted for the Kirkby move. It?s called "people power" and seeing as you?re going to have go there and send your hard-earned dough 20-odd times a year, wouldn?t you want the club to listen if you didn?t like what was on offer?
Well you can’t have it both ways. If you want a pure club for the fans and no corporate welfare then go support a Division 3 side because you sure as hell will not find it in the Premiership. Everton were once great, but that was a long time ago. The team is just now starting to look good again but without the financial assistance that such a deal as this will bring all these players that we have just signed will be gone in a year or two and Everton will be back to the bottom of the league. Make no mistake about it, Football and Everton is a business, pure and simple.
What financial assistance is Everton getting in this deal? How does that compare to spending the same at redeveloping GP or going to the Loop? Why is moving to Kirkby the only way we can achieve the business results you’re talking about if the same facilities can be delivered at those costs at GP or elsewhere?
- "Well we are, Ivan. Liverpool is just down the road across that imaginary line over there. We think of it as Liverpool."
- "But Bill, now we are in Kirkby. Right?"
-"Yes"
-"You leave Liverpool. Now you are Kirkby club. Small town club."
-Well, Ivan, that’s not the way I like to see it. Ivan...? Ivan....? Ivan....?
There has been tons of documentation about the financial assistance being given to us by Knowsley Council for this development as part of Kirkby?s City Center redevelopment and regeneration. You can?t spend the same to redevelop Goodison Park because LCC won?t let Everton expand the site?s footprint. Also, where would we play while this redevelopment was going on? And LCC have said they will not give Everton the same financial assistance that Knowsley Council are giving us.
Lots of claims are being made about Kirkby and what it will or won’t do for the club. None of those are certain, just as your doom-laden scenario is not certain. But even you should be able to see from the opinions voiced on this website that there are extremely serious concerns about that business decision. Surely it would behoove the business to pay some attention to these concerns, purely form a business perspective, would it not? Or are they simply to be dismissed as "collateral damage" of blowing up Goodison and moving to the less-than desireable "Destination Kirkby".
This seems to be about living next door to a supermarket. Well, one of those (a Sainsbury) is not only the best corner shop I’ve ever had, but also one of my best neighbours.
Any Evertonians who disaprove of supermarkets - and, importantly - never shop at them, can hope that this future route for Everton falls apart.
I disapprove of Murdoch, Sky TV, and paying for football on TV. As far as I know, I have never given Murdo a penny.
Last time I checked the club held a vote to decide whether or not to go and the result was "yes".
so boring now....
we are moving.... much to my dismay...
no point raking up old dirt...


1 Posted 14/11/2007 at 20:33:22
Report abuse
Whole-heartedly agree with you. It completely and utterly guts me when I see these glossy "impressions" of what Kirkby will be like. It should not make any fan feel like that. We should not be divided down the midde. We should not be moving away from the city in which we have helped put on the map. We should not have to worry about future generations of supporters from the city of Liverpool choosing to support the only team from the city.
The latest imagery does not fill me with optimism. It fills me with despair. The board and Wyness are leading us down the wrong route in my opinion.
It smacks of contrived propaganda.
Look how they carefully select Kirkby born and bred Alan Stubbs to super impose into the new stadium even though he wont even be around in 5 years time.
Subtle, but it just stinks from top to bottom.