The Curious Case of the Missing Director

, 29 April, 29comments  |  Jump to most recent
Neil Adderley examines the role – or glaring lack thereof – played by Everton director Robert Earl at Goodison Park.
Does anyone know where Robert Earl is? The businessman owns 23% of Everton Football Club yet rarely ventures to Goodison - why is this?

» Read the full article at These Football Times



Reader Comments (29)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


James Flynn
1 Posted 29/04/2013 at 21:55:30
Good question?
Patrick Murphy
2 Posted 30/04/2013 at 01:09:45
Good to know that these folks will throw money around on a gambling night out , but won't invest in our team, we obviously don't merit investment.

The billionaire is a prolific gambler and the club’s best customer, although he also frequents The Ritz casino. In one night he can win or lose up to an estimated £8 million. He has incurred losses but wins more than he loses. He also links his business deals to the gaming tables. When his friend Robert Earl paid £9 million for a stake in Everton FC last year with his backing, he half-jokingly described the amount as ‘no more than a bad night at Les A.’

What are the odds of us winning the PL ever, withuot cash about a million to one or more!

John Gee
3 Posted 30/04/2013 at 02:16:16
He's down the back of the fridge, that's where everything goes if it's lost or missing.

Seriously, only Moulder and Scully or the Winchesters could find the answer of why people who invest millions in a below value institution with scope to improve and grow would not try to move things forward to realise a greater return. Say it quietly to the usual suspects on this site, but the only director we have who seems to actually even like the club, at least, is Bill Kenwright.

Ernie Baywood
4 Posted 30/04/2013 at 03:24:37
I ask this question on every thread that pops up about the worth of ownership. What exactly do people propose they do?

Gift money? - which would effectively mean giving money to the other owners.

Or loan money? Which, again, gifts the interest to the other owners.

I can't wrap my head around how they 'invest'.

Paul Andrews
5 Posted 30/04/2013 at 07:32:47
Something along the lines of....Blue Bill " Bobby it`s a no brainer,invest your initial share purchase money,when Kirby comes along you have the site for your hotels,restaurants casinos etc.Your stake goes up by 400%.I get rid of a director who could challenge me and retain my grip on the club"
Everyones a winner dahling mwah mwah"
Peter Foy
6 Posted 30/04/2013 at 07:58:24
Ernie, if they invested in the infrastructure of the club, they would see a return on this investment in the long term.

But that's not part of the plan. Bill has no money to invest and his pals have no plans to invest, yet they still expect to make a killing on a company that they have destroyed and ultimately made unsellable.

T o be honest, I don't expect or want them to do anything other than leave. They've had their chance and made an arse of it.

All in the best interests of the club.

Peter Laing
7 Posted 30/04/2013 at 10:45:03
Hicks and Gillette received dog's abuse from the Liverpool Echo on the back of their support for the Spirit Shankley but Robert Earl does not receive a cursory glance from the local media. Laughable reading this piece and the bullshit spouted by Kenwright regarding Earl raising the profile and brand of Everton FC.
Brin Williams
8 Posted 30/04/2013 at 12:01:32
Can someone please enlighten me - who is that fella who sits next to BK in the directors box. He's always there, is he one of the directors or the Mafia?

Ryan Holroyd
9 Posted 30/04/2013 at 11:42:59
Brin - That's Jon Woods
Patrick Murphy
10 Posted 30/04/2013 at 12:03:06
Brin just a quick note from the official site:

Jon Woods joined the board in 2000 but his family's involvement stretches back to 1892 when one of his ancestors loaned the fledgling Everton £1000 to build the original Goodison Road stand.

It's a curious twist of fate isn't it that someone involved in the new beginning of Everton FC all those years ago has a relation who is so financially uninvolved, well at least publicly anyway.

Kevin Tully
11 Posted 30/04/2013 at 12:22:27
Ernie #905, I am not 100% sure, but we may have the only Board in the Premier League who have not invested their own wealth beyond the initial cost of their shares. (Can anyone confirm this?)

Also, if they have no confidence in the club, or are not prepared to take us forward in some way, such as ground redevelopment, or player purchases, why are they even there?

The could have a rights issue to raise money, but that would mean diluting their shareholding.

It doesn't take much working out what their motives are, does it?

Ernie Baywood
12 Posted 30/04/2013 at 12:49:43
I suspect you're right Kevin. Most clubs carry a debt to an owner or holding company. With a quick google search, most of these look to have interest payable, which would be difficult for us to swallow. There are examples of interest free loans (eg Wigan) but I'm not sure of the ownership structure of those clubs. I could easily understand it if Whelan owns 90-100% of Wigan - the return is (largely) to him.

For us, if one director was to inject funds into the club either interest free or as a gift, it would increase the club's value and generate a return to all shareholders. No matter how much money I had (and, like many Evertonians, I've had that dream!) I wouldn't be prepared to gift it to wealthy individuals.

I don't pretend to be the font of all football finance knowledge, hence asking the question (and it was a genuine question). I also agree that the lack of investment by our owners appears to show a lack of commitment to the cause, but maybe it shows that we're just not an attractive investment?

Green makes his living buying into businesses that are undervalued and, with a close look at us, he doesn't want in.

Ross Edwards
13 Posted 30/04/2013 at 13:25:12
He's BK's imaginary lackey on the payroll that he can bring out in interviews about the money situation.

The BU interview was all "Robert Earl is important, he's a nice man" which struck me as if he was really saying "look Davey and Elstone, I have an imaginary friend called Robert, Robert, this is Davey and Elstone, meet Robert, he will be on the payroll and has a very important role here, he won't appear at Goodison at all".

Another cunning disappearing act, BK's been hiding the money under the table for 11 years and he probably has Earl hiding under his bed... with Moyes in it!

Peter Laing
14 Posted 30/04/2013 at 13:22:49
Ernie, Moyes needed money in January, he recognised that Jelavic was seriously misfiring and out of form, that Fellaini's early season goal scoring prowess was likely to dwindle and that the signing of a forward was a must if a serious challenge on champions league qualification was to be mounted.

In business, the saying goes "speculate to accumulate"; if any one of the wealthy directors on Everton's board came up with the money for such a striker, then maybe we would be looking at being a lot closer to the top four than we currently are. Just say Everton had a Benteke, a Van Persie, Bale or a Suarez – how much closer would we be?

Brin Williams
15 Posted 30/04/2013 at 13:46:20
Thanks Ryan & Patrick - Jon Woods eh? Knock on!!
Eric Myles
16 Posted 30/04/2013 at 14:58:50
In the email from the CEO of Knowsley Council dated 23 May 2008 "We are however, being advised by our planning QC that there is still a high chance, despite everyone's best efforts that the application will get called in."

So everyone involved knew it would get called in but stillmthey persisted in the folly and ultimately lied to the Inquiry.

Eric Myles
17 Posted 30/04/2013 at 15:01:36
Kevin #992, a rights issue does not mean the current directors have to dilute their shareholding, they can easily maintian the same percentage just by buying some of the shares.

Also if 1 director was prepared to inject money it wouldn't be a case of gifting it to the other shareholders if a contract was written to the effect that he would be the only or major beneficiary from the increased revenue / return.

Any member of the board could also do what Abrahmovic has done at Chelsea and any money loaned to the Club be converted to equity.

Kevin Tully
18 Posted 30/04/2013 at 15:28:30
Eric, couldn't they also offer rights to current smaller shareholders?

From memory, didn't Spurs raise money for ground improvements this way?

Jackie Barry
19 Posted 30/04/2013 at 15:27:14
Great article. I didn't think it was a case of Paul Gregg wanting to get rid of his shares I thought it was more a case of him being the only one that would challenge BK and he had his own plans of which direction Everton should be moving. I have always been left wondering what if in regards to Paul Gregg.
Peter Foy
20 Posted 30/04/2013 at 15:58:25
Same here Jackie.

I'm sure Paul Gregg was willing to fund the King's Dock stadium but Bill wasn't willing to dilute his shares.

It makes it even worse that had he given Gregg the go ahead, Bill's own shareholding would have actually been worth the 35m that he's looking for now.

And we would have really got a 'World Class', 'Virtually Free (30m), stadium with some of the best 'Transport Infrastructure' in the country.

Peter Foy
21 Posted 30/04/2013 at 16:10:26
Let's also not forget how Paul Gregg, Bill's 'Lifelong Friend' was subjected to a media witch hunt which they finally admitted to being 'A Means to an end'.

If Davie Moyes leaves in the summer will he also be subjected to a similar 'Means to an end'?

Ernie Baywood
22 Posted 30/04/2013 at 16:07:24
Eric, that sounds exactly like diluting shares to me. Either you have a reduced shareholding or have to pay more just to maintain your current %.

Peter, I absolutely agree that a cash injection was needed in Jan but if it was such a no brainer then someone would have done it. Which tells me that either:

1). Our owners don't believe we are likely to return on investment
2). It's simply too difficult to invest in Everton.

David Jones
23 Posted 30/04/2013 at 19:13:24
Hmmm I always too wonder what life under Paul Gregg would have been like. If it's right that Kenwright stopped the Kings Dock for the sake of his shareholding then he is the worst Evertonian to have lived.

Life under this board is a complete mystery — we're totally cut off. They have it all sewn up — we just get told what they want us to hear.

I can't believe as Evertonians we allow it to happen. Record debts, no investment, no plans to move the club forward. And we'll probably end up with Billy Davies as manager.

A concerned Evertonian

Kenwright out

Derek Turner
25 Posted 30/04/2013 at 21:18:42
My name is Earl,

I have a list of all the bad things I have done, and in a bid to rectify them all I have left Goodison for some loose friendships and light entertainment of no purpose elsewhere. Please call one of my idiot friends if you have any questions.

Eric Myles
26 Posted 01/05/2013 at 11:07:56
Ernie, if you maintain your same percentage then it is not a dilution.

Kevin, they're not likely to offer rights to smaller shareholdings.

Richard Dodd
27 Posted 01/05/2013 at 16:30:13
Who is Robert Earl?

Well, someone of that name had three big hits in the fifties:–

"I may never pass this way again"
"More than ever"
"Wonderful secret of love"

The first seems very appropriate re his one appearance at Goodison — but was this top crooner our Robert Earl or his dad?

Ross Edwards
28 Posted 01/05/2013 at 16:46:53
Was it your incarnation Doddy? Is that why you supported Kenwright through thick and thin until fairly recently? You also said that you received emails from Rossy and from the club.

Coul ... no, it can't be... Doddy is Robert Earl!

Case solved!

Ernie Baywood
29 Posted 01/05/2013 at 16:48:54
I understand that Eric, you just have to pay more to maintain the same percentage (albeit in a business with more capital).

Patrick Murphy
30 Posted 01/05/2013 at 16:54:07
I might be incorrect but is this Mr Robert Earl's biography?

You know the kind of guy who does nothing but bad things and then wonders why his life sucks? Well, that was me. Every time something good happened to me, something bad was always waiting round the corner: karma. That's when I realized that I had to change, so I made a list of everything bad I've ever done and one by one I'm gonna make up for all my mistakes. I'm just trying to be a better person. My name is Earl.

Apparently when the list is completed he will turn his focus on to that football club he has shares in.
.


Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads

© ToffeeWeb