This article may have been recategorised and is therefore no longer available at this URL.

You can try to find the updated link in the article archive.

Share article:

Reader Comments (23)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Dick Fearon
1 Posted 24/08/2014 at 04:37:55
Hey, Ken, except for a few omissions, you covered it. You seem to have this same outlook as Roberto, attack attack attack! IMO that would normally be OK but, with less than 15 mins to go and sitting on a two-goal lead, it was a stupid mistake to throw caution to the winds by bringing on attackers when our defence was barely hanging on. If ever the bus should have been parked, it was in those final few minutes against Arsenal.

A few other gripes: Whoever is our fitness coach should be shown the door. And Osman should not be allowed anywhere near the first team.

Rant over.

Matt Traynor
2 Posted 24/08/2014 at 07:22:02
Good report, Ken. I was sat in the top balcony – first time since Wayne Clarke ended Liverpool's unbeaten start to the season back in '88, and I'd forgotten how good a view it is.

You've pretty much summed it up. I thought after 55 minutes we offered nothing, and it was a question of when, not if, Arsenal would peg us back.

I agree about bringing someone like Besic on to see the game out. I would've brought Atsu on when Pienaar was crocked, just for his pace. Had we got the 3rd goal, I think Arsenal would've collapsed, but the pundits often call 2-0 a dangerous score, as when they get one back, their tails are up and the other team often becomes nervous – just like today. As it was, it looked almost as if our players were deliberately avoiding passing to Atsu!

Naismith MotM for me.

Ajay Gopal
3 Posted 24/08/2014 at 06:58:57
Martinez admitted in his post-match interview that the players were tired during the last 15 minutes. I am sure he will figure out how to keep the bodies working the full 90 minutes and how to rotate the squad and make the right substitutions. I agree, he should have brought on Besic in place of Mirallas.

Losing Pienaar early was a bit of a blow – as a result, Osman came on very early and he was also running on empty in the last 15 minutes. McGeady should have started instead of Mirallas – he would have surely buried the 1-on-1 chance that came his way in the 1st half.

The positives were Lukaku's effort and sublime pass to set up the 2nd goal, and the more I see Naismith, the more I like him. He and Lukaku will form a good partnership for us and score a lot of goals between them. We do badly need 1 more striker – Welbeck will be a fantastic signing for us, if that ever happens (unlikely, I know).

Although the two results are bitterly disappointing, in the context of the entire season, I think valuable lessons would have been learnt by the coaching staff and the players. I am taking the Martinez view of things here, to overcome the disappointment.

Tony Abrahams
4 Posted 24/08/2014 at 08:49:19
Good report, Ken, you have pretty much summed it up there, mate. We should have six points, but we only have two, but that's Everton for yer isn't it!

I think it was just tiredness that caught up with us because I didn't really see any change in shape, in trying to protect our two-goal lead. Every time they attacked second half, we kept three players up and I was surprised that Martinez never tried to shore things up, because that seemed the most obvious thing to do, to me.

That said, some of the football we played was quite magnificent! And will hopefully only get better when the squad gets closer to proper match fitness.

I agree with your MotM; I found it hard to split them as well, with Naismith fast becoming the modern day Alan Harper!

Gary Cargill
5 Posted 24/08/2014 at 09:16:44
I thought we were our sublime selves first half and ran out of legs after 70 mins. You have to look at pre-season preparations. I just don't think we are quite there yet physically which impacts mentally.

I always enjoy your write-up ken, and your writing, but did you know the term 'Get Down To The Nitty-Gritty' is racially on the knuckle and has been banned by the police?

To "get down to the nitty-gritty" means to get down to basics, or the bottom line. This comes from the days of slave ships from Africa. The prettiest African women were put down in the hold were they were naturally covered in grit and nits (lice) for the sailors to use as sex slaves.

'Getting down to the Nitty Gritty.' The police have banned officers from using the term.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1988681.stm

Mike Childs
6 Posted 24/08/2014 at 09:27:25
Great report, Ken, I thoroughly enjoyed.

I can't believe how much Distin has lost off his game. I thought Jags had his moments yesterday; unfortunately he also had some less than stellar moments as well.

Very worried about Rom's foot.

Mike Oates
7 Posted 24/08/2014 at 09:49:33
When we have the energy we are a match for anyone, but in both opening games we've completely run out of steam. Whether Roberto is right in building up fitness levels over the next few weeks only time will tell but until we reach the levels required we are going to suffer.

Pre-season was poorly constructed, I know we had the World Cup but for goodness sake in 2 years we'll have the European Championships, does it mean we 'll only bit fit and ready every other season?

Simon George
8 Posted 24/08/2014 at 11:03:31
We're all disappointed and, yes, in some ways it does feel like a loss, but let's put this into context, Arsenal are a better team than us, no matter which way you look at it, and we drew with them. The Leicester draw should really be more disappointing than this game because we were the better team in that line up.

Two tricky games to start and 2 points; not a great start, but certainly shouldn't be looked at as disappointing either in my opinion.

Mike Hughes
9 Posted 24/08/2014 at 11:52:43
Regardless of whether you are a glass half-full or half-empty person, the fact remains we were in winning positions with minutes to go and should have seen them out to take maximum points.

If that is not seen as disappointing (to put it mildly), then it goes against 'Nil Satis' as far as I'm concerned and is accepting of mediocrity and 5th / 6th place. Stuff that!

For those who say, "It's still early days" — that is totally irrelevant. The season starts in August. Chelsea and Man City won't be trundling along with their holiday heads on because it's still warm outside. They will be match fit and out to grab every point they can.

It's 4 points dropped and that might cost us at the end of the season — just like they cost us last season.

I like the 'beautiful game' but not at any cost. There comes a point when we have to be more savvy in our approach. Professionalism, park-the-bus or whatever — we have to be more ruthless in closing out games and taking points.

Easier said than done, I know, but a lot easier when you're in the lead (which we were in both games) and if you're match fit.

Worse teams than us beat Arsenal last season and worse teams than us will beat Leicester this season.

Nicky Styles
10 Posted 24/08/2014 at 12:20:51
Simon George, I don’t agree, mate. I genuinely don’t believe the Arse are a better side than us. Go player by player, I would consider us to be as strong as them. Further, take Ramsey out of their game and they are bloody ordinary.

The points dropped yesterday was as much down to us as it was to Arsenal. Still, it’s early days. This time last year, we were even less convincing... so onwards and upwards.

As for the fitness issue, well, it really shouldnt be one. If the other 19 clubs in the league can manage to put a shift in for 90 mins, why can’t we??

Trevor Thompson
11 Posted 24/08/2014 at 12:35:42
Mike, Spot on. If we had drawn those two games by conceding in the 60th and 70th mins then I'd have been annoyed the fact we had 10 mins left in the game angers me. Last season, we knew how to see out games; this season has been the complete opposite. I blame RM. When we have looked leggy, instead of putting on Besic he puts on Atsu. I don't understand it.

Then he talks about being 2-0 up being dangerous. WTF! No, that should be a good thing. What does he want us to win games 10-0? Maybe we might be able to win the game 10-9 if we did go 10 up with 5 mins to go.

I think he lives in a world where the beautiful game always comes through. He reminds me of Tele Satanna, the 1982 Brazil manager. Very naïve. Maybe... and it's a big maybe. He might change his philosophy next season and be a bit more pragmatic.

Raymond Fox
12 Posted 24/08/2014 at 12:23:39
Winning's simple, Mike, ain't it!

We did park the bus – that was part of the problem; our experienced defenders just didn't do their job very well.

If someone had said before the match we would be 2-0 up after 83 mins, I would have said it was unlikely, wouldn't you?

Coleman was letting Arsenal cross at will from his side. I thought the cross for their first should have been cut out, it looked a bit soft from our perspective. Same for their second, they were allowed to cross the ball again and it was a beauty, just dropping perfectly for Giroud who caused us lots of problems when he came on.

We are looking vulnerable at the back in the matches I have seen this season, maybe old father time has caught up with Jags and Distin!

As far as the failure to use Besic as a substitute is concerned, we don't know what goes on behind closed doors, there could be reasons why he wasn't brought on that we don't know about.

Harold Matthews
13 Posted 24/08/2014 at 14:55:45
Matt. Interesting point regarding Atsu. On his O/S interview, Baines didn't sound too enthusiastic about the lad joining us.
Michael Penley
14 Posted 24/08/2014 at 15:05:49
And when has Baines ever sounded enthusiastic about anything?
Matthew Barry
15 Posted 24/08/2014 at 16:36:35
Frustrated about yesterday's result. Certainly after 80 mins of great passing, pace and attacking intent. Lots have been said about pre-season and the lack of it, but it got me think a bit more about it and whether there is a longer-term strategy.

All going well in all competitions, we could potentially be involved in 60-plus games, off the back of a World Cup. Roberto said after the game 'where we are in the season', that to me sounds like there was a plan not to run the players into the ground over pre-season and work them into a season with lots to play for a bit more conservatively than the previous regime.

Allied to the smallish squad we have and sadly some players more susceptible to injuries than others, I do think there are some long-term plans in place for the business end of the season. Granted we need to add a few more players between now and a week Monday, and I think we will.

Again, as frustrating as yesterday was, the performances of McCarthy and Naismith were first class. With a ¾-fit Mirallas and Rom, and losing or most creative player within 10 mins, we still were better than Arsenal for 80 mins.

Fitness will come, along with results and hopefully that elusive trophy!! COYB

Rob Dixon
16 Posted 24/08/2014 at 17:26:40
Ray 12, I think you are a bit harsh on Coleman there, maybe with the first goal, but the second was an overhit cross for which he was rightly defending the back post, he didn't have time to get out to Monreal who should probably have been covered by our right-sided midfielder (if we had had one!!) but he had little help in front of him in that last 20 mins, Monreal was playing like a left winger and Coleman always seemed to have 2 or 3 against him. McCarthy did his best to cover him, but I think Coleman was feeling it in that last 10 mins, after his injury.

I agree with most it was clear we needed to shore up our right and a change to 4-4-2 or 4-4-1-1 would have done this and still offered a counter-attacking option as they were throwing players forward. We just couldn't get hold of the ball for long enough, hence we tired with all the chasing. IMO.

On the whole, despite another disappointing result, we have to be optimistic after that display.

Raymond Fox
17 Posted 24/08/2014 at 18:01:41
You could be right, Rob. I posted from memory which is going downhill fast, from what I could recollect, the two crosses that they scored from came from Seamus's side where they seemed to be getting time and space.

As I say, I may be wrong in just pinning it on Seamus, if I am I apologise to him.

Habib Erkan Jr.
18 Posted 24/08/2014 at 18:39:55
Though EFC has been the team I support here in Texas for years this is my first post. In my humble opinion, Lukaku scares the crap out of the opposition. Regardless of whether or not he scores, he opens space for our other attackers and prevents the opposition from pushing up in numbers.

Last week, he ran out of gas; this week, he was taken off due to a toe injury. In both instances, changing the dynamics of the game. Since we do not have a striker of similar ability on the bench, I agree with those who have suggested that Besic, not McGeady, is the answer to protect a lead when Romelu’s shift is done.

Rob Dixon
19 Posted 24/08/2014 at 18:38:51
Ray, you are right: both crosses did come from Seamus's side and they were getting time and space, but I feel he was getting little support at times.

I am all for RM and his attacking philosophy – it is great to watch and had we got the 3rd we wouldn't be having this debate, but he admits we looked tired last 15 mins, which is why I didn't understand the last sub. Besic/Stones for Osman IMO and shore it up down our right, play 4 across the middle. Ossie I thought did well, but had run himself out.

ps: This is not hindsight, we discussed this in our area with 10 mins to go !!

Mike Hughes
20 Posted 24/08/2014 at 18:58:20
Raymond (#12),

Just to come back on your point, I did state 'professionalism, park-the-bus or whatever' rather than simply one way.

It's obviously up to the manager to decide how we play, read the game and make the appropriate changes, right?

And I also mentioned that it's 'easier' said than done rather than 'simple'. But winning has to be 'simpler' when 2-0 up towards the end of the game, surely?

Michael Kidd
21 Posted 24/08/2014 at 19:24:07
Arsenal were far below par in the first half. It may be that we didn't allow them to play but I have seldom see them play so many bad passes. It really was one-way traffic at half-time. I didn't text my Gunner mates to goad them because I always wait for the fat lady to sing and, boy, did she ever deliver a lung-buster yesterday!

Whatever people may think about letting the Arse back into the game in the second half (which we did, in my view) and Roberto making a mistake with his subs (which were questionable), at the end of the day we would not have lost had it not been for some truly poor defending, mainly from Distin.

If you look at the first goal, there is no Arsenal player in a threatening position in the box just before the cross comes in – Ramsey makes a run and Distin doesn't even notice and doesn't even move. Had he ran towards the goal when he saw Ramsey moving in, the ball doesn't get to Ramsey. Poor.

As for the second, we all saw it. A decent defender doesn't let the guy get a header away. Lots of positives, though and a good report once again, Ken. Thanks!

Aman Kanji
22 Posted 25/08/2014 at 00:56:27
Has anyone seen the image at the front of the Sunday Times today... says it all... Giroud holding down Dizzy for the second goal. I haven’t heard anyone complain... including RM. I'm getting fed up of holding in the box – it needs to be sorted.

And McCarthy for Captain!

Pat Waine
23 Posted 28/08/2014 at 11:52:12
I don't go with the criticism. Evertonians will have to realise that Roberto has a way of playing – it goes like this: You always keep players that can break at your opponents no matter what the score. Parking the bus is not his style. And I would say it is not the School of Science way either.

We played some wonderful football against Arsenal and will not win every game playing as open as we do but the fact is we will entertain and play the game as it's meant to be played.

COYB. Long live the School of Science!!!


Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads


, placement: 'Below Article Thumbnails', target_type: 'mix' });