Where Is the Money, Bill?

Denis Richardson 05/08/2015 84comments  |  Jump to last
With barely 3 days to go before the start of the season, Everton find themselves in the now usual position of approaching the big kick-off with essentially the same squad as the previous season, arguably weaker. With the loss of Alcaraz and Distin and the additions of Deulofeu and Cleverley, it's clear we've strengthened the midfield whilst the defence has gone the other way.

In the past, under Moyes, this lack of transfer activity would have been grudgingly accepted by most Blues due to the eternal 'lack of funds' at the club. This situation has seemed to exist for at least the last 15 odd years. That is, however, up to 2014….

With the first and now second of the 'new' Sky deals kicking in, the amount of cash given to each and every Premier League side has increased almost exponentially. To put things into context, Cardiff, who finished bottom in the 2013-14 season, received £63m in TV prize money. This was more prize money than Manchester United received the season before – and they just happened to be Champions!

The previous pauper status of our beloved club has been well known by most fans for a number of years. However, in this new climate of Murdoch cash-splash, we are no longer poor and no longer need to pinch pennies... so the question has to be asked: WHERE IS THE MONEY, BILL???

Assuming the wages for Cleverley and Deulofeu are somewhat netted off with the savings in wages from the departures of Distin and Alcaraz, we have so far spent about £4.2m on new players. There simply has to be more money in the club, due to the increased TV cash. So why are we not signing anyone?

There could I supposed be a number of reasons for this ranging from:

  • The Board doesn’t trust the manager (odd if true as you'd simply get a new manager)
  • Players don't want to come to Everton (hard to believe given the cash available and club history)
  • Players don't want to play for Martinez (hard to believe simply given the cash available)
  • Using money to clear the debt (hopefully partly true but doesn’t explain the low spend so far)
  • Saving money to sort out the stadium issue (sorry, that was a joke)
  • Black hole - aka Other Operating Costs

There are still 4 weeks left in the transfer window so time for things to change. However, the fact we have got to the start of the season and the first team is hardly any better than it was at the end of the last season is extremely worrying. Especially when the likes of Newcastle, Swansea, Stoke, West Ham are signing quality players like Payet, Wijnaldum and Afellay. (And what happened to our manager's supposed strong Barça connection here?)

Never mind the top six clubs, we are being left behind by the next six! Realistically speaking, we are now not in the same league as the likes of Spurs and putting Everton and Champions League or 'top 4' in the same sentence is a joke. People thinking we just need 'a player of two' to challenge need to take a long hard look at our team, manager and style of play. We are miles off!

As usual, the silence from the club as far as anything progressive in general is deafening and the rumours now circulating seem to suggest we need to sell before we can buy – which brings us back to the above money question. The accounts of the club will provide some answers but they will sadly not be available for a few more months and will only cover the year up to 31 May 2015.

It is simply not possible to hide the sums of money the club is now generating so we wait to see what the mythical 'other operating costs' will now be.

I really cannot see us averaging more than a point a game for the first 10 games of the season, if we're lucky.

Disillusioned fan.

Share this article

Reader Comments (84)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Tony Abrahams
1 Posted 05/08/2015 at 17:36:00
Disillusioned fan x 2! Someone told me today that he thinks there is money but Bill doesn’t trust the manager?

Then, like you, he said that there’s still 4 weeks left of this window?

Neither comment filled me with much hope, especially since it means we are nowhere near prepared, once again.

Chris Feeley
2 Posted 05/08/2015 at 17:53:23
Disillusioned and angry. I'm not convinced by Martinez, but Kenwright and Elstone are quite frankly leaving him in an impossible situation. The lack of accountability at board level is sickening.
Michael Ward
3 Posted 05/08/2015 at 17:56:02
I think/hope that our current lack of transfer activity is due to a number of reasons, namely:

1 - Martinez wanted to get some players in early and use the rest of pre-season to assess if there was any way to fill other positions within the squad. For example Browning has impressed and looks to have covered one of the two CB berths that needed filling. On the other hand, Kone has been dreadful, so he now thinks he needs a replacement in that area and Pienaar has proved his fitness cannot be replied upon.

2 - Early signings were too good to pass up so we’re done early. Cleverley was free and Deulofeu was cheap. He wanted to take care before he spent the big part of his transfer budget.

3 - Timing of Sky payment and wage saving tactics mean big signings are made later in window. This has to be an explanation, quite a lot of business seems to have been going through in this last week, which makes me think this is an issue for a number of teams.

I am hoping for a deal this week and some deadline loans. I also agree with Mourinho for once, the transfer window should end before the season starts as it is disruptive for the teams who don’t have endless money.

Stephen Brown
4 Posted 05/08/2015 at 18:00:23
We spent more in the preseason of 1988!
David Barks
5 Posted 05/08/2015 at 18:00:45
Who says the Board hasn’t given him funds? I don’t think I would ever want the Chairman or CEO to publicly announce how much they have given to the manager to spend, since then everyone we negotiate with will be using that figure against them.

They let him smash the transfer record for Lukaku just last season. They let him sign an old Gareth Barry to a multi-year contract, while still having to pay his prior club even though his contract was up. They let him come close to breaking our transfer record to sign his former player McCarthy. And they then let him buy another defensive midfielder in Besic. And now they’ve let him sign yet another defensive midfielder in Cleverley.

They let him pay the wages of Atsu while he was on loan here, but Martinez would never use him. They let him sign his former keeper who, when given a chance, played very well, only for Martinez to drop him after a string of 3 clean sheets. They let him sign McGeady even though Martinez refuses to play with two wingers. And now he’s signed Gerard to fill another wing spot, which will be on the bench.

The Board has actually let him spend money. I just don’t think he knows what the hell he’s doing. Four defensive midfielders, on top of Osman and Barkley. Would you give him money?

Paul Kossoff
6 Posted 05/08/2015 at 18:00:56
Tony 1, yes, four weeks of the window but we need players in now. In four weeks we could already be adrift of teams who have strengthened, and with our injury list already growing, I'm more than worried.
Colin Glassar
7 Posted 05/08/2015 at 18:11:34
Don't hold your breath waiting for an answer from BP Bill or Sideshow Bob.
Joe Foster
8 Posted 05/08/2015 at 18:14:39
It’s just one of the great mysteries of the universe.
Mark Tanton
9 Posted 05/08/2015 at 18:28:08
It's certainly unusual that the club seems satisfied, determined even, to sacrifice the first month of the season, year on year.
Danny Broderick
10 Posted 05/08/2015 at 18:40:40
We probably will bring in some players once the Sky money is in in 2 weeks time. But I am worried about the financial management of the club - we seem to be permanently robbing Peter to pay Paul. There's no long term ambition or plans.

How can it be right that the manager can state 1 week before the season starts that we still need 3 players? If Jags pulls up injured this week, we'll have 1 centre half who is 21, and another who is 18. We've done nothing to address the goal scoring problems of last season.

Why is it we always seem to go into seasons under-prepared, either in terms of fitness, or recruitment? If we recruit on deadline day again, those players will have missed a month of the season, FFS!

Kieran Kinsella
11 Posted 05/08/2015 at 18:43:24
If we follow the pattern of the past then basically they’re waiting for deadline day when they’ll splash the cash the recoup it plus more by selling Stones.

BK will say RM can spend the Stones money at Christmas but he won’t cause it’s a tough market so he will get someone in on deadline day as a loaner winger (Pienaar, Donovan, Atsu, McGeady -- you know the routine) then we will be told they’ll do the summer business early but then the money will disappear.

Then we will start the cycle again.

Jay Harris
12 Posted 05/08/2015 at 18:46:23
Denis, the silence from our board on all issues is deafening.

It looks to me like they are neither backing him nor sacking him.

Its a bit like death of 1000 cuts and is painful for all supporters.

I am not sure of the majority but certainly a lot of Evertonians thought he should have never been appointed and/or at least sacked after the showing last Xmas when there were no Europa League games to blame.

Martinez does not appear to be as pressurized as he was last season judging by his demeanor so I think it is fair to say the board are prepared to back him for now but they may well have restricted his transfer kitty.

Time will tell but patience appears to be rapidly running out amongst supporters.

Ian McDowell
13 Posted 05/08/2015 at 18:47:40
Anyone else have a horrible feeling that, if it all goes wrong this season, Sam Allardyce could be in charge by boxing day?
Graham Marsh
14 Posted 05/08/2015 at 18:55:23
I believe there’s a meeting of disillusioned Blues at the taxi club at 11h30 on Saturday.
Jay Harris
15 Posted 05/08/2015 at 18:55:34
Bill couldn’t handle big Sam, Ian.

I expect Martinez till the end of the season when Moyes will be approached to come back.

Paul Jeronovich
16 Posted 05/08/2015 at 19:00:58
No doubt we need to get players in which in simple terms means we have to spend some money. The squad is painfully thin.

I don’t for a second believe players will be sold due to the amount of injuries we’ve got. Never mind selling Stones, we need to sell Gibson, Pienaar, Hibbert and Kone. They should now be classed as expensive liabilities to a club on a stretched budget.

Tom R Owen
17 Posted 05/08/2015 at 19:11:42
Wise words, Jay (12)

However I hope your prediction of Moyes back does not happen. I do believe RM will be out by Christmas and the luvvie will promote Ferguson. All the hype following the testimonial says "next Everton manager".

Also, I agree with Paul (16) - those 4 combined must be on a salary of £120k a week. Utter madness as their contribution will be marginal.
Kunal Desai
18 Posted 05/08/2015 at 19:12:46
As long as we finish 4th from bottom the Board are satisfied. The ever increasing television money bulging greater in the pockets of Kenwright, Woods and Earl. There hasn’t been any ambition from the Board over the years to progress this club and there never will be. We as fans suffer as a result of their greed.

Another season of Martinez will presumably mean a lesser payoff to get rid of Martinez.

John Otway
19 Posted 05/08/2015 at 19:27:20
Kunai. Never forget the potty mouthed but highly influential Green.
Brian Harrison
20 Posted 05/08/2015 at 19:32:01
I was listening to David Moyes doing an interview the other day and he was saying that, when he joined, BK told him the most he could give him for transfers was £5 million a year. The trouble was that BK wasn’t a rich man and when the banks wouldn’t lend Everton a penny he was forced to go to the money lenders. No doubt they wanted a high price for their money so Robert Earl and others will be getting a nice % on their loans.

With Moyes, he had a safe pair of hands, someone who could spot a player, and his record for buying cheap and selling big was second to no-one. Also Moyes had us finishing in the top 6 on a regular basis so there was more money brought into the club.

I think he has realized that in RM we will struggle to maintain anywhere near the top 6 and could flirt with the wrong end of the table. So he now faces the dilemma, does he let RM blow all this season's transfer budget and, if it goes pear-shaped, he would be forced to sack him. But he would have to attract a new manager and tell him there is no money for transfers till next season.

Joe Foster
21 Posted 05/08/2015 at 19:40:45
At least next season there will be more money than ever to disappear (if we are still in the top flight). Maybe David Copperfield is on our board.
Ian McDowell
22 Posted 05/08/2015 at 19:55:51
I never really bother in engaging in discussion about the board, directors and stadium move. We have had so many lies, false dawns etc it's just not worth it. Robert Elstone as our CEO says it all. I wouldn’t let him run our local Help the Aged shop. Completely out of his depth.
Jay Harris
23 Posted 05/08/2015 at 20:06:06
Totally agree with you, Ian.

Bill sacked Michael Dunning who was on £100k a year so he could bring his own yes men in on £400k a year but, four chief execs later, we end up with a glorified accountant who can massage the numbers fine but is out of his depth in other respects.

Joe, Bill would run rings around David Copperfield in terms of making things disappear or appear differently than they are.

Greg Mckerracher
24 Posted 05/08/2015 at 20:08:21
Or how about we are waiting for the right players? In Roberto’s first season, would you have preferred we splashed out all of our remaining funds on average players or waited until the last day to bring in 3 players who would revolutionise our season (Lukaku, Barry and McCarthy)?

We have a really strong young team, we need good players to improve our squad -- they will be working furiously behind the scenes and they will get players in. Chillax.

Jay Harris
25 Posted 05/08/2015 at 20:11:51
Tom,

I still cannot understand why, as a top 5/6 regular we did not go out and headhunt some of Europe's top managers instead of Bill having a brandy with Dave Whelan and agreeing to take Roberto off his hands and pay him for the privilege.

This is the guy who tells us he is "Everton’s best saleman" and is "looking 24/7" for the past 15 years. Now, even if both are true, what have we got to show for it? No investment and a relegation manager.

Frank Wade
26 Posted 05/08/2015 at 20:16:52
Kunai, my understanding from previous annual accounts, subject to correction, is that the directors do not take any money from the club, at least Bill K doesn't and hasn't.
William Cartwright
27 Posted 05/08/2015 at 20:20:43
Positive scenario in support of Roberto is we may keep Stones, follow up with the outstanding 2 or 3 key additions (as I think we will).

In spite of Roberto’s various ego and communication foibles, I do believe he is essentially honest and sincere and extremely capable. Therefore players will come in. Also, in spite of last season, he may well have a lot to offer. So much rests on his relationship with the dressing room.

Relating to this is the Duncan Ferguson testimonial match close out was amazing. Being careful what you wish for, nothing would make me happier than a revival under the talismanic Scot with a rampant Rooney pulling the strings on the field and possibly contributing off it. Don’t forget, he is probably wealthy enough to play a partial investment role. One can dream.

In fairness to Martinez, who (I think) fully supported Duncan’s match, could still turn the situation around. Massively optimistic I know, but we should find out whether it's ’shit or bust’ time within the first 5 games.

It goes to show how vital the manager is to the function and success of the team, and how the success of the club really rests on the shoulder’s of 11 young men. Bill Kenwright will have his strategies but he can only exercise so much control over events on the pitch, if at all.

That's probably why he’s so quiet at the moment. It makes a good side show to the normal pre-season anticipation, and I’m surprised the media haven’t seen a developing story. (Oh, I forgot... it's the Blues we are talking about, not the Reds... Silly me!)

Ian McDowell
28 Posted 05/08/2015 at 20:20:55
Damn... no wonder we are skint if we have been paying Blue Bill by the hour for the past 15 years for his 24/7 search of new investment whilst at the same time looking for an area to build a new stadium.
Ian McDowell
29 Posted 05/08/2015 at 20:25:44
William, I like Roberto and I’m desperate for him to succeed but some of his decisions baffle me. His treatment of Distin for one.

If anyone thinks we had a better chance of securing a result in Kiev with Alcaraz in the team ahead of Distin then they obviously have not witnessed any Everton game in the prior 18 Months.

Frank Wade
30 Posted 05/08/2015 at 20:36:35
I think Michael in 3 above is closest to the mark. Martinez has said a few times that he expects to do business by the end of the window. It does make sense to fully suss out the abilities of those like Browning, Galloway, McAleny and Kone, while also assessing the likelihood of Gibson, Pienaar, Hibbert and Kone again etc staying fit, before venturing into the market.

Like most on here, I would prefer to see a manager with a more clear cut vision of his squad and the transfer market, who would finalise dealings prior to pre-season training. I suppose it's a fluid situation and not even the monied Chelski can finalise their squad before the season starts, for which we should be grateful to Bill and his board.

Gibson, Pienaar, Hibbert and Kone are all on contracts and unlikely to be in demand by a club who would be willing to pay them more or even the same, so we are ’stuck’ with them. We cannot just sack players or sell them off in the short term, as suggested by Paul and Tom above.

Dan Nulty
31 Posted 05/08/2015 at 20:41:30
I expect our business to be done next week. I can’t believe we won’t make more signings, I just can’t. There is no way the money isn’t there I just think that the board are simply waiting it out to see if they can get a bargain rather than pay over the odds. Austin still hasn’t moved yet and now that Newcastle have signed Mitrovic I think we will pick him up at less than QPR wanted at the start of the window as they look to save costs.

I also think our accounts will look good when released; they have to do. That for me suggests they really are looking for investment as, showing a profitable company, debt-free, is a much more investable proposition. They have a real opportunity in the next 12 months to move our club forward and I have never resorted to some of the hate delivered on here but for me now, there has to be evidence we are moving forward on and off the pitch in the next 12 months; otherwise I too will become disillusioned.

I really hope I am right and the next 10 days, after players instruct their agents to look elsewhere when they have missed out on selection, mean we can pick up some much-needed talent.

Mark Tanton
32 Posted 05/08/2015 at 20:47:02
Could be worse. We could support Kids Company.
Colin Glassar
33 Posted 05/08/2015 at 20:47:15
Greg 24, your positive post was positively revolting. How dare you remain optimistic.
Tony Abrahams
34 Posted 05/08/2015 at 20:49:44
Brian 20, it was only two years ago that we got a new manager in. He had to sell before he could buy.

Let’s have it right, the last-minute transfer has always been part of the Kenwright regime.

I’m with you, Paul; I just think it is very amateurish the way our squad is always short at the start.

Tom R Owen
35 Posted 05/08/2015 at 20:50:20
Jay,

As we all sadly know, the power and kudos that being Chairman is what keeps Blue Bill going. The search for investment and having the best interests of club are second and third to him and his "toy".

I am sure anyone vaguely interested would take one look at the debt, the lack of investment over the years, and the gross amateur way OUR club is run... and no thanks.

We are lumbered with a board happy to bumble along, not investing, employing a mouthpiece who earns a huge six-figure sum and cannot negotiate a replica kit deal that makes a profit for the club. This means we will not attract the "next level" of players to take us into the Champions League on a regular basis.

Instead, we have a squad with some very good young players who in time will move on along with the likes of Gibson, Barry and Kone. God help if Stones and Rom are both injured regularly.

That will see us in the bottom 4 by November and then, when it’s too late, BK will sack RM and tell everyone how great a Chairman he is.

Said it before on here and got lambasted -- the buck stops with BK.

Zahir Jaffer
36 Posted 05/08/2015 at 21:05:54
Kieran (#11), it's the same old, same old stuff but it's different. Now It’s just more agonising to see our transfer tactics and our on-field tactics so very predictable and parallel to one another. There are rarely any surprises on how it’s going to be played.

Those three positions RM needs to fill will not be. He’s going to have to choose one, if fortunate enough, two of those positions. If Lukaku gets injured we’re screwed. If any of our CBs get injured, we’re royally screwed. If our #10 gets injured, we’ll cross that bridge when we come to it.

CBs come hell of a lot cheaper than any other position, and that’s where our focus should be this window. Instead of loaning a winger, I’d take a striker.
Peter Laing
37 Posted 05/08/2015 at 21:12:46
Another article that could have and probably has been written using the same narrative at anytime during Kenwright's tenure. The lack of pre-season transfer activity is usually mirrored in the January window, on too many occasions the board have remained inactive, failed to bolster the squad and we have fallen short at the business end of the season.

Slow starts, poor finishes and a lack of strategy contribute to our perennial standing as being an exclusive member of the also-rans. Top four finishes aside, our Cup runs are generally piss poor and the clock continues to tick in terms of lack of silverware.

The same can be said for the ground, until Kenwright moves on we are unfortunately stuck in a time-warp.

Paul Jeronovich
38 Posted 05/08/2015 at 21:14:35
Agree with Tony, don't know why we are surprised that we do all our business at the last minute. Sadly, it usually involves a player leaving and not the ones we'd be happy to see the back of.

Wouldn't it be better to do the serious business now, get the players in you want and get the season off to a good start. Bit bored of the drawn out drama now!

Tony Abrahams
39 Posted 05/08/2015 at 21:28:01
Paul, if I’m totally honest, I’m bored with football, even more bored with Everton, and pray for the day that Kenwright feels like I do right now.

The best we can hope for this season is that the football gets better, because I’m sure I’m not the only one who is fed up of being bored inside Goodison.

Bill Farmer
40 Posted 05/08/2015 at 21:53:32
An old mate told me today, "I haven't had a bet since Pinza won the Derby but I'd lay odds that Big Dunc will be in the hot seat by Crimbo and Moyes will be doing the buying next summer."

Make of that what you will but the guy's a shrewdy Evertonwise, I promise you!

Paul O'Neill
41 Posted 05/08/2015 at 22:06:08
Shout at Martinez all you like; bring in whomever you like as manager. Nothing will change until the board and ownership change.
Jay Harris
42 Posted 05/08/2015 at 22:15:38
Bill, that fits in with my thinking.

I would have liked us to set our sights higher but better the devil you know, I suppose.

Ste Traverse
43 Posted 05/08/2015 at 23:06:37
I’m sick and tired of the whole club right now. I’d had enough of Kenwright over 10 years ago and here we are in 2015 still lumbered with him with no sign of getting rid of him anytime soon.

I can’t raise any enthusiasm for the season ahead. But I have renewed my season ticket for the 21st season in a row, fuck knows why.

The club yesterday openly promoting comments from that tosser Rio Ferdinand that Stones should go to Man Utd was a real low point for me and sums up what pitiful people we have in charge and their small-time attitudes.

Tom Bowers
44 Posted 05/08/2015 at 23:19:01
Sadly I have to agree that the season doesn’t hold out any excitement for me either. I cannot see anything new the way the team plays and they just do not have the personnel who can break fast enough to trouble the defensive set-ups of the modern game.

The great weapon of Seamus, Bainsey and sometimes Delboy of two seasons ago, breaking quickly is no longer a force and the new lad Cleverley is just another everyday workhorse.

The starting eleven on Saturday will be so predictable with the usual suspects and probably the mercurial Osman starting again (Ha, ha!)
Spragg Johnson
45 Posted 05/08/2015 at 23:35:57
Ogbonna, Vidic, Dann, Dragovic, Holgate, Van Dijk, Evans, Heurtaux, Koulibaly, Gibson, Hendry and Mbodj.

These are the replacement centre backs we’ve been ’linked with since RM noted (well before the end of last season) that we needed cover in this area due to the departures of Distin and Alcaraz.

We have had MONTHS to find cover ... and nothing has happened ...with a couple of days until the season kicks off. Are Browning and Galloway really up to covering centre back if Stones or Jagielka fall over? Or will teacher’s pet Gareth Barry become the slowest defender ever to play in the Premier League. At this stage, I’d take Per Krøldrup as cover!

Watford will see us as being there for the taking. COYB ... that’s getting harder to say or write with any conviction.
Derek Thomas
46 Posted 06/08/2015 at 00:56:59
The real question is not "Where's the money, Bill?" The money we have at present is sitting in the Players Car Park, or Cheshire Mansions, some might be in BVI via Other Operating Costs... who knows. The new Money doesn't clear until late August.

The real question is... Where is the vision, the plan, the commitment, the ambition, the strategy etc. Both on and off the field.

Do Kenwright, his puppet masters, Green, Earl and however many others, even have a best scenario exit plan... besides the White Knight / Billionaire / Some other fool option??

[Lists usual litany of failure from the sublime KD to the ridiculous lack of lagging on the pipes.]

Then we have the number of times RM has given his version of Maggie's "The Lady is not for turning." Three is it? The happy-clappy total shite sound bites; the Distin cold shoulder; the Baines damning with faint praise; Garbutt's mis-speak / naïve, but seemingly true comments about people not knowing what was going on.

Osman on how 'easy' the training is, the mass resignations of the Physio staff, the Hammies, The Heavy Legs.

Not exactly a spiral of decline yet... but.

On a personal note, we all know that for most of us, times are less than totally affluent. 50% of my extortionate Foxtel bill goes on the sports package, in reality just to watch EFC. Up to now, I've been able to fight the Mrs off on this. I'm starting to think why bother.

Why bother getting up at 4:00am or staying up way way past midnight? I've already started recording stuff to watch on Sunday morning or on Monday evening after work only to hear the result, then read the TW reports and either fast forward all the passing shite, or just plain not bother, make do with Ken Buckley.

They've cut my drug of choice with so much shite that it doesn't do it any more... Beware, Bill... I'm nearly cured.

Fran Mitchell
48 Posted 06/08/2015 at 02:14:59
We’re not weaker. (Although Martinez’s training could have weakened the team.)

The defence has incorporated two very promising young defenders in place two old and past-it defenders.

But we are not stronger.

Denver Daniels
49 Posted 06/08/2015 at 02:21:20
Maybe Roberto has an x amount of money in the transfer kitty. He has identified the targets we need to bring in and ranked them from first choice downwards and according to how much they will cost.

As things stand, he could spend the x amount on second or third choice targets based on how much is in the pot. But if he waits until late in the window, maybe suspecting that Dear Luvvie will sell 1 or 2 of our prized assets, then we have a situation where he can afford to buy the 1st choice targets instead. So it’s better off waiting. Just possibly...

As for us not buying early to save on wages, that doesn’t make any sense. Premier League final positions are worth close to £1.25M each the higher up you end. So the difference between finishing 10th and 15th is about £6m.

If we signed 3 players at the start of July, paid them £60k a week, their wages would be roughly £1.5M. So getting off to a good start and setting the tone for the season would be better for us financially come the end of the season. The people running the club can’t be that stupid not to see this. At least I hope not.

Karl Masters
50 Posted 06/08/2015 at 02:24:01
Ste Traverse #43. Totally agree.

I'm sure players will come in late, just think Fellaini 2008, we came 5th and an FA Cup Final that season.

I'm more concerned with the style of play and lack of excitement in how we play. To read that we didn't have a shot on target against Villarreal until Rooney came on takes me back to last season all over again and suggests more of the same.

I've not planned going to a single match yet. I'll watch the early TV games and see what is occurring. If I see another match like that Spurs last day performance again, I'll not be going till a new Manager comes in. I've never felt this way before.

It's not entertainment, it's torture watching us play!

Derek Turner
51 Posted 06/08/2015 at 05:32:04
Jay (#15),

Just out of curiosity, I wonder what Moyes would do with this squad? He liked small squads, would size be an issue then? I couldn’t stand the man towards the end (well, pretty much after the first contract renewal saga, when he had Arteta voicing off about not staying if he didn’t get his bumper contract), and rejoiced when Oviedo put him down at OT (yes, I am bitter and petty), but he would surely have Barkley, Lukaku and Deulofeu running at defenses.

Big Sam would depress the hell out of me, especially as we have no height or ability in the air for his set-piece-fests. The bastard would buy Nolan for £8M and give him £90k a week for 4 years!

Matt Traynor
52 Posted 06/08/2015 at 06:15:18
Derek #51 interesting viewpoint. I have read here (and elsewhere) views from people that they'd pretty much welcome Moyes back with open arms. I'd rather not go back. It seldom works (Kendall II and III, Dalglish at RS. Mourihno is an exception backed by unlimited funds). I also haven't forgotten how he was complicit with our board in lowering expectations.

But, one thing I will give him credit for is the players always seemed fit, and you seldom saw anyone give up in a game.

I seriously doubt under him we'd have ever have signed Deulofeu and Lukaku though. Probably would've sold Barkley as well. To fund another versatile defender/midfielder.

Rick Tarleton
54 Posted 06/08/2015 at 06:51:17
When he’s sold Stones, Bill will allow the Catalonian to waste £10M on someone, none of us know anything about and he’ll be yet another all-purpose mid-fielder who’s neither fish nor fowl. And we’ll all have to be happy because there’s nothing we can do about it.
Martin Mason
55 Posted 06/08/2015 at 07:55:29
I’d say that, if anybody really wants to know where the money is, then they should look at the accounts. We also shouldn’t confuse lack of spending now to lack of spending before the window closes.

Everton’s weak financial status means that we’ll do our main business at the end of the window because that’s when value is best. We should also recognise that there is no point in throwing money at players who aren’t any better than the players we have. It’s strange that we insist Everton keeps it’s best players yet expect other clubs to sell us their players at realistic prices. Everton’s spending reflects their relative income.

The main thing, and one that we’re all slowly beginning to accept now, is that we can’t spend big money on transfer fees and the pay big wages to attract and keep players because we are a relatively poor club.

Bill Farmer
56 Posted 06/08/2015 at 08:19:30
Amongst so many football followers, there seems to be a perception that August games are merely some sort of rehearsal for when business proper begins in September.

It's as though the dozen or so points on offer don't really count towards the end of season total and no regard is taken towards the boost that a good start can provide for both the team and its followers.

'Deadline Day' has indeed taken on an importance out of all proportion to its relevance... but then, SSN racks up its biggest audience of the year so all must be well with the world!

Steve Cotton
57 Posted 06/08/2015 at 08:59:26
Waiting until transfer deadline day is BK’s crafty way of keeping his powder dry until the last minute, but also a great number of deals done on the last day are loans.

So we may yet get the 3 positions filled on the last day but 2 will probably be loans and the other would in no way be the one RM targeted in June but a ’who is left’ sort of signing.

Also, it's Bill's way to put a few kids out on loan to balance the books last minute and he may also sanction a sale or two; this means the squad numbers stay the same. He could well get a centre back in and then go and put Galloway out on loan to balance his books....

Tony Abrahams
58 Posted 06/08/2015 at 10:09:47
We are not relatively poor Martin, we are skint.

Accepting Moyes back, would in my opinion be the same as accepting Kenwright.

This club has been ran into the ground, and it's been time for change for years.

Mark Tanton
59 Posted 06/08/2015 at 10:14:27
I notice Roberto has just that the club "doesn't actively sell players", in response to questioning about Stones. That's rather an equivocal answer really isn't it? We won't actively seek to sell him, but we might be powerless to stop it?
Matt Traynor
60 Posted 06/08/2015 at 10:34:18
Mark #59, I can't remember who told me this so people are free to file it as bullshit, but I was told the structure of the Rooney deal (£10m + £10m + a manner of additions capped at £7m) was Everton's proposal. Man U were more than happy with a £27m fee, and more than happy to pay it up front. (Like Newcastle insisted when they mugged the RS for £35 for Carroll).

In a nutshell, even though we didn't actively sell Rooney (cough cough) we already had a payment plan ready to minimise the clamour to reinvest the money in one go...

Mark Tanton
61 Posted 06/08/2015 at 10:39:25
An interesting perspective. You seem to suggest that the club wanted this structure to limit re-spend opportunities? Is that responsible fiscal management or short sighted penny pinching?
Matt Traynor
62 Posted 06/08/2015 at 10:53:07
Well Mark #61, given the short-term CEO we had (Trevor Birch) allegedly said we had to sell Rooney to survive (as the only asset with value in what was a pretty poor squad), I’d say it was deliberate to limit the reinvestment.

Trevor of course signed an NDA so isn’t able to go public on why his time at EFC as CEO was only 6 weeks. Cronies of Bill though were openly telling tales of Bill hitting the roof at the suggestion, and telling him to get out. Of course that doesn’t sit well with what subsequently transpired a few weeks later, but hey, at least he’s a Blue!

Clive Rogers
63 Posted 06/08/2015 at 11:22:38
Kenwright will go down in history as the man who finished Everton as a big club.
Patrick Murphy
64 Posted 06/08/2015 at 12:24:24
I concur with the sentiments of Colin, and perhaps that old adage if you can’t say something nice, don’t bother saying it at all would be useful for all of us on TW. However, thousands of Evertonians sat through, many aimless and mind-numbing displays last season but despite that fact, the same thousands have dug deep into their pockets and purchased their season tickets for this coming season, perhaps reluctantly perhaps merely out of habit, but they as usual have kept their part of the bargain and put their money where their mouth is.

What we as a fan-base are asking for is an acknowledgement by the manager and team that the methods largely employed last season were unsuited to either the players available or the Premier League itself. We do have another 3-4 weeks of the transfer window left and Everton may well splurge the money on some exciting arrivals, depending on results that may well prove enough to allay the fans fears and inject a bit more positivity into the club.

As always we know that the club is unlikely to push the boat out too far and given that even new arrivals Bournemouth have overtaken Everton in their net spend figure for the last five years.

The crux of the matter is that Everton do not generate enough money outside of the TV revenues, they can’t in all honestly ask the supporters to pay higher admission prices to Goodison without it having a detrimental effect on the current levels of support, they are unable to attract the type of sponsors who would throw huge wads of cash at the club and in every other area of commercial activity they are limited in ways to generate new income, some would argue that they are already maximising the opportunities available to them.

The 20 years without a trophy has in some ways brought about an awakening of the fan-base and alerted many to the actual position of Everton FC in this new money based league, how we arrived in this position has been well documented but we can’t achieve much by concentrating on the blame game -- we have to now look to see how the club is planning to move the club forward but as usual the silence from those in positions of power has been deafening.

If we can’t as a club generate income to match those clubs we dream about finishing above in the league, surely it is the manager's and players' responsibility to at least try and entertain us in a controlled style but a style that has us on the edge of the seat from time to time.

New season, new hope but same old problems, same old arguments and as supporters we cannot do anything about it other than withdraw our support or post many posts on sites like TW, most of which, given the club’s finances and track record. won’t tend to be of the optimistic variety.

Dave Abrahams
65 Posted 06/08/2015 at 12:35:14
Patrick (66) good article, but in all honesty have you ever known the fan base to be so despondent and downhearted as this season?

Martinez is responsible for the way the team perform, but it is one man and one man only for the despair hopelessness quite a lot of fans are feeling now. There are no prizes for guessing who he is.

Richard Jones
66 Posted 06/08/2015 at 12:45:50
Poor compared to who, Martin?
Patrick Murphy
67 Posted 06/08/2015 at 13:04:32
I agree Dave (67) perhaps some of Walter Smith's opening days or Mike Walker's second season generated an equally negative mood among the Blues' but with the news that Martinez has today admitted that Lukaku may not be fit for Saturday, the mood is not going to improve much in the next few days.
Pete Edwards
68 Posted 06/08/2015 at 13:11:53
Tom @35, I'm sure the replica kit deal (as shite as it is compared to others) took us from loss making when the club ran it to a guaranteed profit of £3m per year?
Trevor Peers
69 Posted 06/08/2015 at 13:31:54
Patrick (#66);

You seem like a guy with a good sense of humour and I always like your contributions, very well balanced and well written.

To suggest that we only say nice things on the forum in the face of so many problems within the club doesn’t add up. Undoubtedly life might seem a little bit more cheery, and a lot of posts are a bit depressing, but that’s where were at with the football club and I’d sooner face the problems head on, than hide from them, and I think most of us would agree on that.

Eric Myles
71 Posted 06/08/2015 at 13:52:38
Martin (#55)

"I’d say that if anybody really wants to know where the money is then they should look at the accounts."

I don’t think you’ve read the numbers in the accounts with all the peddling of the "paid off debt" soundbites you keep posting.

Nicky Styles
72 Posted 06/08/2015 at 17:33:04
It sounds awful but I think we will finish in the top 7 and I am relatively satisfied with that. Throw in a win at Anfield and I consider the season a successful one.
John Raftery
73 Posted 06/08/2015 at 17:53:27
Well some of the money has just gone into James McCarthy’s bank account and presumably that of his agent. Cleverley and Deulofeu will both be on considerably more money than Alcaraz and Distin. We have had summers in the past when we have signed several players, for example 1998 and 2000 and subsequently been very disappointing.

Bringing in a load of foreign names may make headlines but very rarely do they meet expectations. Signing the right players late in the window is better than signing the wrong players early. The trouble is the right players are hard to obtain.

Martin Mason
74 Posted 06/08/2015 at 19:56:08
Eric, I never said anything about paid off debts, my comments were about net debt that's all.
Martin Mason
75 Posted 06/08/2015 at 20:00:59
Richard@66

We're poorer than those clubs with higher income, less debt and more assets than us and I believe that we're ranked about 8th in the EPL. It's all info that's available on the internet?

Steve Sweeney
76 Posted 06/08/2015 at 20:13:00
John Rafferty, I cannot understand your thinking. McCarthy will have an increase of about £20 grand a week = just over £1 million a year. We got over £90 Million the season before last and probably not much less for last season (due to the increase in TV money).

We did not pay £28M up front for Lukaku but £5M a year. Also, before we paid any transfer money out last season, we still had the £27M and £6M (for Fellaini & Anichebe, not including Jelavic).

So what are our other operating expenses going to be this season? Jeez... can't wait for BK to croak and then the shit will really hit the fan.
Phil Hoyle
77 Posted 06/08/2015 at 23:32:35
I am so fed up at the negativity on here. I really feel we have become a totally fickle bunch and ToffeeWeb depresses me. I have been using this site for years but I have got to the point where I am tempted not to come here because of the bad feeling.

This is not a new thing. When Moyes was manager and over-achieving (in my humble view) there was a large proportion of people wanting him out. When he went the celebrations started but immediately on the appointment of Martinez the negativity began. He had a superb first season which no-one can dispute and we had very little negativity BUT the second anything goes wrong the negativity begins -- are we really that fickle?

Let's wait until the end of August for transfers. I don't want us to be like the other clubs who buy players for overly inflated prices, for them to flop and ship them out in a year.

How many bad signings has Martinez made? Subjective I know but I think he has done pretty well.

What I am encouraged by are the amount of youth / homegrown players on the fringes. I cannot remember a time when that has been the case. We have already had 1 or 2 but never a large crop. He (Martinez) seems to want to keep adding to this crop whilst retaining a good crop of players. I think we have a strong squad who will compete with everyone in the league IF they stay fit.

Unless we sell our soul, we will not be able to compete financially with the top 6 so Martinez is trying to build a solid squad and bring through a 2nd team of youngsters good enough to step up and find some gems in that batch. Anyone remember the Man Utd class of 92?

Personally, I am not that desperate for success that I want to become the next Man City. I would prefer to compete how we do and EARN success. Naïve, I guess but I want to do it the right way.

Optimistic, positive and maybe missing something upstairs here but until we are in the mire this year I am looking forward to a good season. #COYB

Richard Jones
79 Posted 07/08/2015 at 00:56:46
If only we could be 8th in net spend hey Martin, surely that is achievable, I'm sure you'll find some way of apologizing for this appalling board of directors who carry on woefully mismanaging and destroying our beloved Club.
Eric Myles
80 Posted 07/08/2015 at 02:43:30
Martin #74, then you still clearly do not know the distinction between debt and nett debt as in the thread Reality Cheque you stated several times that "debt is being repaid" (#140 & 164 for example) when debt has clearly risen.
Matt Muzi
81 Posted 07/08/2015 at 11:48:08
For me the big issue here is that an awful lot of us on here sat in our seats and went travelling round the country week-in, week-out last season & could see the glaringly obvious issues with our squad & style of play.

Added to that we’ve had key players regularly being sidelined with hamstring injuries.

Some players have gone (in my opinion rightly so), but that has left us threadbare in central defence, unless the younger players are ready to step up. Added to that for reasons beyond me we’ve contracted older players who we should be looking to replace with new contracts.

I like many, many others was very abject about our performances last season and we have done nothing to remedy the situation at all so far in my opinion.

That brings me to a number of conclusions:

1. There is no money, or not significant enough to sign the right players -- would not surprise me at all if this is the real reason.

2. The board aren’t confident enough in RM -- even so in my opinion they must be aware of the frailties in the team and must know we need new players. Even if they aren’t confident in RM they know what players are available and they know who would improve the team.

3. The board think we have a good enough squad...

4. RM has assessed the squad players in the U21s and now knows where he needs to invest -- Rubbish in my opinion if he didn’t know this in May, he isn’t worth a bean as a manager and although the man drives me up the wall, I think he knew what he wanted probably in February.

I hear rumours today of Charlie Austin signing, it would make my day if he did, but there’s been even more speculation than normal this summer.

I personally think we’ll get a few loan signings in & that’ll be us.

A long and arduous season ahead in my opinion.

Martin Mason
82 Posted 07/08/2015 at 16:03:09
Eric, I clearly understand the difference between net debt and total debt. I also understand that net debt can be reduced by repayment of debt even if actual debt rises. Net debt is the key value as it reflects the ability of the club to repay the debt.
Andy Walker
83 Posted 07/08/2015 at 20:45:33
Think the board are waiting to see how Martinez manages pre Christmas. Maybe they are trying to manage the risk that we will be in the shit and then have to sack him, but at least their would then be money to attract a new manager and to spend in January.
Colin Glassar
84 Posted 07/08/2015 at 20:49:58
I think we should start a 'Free Billy' campaign. See if he gets the hint like.
Iain Love
85 Posted 07/08/2015 at 21:14:53
Clearly we ARE waiting for the sky money, the other point is ALL the teams in the prem are getting the same windfall we are, which makes competition for players more competitive for want of a better word.
I would prefer us to get new players in earlier but thats the way we are.
Anyway new season new start coybs.
Dean Adams
86 Posted 07/08/2015 at 21:52:56
Eric, you say our debt is rising, fair enough. But is our debt liability rising? Perhaps we are clearing the high interest debt and therefore improving our position! It all gets murky and without ALL the facts, you are just speculating.
Eric Myles
87 Posted 08/08/2015 at 03:54:09
Martin #82, thank you for proving my point.
David Sheen
88 Posted 10/08/2015 at 16:36:47
They actually have transfer league table at transferleague.co.uk that show you the net spending of clubs. The table including 'since 2003' does not make good reading for fellow Evertonians.

Evertons net spending on transfers since 2003 is lower than Manchester City, Manchester United, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool, Aston Villa, Sunderland, Arsenal, West Ham, Stoke City, Tottenham, West Brom, Leicester City, Newcastle United, Crystal Palace, Norwich City, Queens Park Rangers, Hull City, Fulham and Charlton Athletic.

What makes worse reading is that Evertons net spending on transfers is close to Bolton Wanderers. An average of £2,533,423 a season. That is nearly a third less than West Ham. It is half as much as Hull City, It is a quarter of what Aston Villa have spent. Championship clubs like Queens Park Rangers have averaged £7,379,167 a season.

We are practically a club that is on the level with Chartlon Athletic and Bolton Wanderers when it comes our board investing in players with money other than player sales.

Since Bill Kenwright took charge in 1999, we have not punched above our weight. We have practically been a champion boxer that has been fighting with one arm tied behind his back.



Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads



© ToffeeWeb