11/06/2026 18comments  |  Jump to last

(Photo by Clive Mason/Getty Images)

From next season, the Premier League is switching to a different model of financial regulation and cost controls.

The Premier League is aligning with Uefa’s Squad Cost Ratio (SCR) model, rather than sticking with the unfit-for-purpose Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR).

So, how does it work, and how could it impact Everton?

WHAT IS SQUAD COST RATIO (SCR)?

Essentially, rather than focusing on how profitable a club is, or how much a club is losing, SCR measures the spend on player-related costs against the total football-related revenue and net profit or loss from player sales.

According to the Premier League, football-related revenue relates to: A club’s total earnings from football operations, including income the clubs generate themselves and the revenues distributed by the League and other football competitions.

The Premier League’s SCR will allow clubs to spend up to 85% of their total, estimated football-related revenue on their squad.

However, there is a difference for those teams in Europe, who are restricted to spending 70% of their revenue on their squads, which lines up with Uefa’s rules.

But what costs count towards SCR? Well, any costs accrued when it comes to building the squad, including player wages, amortised transfer fees and agent payments.

SCR means there will also be the closing of loopholes, such as clubs selling women’s teams to themselves — as Everton have done — or selling assets such as hotels to themselves, like Chelsea managed to do.

The Compliance Test will take place in March, when the clubs have filed their annual accounts for the previous season.

WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT FOR BREACHING SCR?

Lots of Premier League clubs will be above the threshold of 85%, so in order to give teams time to get closer to, or within, the limit, either by trimming their squad spending or increasing their revenue, they are introducing a ‘red threshold’. 

That means that any club found to have spent between 85% and 115% of their revenue on their squad will face a financial sanction, rather than a sporting one, such as a points deduction.

If a club breaches the 115% threshold, then they will be handed a sporting sanction.

However, each time a club breaches the lower threshold of 85%, they then have less headroom when it comes to further breaches.

WHAT ABOUT EVERTON?

Given Everton were the first club to be punished under the Premier League’s previous PSR, TFG, Angus Kinnear and Co will no doubt be keeping a very close eye on how close the Toffees are to the wire.

Everton’s last set of published accounts, for the 2024-25 financial year, show a total turnover of £196,697,000.

Now, that covers the final season at Goodison Park, and so the revenue generated from the move to Hill Dickinson Stadium, plus the naming rights deal for that ground, is not yet factored in.

But we’ll do a quick calculation based on that number, just to show how it could work in theory for Everton.

Based on the above, they could spend up to £167,192,450 on all of their squad-related costs. That would include all wages, agents fees, amortised transfer payments, player bonuses, etc.

The Premier League allow clubs not to include academy and women’s team costs in this calculation, so this just boils down to the first team.

Now we should stress that the turnover number above may include some revenue that would not count as “football-related” under the new SCR regulations.

THE WAY FORWARD FOR EVERTON

We cannot know for sure what Everton’s budget is for the coming year. 

In some ways, not qualifying for Europe helps in that there is more leeway for Everton to spend, relative to their revenue. Indeed, had they qualified for Europe, then they would have almost certainly have had to enter a sanction agreement with Uefa, which would have likely resulted in a fine and/or some squad restrictions for 2026-27 (those restrictions would have only been in place for whatever European competition the Toffees were in, though).

However, if Everton want to be competing to qualify for Europe in the coming years, they need to spend wisely and improve their squad, and that will mean they have to increase their revenue.

The main way to do this is by improving as a team, and therefore finishing higher in the Premier League, going further in cup competitions and generating more income that way. However, that also risks getting into a cycle of spending more to push the squad on, and it is why it’s vital that Everton find a way to maximise every ounce out of their team — that’s on the manager.

Smart player trading also has to be taken into account. Everton cannot simply accumulate players. If 6 or 7 players come in, then 3-4 should be moved out of the door, for transfer fees.

Lastly, they must maximise the potential of Hill Dickinson Stadium and increase commercial revenue. Higher sponsorships, more events at the stadium — all of this will play a part.

By the end of this calendar year, Everton should be ensuring concerts are booked in for Hill Dickinson Stadium in 2027, while also prioritising the venue as a go-to place for other sporting events.

Just this week, we saw England Women play a World Cup qualifier there, and next month, rugby league’s Magic Weekend will take place on the docks, with a Fiji v England rugby union clash to be held there a week later.

EVERTON’S TRANSFER WINDOW PLANS

Ultimately, Everton’s approach to this window should not change too much because of SCR. The club knew it was coming and will have been planning accordingly.

Fringe players must be sold; if a huge offer comes in for a first teamer, such as Iliman Ndiaye, it will have to be considered as that is simply good business practice.

But Everton still need to spend a sizeable amount — a net spend of £60-70M is probably realistic, and should see the club stay within the SCR limit.

They must be extra careful on wages, and that puts extra pressure on the club’s lead negotiator, Nick Hammond, to ensure the deals are correct for Everton.

For now, it’s a case of trusting the process, but in theory, if Everton get this right, then SCR should not be a problem for them moving forward.

Read more World Cup watchlist: 12 under‑the‑radar players Everton could realistically target across every group

 

Reader Comments (18)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()


Michael Boardman
1 Posted 11/06/2026 at 11:28:43
Another stick to beat us with.

At least in 2049, when the Man City verdict is in, we'll be having matches against Southport, St Helens and Wigan whilst Liverpool, Man Utd and Spurs play against Real Mars and Jupiter FC.

Burnley? They will continue to name pubs after their managers.
Mark Taylor
2 Posted 11/06/2026 at 12:38:50
Scoping this using some real (though guesstimate) numbers.

I think our total playing costs (including managerial staff) were around £150m for this season, revenue £200m so we're at 75%.

Revenue for next season grows a fair bit. To £250m? That gives us c £210m squad budget at the 85% level. £60m more than what we have.

The way SCP works (if I understand it), that isn't a straight transfer budget. It's a combination of wages and amortisation of transfer costs. So £60m for example would allow you to buy 2 £75m players on 5 year contracts paying them c £300k a week. Or permutations thereof.

Of course the whole thing is more complex than that, not least whether the Burnley ruling has any effect and also separate rules around financial stability. And to repeat, the above is indicative, as I understand it, not intended to be read as absolute, but to me, it seems almost pointless talking about squad recruitment until and unless we know what our resources are- and whether the owners will fully commit to them.
David West
3 Posted 11/06/2026 at 12:41:36
Patric, Good article.
I've been wondering what kind of level we could spend at.

If our turnover is up due to the move, naming rights, new sponsorships etc and we are allowed to spend say £120m why wouldn't you do it ?
Especially as if you do qualify for Europe, your spending is cut back the next year.

A net 60-70m spend may be realistic, but would it really solve the glaring holes in the squad ?
when other sides are spend that on 1 full back !

There's not many surplus players who would command huge fees.
What would mcneil, Patterson, Tim, Alcaraz bring in ? 35- 40m topps ?

I thought we would would and should have got our finances all in order now, ready for this window where SCR was applied, and be able to really enhance the squad to a good level.
Your 60-70m estimate has depressed me !
Hope your just being conservative.
Phil Roberts
4 Posted 11/06/2026 at 12:48:17
So... did Moyes get a message from the board to not make Europe as we will be fined?
Charles Ward
5 Posted 11/06/2026 at 13:24:33
Phil - Without being too pedantic we weren’t ‘fined’.

The BBC report states;

“Burnley argued the breach impacted their chances of staying in the Premier League, and sought compensation for the losses associated with being relegated.”

So the money will go to Burnley rather than the PL.

The article also states that we have agreed compensation to Leeds in September 2025. There’s no detail about the amount but I’m sure it will come out in the accounts.
Andrew Merrick
6 Posted 11/06/2026 at 13:34:12
A thought on this, the 15% difference between prem limit and Fifa limit may actually work as a bit of a leveler, as it would mean that the more successful clubs (in European competition), may earn more but have less percentage to spend.
It doesnt really raise the mood I know...
Michael Kenrick
7 Posted 11/06/2026 at 13:39:42
Sorry, Charles, I think Phil is talking about the risk of a new Uefa fine for breaching SCR, had we qualified for Europe, with Uefa's lower 70% SCR limit.

And to answer Phil's question, there is certainly grist for the conspiracy theorists who can readily claim that TFG did not want Everton in Europe for this reason, plus the more remote risk that they would qualify for the same European competition as AS Roma.
Mark Taylor
8 Posted 11/06/2026 at 13:52:55
Michael,

Does that 70% limit apply to the lesser European competitions? Because, if so, my back of a fag packet calculations imply that qualifying for especially the Conference League would be seriously detrimental. You need a bigger squad but suddenly get a cut in budget.

Strategically, I wonder if the optimum approach here is to focus on maximising revenue from our new stadium in the next couple of years to a point where we would afford to compete in the lesser competitions.

Put it this way, 70% on our current year revenue leaves us in breach with a squad that is not remotely strong enough to take on the burden of an extra competition.
Ian Bennett
9 Posted 11/06/2026 at 17:16:02
Could this have an impact on big transfer fees?

Teams will be incentivised to keep their amortisation low, to provide a higher ability to pay higher wages.

Looking for value, using the academy, free transfers and sister clubs seems the order of the day.
David West
10 Posted 11/06/2026 at 18:56:42
Yes Ian.

It could take a while to see how this SCR will develop. We have seen teams trading players to comply with PSR (Iroegbunam & Dobbin).

Still think if they wanted to make it truly competitive, the percentage of income you could spend should be based on your previous season's league position. A bit like the NFL draft where last place gets first pick. Last place in the league should be able to spend the biggest percentage, getting smaller the higher you finish.

We know that they claim these rules are to stop clubs over spending, but it wouldn't hurt the competition to curb what the biggest clubs spend.

Sure the corporate owners of the biggest clubs would be happy not having to spend all their revenue on players and would even out the competition.
David West
11 Posted 11/06/2026 at 19:09:49
Andrew 6,

The 15% difference isn't that much when a team like Man Utd's revenue is £666M for 2024-25... 3 times ours.

So the15% difference means they have over £450M to play with still.
Michael Kenrick
12 Posted 11/06/2026 at 20:15:31
Mark @8,

Yes, the 70% Uefa limit on SCR applies to clubs in all three European competitions.

The problem, had we qualified, is it would be based on last season's spending, which I think was well over the 70% limit, and we would have been fined for that.
Paul Kossoff
13 Posted 11/06/2026 at 22:47:09
Mark Taylor
14 Posted 11/06/2026 at 22:47:39
Thanks Michael, that's what I thought. I felt it was at best a mixed blessing to qualify for Europe in our current situation, now I know- not even mixed. Unless of course CL, then we'd be in a different league, figuratively and literally.
Paul Kossoff
15 Posted 11/06/2026 at 22:50:51
Michael 1.
"Whilst Liverpool, Man Utd and Spurs play against Real Mars and Jupiter FC" Far out Michael. Do you think ray guns will be allowed in the stadiums?
Don Alexander
16 Posted 12/06/2026 at 23:00:55
I’m surprised Mr Friedkin hasn’t seen fit, again, to announce a single word on this issue.

Is he even aware?
Andrew Merrick
17 Posted 13/06/2026 at 11:06:48
David 11, we are so far off competing with those figures arent we.
So with the restraints still in place the onus is (more than ever) on being a club that can develop players, both for first team and sales revenue.
How patient should we be, when are the changes going to happen, when do we change direction, strategy and manager?
Alan J Thompson
18 Posted 14/06/2026 at 08:09:12
This is the life,eh? Never mind the football let's sort out the accounts.

At times I think it might be easier to change the rules so that any club going bankrupt and feel unable to complete their fixtures should have their TV money used to pay players and coaches to fulfill them as away games until the end of the season when they are replaced by a fourth team from the Championship.

If players not signed by another club want their contracts paid out then perhaps the difference in contracts comes out of the sale of the club's ground or they just become Free Agents.

But then it's more about appearing to have control, isn't it?

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


How to get rid of these ads and support TW

© ToffeeWeb