-sm.jpg)
The summer transfer window officially opens on Monday. Off-field disputes and the World Cup have distracted some of the gaze from the silly season rumour mill, but transfer gossip continues to simmer in the background.
One unwanted story revolves around the future of Iliman Ndiaye. The Senegalese forward is understood to be stalling on a new contract at Everton amid a reported desire for a rather modest release clause, in an ever-inflating world of transfer fees.
The numbers circling suggest Ndiaye’s camp wants a get-out clause of around €50m (£43m), a figure that falls far below Everton’s internal valuation. Amid interest from Premier League rivals, the Toffees quite rightly believe Ndiaye is worth a significant sum more.
Ndiaye, at surface level, is Everton’s best talent. A wonderfully smooth dribbler, he’s one of the few in the David Moyes regime who brings genuine excitement. Ndiaye gets supporters on the edge of their seats, a rarity in a notoriously pragmatic team.ā
It’s the 26-year-old’s work ethic that perhaps grants him greater licence under Moyes. He is tigerish without the ball, ranking seventh among Premier League wingers for possession won per 90 last season, bringing graft alongside his guile.
But as Everton faltered down the run-in, Ndiaye’s impact waned. A packed schedule that included a mid-season run to the Afcon final caught up with him across the season’s latter weeks, fatigue seen in both his output and decision-making.
The latter is perhaps what is holding Ndiaye back from performing at a truly top level. Across two seasons at Everton, he’s managed just three league assists. For a player of such obvious talent and individualistic brilliance, that is a meagre total.
So, should Everton receive an offer upwards of £60m this summer, would there be a temptation to sell?ā
The dream world would be that Everton add players to complement Ndiaye, signings that raise the level around him, and extract more from his maverick gifts. But the Premier League’s financial rules have the club’s hands tied when it comes to net investment.
Jack Grealish’s future could be decisive. Everton are eager to re-sign last season’s loanee, following a positive impact prior to his season-ending injury. Both favour a role drifting from the left, and Grealish’s numbers far outperformed those of his club teammate.
He ranked in the top 20% of wingers in Europe for progressive carries, completed dribbles, assists, and key passes per 90 minutes. Ndiaye, in comparison, did not rank in the top 20% for any of those metrics. Their numbers for non-penalty goals per 90 were also similar, despite often being used as a criticism of Grealish’s game.
There are elephants in the room. Almost five years Ndiaye’s senior, Grealish will turn 31 in September, while the size of the financial package poses a challenge.
Another loan, or a reasonable deal for a player that is unwanted at the Etihad, could fill the Ndiaye-shaped hole, while raising funds for priority positions, including the recruitment of a specialised right-sided forward and a long, long, overdue right-back.
The risk, of course, is sanctioning the sale to free funds for a recruitment team whose record has been patchy at best. A sale can have its merit, but the fanbase needs to trust the succession plan. Right now, few have that confidence.
Read more - Can Everton keep fan favourite Iliman Ndiaye after star rejects multiple contract offers?
Reader Comments (83)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 12/06/2026 at 15:17:28
I think he's the most exciting Everton player I've seen in an Everton shirt since Kanchelskis but, unlike the Russian, he doesn't have the same final product, often making a spectacular run before skewering his shot or pass.
Ndiaye to me is like a better version of Bolasie, and the player we hoped Bolasie would be when we signed him from Palace.
I look at it in these terms. We could probably get £60M-£70M if he has a decent World Cup, and we could potentially get a less flashy player in Harry Wilson on a free who would probably get as many, if not more, goals and assists.
3 Posted 12/06/2026 at 15:18:20
4 Posted 12/06/2026 at 15:30:46
You can talk about Wilson on a free, but his wages would be treble Ndiaye's. I'd take Wilson, but he doesn't dribble past players. Ndiaye finished the season poorly, but he played nearly every game plus Afcon, and Moyes still wouldn't rest him.
5 Posted 12/06/2026 at 15:35:51
Keeping him on improved terms whilst being vulnerable to a low bid is poor business. However, this is assuming that the much vaunted recruitment team have got players lined up.
It's no use having money in the bank only to be skanked on transfer window closure day. We need to get some good business done early on.
6 Posted 12/06/2026 at 15:37:28
We need a maverick type of player but, if we get Grealish or his ilk back for next season, I would say £60M for Ndiaye would get us a decent replacement...
In fact, if we could get that and get Richarlison back for £30M to £40M, I would say we will be better off.
7 Posted 12/06/2026 at 15:44:17
I gather he was bought for about £17M. If you sold him for £70M, with 2 years amortisation on the original transfer cost, you're looking at a player trading profit of near £60M. That buys a lot of new players.
8 Posted 12/06/2026 at 15:51:09
Tyrique George won't sign for Moyes. Why would he?
9 Posted 12/06/2026 at 15:58:35
A genuine world class talent?
10 Posted 12/06/2026 at 16:04:27
This is one of our problems, though: if a regular Top 4 club comes sniffing around, they want away. It's the chicken or the egg situation, you need your best players to force us into the Top 4 to 6 places.
11 Posted 12/06/2026 at 16:15:44
Personally I can't see how we're not looking at Richarlison at around £25M he's a bargain?
Instead, we're being linked with all and sundry who cost more and aren't proven in the Premier League? Baffling...
12 Posted 12/06/2026 at 16:23:25
13 Posted 12/06/2026 at 16:23:38
If you don't ask, you don't get. I'd happily give him Jack's wages and his position.
14 Posted 12/06/2026 at 16:25:32
I suppose the problem there is that Rashford sees himself as above us whereas Grealish doesn't.
15 Posted 12/06/2026 at 16:36:42
He is equal 4th for assists with Tarkowski and Gueye and 4th for goals scored last season -- he had 0 assists the season before.
Take the money and reinvest.
16 Posted 12/06/2026 at 17:14:20
I can't see the club agreeing a new contract that weakens the club's side of the deal and as we don't need to sell him (for less than we value him but more than his agent's desired exit clause), I can't see him leaving until next summer at the earliest.
17 Posted 12/06/2026 at 17:21:18
Why all the fuss? We all know contracts are not worth fuck all. If a bigger club wants a player and he wants to go, it will happen. No one wants someone who's not 100%.
Just tell him, no get out clause or no new deal, 3 years left. If Man Utd or anyone else wants him, get the big bucks out!!!
18 Posted 12/06/2026 at 17:27:43
How do you know that?
19 Posted 12/06/2026 at 17:52:14
That said, however, his actual goal production is spotty. He needs to be alongside a quality #10, in front of a good overlapping fullback and provided a pacy opposite wing for his crosses. I say keep him and get him some better running mates.
And Harry: "... a recruitment team whose record has been patchy at best" is pure malarkey. Last July, half the current six-member recruitment team wasn't even on board yet! Smith, Cox and Howarth had been announced but hadn't yet joined. And even Kinnear had been in his chair only three months. So the record isn't "patchy" -- it has not yet begun.
20 Posted 12/06/2026 at 18:01:18
True, I don't know (how can we know anything about transfer business until and unless it happens) but whereas Grealish has a made it clear he would play for us by, well, playing for us, I have seen no evidence we are even on Rashford's radar and he has certainly not been mentioned in connection to us, at least not since 2018.
He currently gets Champions League football. If money is his thing, the Saudis will pay him more than we ever could... and, if glory is his thing -- well, let's be realistic, that is not on the table from us right now.
So you could ask I guess but I'm pretty sure I know the answer. Incidentally, the above does not mean I think we should be paying Grealish his £300k. I'd like to think our recruitment team could find at least two equally good players for those wages.
21 Posted 12/06/2026 at 18:06:32
Rashford "thinking he is above us" is straight from your imagination.
22 Posted 12/06/2026 at 18:08:14
A decent pair of full backs would help him enormously, on either side has no help.
It's a tough one, don't think anyone would even be debating this if it wasn't for the contract situation, yet the club needs to be firm, we've given him the platform, we are offering better terms as a reward, so in my opinion it's a clear case of make the offer we are happy with, I'm sure will be good money for a player not many wanted 2 years ago or get the big fee while his contract is still long.
Will he be adored at utd, or another club like he is now?
Had a few moves already, grass isn't always greener illy !!!
23 Posted 12/06/2026 at 18:21:46
A quality No 10 similar to Rooney. š
24 Posted 12/06/2026 at 18:27:22
And shite at buying good ones.
25 Posted 12/06/2026 at 18:32:48
If a high offer comes in (Ā£70M+), I guess, unfortunately, we would be wise to accept it.
26 Posted 12/06/2026 at 18:34:54
He must know what players we need, and any player who plays well, their value will rocket. As we know from previous tournaments, it seldom works out. Remember Poborsky at Man Utd, a disaster.
27 Posted 12/06/2026 at 18:51:52
Maybe you know different?
29 Posted 12/06/2026 at 19:17:27
I should be running this club.
30 Posted 12/06/2026 at 19:17:37
There's certainly no reason to stay away because World Cup transfers sometimes fail. I mean, Poborsky? Really? 30 years ago is the best example you can come up with?
31 Posted 12/06/2026 at 19:20:52
I don't know different and I won't be taking a guess.
32 Posted 12/06/2026 at 19:26:17
When the competition goes deeper, the bigger nations will be there and we all know their players anyway, they are mostly out of our price range.
33 Posted 12/06/2026 at 19:27:00
Mike, the only reason I mentioned Poborsky is because he always stuck in my mind, and a quality player's price will shoot up if they perform well.
34 Posted 12/06/2026 at 19:43:06
I'll also give you Phil Babb, went to the Red Shite and was awful.
But don't tell Gaynesy I've told you that.
35 Posted 12/06/2026 at 19:57:37
Your last paragraph is bang on the money. It's daft to blame a recruitment that wasn't even here yet for the poor signings we have made.
By his own admission, they're all on Moyes.
36 Posted 12/06/2026 at 21:02:51
Yeah, I think Ndiaye has been more exciting to watch than Rooney for Everton, because someone who is an elite dribbler, which I think Ndiaye is, will always excite and get people off their feet.
While Rooney went on to being a world class player and superior to Ndiaye, I seem to remember him not being a nailed-down starter under Moyes at 17 years old and, that Arsenal goal aside, he had his biggest moments playing for England in that period.
37 Posted 12/06/2026 at 21:34:39
āNdiaye more exciting to watch than Rooney.ā
38 Posted 12/06/2026 at 22:10:26
Rooney didn't even play every game as a teenager under Moyes. He wasn't a complete player at Everton, so I don't think my comment is ridiculous at all.
Kanchelskis was more exciting to watch than Ndiaye, but I don't think Rooney was at that age.
39 Posted 12/06/2026 at 22:22:24
Rooney was only 16, 'he wasn't a complete player at Everton' unbelievable, I'll say no more.
40 Posted 12/06/2026 at 22:37:36
List me all the moments in an Everton shirt that made him so exciting, apart from the Arsenal and Leeds goals, cos I can't think of many. His biggest moments were in the Euros for England before he went to Man Utd.
I think you're under the misconception that I think Ndiaye is better. I think Ndiaye is more exciting because of the way he travels with the ball. He is also in his peak years. Rooney wasn't with us.
At the end of the day, my opinion is that Kanchelskis and Ndiaye are the most exciting players I've seen in an Everton shirt because I like the way they play/ed. There is no right or wrong answer in what people like to see in players. It's subjective.
And while I enjoy watching how Ndiaye can breeze past players, I can also see his short-comings and would sell him for the right price.
If we could sell him for £60M+ and get Harry Wilson on a free transfer, we wouldn't have the flashy maverick in Wilson, but he would probably get as many goals and assists as Ndiaye, if not more.
41 Posted 12/06/2026 at 22:47:38
In today's market, to replace him would be more than we would sell him for. I think he's a better player than Anthony Gordon and he went to Barcelona for £70M.
42 Posted 12/06/2026 at 23:27:59
43 Posted 12/06/2026 at 23:37:04
My original post also wasn't on who was the better player. It's on the "excitement" watching a player.
If someone finds watching one player more exciting than the other, they cannot be wrong because excitement is a subjective feeling and emotion, giving them an opinion personal to them.
Do not tell someone how they feel or felt about something.
Time for you to leave it there, Les.
44 Posted 12/06/2026 at 00:17:48
I thought he was somewhat less exciting at Man Utd after being shoehorned all over the pitch, because he had so many strengths.
Personally, I see Ndiaye as more style over substance really. Although after years and years of average players, he is undoubtedly exciting.
Kanchelskis was great though for 18 months. I thought he signalled a new dawn for us. Sadly, it wasn't to be. A missed opportunity back then.
45 Posted 12/06/2026 at 00:54:21
I remember we went for Collymore and missed out on him to Liverpool. Who knows if he'd have done the business for us but he was one of the best strikers in the league at Forest.
Yeah, I totally agree with you on Ndiaye that sometimes it feels like style over substance, but I guess that's why we attach the 'maverick' tag to players like him. You may be right too that, after years of seeing rubbish football, he's given us some of the excitement that we've been starved of for years.
46 Posted 13/06/2026 at 06:15:25
Then it will free up a spot of George. Perhaps if Dibling finally steps up. Anyway, it's a good time to look at how Hammond, supposed to be a transfer expert, executes this time. His last picks on Anzou and Dibling are disappointing, while Dewsbury-Hall is great. Let's see.
47 Posted 13/06/2026 at 08:55:59
And a good job handling the snipers who want to tell you how to think, feel and react.
48 Posted 13/06/2026 at 09:20:37
Looks like we will have to sell him as the Premier League are costing us £35M in their quest to destroy Everton.
49 Posted 13/06/2026 at 11:15:13
50 Posted 13/06/2026 at 11:32:37
Sorry but Rooney at 17 was better than Ndaiye is now in my opinion, but they are different types of players, and the player i was most excited about was James, I know we didn't have him long but I was gutted not to see him in the flesh, we sign an absolutely fantastic footballer and Covid stops us watching him live, typical Everton luck
Me personally I couldn't care less if Ndaiye wants to move, players come and go, if we can get 3 players for his transfer fee then we'll be better off in my opinion
51 Posted 13/06/2026 at 11:42:49
52 Posted 13/06/2026 at 11:43:48
53 Posted 13/06/2026 at 12:14:16
Was I the best ? I always wore my Everton shirt when playing. My greatest stint being at Ramrod Reserves ( 5th team ). Player of the season (I turned up more than twice).
Lol
54 Posted 13/06/2026 at 12:16:56
55 Posted 13/06/2026 at 12:55:39
56 Posted 13/06/2026 at 13:01:41
57 Posted 13/06/2026 at 13:45:18
58 Posted 13/06/2026 at 15:15:24
John (52) Come on John who was your best player for the Blues— just to see if I can disagree with you although I think it would be hard to find a better player than Wayne Rooney!
59 Posted 13/06/2026 at 15:26:45
Who's the greatest of them all?
60 Posted 13/06/2026 at 16:21:37
Bobby Collins was my best player, until Wayne came along— only two seasons granted, but Bobby like Wayne came into poor teams and they were standout players, Collins for me dragged a very poor squad together and dragged them up season by season albeit getting very good players to join him make a very good team but sold before he could get the medals he richly deserved.
Rooney was not used an enough by Moyes, protecting a lad he thought(?) but that lad was a young physical man despite being only 16 and he became a standout player which nobody could deny although it was the wrong.
On reflection Bobby Collins become higher rated on their length of appearance for the Blues than Wayne, but not on their careers and Bobby outrages Ball for me because of the length of his career and what he achieved in it.
At the end of the day its all about opinions and no doubt other Everton fans will have other players than the three Ive mentioned with many thinking what might have been regarding Tony Kay only for his bit of foolishness!
61 Posted 13/06/2026 at 16:23:38
62 Posted 13/06/2026 at 16:31:26
And in paragraph 4 it should have read ā Bobby outrates Ball for meā not outrages!
ā
63 Posted 13/06/2026 at 16:54:35
64 Posted 13/06/2026 at 17:17:30
My dad was same as you on him but Tony Kay was one that got away mate.
My dad reckoned he would have played in the 66 world cup final if he wasn't banned.
Spent an afternoon with him on the ale one day.
He was genuinely baffled at how high he was held by Evertonians.
65 Posted 13/06/2026 at 17:19:27
The all time great of my dad's.
"He floats across the pitch son,he doesn't run.
He could run across a puddle and not cause a ripple"
66 Posted 13/06/2026 at 17:21:28
Two spazzys ?
67 Posted 13/06/2026 at 17:56:52
I remember him against West Brom when Calvert-Lewin got a hat-trick, he just made the game look so easy.
68 Posted 13/06/2026 at 18:14:59
John (65) Alex Young was truly great with the proviso — On his day, he had quite a few off days which maybe I shouldnt remember ? In their time playing together I loved Alex but preferred Roy Vernon. I could have mentioned the truly immaculate T G Jones the Welsh centre half whom I saw through the eyes of an eight year old boy who was as elegant on the ball as the Golden Vision — a ball playing defender of the highest class.
69 Posted 13/06/2026 at 19:22:42
Is that accurate?
My dad could throw a bit on when it came to Everton players
70 Posted 13/06/2026 at 20:02:58
I was still a kid but cried when he left.
As an older guy I cried again when Rooney left.
We sold our soul on both occasions.
71 Posted 13/06/2026 at 20:54:59
I can't agree with you there, Mick.
72 Posted 13/06/2026 at 21:38:44
I never forgot how sublime he was with the ball, his passes, free kicks and how he loved the ball and when he got it he looked after it very well.
Mark (70) I never cried when Alan Ball left the club, I was 30, but Goodison Road was strangely quiet before the start of the first Saturday game after he went to Arsenal, with hardly a sound it was like being in a morgue.
I think though that Everton got the best six years of Alans career and although he was still a very good player for Arsenal and Southampton he never reached the heights that he did with us and he certainly was never loved as he was with the Blues.
I think he was the first player to play 100 games in the top division with four clubs including the club he started with Blackpool—- how Bolton must have regretted rejecting him as being to small to play for them—- too small ? they should have looked at his heart it was as strong as a loin— even though he cried when he realised Catterick was letting him go.
73 Posted 13/06/2026 at 23:19:35
He doesn't score or assist enough for his ability. Cash in and get someone else in with more end product.
74 Posted 14/06/2026 at 06:42:03
If we sold Ndiaye we'd end up with more Barry's or supporting to be but never was signings.
75 Posted 14/06/2026 at 07:30:59
You just never get it lad do you? Always out of touch. The worst judgment ever. No class. An online clown.
76 Posted 14/06/2026 at 08:26:21
How did you rate Grealish?
77 Posted 14/06/2026 at 08:45:49
"Carlo,who managed some of the world's top teams, and Everton, is preparing for the first game'
78 Posted 14/06/2026 at 08:52:26
79 Posted 14/06/2026 at 09:00:17
Why did the reporter have to throw "and Everton" in?š
80 Posted 14/06/2026 at 10:42:47
But its a bit of a smokescreen his contract runs up to 2029. He finished the season off poorly but, as everyone knows, he was out of position in the games, chasing the ball.
And when he did get it, there was no movement from them two blag strikers again. Its getting to be an old song but thats Moyess fault. What does Moyes do for the money he is on, except annoy us?
81 Posted 14/06/2026 at 10:51:10
For me, Tony Kay was a class above the rest and, had it not been for his ban, he would have been playing in the 1966 World Cup Final and not Nobby Stiles.
Catterick replaced Collins with Dennis Stevens from Bolton, a decent player but never near the quality of Collins.
82 Posted 14/06/2026 at 11:21:33
83 Posted 14/06/2026 at 12:04:30
Bobby Collins was before my time but I recall Ron Yeats saying what a great player he was.
My late father would agree with you re Tony Kay -- in his view, the best player he saw in an Everton shirt.
84 Posted 14/06/2026 at 17:03:18
The great Neville Southall leaves them all standing.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW


1 Posted 12/06/2026 at 14:43:07
Cant say I like that, but that would then make a £60m offer a lot more likely to succeed, so is the players camp putting him out there?
I'd sit tight anyway, not sure how TFG would choose to play it though.