14/10/2025 53comments  |  Jump to last

Another unwanted hiatus to the Premier League programme is past and on Saturday, Everton will be revisiting The Etihad Stadium, where Manchester City, and especially Erling Haaland, appear to have largely recovered their Mojo.

Their giant centre-forward has already scored an incredible 12 goals so far this season, and has returned home from the Norway team early so he can rest in anticipation of Saturday's testing encounter with the resurgent Toffees under David Moyes.

But, because of the ridiculous loan rules, Everton's primary catalyst Jack Grealish will be sitting in the stands for this one, with Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall reinstated after another ridiculous episode that saw him banned from playing in the win over Crystal Palace after being booked for talking a free-kick too quickly. That goal Dewsbury-Hall scored against Wolves was simply brilliant... but it's a rarity — he just doesn't score many goals.

After 7 games, Manchester City are remarkably only 2 points above Everton in the nascent Premier League table, and a win for the visitors will see the order reversed.  But the challenge of securing a win at the Etihad is something that has largely eluded David Moyes and Everton for many years.

Indeed, the last win there dates back to a previous era when Tim Cahill set the tone with a goal after just 4 minutes and Leighton Baines followed up with a simply exquisite shot — curled in off his wrong foot! — after just 18 minutes. That gave Moyes what he needed to cling on for a fantastic win... proving it can be done! 

But with the patterns of play his side have adopted at times this season, that is likely to be an extremely hard ask. Everton simply do not play the ball forward fast enough to score early and often. Moyes instead appears to have drummed into the players the absolute requirement to focus instead on defence in the first half and hope to get in at half-time unscathed and still in the game. 

Part of the problem is his maddening reluctance to use the full complement of subs allowed in the modern game. He's been doing marginally better — albeit only after dreadful first-half performances (at Wolves and against Palace), but won't unleash his faster players to really attack at pace and hopefully score early goals that would then give his defenders something worthwhile to defend.

To be fair, the players who should be providing this much-needed energy and intensity going forward are maddeningly inconsistent. Charly Alcaraz was great against Palace when he came on, but he was awful against Wolves and Moyes was right to hook him at half-time. 

Tyler Dibling remains a huge enigma, almost completely unable to show his reputed silky skills given the moribund approach to forward play in the seriously limited opportunities he's been given so far. And he seems unlikely to start this game.

Iliman Ndiaye is of course undroppable. A huge crowd favourite, his dynamism, jinking runs, and uncanny ability to keep possession of the ball are all fantistic for Evertonians to watch; he is beyond criticsm... or is he?

I think he holds the ball too long, doesn't look to play it off quick enough, or shoot at goal often enough. There, I've said it. I'm sorry. And part of the problem is not enough support players close enough to him.  

Like Ndiaye, the rest of the team picks itself while Moyes persists with alternating his pair of monster centre-forwards firing blanks... or just not firing at all. Haven't we seen enough? Time for something different... Ndiaye, Keane, Alcaraz. Surely any one of them could do a far better job? 

To counter Haaland, assuming he's playing, maybe Moyes needs Keane in the back line alongside Tarkowski and O'Brien to challenge his physical presence, assuming Jarrad Branthwaite is not yet fit enough. 

Seamus Coleman returns from his international exploits again astounding the critics who wrote him off years ago. On the subs bench again, I expect, with Garner and Mykolenko defending the flanks and bombing forward.  

I never pick teams, and there is clearly a very good reason for that,  but here is what all this nonsense might equate to — a rather novel 3-3-3-1 formation:

Pickford
O'Brien, Tarkowski, Keane
Garner, Gueye, Mykolenko
Dibling, Alcaraz, Dewsbury-Hall
Ndiaye

In my dreams...

 

 

Reader Comments (53)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()


Paul Kossoff
1 Posted 13/10/2025 at 23:18:41
Micheal, set up, 4-5-1 for me. Flood the midfield, draw them in, ball over the top.

With the talent we have now Moyes has to try something different. I did say before we signed Grealish, that he tends to slow the game down, and he has started to revert to his Pep Instructions of keep possession.

Any of our forwards I would have in the side instead of Beto or Barry. False nine time, Moyes, false nine time.

Jack Convery
2 Posted 13/10/2025 at 23:33:02
I reckon he will pick - if fit :

Pickford
O'Brien, Tarkowski, Keane, Mykolenko
Gueye, Garner, Dewsbury-Hall
Alcaraz, Beto, Ndiaye.

If Branthwaite is on the bench, expect to see him, unless there's an injury, at 75 minutes.

Paul Kernot
3 Posted 14/10/2025 at 05:43:22
Same feeling as the Palace game for this one, that being, I can't see us getting much from this game, particularly away. However we somehow managed to win the last one so why not?

My own personal challenge is to leave my past concerns behind and expect us to keep competing with the lot of them.

Alan J Thompson
4 Posted 14/10/2025 at 07:04:32
He must play Beto upfront next to Stones, whose brain will be flabbergasted by where the ball will bounce off to, and with Alcaraz playing close by to give us the early advantage of knowing that nobody knows where it will go next.

That and Beto may be better than Barry at chasing the long punt now that Grealish will be torn in his allegiance, apparently.

Jerome Shields
5 Posted 14/10/2025 at 07:28:49
Moyes will play a defensive formation. Hopefully it works for a change in the first half. Players have to be on the front door from the start, even Moyes has to get that message.

Should be better in the second half and hopefully he does not need to go a goal down in the first half to get the type of performance we have been seeing with Everton trying to attack and get forward in the second half.

Ian Jones
6 Posted 14/10/2025 at 08:19:21
'I think he holds the ball too long, doesn't look to play it off quick enough, or shoot at goal often enough. There, I've said it. I'm sorry. And part of the problem is not enough support players close enough to him.'

Michael, not sure why you are apologising for your comments about Ndiaye. It's true.

Paul K, I have also noticed Grealish slowing things down and keeping possession but I also think that he may not have confidence in some of his team mates especially when the movement around him is non-existent so tends to hold on to the ball longer than perhaps he should.

As for formation, I can't recall how some of the lesser teams that have been successful against City have set up but imagine it'll be a defensive mindset for us. It would be nice to go there with an attack minded get at them approach and stick two up front so that their defence have something to do/think about but it'll no doubt be backs to the wall with them having 4 free defenders walking around with little to do.

Hugh Jenkins
7 Posted 14/10/2025 at 08:31:40
Has Grealish been given a dispensation to allow him to play against the team from whom we have borrowed him, or are some of us overlooking the fact that he is not available to play against Man City?
Laurie Hartley
8 Posted 14/10/2025 at 08:38:52
Well unfortunately unless Moyes does decide to go with a back three as you suggested, Michael, I think O'Brien should make way for Garner in the right-back position and Beto played up top. In which case my team would be:-

Pickford
Garner, Tarkowski, Keane, Mykolenko
Dibling, Gueye, Alcaraz, Dewsbury-Hall, Ndiaye
Beto.

Jon Atkinson
9 Posted 14/10/2025 at 09:07:47
We'll leave the Emptihad empty-handed as per knife to a gun fight etc.
Martin Reppion
10 Posted 14/10/2025 at 09:14:09
Regarding Ndiaye, I was delighted with his late creation of the winner v Palace. (Doesn't go down as an assist due to Beto missing the header.)

Usually he is hooked at around 75-80 minutes as he is blowing hard and spent. I think the first half in which we created nothing probably helped him last the game.

His fitness in hard games is a slight concern but, as he does more than most to lift the gloom, he is forgiven for that.

Eric Myles
11 Posted 14/10/2025 at 10:32:51
Hugh #7, I don't see any post indicating Grealish will be playing.

Did you comment in the wrong thread?

Brian Harrison
12 Posted 14/10/2025 at 11:01:53
Obviously Grealish will be a big miss, and with Dibling still finding his feet, then I guess it will be Alcaraz out wide. Problem is, when played out wide, he has been ineffective.

But my biggest worry is O'Brien trying to keep Doku quiet, he is probably the quickest winger in the Premier League, and Jake has really struggled against pacey wide players.

Jake FitzGerald
13 Posted 14/10/2025 at 12:34:15
Laurie@8 - yep, that's a neat starting line-up. Alcaraz in mid to feed Beto & Garner to chase Doku.

The problem is:- what's the finishing line-up going to look like? City can keep it going full pelt for 96 mins. We can't. Not without Grealish.

Ian Bennett
14 Posted 14/10/2025 at 12:59:24
Haaland vs Keane & Tarkowski is a mis match.

He put Branthwaite on his arse last season, these boys will struggle.

Harsh to drop Keane, but Jake might be able to handle his pace and physicality.

David Bromwell
15 Posted 14/10/2025 at 13:36:29
Is Michael Keane fit?

Remember he went off in the last match v Palace.

Ajay Gopal
16 Posted 14/10/2025 at 13:39:27
I like Michael's 3-4-3 idea, but would play McNeil instead of Dibling. He can really test their goal with his long range rockets.

Pickford
O'Brien Tarkowski Keane
Garner Gueye Dewsbury-Hall Mykolenko
Ndiaye Alcaraz McNeil

Subs: Travers, Coleman, Patterson, Iroegbunam, Branthwaite?, Rohl?, Dibling, Beto, Barry

My guess is Moyes will go with the usual back 4 and play Beto instead of McNeil. Still, that's not a bad starting XI, and if Moyes sends them out with the right mentality, we should give Man City a bloody nose!

Tony Abrahams
17 Posted 14/10/2025 at 13:58:19
I have got no worries about Everton beating City, but this might change once I see who's going to be refereeing us this Saturday afternoon.
Robert Tressell
18 Posted 14/10/2025 at 14:17:22
If we play a back 3 I’d go with OBrien, Keane and Mykolenko. Much more balanced (with a left footer) and mobile that trying to accommodate both Keane and Tarkowski together.

Wing backs would then be Garner and McNeil.

Then possibly a narrow 3 of Gueye, Iroegbunam and KDK.

Ndiaye then playing off Beto.

The main flaw with this is that:

- Keanes lack of pace moves the back 3 deeper than where you’d want it to be

- moving Garner to RWB weakens the central midfield (Iroegbunam isn’t especially good)

- McNeil is slow and out of form.

- Beto isn’t very good.

Unfortunately by moving to a back 3 you create as many problems as you solve. There isn’t a magic tactical approach or formation etc that puts us in the driving seat.

Realistically we will have to cede possession, defend deep, double up on their wide players and try to eke out a few chances on the break and from set pieces. Shame that we’re still talking in those terms but with each round of spending the squad should become better equipped to properly compete in these gsmes.

Christy Ring
19 Posted 14/10/2025 at 14:17:39
Why would we move Garner into a back 4/5? He’s not a fullback and we need his athleticism in midfield beside Gueye, I’d play Seamus in Saturday if he doesn’t play that tonight, and you can criticise Ndiaye, but if he had movement upfront he’d play the ball quicker,
Edward Rogers
20 Posted 14/10/2025 at 14:53:27
Probably come back to bite me in the arse, but I think Doku flatters to deceive a lot of the time, not much end product?
Snatch your hands off for a point.
Steve Brown
21 Posted 14/10/2025 at 15:18:20
Robert @ 18, your 3-4-3 formation makes a lot of sense.

Unfortunately, the manager would never pick that formation or team.

Dave Abrahams
22 Posted 14/10/2025 at 15:25:03
Edward (20),

I think Doku is one of the reasons we've got Grealish playing for us!

Jay Harris
23 Posted 14/10/2025 at 16:45:40
City are strong in midfield and on the wings but suspect at the back because they hold a high line.

This is ideal for Beto, who I would hope has enough confidence left after a miserable couple of months and international disappointments.

I would go 4-3-2-1:

Pickford
Coleman Tarkowski O'Brien, Mykolenko
Garner Gana Dewsbury-Hall
Alcaraz Ndiaye
Beto

With Ndiaye dropping in to help Dewsbury-Hall when we're under pressure.

Edward Rogers
24 Posted 14/10/2025 at 16:45:59
Probably right, Dave.

I just find Doku very frustrating to watch at times. Does the hard bits well, then messes up the final ball.

Jerome Shields
25 Posted 14/10/2025 at 16:53:28
Michael,

Ndiaye I think is told to concentrate on his low-block duties and that may be the reason he is not getting the ball forward fast enough.

Everton forwards would benefit from a faster supply and their movement would count more in creating chances.

Dave Abrahams
26 Posted 14/10/2025 at 17:36:00
Edward (24) Fair enough but I think he gets an awful lot right as well and I was hoping he wouldn’t come on last season in the game at Goodison but he did and changed the game in City’s favour although losing Tarkowski with an injury didn’t help us either.
Ste Stannard
27 Posted 14/10/2025 at 17:55:50
It's time for sentiment to be put to bed. Seamus, our amazing servant and right-back, should not be starting any Premier League game for us unfortunately and Jake and Keane as well as Branthwaite start before our captain Tarkowski.

He has been a massive liability last season and he's been awful this season too. As I said wonderful servants and players but not now. I like to see Jake playing centre-back from now on. He is our future at centre-back and in his natural position.

Garner is a great pro and plays well wherever we put him but I'd love to see him play regularly at right-back and utilise his crossing and foward runs from there. That's where the brilliant England coach Lee Carsley used him to great effect.

Let's face it, a player of Garner's intelligence and work ethic can make the easiest position in football all his. Alcaraz or Ndiaye are real Number 10s and one of them should play there regularly with Dewsbury-Hall in central midfield.

For the Man City game, we are without Jack Grealish so I'd play Alcaraz there and Ndiaye left, his next best position. Unfortunately up front it's a toss of a coin as both are useless but at least Beto has a go and occasionally gets a goal.

Barry is new to UK and us but his body language stinks. I hope he proves me wrong. Dibling should start vs Man City, he needs games; he will come good I think.

Ian Bennett
28 Posted 14/10/2025 at 19:34:56
I don't think this is a game for passengers, so Barry & Dibling need to be on the bench.

3-5-2:

Pickford
O'Brien Tarkowski Keane
Garner Gana Alcaraz Dewesbury-Hall Mykolenko
Ndiaye Beto

Peter Mills
29 Posted 14/10/2025 at 21:19:16
Michael, I'm a fan of Ndiaye, but I wouldn't argue with your observations on his play this season. Equally, the same comments could be made of Jack Grealish.

Alcaraz and Dewsbury-Hall have neat footwork and an eye for a pass, but their involvement in games is spasmodic.

The problem, I fear, is that they all play too far away from one another. These players show in patches how well they can combine. Unfortunately, there is a Number 9 size hole in the middle of the forward line, into which the ball too frequently disappears.

Tony Abrahams
30 Posted 14/10/2025 at 21:46:38
Interesting opinion on Ndiaye, Michael.

I like him, I think he's our most dangerous player, and I think he must get really frustrated playing in our current set-up because, when Dewsbury Hall is in the team, then nearly everything seems to go left.

We obviously also go left because of Grealish and this is something Garner also does because he seems to have a very good understanding with Jack Grealish.

Unless Alcaraz is on the pitch, then Everton tend to overlook the right and prefer to attack down the left, which makes me think that Ndiaye must sometimes be thinking to himself that he would like to get a part of the game playing in his strongest position.

Laurie Hartley
31 Posted 15/10/2025 at 05:11:32
Tony # 30 - I agree with you that wide left is Ndiaye's strongest position and that he should definitely be played there in this game.

Looking further ahead, I also think that when Grealish is back, there is an argument for leaving Ndiaye on the left and bringing Grealish inside.

That would allow Dibling to play on the right and -- dare I say it -- putting Dewsbury-Hall in Gana's spot in the same line-up and formation that I posted @16.

That would have O'Brien, Gana, Iroegbunam, and McNeil ready as subs to come on and close shop.

I think we will give City a game this weekend.

Eric Myles
32 Posted 15/10/2025 at 05:27:45
Tony #17,

Referee: Tony Harrington.
Assistants: Simon Bennett, Steve Meredith. 
Fourth Official: Leigh Doughty
VAR: Nick Hopton.
Assistant VAR: Constantine Hatzidakis.

Tony Abrahams
33 Posted 15/10/2025 at 09:02:08
I haven’t really heard these names before Eric, so I presume they will probably be intimidated by City’s, international superstars!

We just can’t win with these modern day referees and I’m already fearing the worst because one of them really had no option but to give us a penalty kick, in our last premier league game🤷‍♂️

Mal van Schaick
34 Posted 15/10/2025 at 09:52:27
Play Ndiaye wide right as an outlet from their constant pressure. He can hold the ball up and then we can take the pressure off and keep the ball, and by chance we may be able to build some attacking football.

The key is to keep possession against City as we will pay for their better footballing squad.

Derek Thomas
35 Posted 15/10/2025 at 11:09:38
Will Moyes learn from his previous 1st half failures?

If he doesn't, then all formation permutations are moot.

Jack Convery
36 Posted 15/10/2025 at 11:13:03
Ref Watch:- Tony Harrington.

Refereed us twice last season. Away at Newcastle giving us 4 yellows and the Barcodes 1. We won 1 nil.

Refereed us at Home to Forest, gave us 4 yellows and them 1. We lost 2 nil.

He's refereed 3 Premier League games this season, issuing 15 yellows and zero reds.

Looks like he likes the colour yellow... Dewsbury-Hall beware.

Conor McCourt
37 Posted 15/10/2025 at 11:32:49
City's threat comes from wide, up front and midfield runners, their full-backs aren't the best offensive weapons.

I would take a point now, flooding the midfield and try and counter with Ndiaye and Beto. This is not a game for Garner at right back against Doku with his power and pace, despite feeling he should play more here.

It's a diamond for me

4-1-2-1-2

Pickford
O'Brien Keane Tarkowski Mykolenko
Garner
Gana Iroegbunam
Dewsbury-Hall
Beto Ndiaye


Jake FitzGerald
38 Posted 15/10/2025 at 11:44:15
I like the idea of two up front against City, Conor.

Anders Limpar was saying in the Echo that Barry would profit from having Beto alongside hiim, but the power and skill of Ndiaye together would be worth watching.

Might as well give it a go at the Etihad.

Sam Hoare
39 Posted 15/10/2025 at 11:52:58
Very tough game with Man City in good form and Haaland and Doku in particular looking very hard to stop. It will be a tough game for whoever plays right back.

I think I'd probably play Alcaraz behind Beto as they seem to work well together, both feeding off each other's chaos!

I'm not sure I see Iroegbunam as an ideal starter despite his excellent cameo against Palace as his defensive wanderings (along with Gueye's) would leave us too open against a team like City.

Conor McCourt
40 Posted 15/10/2025 at 12:01:38
Sam, I played Tim because I thought he would give us more protection and physicality than Dewsbury-Hall would in his natural position in a three-man midfield, allowing Alcaraz to come in.

Had we been at home, I think I would have gone with the latter.

Just shows you how differently we all see things.

Robert Tressell
41 Posted 15/10/2025 at 13:02:22
Lots of different formations etc but one common theme - they all contain a few structural problems and players who aren't very good.

Despite improvements to the squad over summer, without Grealish we're not really able to field a better side than was available to Dyche and Moyes last season.

How have we managed that?

Anyway, no need to shit our pants.

The key to any success for us is boring things like defensive discipline, defensive shape, hard work and hopefully taking the few chances that come our way.

Grant Rorrison
42 Posted 15/10/2025 at 13:18:58
Conor 37.

A very conservative looking line-up you've picked there. Looks straight out the David Moyes playbook. Weird given you'll be giving him grief after the game for doing the very things you're advocating now.

I agree with Sam that Alcaraz would do better linking with Beto.

Sam Hoare
43 Posted 15/10/2025 at 13:19:38
Conor, I see the sense in it. Ultimately, we don't have that many well-rounded options in the middle. Maybe Röhl might offer that in time?

Tim's physicality may well be useful but I guess you're trading that off with the gaps that he leaves.

No perfect solutions as Robert alludes to.

Ian Bennett
44 Posted 15/10/2025 at 13:30:16
Robert 41, because we bought mostly for tomorrow, rather than today.

Röhl and Dibling might come good, but I wanted a proper Number 6 and a right winger that delivered straight away. Despite trying, we just couldn't get deals done.

It will be the case of getting a Top 10 finish, and trying again for better players next summer. Some might come good.

Conor McCourt
45 Posted 15/10/2025 at 15:10:04
Yes Grant I know you don't watch a lot of football but it is one thing to set up conservatively, starting deep at home to a Palace side who had played three times in a week than it is to play away at the Etihad.

It may surprise you to learn that they have won 3 of their 4 matches there this season with their only defeat coming to a very organised Spurs team, who countered very effectively.

James Marshall
46 Posted 15/10/2025 at 15:42:27
We'll probably lose. We might not but we probably will if we're being realistic.
Paul Kossoff
47 Posted 15/10/2025 at 16:05:09
Two one win to the blue boys, the royal blue boys. Be positive like me.
A double negative forms a positive. In some languages, such as Russian, a double negative is still a negative. However, in no language in the world can a double positive form a negative.”
What do you mean “Yeah, right!😁
Jerome Shields
48 Posted 15/10/2025 at 16:18:52
Conor#37

Good formation that.Definitely a step up on Moyes's low block explaining why Nidaye and Grealish are more build up than attack.

Robert Tressell
49 Posted 15/10/2025 at 16:22:57
Ian # 41, the interesting one is KDH because although he’s a likeable player - I’m starting to wonder whether and to what extent he gives us more than Doucoure.
Bill Hawker
50 Posted 15/10/2025 at 16:31:59
Ok, I'll say it...

...if Branthwaite is fit, you drop Tarky. Keane has been on much much better form.

I'm ok with Beto starting up front and just being a general menace if he's not going to score.

Ian Bennett
51 Posted 15/10/2025 at 16:54:52
Dewesbury Hall is a good solid player. Quick, gets around the pitch. Easily Premier league level.

But still think it's him or Alcaraz at 10. Neither are scoring a lot of goals, so that is a limitation for the team.

Seen the calls for him and Garner to play further back behind Alcaraz (at the expense of Gana). That would improve the football quality, but I think it would cost cheap goals.

The defence has benefited from the screening in front of them. And without it, I think it would highlight that theyre all average defenders excluding Branthwaite.

Kevin Molloy
52 Posted 15/10/2025 at 16:57:40
I don't think he is quite as influential as Doucoure, Robert, but he was our most influential player so that is a high bar. this I think is what we find difficult to accept, that it cost us £50-£60m to replace Doucs and DCL, and in the short term we may have been weakened as a result. That though was the bind we were in, highly influential free transfers who needed replacing. We had been robbing Peter to pay Paul for years. And it's going to take a similar period to right it all. As you've commented previously, it's going to take several windows to get us to a healthy place with our squad.
Robert Tressell
53 Posted 15/10/2025 at 17:26:35
It’s interesting that you describe Doucoure as our most influential player Kevin. I’d lost patience with his lack of technical ability but you couldn’t knock his energy (along with defensive contribution and some vital goals). So I can see what you mean.

We all see players’ contributions differently I guess. I liked Sigurdsson - a player who would vastly improve our current team in my view. But not everyone did.

Him, Townsend, Richarlison and Baines and Coleman in their prime and we’d have really good team.


Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


How to get rid of these ads and support TW

© ToffeeWeb