ToffeeWeb

Mick (67) Yes that left foot was magic— When he was good James was very very good when he was bad he — I’ll just leave the argument there.

John (65) Alex Young was truly great with the proviso — On his day, he had quite a few off days which maybe I shouldn’t remember ? In their time playing together I loved Alex but preferred Roy Vernon. I could have mentioned the truly immaculate T G Jones the Welsh centre half whom I saw through the eyes of an eight year old boy who was as elegant on the ball as the Golden Vision — a ball playing defender of the highest class.

You criticise Everton fans for going against The Premier League officials.

Careful, Dave @13. I listed specific statements that are admittedly made more out of anger and frustration — but which include varying measures of falsehood that happen to fit the mood but don’t I think reflect well on Evertonians when they are not based in fact.

The consensus is that Everton have been treated harshly but I have struggled to find anywhere that the rules themselves (on which all this is based) have been subverted or applied incorrectly… which should surely be easy to show if the Premier League are indeed ‘corrupt’?

Dave agreed about James but I jut loved that left foot and no look passes, I remember him against West Brom when Calvert Lewin got a hatrick, he just made the game look so easy,

Yea, I read that piece by Boyland too. I think he overstates things a little.

The same three clowns? It would have made sense from the Premier League’s perspective that the same panel looked at this given their familiarity with the case. Everton failed to get them removed…

And sadly that kinda gives a clear indication just how much extra sway Friedkin’s billions will bring to proceedings. That sort of thing might work well in Trump’s America, but things are a little different over this side of the pond.

Still, the switch to a different law firm in Slaughter and May could be significant… or it might be yet another mistake by Everton in a mounting list of legal failings across all these proceedings.

Perhaps we should celebrate the little wins? Burnley claimed £51.7M in damages; they were awarded barely half in ‘only’ £26M.

Also, Burnley were given all the paperwork on Everton’s PSR breach and they said the losses in excess of £105M over the four seasons in question were a lot more than the £19.6M figure from Round 1 of this fiasco. They tried to expand the size of the breach on this basis but that attempt was knocked back by the three clowns.

There’s probably more such instances I could find by reading the whole thing, but surely the bias and bad faith from the three clowns would have prevented such things being adjudicated in Everton’s favour?

Sean,

Two spazzys ?