We all know kids who were brilliant with the ball in the school playground at lunchtime, or on the car park football pitches in Stanley Park, and some dreamed of being professional footballers. In our heart of hearts, however, they felt they were just not good enough.
So, as seasons passed, even the boys with golden feet set aside their dreams and became builders and computer programmers and teachers. To be a professional footballer, you had to be in some way specially gifted.
But it was not so!
Look around. Everywhere we see incompetence. If plumbers, bricklayers, bakers – let alone surgeons, airline plots or air traffic controllers – performed at the level that many footballers play, they would be out of work. In the world of football, they are simply moved on to other clubs.
Take Neal Maupay. Those offensive social media posts seemed to compare Everton to a maximum security prison from which players are desperate to escape, but in truth, Everton escaped him – not the other way around.
Maupay’s career peaked at 17 when he was at Nice. His Premier League track record is the very definition of mediocrity: 28 goals in 172 matches; a single goal in 32 appearances for Everton. Over the last 10 years, no fewer than seven clubs have found him out and moved him on.
Yet he was earning £2.6M a year – more in a week than most people earn in a year. And despite everything, his services are still valued at £4M – a paltry sum for a striker in the greed-warped economy of football – but it still seems a lot for a goalscorer who can’t score goals.
He is not alone, of course. He is not even the most egregious example in football. It seems being a professional footballer is like being a member of a closed guild. You may be incompetent, but you’ll never be out of work for long. In some respect, that’s unfair to guilds because most guilds try to uphold certain minimum standards.
Every season we see managers failing upwards. Some would say our own Arrigo Dycchi is a poster child of mediocrity based on his career-long win:loss ratio and the abysmal standards he sets for his players.
The guys who harangued the Everton players at Euston Station – and I’m among what seems to be a pitiful few to agree with them and their right to express their outrage – were not protesting the result so much as their attitude and nonchalant incompetence, the absence of consequence, and the rewards of mediocrity.
Each of us could name players who have come and gone – but alas, not fast enough – and yet enriched themselves while they were here. There are players like Rondon, and Jo, and Niasse, and Nyarko, and Bakayoko, and Li Wei Feng, and Idan Tal – I could go on – at every club. Indeed, Anthony Gordon’s stock continues to rise at Newcastle Utd despite the fact that his only real skill is a blistering pace.
Now, I realize that you can’t compare athletic performance precisely with other arts or crafts but what they do all have in common is practiced skill. You practice something repeatedly and it becomes second nature.
I’m really not sure modern footballers actually practice their fundamental skills – not enough anyway. If they did, surely we would not see so many basic errors on the pitch.
Most training sessions seem to focus on physical fitness, endurance, stamina, pace, upper body strength and diet. The evidence is in front of us every week and not just with Everton. The pace of the game is faster than ever, the physicality more demanding, the pitches more forgiving, the balls more responsive, yet I don’t see a corresponding increase in skill, ingenuity, artistry or genius or even just courage. Quite the opposite.
Accomplished players – and you read this all the time in memoirs – often stay the extra hour after training sessions to practice the skills that make them great. So what are the others doing?
Presumably those great players don’t think they, and therefore their teammates, have done enough actual football in regular training. You see the results on the field. The mediocrities are firing crosses 20 feet above the heads of the strikers, mistiming tackles in scoring positions, and making many other basic errors.
Football has never been more competitive. It used to be that a talented young English player only had to compete for places with the other talents in the UK and Ireland. For over a generation, clubs – even lowly ones – have recruited from all over the world. Theoretically, foreign players seeking a work permit have to show that they have skills that set them apart from homegrown talent but these rules seem to be observed very liberally indeed.
We bring foreign players to the Premier League presumably because they are better than the players available in the UK and Ireland. Many overseas players have indeed enhanced the skill and competitiveness of the Premier League. However, what is the point of importing so much mediocrity?
Surely we can find enough home-grown mediocrity in the UK. And there has to be a way of weeding out more mediocrities during the development process, which for most players began at 5 years old, and putting a greater emphasis on actual skill over physical development.
Someone once said that Pele and Garrincha – both of whom once graced Goodison Park – were greater artists than Michelangelo because, when Michelangelo painted the Sistine Chapel, he didn’t have 11 guys shaking the ladder, like they had.
I get that. The opponents are there to stop you playing well. But I look around the Premier League and see too many players who are frankly barely at the level of journeymen.
Reader Comments (15)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 01/09/2024 at 13:40:45
I've said it before but having the same size pitches of days of yore is akin to playing 14 a side but conversely I reckon the dropping of standards has helped lesser lights compete (see Brighton et al).
So why are WE shite and going downhill at a rate of knots with every passing season?
Our problems are probably more complex than most and in truth recruitment at this club has always been dreadful but today the bizarre sense of entitlement married to having no money has made the club toxic. Any mistake by player or coach is a banquet for the intolerant, which seem to be growing in number. The oft mooted idea of steady progress over several seasons will never work here.
Dyche was finished after the first game of the season, it's not if but when, then it's back to square one. Great isn't it?
3 Posted 01/09/2024 at 19:09:30
Most match going regulars, would be happy to see evolution rather than revolution. But unfortunately, the very poor schoolboy errors by Dyche and his team on Saturday, was bordering on criminal.
Sure the uncertainty surrounding the ownership adds fuel to the fire, but this guy will be responsible for taking us down, with his 'caveman' football and weird substitutions.
Why shoud probably the most loyal fans in football, not feel angry when witnessing that shitshow yesterday. Nobody wants to see a conveyor belt of managers, but what is the alternative if results remain consistently poor?
Prior to Saturday, the football was dreadful, with the team unable to put together three or four passes. In the recent Spurs game, we had 29% possession, how can we present any sort of goal threat with those stats?
If were still bottom at Xmas, he has to go.
4 Posted 01/09/2024 at 19:54:14
It would like hiring a Plumber who only sorts out leaks in your kitchen...as he doesn't do bathrooms!!!
Fucking pathetic.
5 Posted 01/09/2024 at 20:27:54
That fellow ripping the players as they walked past didn't bother me at all. His screaming histrionics was on par with the terrible performance he (and we) had just witnessed. Even-Steven for me.
I wish you hadn't pushed the money into it, though. Maupay is like every other professional athlete. He can only get paid what a club will pay him. He is mediocre and a bum signing, it's true. His wage is not his fault.
6 Posted 01/09/2024 at 20:48:15
Just for you….
7 Posted 01/09/2024 at 21:06:34
Centres of Excellence — my arse!
8 Posted 01/09/2024 at 21:14:11
9 Posted 01/09/2024 at 21:36:51
Being a footed footballer should be a basic requirement of any professional footballer.
10 Posted 01/09/2024 at 22:03:03
Although it worked, unfortunately I was distinctly average (shite actually!) and only ever made it to Sunday League level but I could use both feet.
11 Posted 01/09/2024 at 22:46:34
12 Posted 01/09/2024 at 23:02:34
13 Posted 02/09/2024 at 01:36:30
14 Posted 02/09/2024 at 02:27:07
Our problem is regular delivery of pinpoint accurate balls from the wing, plus attacking midfielders as you mentioned. We have a decent CF and now, it seems an excellent #10 in Ndaiye. The supply is a huge issue though.
Although I agree with the point about creative, two footed players, pure pace still gets you some of the above and we have zero of that commodity sadly.
15 Posted 05/09/2024 at 08:55:44
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW
1 Posted 01/09/2024 at 10:37:12
My biggest gripe about modern football is the one-footed player. No one who plays football at any competitive level should have a favoured foot. Everton have a few and they should be embarrassed.
Nobby Styles, for fuck's sake, in his book Soccer, My Battlefield, describes practising this skill.
Jimmy Armfield in his sixties manual, Soccer for Schoolboys called it a fundamental ability for any young footballer.
Yet, we swallow the full modern myth of Premier League players as elite athletes with skills beyond imagination. Some are, and they are through natural ability and monumental endeavour.
Many aren't and they are stealing millions.