FAN ARTICLES
Who are the RIGHT people?

Now while we all have our views on Kenwright and cronies too much has already been published in the way of pro and anti Kenwright to waste more space and time on that.
My question is what makes a good board and what qualities should they have.
In my opinion the following qualities are essential:
Vision
Financial acumen
Ability to set and achieve long term plans and strategy
Good relationship and standing with the financial community
Ability to gain respect from others
Honesty
Openness
Tact
Luck
For me the current board doesnt tick too many of these boxes but are these qualities essential or does the club need big money backers.
Over to the forum....
Reader Comments (82)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 19/04/2011 at 20:56:12
3 Posted 19/04/2011 at 21:20:09
They pay him a million a year, he delivers fuck all season after season and his job is safe as houses.
Not bad work if you can get it.
4 Posted 19/04/2011 at 21:29:04
5 Posted 19/04/2011 at 21:32:49
6 Posted 19/04/2011 at 21:12:54
The Chelsea Russian-NO
The City Arabs-NO
The Blackburn Indians-NO
The previous RS Americans-NO
The present RS Americans-probably NO
The Shite Americans-NO
What the above have is more money than us, so you can forget all the above qualities, to be successful in todays football world you need cash and lots of it. Kenwright"s issues. and their are many, are irrelevant. The real problem with him is that he is broke and consequently so is the club. To move forward, regardless of what Moyes believes, we need a rich owner who can afford a good management team, can bring in the best players and pay them the going rate and has sufficient funds left over to build us a state-of-the-art stadium within the boundaries of Liverpool. If we are lucky enough to get such an owner we also need a Manager who can create a trophy winning team. I hope Moyes is up to it. He has shown he can punch above his weight with little money but can he build a team that wins trophies?
7 Posted 19/04/2011 at 21:49:14
8 Posted 19/04/2011 at 22:12:58
9 Posted 19/04/2011 at 22:17:23
Of course we have SOME money and if we were in the relegation dog fight it WOULD materialize...when the fans were really restless and every article was venomous towards the management, money appeared at the 11th hour for Fellaini when everyone was talking Moutinho.
Now we sell and loan out hordes of players just to get them off the payroll and bring in very few if any.
Our recent buys have been poor...both Bily and Heits have been gross disappointments and we have been luckily bailed out by the form of Osman and to a lesser extent Hibbo..
Unfortunately our reserves are very poor so it looks unlikely that any will come through and really push for places.
If no money is provided to freshen up and strengthen the present squad I will not be attending next season...
We have no cover whatsoever for Baines...he can play whenever he likes and is in a very strong position to negotiate a TOP SALARY for himself as EFC mismanagement have made him indispensable.
NO COMPANY WHICH IS PROPERLY RUN WOULD ALLOW THIS !!!!
So much for the bumbling board of dumbfucks !!
10 Posted 19/04/2011 at 22:08:30
I mean if it was me, I'd have said something like..
"Could it be Bill Kenwright knows what he's doing?
Under his reign we've not done too badly.
Not just a chairman, he's an Evertonian.
Through and through and through.
Be careful what you wish for then.
I definitely support him.
Limited funds maybe all that's available.
Love of Everton however means more than money"
(that way I'd SEEM to be supporting Bill, but when you put the first letter of each sentence together..)
11 Posted 19/04/2011 at 23:02:56
12 Posted 19/04/2011 at 23:29:20
13 Posted 19/04/2011 at 23:33:02
The Chelsea Russian-NO
The City Arabs-NO
The Blackburn Indians-NO
The previous RS Americans-NO
The present RS Americans-probably NO
The Shite Americans-NO
Sunderland - Ellis Short - Yes
Villa - Randy Lerner - Yes
Stoke - Peter Coates - Yes
Tottenham - Joe Lewis - Yes
In addition to your own list of No's
Birmingham - No
Fulham - No
Magpies - No
West Ham - No
I think out of all the takeovers in recent years of English clubs more than half would come into the not for us category.
14 Posted 20/04/2011 at 00:01:19
The writer of the Chester Chronicle article apparently posed the question as to how a club like Blackburn could attract new owners before Everton? I have no doubt that BK would have given those chicken pluckers short shrift as "not Everton`s kind of people". Thank God for that, I say. Stay firm, Bill until the right money is offered by the right people. Everton is too precious to be sacrificed for a shedload of rupees!
15 Posted 20/04/2011 at 00:03:55
But as they got up to the picture of Kenwright on the time line,half of them stood underneath it with a banner taking pictures of themselves. They did it by the reception as well, although I'm unsure if they had done anything else before that. The banner read;
"Kenwright, if you love this club, please let it go, we need investment to grow." Or something close to that.
So, for the fans here that have asked for protests, something seems to have begun now. No idea who they were or why they were doing it but there you go.
16 Posted 20/04/2011 at 00:09:16
It seems that "investment" will solve our ills, not "a new owner" For crying out loud. Who on earth is going to open their wallet and fund our club's current owner and his crew, after seeing the track record so far???
King's Dock, Fortress Sports " The money's in the bank". Desperation Kirkby, and now getting a bloody office suitem built on land that could be used to increase the capacity of Goodison Park.
I've always thought of Moyes as an Honourable man but stuff in the Echo tonight makes me wonder.
We have a man, who's position in the club I'm not sure about, who is a Billionaire. We have another who sold a chain of food outlets and promised to release funds to the club and bugger all has happened.
So Davgid Moyes believes that all that is needed, is for someone to come along, fund this mob, probably to the tunen of £two hundred million or so, for players and ground redevelopment and sit back and leave it to the current board to fulfill some kind of management plan, which will ensure that his/her investment is used wisely!!!
My God, we certainly are living in interesting times!
17 Posted 19/04/2011 at 23:58:18
Please spare me the usual rubbish about mysterious shadowy figures that Bill K has fended off. While you are at it perhaps you could name an actual witness to some of the boardroom shenanigans that you claim to have taken place.
18 Posted 20/04/2011 at 01:16:26
But not wanting to rake up old wounds, are your last 2 sentences taken from your DK times ?
19 Posted 20/04/2011 at 01:22:53
You say you don't want to this club to be a 'Zillionares plaything'.
It's obviously lost on you we are currently a poor mans plaything.
I know what I'd rather be,given the choice.
As for Moyes' comments,he's talking out of his arse. Is it in his contract he must talk up Kenwright and his cronies on the board when we're on a decent run as surely I'm not the only one to have noticed this?
20 Posted 20/04/2011 at 01:26:37
But I will say this: it is not for the manager to say whether a club needs new owners or not. However, it is expected of a manager that he doesn't become a de facto supporter and virtual prop of an unpopular board by swallowing all the team-destroying decisions that come from upstairs. Being capable of slamming the door is a much more admirable quality.
21 Posted 20/04/2011 at 01:46:48
22 Posted 20/04/2011 at 01:59:27
The answer is "No" brother. Look up Lerner's Cleveland Browns in the NFL since he's owned them. He's a well-known piece of shit over here. Try a few Browns ToffeeWeb-like sites.
May he keep ownership of Villa all the way to the Championship.
23 Posted 20/04/2011 at 05:51:08
Arsenal dont seem to fair too badly under Stan Kroentze who is not even chairman.
Likewise Spurs have prospered under the chairmanship of Daniel Levy who does not interfere with Appy Arry even though some think he should.
Man city supporters would not be unhappy with their owners either although that is not my preferred type of board.
For all the Man U supporters unhappiness with the Glazers they havent been too interfering either.
The only board I would not like to see in place of BK and his cronies are West Ham's and Blackburn's.
24 Posted 20/04/2011 at 06:00:29
He says we need new money, not new owners.
1. Fucking bullshit. The new owners have shown that they are inept, and a lot of the supporters are getting fed up with their constant inability to connect to them.
2. Who, in their right mind, would give the current board their money after seeing how they have run the club into the ground over 12 years.
What Moyes needs to do, after having fucked off to Norwich (they'd love his tactics there), is pick up a dictionary and compare the entries for these two words: "investment" and "donation".
25 Posted 20/04/2011 at 06:20:11
If Kenwright, Moyes, Elstone and the whole bunch of arseholes running the club would step out of the FicDep fucked off to the Miniluv, that would be doubleplusgood!
26 Posted 20/04/2011 at 08:49:17
Maybe Bill would say "we dont need a new manager, we just need to win more games".
27 Posted 20/04/2011 at 08:49:17
Maybe Bill would say "we dont need a new manager, we just need to win more games".
28 Posted 20/04/2011 at 09:51:49
Villa - Randy Lerner - Yes
Stoke - Peter Coates - Yes
Tottenham - Joe Lewis - Yes
Yet all but 1 are below us in the league. Despite their money.
29 Posted 20/04/2011 at 09:49:38
After 11 years and counting BK hasn't invested a single penny into the club beyond his shares, it's documented that neither he or any of the major shareholders are willing to spend a single penny on the club or dilute their shareholdings to the club's benefit YET you still believe somewhere in the world there is an utter moron of abject stupidity willing to give BK money to keep hold of his trainset and failing business for fuck all in return?
I've said it before, want to buy some magic beans?
30 Posted 20/04/2011 at 10:19:06
We might not like it, but I would be shocked to hear him come out and say "what we need is a clear out of the board. Bill's got no cash and I'm sick of having no money to spend in the window." It might be what we want but I still don't expect the manager to be the one that puts it out there in the media. Moyes will say the right things until he walks or is sacked and it's no different from the infamous "board backs the manager" curse that gets rolled out days before a club sacks the gaffer.
It's one thing for fans to protest and start movements against a regime that they believe is rotting the club from within, but to expect the employees to do it is somewhat naive.
Do I agree with what Moyes has said? No
Would I expect him to have said anything else? No
Good point from Roman which is one of the things that has annoyed me the most over the last few years. Bill seems to be looking for mugs to just handover large lumps of cash so that he can continue to play with his favourite toy. Investment and donation are not the same thing. He needs to step aside and accept that he has nothing left to offer EFC.
31 Posted 20/04/2011 at 11:22:01
Very constructive comment - my my not on your high horse today then.
Whilst I crave progress for Everton on and off the pitch - that is just garbage being spouted by a hypocrite.
32 Posted 20/04/2011 at 11:29:41
I suppose there is a broader point about the 'right type of owners' - I recall people on here going nuts because teams like Portsmouth, Notts County etc could get new owners, but they clearly were the wrong type. The Notts County saga is mind boggling. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13109493
I am not a Kenwright 'acolyte', 'apologist' or even a Doddist (new form of religion perhaps, bit of a cult type thing?) who backs the board as it is clear they have massive limitations and are not the most honest. However, they are probably right to be cautious about selling to anyone. I suspect given the state of the club finances, only the iffy so and so's may show interest....
Just my thoughts!
33 Posted 20/04/2011 at 11:53:06
34 Posted 20/04/2011 at 11:39:36
35 Posted 20/04/2011 at 11:23:12
Care to explain your "chicken pluckers" comment? I sincerely hope it's not a racist slur against Indian people concocted by you and your mates at whatever backwater town you hail from.
What, pray tell, is Everton's "kind of people"? White people only?
And how is Everton "too precious to be sacrificed" by an investor with "a shedload of rupees"? Would it be better if it were a shedload of American dollars or Russian roubles?
Please explain.
36 Posted 20/04/2011 at 12:09:55
37 Posted 20/04/2011 at 12:15:51
38 Posted 20/04/2011 at 12:30:05
On the thrust of the article, I ask posters who are lambasting Moyes one question: What do you want him to do? Come out and say what a bunch of cunts the owners are?
Roman Sidey I have an idea. Why dont you tell us who your employer is and then post a comment on your employer's website openly lambasting them. Then please feel free to call Moyes a "spineless cunt".
Moyes does not own the club. He is an employee of Kenwright whether he likes it or hates it. I imagine he enjoys his job so to some degree has to tow the line.
Its not unusual in a workplace to have to put up with your boss even if you hate him.
39 Posted 20/04/2011 at 12:49:18
Time after time supporters come on here either urging the current regime to spend money we patently havent got or plead for some 'investment'
It really is time to wake up and smell the coffee. Our current business model is one that loses £20m every year unless we sell players at a profit. This situation looks like it is only going to continue in the short term. We have a dilapidated stadium, a stack of bank debt and three much richer clubs in a 40m radius.
No sane person would treat this as an 'investment' unless you were paid to take the club on.
Our only hope like some other PL teams is a benefactor who will happily write off losses against their own personal fortune.
It is very easy to be critical of BK and Im neither a fan or a critic but two things I do admire, we have not put the future of the club at risk by financial folly and for 7 years we have consistently outperformed as a football team in relation to our financial clout.
40 Posted 20/04/2011 at 13:13:35
His "chicken pluckers" comment was probably due to the fact that Blackburn's owners, Venky's are a company who process chicken meat. This has been pretty well documented since their takeover, although maybe you and your mates in whatever backward town you hail from have not had sight of this.
41 Posted 20/04/2011 at 12:51:48
We can't expect Moyes to push our agenda. I know how you feel about Moyes and I can appreciate that these latest quotes do nothing to improve his image with you, but I just think that he's doing nothing more than I would expect and whilst it does not increase my respect for him, it does not necessarily reduce it either.
42 Posted 20/04/2011 at 13:07:05
Personally, I think David Moyes made a very honest statement of where we are right now.
I do NOT want Everton to end up in the hands of a non-Evertonian or some mystery foreign 'investor'.
Do any of you who have posted here really want us to be owned by the likes of a poultry production company, irrespective of their nationality?
Do heritage, tradition and principles not have a part to play?
This is Everton, not Birmingham City, Blackburn Rovers, Sunderland, Stoke or even Aston Villa and Tottenham Hotspur.
Call me naive (as I am certain some who follow will need no encouragement to do), but I echo David Moyes' sentiments and would be delighted if his plea was to become a reality.
Because despite all the 'we're doomed' disciples on here, we are the fourth most successful club in England and have the capacity to easily maintain and improve on that if afforded a more level financial playing field.
May I suggest that those who think a short-term fix from some anonymous, alleged billionnaire - followed soon afterwards by the usual hollow and unfulfilled promises - is a more viable and realistic long-term solution, need to start bigging us up.. .instead of continually putting us down?
43 Posted 20/04/2011 at 13:18:44
it is you with the financial naivety.
We made an operating profit until Kenwright took over and since then have made a loss every year since except when Rooney was sold.
There is 21 million a year of unexplained operating expenses.
Kenwright has sold or mortgaged every asset including future season ticket sales incurring huge interest charges every year.
The board spent 5 million in fees on a pipedream that was Kirkby when 15 million would have put 8500 extra seats in the Park end.
The board have cocked up numerous player departures including Gosling which have cost the club millions.
The board will not put one penny of their own money into the club and refuse to have a rights issue because it would dilute their shareholding.
EFC' merchandising and commmercial operations are notoriously bad, e.g. EFC2,Liverpool 1 was an afterthought due to supporter pressure and should have been set up for the capital of culture year.
by the board's own admission they have no plan for the club so we stagger from year to year rudderless except for Moyes.
Kenwright's lies and deceipt are legend and unacceptable from a chairman of EFC and people of influence around Merseyside will have nothing to do with him.
44 Posted 20/04/2011 at 13:39:49
I am not happy with many of the ways in which Kenwright go about their business but at least we have are still owned by people who care about the club and though are debt id not great it is much less than several around us. Also we have massively out performed in relation to expenditure on the team.
People need to be realistic about what could happen.
And as for those who say that Kenright has 'run this club into the ground'....behave yourselves!
45 Posted 20/04/2011 at 13:53:08
46 Posted 20/04/2011 at 13:59:46
So far I think we have done nothing but benefit from off-loading Gosling from the wage bill ? a hugely overrated player who hasn't played more than a few minutes for Newcastle yet and may never return to fitness.
And just who are the other players whose departures were "cocked up"?
47 Posted 20/04/2011 at 14:09:45
Take your 'race card' and fuck off.
48 Posted 20/04/2011 at 14:28:32
I'll keep this simple.
If you can show me JUST ONE post from me (ever!) indicating that I think Kenwright ISN'T a cunt, please point it out.
If you can't, wind your fucking neck in, get off your THICK horse and buy a dictionary (poltroon!)
49 Posted 20/04/2011 at 16:11:36
50 Posted 20/04/2011 at 16:01:56
Why shouldn't I question if I think someone could be spouting racist slurs on this website - or anywhere for that matter? If anything, I'll be a damned disgrace if I simply sit back and do NOT do anything about it.
By raising the issue and openly questioning Dick Dodds, by asking if he "care[d] to explain", if he cared to elaborate on "what...Everton's kind of people are" and "how Everton...is too precious to be sacrificed...for a shedload of rupees", if he could "please explain", I don't think I'm putting words into "someone else's mouth", but asking Dodds to EXPLAIN his derogatory remarks.
You're the disgrace for simply accepting that it's okay to term someone as "chicken pluckers". Chicken pluckers! Take your high society, superior social status card and fuck off!
Noel #40:
No, I did not know the back story about Blackburn's company as chicken-meat processors.
Fair call - my "backwater town" reference was probably uncalled for. But I'm not going to back down from my response to what I thought could be a racist slur. It may have not been intended as such, but I'll be damned if I let it slip by without questioning the intention behind it - especially on this site.
51 Posted 20/04/2011 at 17:38:59
If you don't know what kind of people Everton people are, knowledgeable, committed football fans who know their history and value the dignity of the club over splashing the cash on the latest mercenaries, then you need a lesson or three in what it means to be a blue.
And yes, you did put words in his mouth, you didn't just ask for him to explain, you wrote 'White people only?' and asked the highly leading question if it would be better if they were Roubles or Dollars, implying it was the brown-skinned Indians specifically that were a problem, rather than any overseas investor with no connection to the club. There was no racism contained in Richard's post, it was manufactured by you.
How am I a disgrace for accepting that its okay to term a chicken meat processor a 'chicken plucker'? I'm pretty sure plucking chickens is part of the process.
Go and try to be Martin Luther King somewhere else.
52 Posted 20/04/2011 at 17:53:12
53 Posted 20/04/2011 at 18:06:39
54 Posted 20/04/2011 at 18:05:36
Which increases my concern that he may walk in the summer. I don't think he's the greatest genius ever to grace the bench at Goodison, but he has brought stability to the club, in spite of everything.
55 Posted 20/04/2011 at 19:39:00
56 Posted 20/04/2011 at 21:10:09
57 Posted 20/04/2011 at 21:14:49
I can tell you loads of NOTHING he has done.
58 Posted 20/04/2011 at 21:41:52
Unfortunately it looks like BK has tried the same trick running Everton for over a decade, he destroyed a long standing friend and well and truly burnt that bridge, blagged another supposed "friend of the club" which will have made him financially burdened to one of the biggest tax fraudsters in the UK and his hare brained schemes have all fallen flat, where now? I too would rather have anyone, any shape size, creed, colour, nationality as long as they understand how to run a business.
59 Posted 20/04/2011 at 22:27:47
60 Posted 20/04/2011 at 22:27:14
Do I want Everton to be run by a transient sugar daddy like City are, or financed by massive debt like United and Liverpool, or an oligarch like Chelsea? No I don't. I quite like the idea of Everton being run by Evertonians who have only the long-term well being of Everton at heart.
We need to sort out the ground issue so that we can have a stadium that can generate the additional income that we desperately need. Arsenal are the model that I look up to and I absolutely believe that Moyes is our Wenger. Everton has the potential to be a massive club again, we have phenomenal fans and we need stability and a common purpose to achieve the aims that we all want.
In the absence of alternatives I'll support the club and its current management to the hilt and would be prepared to invest what little I could to help us achieve these aims. That's what supporters surely need to do?
61 Posted 20/04/2011 at 22:42:19
We should all be Evertonians above everything else.
More money would be wonderful, but it's killing the game and reckless, indiscriminate pursuit of it will kill our club as we know it.
Time will change. British football will change.
When it does, I hope Everton still stands for something - when everyone else has sold their soul and prostituted themselves in pursuit of filthy lucre.
I fervently hope we will still be run by Evertonians, not some faceless chartlatan from Asia, the Middle East, Russia or the USA.
This clamour for a 'billionnaire' to appear like Santa and throw millions into a transfer kitty is just fanciful. And I for one, do not want it.
This is my club. I feel it belongs to me and I am proud of that sentiment.
I'd rather be an Evertonian than a Chelsea or Manchester City fan. Am I alone in cherishing such values?
62 Posted 20/04/2011 at 22:59:32
This regime is putting us more into debt every single time we have brought a new player in with a new bank loan. They have not got a clue how to make our club financially sustainable over the next 10 years. They are living hand to mouth. Day by day. Now they have got Mr Moyes saying £50 million would probably do to make us a much better team. If that's not desperation, I don't know what is....
You say you don't want any arab or sugar daddy as you say, but what about the Gooners with Stan the man. We are being treated like outsiders by the people who own EFC. As I asked before, one example of what they have done progressive or good for our club? Your response was typical of the Kenwright supporters.
63 Posted 20/04/2011 at 23:10:29
64 Posted 20/04/2011 at 23:22:33
65 Posted 21/04/2011 at 00:02:00
66 Posted 21/04/2011 at 00:41:41
Well, I've got news for you: the world isn't made of black-and-white. I go back to the days ? and I'm not the only one around here who does ? when Everton were derided by some people for being "the Mersey Millionaires", when Sir John Moores ran the club with a firm hand and a great deal of business acumen. He did have a lot of money, but more than that, he knew how to run a business and a football club. That is a sharp contrast to what we have today.
67 Posted 21/04/2011 at 01:52:03
John Moores would have emptied this lot out years ago.
Not one anti Kenwright poster has suggested we need a billionaire.
I would also ask any Kenwright supporter to explain why he refuses to have a rights issue.
Could it be that he has already mortgaged the club and his soul to the tax evader and his sidekick.
68 Posted 21/04/2011 at 07:17:21
I don't know the full story and I'm not a conspiracy theorist but I'm not sure why they don't raise capital via a share issue.
69 Posted 21/04/2011 at 09:44:20
70 Posted 21/04/2011 at 11:10:41
71 Posted 21/04/2011 at 11:29:55
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JfgGIHv-mo
Could he be talking about our good buddies, Bill Kenwright and Richard Dodd :0)
72 Posted 21/04/2011 at 11:44:22
73 Posted 21/04/2011 at 11:59:25
Don't kid yourself into thinking you know what it means to be a blue more than anyone else. We're all Everton supporters on this site. I don't see you as a better or worse supporter than me, and I don't see how you could think otherwise.
As for the rest of your post, I can't be arsed with it. You read what you chose to read from my posts, as did I from Dodds' post. That is all.
74 Posted 21/04/2011 at 19:02:05
75 Posted 21/04/2011 at 22:58:15
76 Posted 22/04/2011 at 03:05:07
Richard Dodd, my sincerest apologies. I really did read your comments as a possible racist slur, and my intention was to ask you to explain them. However, in the process of doing so, I cast you as a racist without knowing the full context and without giving you the benefit of the doubt and waiting for your response. That was simply uncalled for. I am sorry.
Rob
77 Posted 22/04/2011 at 12:01:05
This summer is leading towards a prized asset being sold to fund 2 or 3 players in. That's likely to be Rodwell or Fellaini. Plus some fringe players are probably going to be sold and subsidised by free to low-value players.
This in my view is what the board should be telling Moyes. There'll be no more borrowing, you've got playing staff worth value... wheel and deal.
Meanwhile the current board should also be more radical in their approach. A rights issue wouldn't go amiss in the short term and some honesty over the value they're holding out for.
It's obvious Kenwright and Co are holding out to make a handsome profit, that's not real fan behaviour (making up for apparently no cash being taken out the coffers for wages?). It's the only sensible long term approach he's adopted so he does have some strategy but it's for himself.
78 Posted 22/04/2011 at 12:54:16
So we go into another thread of amateur accountancy riddled with conspiracy theories aimed at discrediting Kenwright. Someone even thinks the Glazers have been better for Man Utd. Impossible to enter an argument with that kind of thinking.
79 Posted 22/04/2011 at 13:27:08
I think Man Utd's trophy cabinet and 75,000-seater stadium speak for themselves and to think at the start of the Premier League we were level pegging with Utd.
The Glaziers might not be popular but they've sure as hell achieved significantly more than our board.
80 Posted 22/04/2011 at 17:03:56
If you want to bring some accountancy or any other evidence you have to credit BK then bring it on as I'd love to see it and the basis it is made with. Dave Moorcroft asked pretty much the same question and yet not a peep from any of BK's lickspittles.
81 Posted 22/04/2011 at 19:22:35
I totally agree with Moyes on this:
Kenwright and Moyes are the right people.
We just need a cash injection and a clever developer to see what the others can't in Goodison.
Oh and to get rid of Anichibwassiface.
[unrelated] What has happend to Go[o]sling this year by the way? Bag a shite. that milk was cleared up quickly wasn't it.
82 Posted 22/04/2011 at 22:21:20
Given Kenwright has made cock-up after cock-up during his disasterous tenure,who in their right mind would give us a cash injection and let that bungling fool do what he wants with it?
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
1 Posted 19/04/2011 at 20:58:08
Excuse me? Positively Orwellian Doublespeak. If you don't disappear up your own fundament working it out, I think he's actually saying he accepts that we need new owners because that's typically the only way to get new investment. However, in his opinion that's a shame as he thinks the current owners are very good. In which case why not just say that!
BTW, Davie, you are in an increasing minority if you believe the current owners are up to the job.