Fee fight for Naismith goes to arbitration

, 13 December, 7comments  |  Jump to most recent
Charles Green, the businessman who bought Glasgow Rangers, insists the newco is entitled to transfer fees for Steven Naismith and other players who walked out. Green's case will go before a Glasgow arbitration tribunal in January, with initial legal discussions expected to begin early in the month.

Scottish legal experts are sceptical over the chances of Green's bid being successful, and even if it is, there is doubt over whether Everton would have to pay a fee in the £1.5M region as has been mooted.

Green paid £5.5M for Rangers when he took the club over, with an estimated £3.5M of that based on the value of the entire former playing squad — casting doubt on how one player such as Naismith, could represent such a huge slice of that figure.

Talking about Green in Glasgow, Steven Naismith said, "He's going to say everything he can that he thinks is right, that he needs to say in the position he's in.

"I've never met him or had a conversation with him. Part of what he is doing is because he's now the head of Rangers.

"There are things he needs to do or the fans wouldn't be happy with him doing his job so that's fair enough.

"I'm not going to slag the guy because I've never met him.''

Naismith, who insisted he had always been a Rangers fan, did admit he would not be back at Ibrox in the near future.

"To be honest at this moment I wouldn't go back for a game,'' he said. "A lot of fans aren't happy with what's happened and what went on but you never know in the future.''

The player, who was in Glasgow to attend the charity lunch for the homeless which he funds, added: "The situation is probably still raw. I'm proud of the fact I played for Rangers for five years, I won trophies and won leagues with them, I was involved in Europe.

"It was probably the proudest I've been in my career. I'm a Rangers fan, I grew up a Rangers fan and it was the hardest decision of my career, not just to leave, but everything we went through, it was more than what was in the job title.''

He said the public did not appreciate the issues, adding: "Ninety per cent of people that talk about it don't know half of what happened.

"If you'd asked me just before we went into administration if I'd like to stay at Rangers for the rest of my career, I'd have probably said yes.

"But circumstances change and you need to make decisions you probably don't want to make."

Quotes or other material sourced from Liverpool Echo & Evening Times



Reader Comments (7)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Kevin Gillen
1 Posted 13/12/2012 at 14:41:50
I'll see you in court.
Patrick Murphy
2 Posted 13/12/2012 at 16:26:00
So how much do you reckon they'l give us then? Seriously if he commands a fee of anything over a million they can take him back.
Nick Entwistle
3 Posted 13/12/2012 at 16:32:22
How much did we let them off in Michael Ball dues? Cheeky sods.

Then again, we did send him crocked...

Ian Bennett
4 Posted 13/12/2012 at 19:42:08
That'll be the transfer kitty spent then. Everton strike again... pulling a £3m transfer fee from the jaws of a free agent.
Jimmy Sørheim
5 Posted 13/12/2012 at 21:15:06
I had a bad feeling about this transfer going bad, I just thought it would be resolved by now... seems like we would be better off shipping him back to Rangers if we are going to end up paying more then £1 million for him.

To me, this guy is hardly worth £500k so I think if they try to force our hand then return him back.

Peter Warren
6 Posted 14/12/2012 at 18:25:16
Chill out, guys... we won't pay a penny.
Mark Tanton
7 Posted 15/12/2012 at 12:03:19
I don't get this - are we arguing over who doesn't keep him? I hope win.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads