Shareholders Association minutes

, 12 March, 37comments  |  Jump to most recent
The Everton FC Shareholders Association have published summarised minutes of their meeting with the Club's Chief Executive, Robert Elstone, last night.

The discussion, the first of a quarterly series planned for 2013, covered several topics, including an update on the SA's petition for an Extraordinary General Meeting, benefits for shareholders, ongoing plans for minor development at Goodison Park, the recent transfer window and the Premier League's Financial Fairplay measures.

Quotes or other material sourced from EFCSA



Reader Comments (37)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Colin Fitzpatrick
1 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:07:42
“Mr Elstone expressed his disappointment that the Executive were intending – against his repeatedly stated wishes – to include in their group, members who are active in the Blue Union.

He reiterated that he will not engage with anyone who has played a part establishing or promoting that organisation’s activities."

Why they didn't stand up and walk out at that point is beyond me.
Mike Dolan
2 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:03:48
Well I read the transcript of this meeting and it sounds like while one of you were asking questions and the others were blowing him. Pathetic, ingratiating nothingness. Why did you waste the wankers time?
Ray Said
3 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:10:51
Silly me-i thought shareholders -however small the shareholding-put their hard earned into the club hence owned the club not the CEO, Aagainst his wishes' what an arrogant prick
John Keating
4 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:10:32
So now the Club decide who to speak to in the Shareholders Executive.
We live in a democrative country but it appears democracy doesn't apply to our Club.
Actually it shows the Shareholders up in some light.
Surely its up to them to decide who does and does not attend.
They should have called Elstones bluff and gone for an early bath !!
Phil Sammon
5 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:45:05
Colin

How come you only ever comment on articles regarding the board?

Colin Fitzpatrick
6 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:51:55
in what way Phil?
Dennis Shaw
7 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:52:12
In this report Robert Elstone was described as a fan - he is NOT a fan.

As CEO he is a puppet of Kenwright he has no interest in us other than earning a massive wage, looking after Blue Bill and keeping us 'plebs' quiet.

Time is running out Elstone.

Lee Browne
8 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:49:34
ALL shareholders should be able to voice an opinion , organised properly
Peter Laing
9 Posted 12/03/2013 at 22:06:07
Elstone is more odious than Wyness if ever that could be possible
Bobby Thomas
10 Posted 12/03/2013 at 22:06:37
We need that EGM.
Patrick Murphy
11 Posted 12/03/2013 at 22:06:43
This link refers to a meeting held during the morning of 8th February and not the one last night
8 February 2013, 10am – 11:30am or is that just an error?
David O'Keefe
12 Posted 12/03/2013 at 22:14:33
Wyness has stated on twitter that its "outrageous".
Peter Laing
13 Posted 12/03/2013 at 22:21:00
Wyness almost appears on twitter to be hoping that an EGM will provide the opportunity for the cat to be let out of the bag, disgruntled former employer with an axe to grind ?
Kevin Tully
14 Posted 12/03/2013 at 22:27:03
At least they will get a fiver off a new shirt - glad to see they are addressing this travesty!
Lyndon Lloyd
15 Posted 12/03/2013 at 23:02:41
Peter: Wyness almost appears on twitter to be hoping that an EGM will provide the opportunity for the cat to be let out of the bag, disgruntled former employer with an axe to grind ?

Wyness is now a shareholder in his own right so, at the very least, he has a vested interest in how the Club is run.

John Shaw
16 Posted 12/03/2013 at 23:17:30
Is that Twitter account for Wyness genuine?
Ste Traverse
17 Posted 12/03/2013 at 23:31:24
I've always found Elstone hugely patronising.

I used to think we couldn't have a worse CEO than tubby Wyness...I was wrong.

Ben Jones
18 Posted 12/03/2013 at 23:49:17
Elstone's a City fan
Paul Columb
19 Posted 13/03/2013 at 00:41:38
Been almost 2 years since last at Goodison.......saw in the minutes that the Winslow is closed?? True??
Adam Fenlon
20 Posted 13/03/2013 at 02:03:49
Paul - http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/everton-fc/everton-fc-news/2013/02/07/closure-of-iconic-everton-fc-pub-the-winslow-leaves-fans-group-homeless-100252-32761290/
Paul Columb
21 Posted 13/03/2013 at 03:46:50
Thanks Adam. Bummer....always loved a final pre match ale at the Winslow. Unlikely anyone will take it on with the ground issue lingering. The club really should look at it as a hospitality opportunity and keep it as a historical Everton pub. Wouldn't be a cash cow but would pay for itself if injected with a little cash and run well.
Brian Hill
22 Posted 13/03/2013 at 05:25:07
Paul Columb, amusing to see the name of Everton and the words "run well" in the same paragraph.
Phil Sammon
23 Posted 13/03/2013 at 08:53:30
Colin

I've just never seen you comment on the football side of things, yet you seem very vocal on all matters concerning the board.

Maybe I'm wrong. It just seems odd that someone can be so passionate about the running of the club whilst seemingly not taking an interest about the football itself.

John Keating
24 Posted 13/03/2013 at 09:17:34
Phil
doesn't the Board and the football go hand in hand ?
The Board supply the cash to give the manager to get the players who play.
Possibly why we're getting found out now and why the manager is not committing himself to the Club is because the Board plus Elstone are tossers !
In my opinion when we get a decent Board and management team who have the interest of the Club at heart, success won the pitch will follow.
Matt Traynor
25 Posted 13/03/2013 at 09:21:30
Paul #708, a number of the houses on Goodison Road are converted to lounges. These are private initiatives with groups of ST holders renting the property and paying for the fit out. The one I was in is also sub-let by a group from Anfield - they showed me the pictures and memorabilia etc. that they swap out for them.

Interesting that when I have been there, there were also a number of Everton figures from the past there, who, when done with official club or media duties, preferred to socialise elsewhere. Also it seems officials from the visiting club often pop in to renew friendships.

I don't think the Winslow demise was anything to do with uncertainty around the long term viability of Goodison. From memory they did open at other times in the week, and had cheap beer deals - although naturally on matchday there was no incentive pricing. Lots of pubs in the area have gone now, a few seem to be only operating at weekends or midweek matches. A decline that is repeated across the country.

Mark Wilson
26 Posted 13/03/2013 at 10:43:04
When you read the meeting notes its very clear that there is little if indeed any chance at all of the BU getting into dialogue with the club. Both parties seem to be getting deeper entrenched in their views of each others goals and motives. I suspect that the CEO feels he and the Board have good reason not to enter into dialogue with the BU. I've no real idea why other than the obvious slanging match after the infamous was-it-or-wasn't-it-secretly-recorded BK meeting and the lads shouting awkward questions at a clearly upset BK through the car park railings, not to mention the marches and public statements that the club don't like.

From the BU perspective their mistrust of the Board and anger at lack of investment just keeps on getting stronger and the despicable "performance" against Wigan has obviously taken matters to another level as, after a quiet spell when the team were doing well and disruptive opposition might have damaged that progress, the stakes are raised and perhaps more fans have joined the BU. Plus, due largely I would think to the animosity between the parties, some decent well argued BU financial and strategic papers get little attention which is a shame as despite the clubs intense dislike of the BU approach, there is more common ground than may at first appear when you look at the CEO's various state of the nation blog type messaging.

Leaving out last weekends shameful showing, and the laughing stock it has made us, not to mention the still painful disgust felt by nearly all fans, what has happened over the last year or so to intensify what feels like personal disgust between the club and the BU ? I had picked up that a while ago there may have been some vague report of fans purporting to be BU spitting on BK. Is this nonsense or is there any truth in it ? I can see that closing down all communication instantly but then it is not in keeping with the lead group of BU supporters whose stuff I've seen here and elsewhere. Sometimes campaigning groups cannot control the strategy / approach in ways that they themselves see as reasonable. However, it can be damaging when a small minority go off reservation and behave in ways that may be a sign of despair, anger and frustration, but ultimately means that no sensible dialogue will ever happen. I genuinely don't know if it is this spitting thing that caused the final meltdown, it may be utter rubbish, or whether there is something other than mutual dislike, even hatred, going on here. I think many would welcome some feedback on the question.

The saddest thing of all is that whether you are BU or not, and perhaps today more are voicing there support for the BU position, it is the case that many of us see a club, a team and a manager going under, and in embarrassing style. The sky bonanza is hardly going to make this all better, all Prem clubs get the dosh and all will be busy driving up prices for useless league1 level players, whilst lining the pockets of those same players and their agents.

No sale will ever happen when £175m is needed just to buy the club and wipe out the debt. The stadium cannot be redeveloped...or can it ? Who knows, there are so many conflicting expert views. But the gulf between supporters and the club seems to be growing and though it hurts me to say it, this cannot go on without some kind of explosion of anger spilling over into the stadium and the city. It just feels like its coming and I dread it as I cannot see a good outcome either way. So is there ANY chance that the club and the BU and others can put aside deep dislike and mistrust ? Can they put our great club first ? I think most of us have no answers, no real idea as to how we fight our way out of the culdersac that is debt, versus little capital spend on players and a wonderful but way past it stadium.....yet fans expectations remain higher than ten years ago, and pride in our club remains fierce, as it should be.

Will someone, somewhere, blink first please and try to find some common ground, quickly, else we are on the way to headlines that are all about protest and hatred rather than this special club moving forward. And who knows, football has a funny habit of making utter fools out of us all.....4th place in ten games ? Can't see it myself but stranger things have happened, after all bloody Harry could be about to pull off a miracle at Loftus Rd......


Chris Matheson
27 Posted 13/03/2013 at 11:31:04
Who the Shareholders Association choose to be on their Executive is a matter for the members of the Shareholders Association. It is none of Rbbert Elstone's business. He either respects the SA, or he doesn't; he can't pick and choose which members to engage with from an elected executive.

My advice to the members of the SA is to stand up to these bully-boy tactics and insist that they wil decide who comes from the SA. If Mr Elstone then wants to cut off all contact with the SA as a result then that is for him and the club to decide. It would be another example of the Board isolating itself.

Ste Traverse
28 Posted 13/03/2013 at 12:59:58
I thought they'd 'won' their battle with the Blue Union, but going off Elstone's comments, it's just obvious that the club are still running scared off the BU.
Eugene Ruane
29 Posted 13/03/2013 at 13:23:53
Ste - Maybe because when people lie about their detractors and/or simply try to silence them - eventually, it's they who lose.

Battles and wars etc.

Gavin Ramejkis
30 Posted 14/03/2013 at 12:46:14
For the club to ban someone from the meeting and the reason supplied is par for the course of their blinkered ivory siege tower mentality. The right thing to do would have been a walk out by the Assosciation standing by the banned party with a simple statement of unity and that they are not to be bullied with Elstone and the club's childish antics. Again no of this will see the light of day in the media which would create a tasty question as to why the ban and how do they demand who the Assosciation chooses to attend.
Frida Ericsson
31 Posted 14/03/2013 at 14:34:27
John Keating - Moyes should not be offered any kind of contract at this club ever again. No more of his pathetic shite on the pitch. too many years of negativity..i wouldn't trust him to boil some water.
Colin Wainwright
32 Posted 14/03/2013 at 14:38:58
Exactly Gavin. Should give the self proclaimed guardians of Everton, from the Echo, a shout. Surprised this one slipped under their bloodhound-like noses.
Frida Ericsson
33 Posted 14/03/2013 at 14:38:38
But hang on a minute. How about the new saudi initiative in quatar? They are offering invited teams £175 million every two years, and may include 4 premier league clubs while the rest come from spain, france, germany and italy?

The planned european super league would begin season 2015/16. Invited teams would not be permitted to play in their dometic league, would not be permitted to play in domestic competitions and they would not be permitted to enter the champions league. Hence the saudi pay off to every club 175 million every two years. The league would consist of 24 teams, and my understanding is that 16 would be permanent, while the bottom 8 would probably fight it out in relegation.

No club would turn down such a huge amount of money, and god knows what else in incentives. The premier league wouldn't be able to stop said clubs. Imagaine how much these clubs would get from television pay? shocking amounts of money.

How would you get into that rich list? it's unclear because all the details haven't been released. Fifa and UEFA wouldn't be able to do a thing to stop these clubs and league anyway.

From my further understanding, the champions league would still be as profitable as ever, since it would be in direct competition with the new league, but what would you rather watch? a diluted champions league, berift of high quality football teams, or take the money and run and hope one day to enter the rich list of the new league?

The premier league bubble about to burst? it will if it's biggest clubs leave.

Paul Columb
34 Posted 14/03/2013 at 15:00:23
The powers that be at Everton are obviously wary of the BU and have no intention of engaging with them. I was initially enthusiastic and supportive of the BU but over time have become more and more disappointed with their lack of focus and function.
From a social media perspective they lack leadership and spokesmanship, perpetually commenting on everything from the price of spuds. It's become ineffective, petty and frankly boring. That's not to say well intentioned folks have not dedicated a good deal of their time to this and thus it's taken time for me to allow myself to becoem disinterested.
The climate is perfect for the BU to regroup, refocus and increase pressure on the board to put up or move on. On the flip side, the club could dismiss the BU publicly in their current state as a fragmented group of facebook shit-stirrers of little structure with a lack of mission or constructive suggestion.
Colin Wainwright
35 Posted 14/03/2013 at 15:16:30
Kin 'Ell Paul (098), what do you want from the BU? They brought issues out into the open, tried to put pressure on our useless board, organised demonstrations, tried to obtain answers to previosly ignored questions and were met with.......indifference from the majority of Evertonians.

I thought the lads were doing an excellent job of hounding the chancers "running" our club, but tbh, I wouldn't blame them for fuckin' it all off and concentrating on their own lives.

Peter Foy
36 Posted 14/03/2013 at 15:41:23
Well said Colin,

The last time the Blue Union organised something they were met with shouts of "Kopite behaviour".

Even worse was the demonstration of support for the worst chairman in the history of Everton Football Club when his face appeared on the big screen, and "The happy Clappers" were born.

Toffeeweb should have a vote on the main page.
Did you clap Bill Kenwright that fateful day? I bet not many people would admit it.

Totally agree, why should The Blue Union do a fuckin thing? We will end up with the club that we deserve, nothing more and nothing less.

Paul Columb
37 Posted 14/03/2013 at 16:13:44
Colin. I fully respect the time the BU lads have and continue to put in. In order to be successful the support of a greater number of Evertonians will be required and the current climate could be a catalyst to this. My point is that in order for folks to feel comfortable joining their ranks a succinct and focused mission and message is needed. A spot of professionalism perhaps. Not random nitpicking and slagging matches on Facebook which has seemingly already diluted support for their cause.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads

© ToffeeWeb