Bloomberg report that The Friedkin Group are looking to revive their plans to complete a takeover of Everton just two months after walking away from talks with Farhad Moshiri.
Citing sources familiar with the situation, Jill Shah, Silas Brown, and David Hellier say that Texas billionaire Dan Friedkin is "in talks with stakeholders" over the feasibility of another offer for Moshiri's stake in the Club, although they temper their report by saying that there is no guarantee it would result in a bid.
The Telegraph are similarly circumspect, suggesting that Friedkin "is understood to have been monitoring developments throughout the summer as Moshiri’s hunt for a buyer becomes increasingly desperate" while also being of the mind that the longer the situation drags on, the more the Anglo-Iranian needs to be realistic about his demands.
The Friedkin Group were granted a period of exclusivity to negotiate with Moshiri earlier this year and appeared close to finalising a deal before they abandoned the takeover bid due to the legal complexities of the £200m loaned to Everton by former bidders 777 Partners.
777, together with chief lender A-Cap, are embroiled in a civil case in New York with London-based Leadenhall Capital Partners suing the Miami-based investment firm for $600m they say was "double-pledged".
If Friedkin, whose firm also loaned the Club around £200m, is indeed ready to re-enter into negotiations over buying Everton, it would follow a similar playbook to his acquisition of AS Roma where he stepped away from talks before returning to purchase the Italian club in a $700m deal.
He would also be going up against fellow American businessman, John Textor, who has also held extensive talks with Moshiri in recent weeks and is reportedly close to finding a buyer for his Eagle Football Group's 45% stake in Crystal Palace which would open up his pathway to buy Everton.
Reader Comments (72)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 16/09/2024 at 20:58:43
I prefer Textor.
3 Posted 16/09/2024 at 21:02:54
Textor has exclusivity til the end of November... Duelling bidders will suit Moshiri...
But we need the quickest takeover — clear as mud how this pans out.
4 Posted 16/09/2024 at 21:04:56
Come on, Friedkin for me!
5 Posted 16/09/2024 at 21:08:39
Then get Dyche out and get a decent manager in.
6 Posted 16/09/2024 at 21:19:03
I assume it would need Textor to back down though, before Friedkin could do anything.
7 Posted 16/09/2024 at 21:21:36
8 Posted 16/09/2024 at 21:25:00
Maybe it was to try and chip the price on Moshiri and maybe Textor has been used by Moshiri to let other interested parties know that, if they don't act soon, then it might be too late, because Textor is telling everyone he his getting a bargain.
The sale of Everton can't come soon enough… but I've been saying this for at least a couple of years now.
9 Posted 16/09/2024 at 21:31:23
I think Textor is saying he is getting a bargain because he wants to attract additional capital from other investors as part of his consortium.
10 Posted 16/09/2024 at 21:34:34
My one (two as I'm not in favour of the multi-club model) but my main gripe is that when The Friedkin Group pulled away at the start of the season, that single-handedly destabilised our season (transfer market) — second only to the fine work Dyche is doing.
11 Posted 16/09/2024 at 21:38:18
Everton has been brought to its knees for most of the Moshiri reign. For the sake of Evertonians, this deal or when a deal is agreed, it must be right. There's a void to fill, in the running and football structure of the club.
Hopefully there's some credibility on both these organisations' interest in Everton FC. I've not done enough research on these two bidders, but both seem light years better than 777 Partners.
12 Posted 16/09/2024 at 21:44:24
Plus £15M for O'Brien when he cost them £1M the summer before from Palace… It just doesn't stack up in my opinion.
13 Posted 16/09/2024 at 21:47:48
But getting clear of Moshiri would be a bonus at any price.
14 Posted 16/09/2024 at 21:53:40
Textor can't have access because he partly owns another Premier League club, that's against Premier League Rules. He may have an agreement but he doesn't have Exclusivity.
15 Posted 16/09/2024 at 21:54:09
Textor is too vocal for my liking and he may have peed on his own chips talking about our current manager. I assume that Friedkin would have to wait until Textor's exclusivity ends?
16 Posted 16/09/2024 at 21:58:52
Your theory re: Textor's comments might be on the mark. There was always a reason for them – that might be it.
17 Posted 16/09/2024 at 22:03:33
Cynical? Fanciful? Maybe. But I've known farmers do similar things with land acquisitions.
18 Posted 16/09/2024 at 22:08:10
We can't rule anything out nor anything in. I just wish our football operation had as many tactical options as these high-flying financial wizards.
19 Posted 16/09/2024 at 22:22:40
I would rather have The Friedkin Group.
20 Posted 16/09/2024 at 22:28:41
As they've already had a period of exclusivity, and had a period of negotiation, they could possibly carry on rather than go through the process from the start again.
Would or could they join with Textor? I don't have enough knowledge to understand if that is an option and, if the report is to be believed, Friedkin would want full control.
It rumbles on.
21 Posted 16/09/2024 at 23:13:25
When Textor arrived with serious interest, I just wondered if it could "threaten" Friedkin's strategy. Still, I wonder how much credibility we can give to the report of rekindled interest?
Until someone comes out and agrees the deal, I will believe it when I see it. So many twists and turns with Everton, it's hard to know what to believe.
22 Posted 16/09/2024 at 23:21:41
He will want a Premier League club after all.
23 Posted 16/09/2024 at 23:51:03
24 Posted 17/09/2024 at 00:42:52
Yes, my thoughts, precisely too. I was expecting something like this to happen. Said at the time that Friedkin was playing games, hoping to get rock bottom price.
Plus, the timing of the pre-emption of another offer being made, in Textor's rambling statement. Or, are we just conspiracy theorists?
25 Posted 17/09/2024 at 00:44:06
Friedkin may have delayed in order to get a better deal.
26 Posted 17/09/2024 at 00:47:48
This had crossed my mind, as well. Would be interesting to see who would take the majority shareholding? Grin!
27 Posted 17/09/2024 at 02:02:03
The Leadenhall v 777/A-Cap lawsuit that led him to walk away is still ongoing. But, somehow that is not an unstoppable issue now that Textor has stepped in with a bid.
28 Posted 17/09/2024 at 02:03:51
6.5 billion times better if you compare their net worth.
29 Posted 17/09/2024 at 02:32:01
A quick rate cut might fuel the bidding spree.
30 Posted 17/09/2024 at 04:52:23
That man knows how to build brands and has powerful connections plus a wife who can fill the front cover of the match-day program. (Apologies to Christine and our other female posters in advance for that sexist remark!)
31 Posted 17/09/2024 at 04:57:27
' Surely that's a different field altogether!' :-)
Sorry Peter, couldn't resist. Either way, I just hope a conclusion is close, and as I said before, I hope Moshiri ends up with next to nothing, but if anything this strengthens his position, having two punters fighting over his shit-show.
Does anyone across the pond know what, if anything, has happened in the 777 Partners Court Case? Again I hope they get next to nothing, or a long porridge diet.
Dyche won't need a target on his arse, as I believe either suitor, when feet are under the boardroom table, will hoof him out with his two hard-boiled eggs! Mr Ferry will no doubt be as pleased as myself.
32 Posted 17/09/2024 at 06:26:36
I doubt they would join forces, Friedkin is a decision maker and Textor is selling his shares in Palace because he can't get a controlling interest.
It would be great if they could though: Friedkin's wealth coupled with Textor's connections.
33 Posted 17/09/2024 at 06:33:23
Why would you want a bidding war? That would just play into Moshiri's hands. I couldn't give a monkey's whether he gets value — I just want the situation resolved as quickly as possible.
A bidding war will just create a delay.
34 Posted 17/09/2024 at 07:12:11
Who knows? I don't confess to understand the complexities.
Whatever happens, just get this done, Mr Moshiri, and stop keeping us hanging on.
35 Posted 17/09/2024 at 07:27:10
I've a feeling this won't be sorted anytime in the next 12 months.
36 Posted 17/09/2024 at 07:39:12
The BBC reported that Everton had agreed a period of exclusivity with Textor. Pretty sure Textor also recently confirmed an exclusivity agreement was in place although he suggested that didn't really count for a lot if another bidder entered the fray.
37 Posted 17/09/2024 at 07:46:25
Agreed. Hence my comment about who would take the major share if they joined forces to buy Everton. I can't help but think there is something in all of this that we are all missing and that is frustrating the crxp out of me. Are Friedkin and/or Textor involved in the steel industry???
38 Posted 17/09/2024 at 07:57:14
This points to it being an affordability issue first time around, rather than an issue with the 777 situation. As why be back in otherwise for a smaller stake?
Whatever the situation can we please sort this out such that I am not watching Ashley Young & Michael Keane at Bramley Moore Dock playing Rotherham.
39 Posted 17/09/2024 at 08:14:04
I think its exclusivity in terms of access to accounts etc Brendan as another poster said.
Having already had access Im hoping that Friedkin wouldnt have to start from scratch.
40 Posted 17/09/2024 at 08:25:40
As Danny said hes got form for this, did the same with Roma.
I think he was probably testing Moshiri resolve on pricing. In reality the whole 777 thing was just a smokescreen and now Textor has come in and upset the Apple cart.
Anyway, who knows, certainly not us mere mortals.
41 Posted 17/09/2024 at 08:27:56
Not quite sure how "exclusivity in terms of access to accounts etc" differs from what is normally understood by "exclusivity"
That also contradicts what Stephen #14 is saying as he seems to be suggesting that under Premier League rules Textor can't have access to Everton's books.
It's generally being reported as a period of exclusivity and this is the first time I've seen it suggested that it is somehow limited.
42 Posted 17/09/2024 at 08:38:19
43 Posted 17/09/2024 at 08:47:05
That's generally the case with exclusivity agreements. It's not necessarily peculiar to the Everton/Textor "exclusivity" period.
44 Posted 17/09/2024 at 09:04:11
45 Posted 17/09/2024 at 09:04:24
I would think that our current owner would like to get the deal done ASAP, however, I would also think that he is trying to minimize his losses, which will be quite substantial the way things have worked out. I bet he rues the day he came across Bill Kenwright.
46 Posted 17/09/2024 at 09:32:48
It was an opportunity for change, as it will be with the new owners, whoever they may be.
47 Posted 17/09/2024 at 09:34:11
48 Posted 17/09/2024 at 09:40:20
Friedkin did the same thing with Roma, making a bid, pulling out then going back in and buying them so it's not out of the question for him to come back in - he's also some way down the line with due diligence already so it has legs.
49 Posted 17/09/2024 at 10:58:11
50 Posted 17/09/2024 at 11:06:03
Brands wanted to give Silva, more time, but anyone who has a clue about football, would have definitely got rid of the Cloggy, who was obviously on a completely different page to the first team manager.
51 Posted 17/09/2024 at 12:18:05
That's why he scrambling around the globe for 'celebrity' type investors. If he gets his hand on the club, don't be surprised to see BMD sold off at some stage to give his 'investors' a return on their capital.
52 Posted 17/09/2024 at 12:25:38
As a club, we need stability and a clear plan for the future.
It is imperative we stay in the Premier League this season and begin to build on the financial rewards that the new stadium will start to bring next season.
Whether that is Textor or Friedkin or some other entity hiding in the shadows, I don't know… Everton are just a pawn in the game.
I personally don't like multi-club ownership, but then I am very old, conflict of interest and all that. However, one man ownership hasn't done us much good either, has it?
Whether we get new owners soon, whether Dyche is going to remain as manager, if not,who will it be? However it pans out, it certainly means some interesting threads to look forward to on ToffeeWeb.
To start it off, I think Gary Neville couldn't be any worse than the above as owner. Plenty of money, football and Premier League background, too bad he's a Manc!!
I'm just going to get my steel helmet now!!
53 Posted 17/09/2024 at 12:33:34
Filthy old money to the tune of $18B.
He (Textor) also owned a skateboarding company in the '90s, and actually competed as a skater himself until a severe head injury halted his career – no wonder he wants to buy Everton!
54 Posted 17/09/2024 at 13:00:07
I can't see why Moshiri can't sell parts of club if he can't find one person to buy us. I get 'tycoons' would prefer to have full control but it's a big chunk of money to do that.
The new ownership needs to be sorted sooner rather than later because money needs to be spent on new players, we are in danger of being relegated if the team is not strengthened.
The value of the club would nosedive if that happened.
55 Posted 17/09/2024 at 13:05:36
They could set up a match, Palace against Roma, or just a running race for the pair of them, once around Goodison.
Loser has to buy Everton!
56 Posted 17/09/2024 at 13:53:41
57 Posted 17/09/2024 at 13:57:06
The people who are suffering the most that he does not seem to care about, are its fantastic supporters, who will stand by the club long after these investors try to increase their fortunes.
As I have said before, Investors only invest to make more money, and despite how much they spout about waking a sleeping giant and helping their fantastic supporters world wide, profits are their bottom line.
58 Posted 17/09/2024 at 14:08:28
I live and learn Brendan.
Someone please just buy us.
59 Posted 17/09/2024 at 14:15:43
60 Posted 17/09/2024 at 14:51:47
Wasn't trying to be controversial. Just thought I had missed something.
61 Posted 17/09/2024 at 14:59:05
I come from the finance industry and I cant make head or tail of Evertons situation
62 Posted 17/09/2024 at 18:22:57
"Leadenhall filed an amended complaint with the same court on 30 August, this publication can reveal, which seeks to place A-Cap at the heart of its allegations by claiming 777 Partners scheme would not have been possible and would not have been “able to operate undetected for so long” without the aid of A-Cap and its executives."
My amateur read of it is that Leadenhall is calling King and his A-Cap basically the leader(s) of the whole mess.
Link
63 Posted 17/09/2024 at 20:10:57
Many thanks for posting that link to 'The Insurer' magazine/website, it is thankfully more detailed and informative from other articles that I have recently read.
There is a very worrying aspect that this could mean any take over drags on, as I'll show here via an excerpt;
"“While the court has already acknowledged the robustness of the claims by issuing an asset-freezing order to prevent further harm against Leadenhall and its investors, the amended complaint expands on the extensive timeline and facts supporting our legal claims, including A-Caps role in the alleged fraud. “We (Leadenhall) remain confident in our strong legal case and look forward to moving ahead with the discovery phase of the litigation, during which we expect to receive communications and other documents from defendants to further reinforce our allegations.”"
The second paragraph means that it will obviously slow down the trial process while documents and evidence is provided to the appellants legal team(s) for discovery and bargaining.
Additionally, if the Court decides to expand it's initial asset-freezing of the 777/600 funds and assets, to the assets held by A-Cap, Haymarket etc and Kenneth King himself; then this could drag on well into Q3/4 of 2025 before the Court moves to hear the opening arguments of the case.
The problem being then, that the ca. £200mn of lending to the club could become tantamount to being frozen (I.e. evidential to the legal course) until the case is over.
Would that mean interest is still being accrued on the loan, at what rates if so, and to who(m) is the interest payable?
I doubt very much that (if the means are available) that putting monies aside to settle the debt would be applicable E.g. placed in an escrow account; and indeed, I doubt other than early settlement of the debt (which might incur indemnity payments) which would mean that the Court would probably hold the repaid funds in 'trust', until the case is resolved.
The unfortunate fact of life is that the loans were made to the club directly and as such they are a liability to the club and not to Moshiri.
Thanks again for posting James, 'tis much appreciated. 👍🙂
I as I hope all on here, just want the ownership issue resolved successfully and rapidly. With the best foundations laid for moving the club forward, without haemorrhaging too much money into investor's portfolios; thus allowing the club to start the undoubted slow process to being competitive above out current level again.
64 Posted 17/09/2024 at 23:35:53
Maybe Moshiri is spinning false info to the press.
Maybe, maybe, maybe. I'll believe it when its done.
65 Posted 18/09/2024 at 10:56:01
66 Posted 18/09/2024 at 10:58:23
I wish you would expand on some of the posts you make, I'm not doubting your information at all, but it would be nice to know who said it and where you heard it.
67 Posted 18/09/2024 at 10:58:43
Safe to say that, if they had been successful in their purchase of Everton, Dyche would be a lot closer to the exit door by now.
68 Posted 18/09/2024 at 11:03:25
Also interesting that Dan Friedkin had flown into Rome yesterday – presumably to sack De Rossi himself.
I like his style.
69 Posted 19/09/2024 at 01:09:56
James @62 and Simon @63. Thanks for the details. This is a worry but there must be some way to create a solution that allows the sale to go through. Way beyond my knowledge, though!
70 Posted 19/09/2024 at 07:53:16
71 Posted 19/09/2024 at 08:36:40
We are spiralling out of control and losing altitude.
The impact on our finances results in bargain-hunting.
The rather pragmatic reputation of the manager and his brand of football does not attract players.
The general uncertainty undermines everything we do.
As we suffer on the park, I have noticed how some pundits have revelled in our woes.
The PL, the refs, opposing fans all feel emboldened.
A lack of leadership from the owner, a manager who feels assured in his tenure despite his own performance and players lacking focus as there is palpably still no "plan" other than that shiny new stadium, which will cure all of our ills.
Boy do we need a proper leader.
72 Posted 19/09/2024 at 08:47:09
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW


1 Posted 16/09/2024 at 20:49:29
Source is Bloomburg apparently.