By far the biggest talking point this week, amongst all the anti-/pro-Moyes talk, has been his refusal to start a game with two strikers (in some cases with none). For years, Moyes?s adoptive formation has been 4-5-1, and, as many have pointed out, we have enjoyed a few seasons in the upper area of the table, being dubbed ?best of the rest? for some of those seasons.
With success (using the word very lightly) comes the problem of complacency. This article is not going to lament on the issue of funding the manager has had at his disposal, as this is only a valid cry during the transfer windows ? once the window is shut, you get on with the job. Back to complacency: Moyes does not see the need or have the vision to change from his tactic which has been worked out, and is failing miserably.
It was only a few seasons ago when 4-5-1 or 4-3-3 were the popular formations being used by most clubs, mainly because Chelsea won the title playing the latter. Sir Alex was playing 4-5-1 for a few months, with Ruud van Nistelroy the usual striker. This was after a season where Man Utd finished 3rd in the Premier League ? ask anyone from the Prawn Sandwich brigade if 3rd is an acceptable finish... It didn?t take long for the fans to turn on Ferguson and demand that he revert back to the classic 4-4-2. They chanted, they lobbied, they made him know they weren?t happy. What did he do? Sir Alex Ferguson, the greatest manager the country has seen, listened, and did what his real employers asked for. He went back to 4-4-2 and within a year had broken a three year title drought (a long drought by United?s standards).
Moyes refuses to change, after years of the same old formation. The strikers he brought into the side aren?t suited to play his style, yet he persists in selecting the team around one of them getting a game, and the others being expected to spend 10 minutes cleaning up a mess that took 80 to create. If it is okay for Sir Alex Ferguson to admit he was wrong and change his tactics back to how the game was invented, then why is it okay for David Moyes not to admit defeat and try something (in his mind) new and exciting?
This week, Everton face Tottenham without the only goal threat, forcing Moyes to shuffle the side. Everyone knows how they want to see the team shuffled, with many people agreeing on some tactics and disagreeing on others. What everyone can probably agree on is this: everyone has a fair idea how Moyes will shuffle the side. He has already come out in the press begging the fans to show faith, a day after his post-match press conference claiming he thought he was doing the right thing even though results said otherwise. This gives it all away.
The result against Spurs is actually irrelevant. Sure, if Everton lose, the club could be in relegation territory when they take on Scunthorpe at the weekend. Avoiding relegation doesn?t come down to nicking points off the top teams, it comes down to beating the teams around you and at the bottom ? something Moyes needs to rectify over the next 18 games. What is relevant in this match is the way Moyes communicates to the fans via the team sheet and the way the players move on the field that he truly is the man that they want managing their club.
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
We cannot stand the absence of Cahill and Jags without it causing big problems at the front and back. Fellaini will no doubt be told to combat Crouch and DM will be working overtime trying to block the danger from Bale and Lennon.
He will not play untested youngsters against Spurs!!
My point was that we cannot criticise the manager endlessly when he has NET spend since Jan 2008 of roughly £0.00, now we find that he can't even bring a loan signing in without selling because we can't afford the wages! The company is pretty much bankrupt and that completly down to Kenwright and Co ? nobody else!
I am looking forward to analysing the latest accounts when they are published because they will show the Board up for what they are, asset strippers who are clueless, people who have left us with NO tangible assets ? not Goodison, not Bellefield, not Netherton and not Finch Farm. This is obviously only my opinion, but it's an opinion born from over 20 years working in finance and successfully running companies!
My point was that it is now that bad we need rid of Kenwright, Green and Earl if we are to survive, let alone prosper, which would obviously require a buyer. Oh, and what a great win for the Blue Boys tonight, fantastic, get in boys.
The best match we've played since the derby... Coleman was like Kanchelskis against Ekotto.
One happy Blue in the office today... couple of not so happy reds though..bliss.Carlsberg dont do results to suit Manchester United..
The School of Science played 2-3-5 and that was what I was taught at school.
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
» Log in now
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
About these ads
Get rid of these ads and support ToffeeWeb
Bet on Everton and get a deposit bonus with bet365 at TheFreeBetGuide.com
View full table
We use cookies to enhance your experience on ToffeeWeb and to enable certain features. By using the website you are consenting to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.