Blues win out with a great Mirallas goal

, 30 March, 138comments  |  Jump to most recent
Everton 1 - 0 Stoke City
Tim Howard returns to the Everton goal despite suffering two broken ribs in his back last month against Wigan; so much for the improving displays from Jan Mucha. Nikica Jelavic has been given a start up front alongside Victor Anichebe. Phil Jagielka has also returned from a leg injury, which in turn has seen Johnny Heitinga promoted into a midfield role... unless Moyes is playing three at the back! No sign of Phil Neville in the team or on the bench!

Stoke kicked off playing toward the Gwladys St end, while The Blues started with a 3-4-3 formation, the ball getting forward to Jelavic on the left side but his cross was hopeless. Shotton's Delap-style long throw was headed on and saved very well by Howard before hitting the Everton bar off Walters and being scrambled away rather fortuitously. A Heitinga free-kick came to nought.

It was fairly direct from both sides in the early stages, no surprise to see rather too many long aerial balls for the purists but Everton were trying to get their passing game going, Mirallas swinging in a great cross at the end of one move. Osman fired in a feirce shot that deflected before catching Wilson on the arm, to mandatory "Penalty!" shouts.

Everton were trying to build intelligently from depth through midfield but poor passing was spoiling some of the neat approach work. Baines did pick out Jelavic for a crisp header that Begovic claimed. Baines then powered in a great ball for Jelavic to attack that Huth scooped away from him as the Blues finally threatened to some effect until a Coleman dribble ended with a woeful shot.

It was nervy stuff in the Everton area, Heitinga having to head away from almost under the bar as the intensity of the game increased a few notches. Another absolutely brilliant cross from Baines was laid on a plate for Jelavic who misjudged it badly. But Kevin Mirallas then got a hare up his arse, and after a fortunate bounce off N'Zionzi, galloped the length of Goodison park following a Howard punch, slotted it through Begovoic with some very welcome confidence and aplomb. 1-0!!!

Jelavic then played Mirallas in wide right and the Belgian fired in a low cross that just evaded the far post as Everton looked to do anything but Kitapo... A free-kick at a nice distance was curled around the wall by Jelavic but it lacked the required pace. At the other end, Howard was stretching to palm away a shot from Walters, while Jelavic and Shawcross entered 'discussions' after a high ball.

A dangerous free-kick given away by Heitinga was immediately penalized against Huth for wrestling Baines. Mirallas did well to cross the Stoke area with the ball on his toe but when the shot came, it was deflected and the corner was neutralized by the rugby scrum as half-time approached, but not before Whelan had got himself booked for clinging to Anichebe's arm.

Distin had to be alert to deny Walter a shot on goal and Whelan's corner was headed out firmly by Jelavic as Everton looked to build after the break. In attack, Jelavic was trying everything he knew but very little was coming off.

Anichebe got into space and won a corner that Mirallas delivered very well but a turnover saw corners as the other end that almost paid off for the visitors, who then got a free-kick that was curled over to Huth whose header bounced wide.

Everton produced more by way of ground attack and another corner resulted but pushing was punished as the hour-mark approached. Mirallas did at least get a defected shot on target, but little else to speak of, while Shotton came so close at the far post with a difficult header. Jelavic continued to look simply dreadful, mistiming his runs, miskicking the ball, missing his passes, although he did get a tame header straight at Begovic off a good deep cross from Coleman. Ross Barkley was preparing for quite a while to come on for him...

Shawcross was booked for hauling down Jelavic in the Dee, but Baines could only drive into the wall as bodies fell all over the place, Osman getting an almost identical free-kick awarded that Jelavic curled brilliantly around the wall, Begovic producing a magnificent full stretch save that was not credited with a corner.

Distin was called for a foul on Crouch, but Huth could not get on the delivery, as the first subs seemed imminent as a snapshot from Jerome flashed across the Everton goal. Mirallas produced another good run in from the left but Anichebe collapsed on contact with the pullback, Barkley finally replacing Mirallas for the last 10 mins.

Barkley fluffed his first lines, kicking a clever backheel into his standing leg, while Osman perfected the dubious skill of giving the ball away needlessly.

With the game seemingly drifting to its conclusion, Barkley got himself booked rather stupidly for kicking the ball away after he got called following what looked like two good if exuberant tackles, and it seemed to give Stoke one final burst of energy. But Coleman responded with a trademark run down the right with 3 mins of added time.

A highly questionable free-kick was given against Osman beyond the third added minute and Howard needed to beat it away to clinch the points..

In the end, it was a competent and professional display from a re-jigged Everton side lacking Fellaini and Pienaar. A rare clean sheet for the returning Tim Howard, and three more vital points toward a possible grandstand finish to the season that just might kep David Moyes interested in extending his

Everton: Howard; Coleman, Distin, Jagielka, Heitinga, Baines; Gibson, Mirallas (80' Barkley), Osman; Anichebe, Jelavic.
Subs: Mucha, Stones, Duffy, Oviedo, Hitzlsperger, Naismith.

Stoke City: Begovic, Cameron (79' Adam), Huth, Whelan Y:45+1', Wilson, Nzonzi, Shawcross Y:70', Walters, Crouch (79' Jones), Shotton, Jerome.
Subs: Sorensen, Owen, , Whitehead, Kightly, Wilkinson.

Referee: Mike Jones

Quotes or other material sourced from ToffeeWeb Match Reports



Reader Comments (138)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Timothy Sebastian
1 Posted 30/03/2013 at 17:19:52
Why Howard? Mucha must be gutted. Hope Moyes knows better.
Jack Okell
2 Posted 30/03/2013 at 17:48:51
Heitinga is so poor. If we concede today, he will have a part in it. What was that free kick about. Utter Shite.
Nick Entwistle
3 Posted 30/03/2013 at 19:28:54
Solid, confident, composed, professional, dull, victorious. That CL place keeps coming closer and closer. 8 games left and its all shaping up very well.
David Mockford
4 Posted 30/03/2013 at 19:29:06
Distin, Coleman and Mirallas outstanding; Osman, Vic (second half), Howard very good. The lads turned up today against a tough team; let us keep believing.

I was really impressed by their lad Shotton however: fast, strong and a bit of attitude.

Tony Twist
5 Posted 30/03/2013 at 19:39:24
Good result today, well done the blues. However, if Moyes is still with us next season, I will regrettably taking a break as I have had my fill of him.
Jamie Barlow
6 Posted 30/03/2013 at 19:42:59
8 games to go and we can still finish second.
Mark Frere
7 Posted 30/03/2013 at 19:42:48
Not a very good performance, but we ground it out and another clean sheet. Reminds me of the 2005 team: passed poorly, no cutting edge, but solid and finished 4th.
Mike Webb
8 Posted 30/03/2013 at 19:47:46
I thought the referee, indeed all the match officials, were excellent today, despite some dissent from Stoke's players and management. The game was marginally less fractious than I thought, highlighted by Mirallas' superb strike.

But I predict that the post-match reaction from that advocate of the beautiful game Pulis will be all about the offside goal. It was, and was a brave decision by the linesman given the activity in the area at the time.

Mark Frere
9 Posted 30/03/2013 at 19:51:17
As happy as I am with the win, I didn't think the 3-5-2 formation suited our attacking game. I can't complain too much though, it's hard to play nice football against the yard dogs of Stoke.
James Byrne
10 Posted 30/03/2013 at 19:58:44
Super Kev, Super Kev Mirallas.........

Good solid performance - getting a bit frustrated with Jelavic though; he should be burying headers like the one he got early on the game from Baines's pass. What happened to strikers rule of heading the ball down!

Not complaining though and next up a very tough away fixture against Gareth Bale.

Peter Leslie
11 Posted 30/03/2013 at 19:58:08
Just relief after that, wouldve been just so Everton to have given up two points in an ugly draw.

Grateful to Mirallas for a terrific goal that made the difference: Kanchelskis-like is the best compliment I can pay him, I was totally confident he'd score as soon as he shook off Nzonzi in the centre circle.

Stoke are just fucking vile in the way they play, which is baffling to me seeing as I would gladly have any of their front 4 in our squad. Pulis is just one ugly cynical gobshite of a coach - it must be soul-destroying for a decent player to have to play for that twat.

So, a potential banana skin avoided, onward to the remaining football matches with hope and confidence.

Playing the competition away is not that bad for us - they will all feel the pressure, while we will just have our ace away support, no expectations and no nerves.

Just hope we go for it fully and don't just try and nick points.

COYB

Colin Glassar
12 Posted 30/03/2013 at 20:07:34
Very brave of Moyes to change his formation at this time of the season. It was slightly disjointed at times and we clearly missed Fellaini and Pienaar to retain the ball.

So, despite it being a crap spectacle, thanks to Stoke, hats off to Moyes and the lads. Bring on the spuds next.

Ian Campbell
13 Posted 30/03/2013 at 20:15:31
Although just a 10 minute cameo I think Barkley showed why Moyes has him on the bench, a few flicks and wayward passes and gave the ball away cheap at times which could've cost us.

Fingers crossed the fans that want him to start every game will be a little more reasonable now.

Gavin Ramejkis
14 Posted 30/03/2013 at 20:23:32
Not a great game but one where the players chipped in and produced enough to win the game. Mirallas was outstanding and looked a constant threat. I'm glad we were missing Fellaini as that twat Shawcross was looking for his trademark wind-up on Jelavic who nearly took the bait.

I will have to see the replay of MotD show it for our regular 3 minutes slot at the end of their show when it looked like the linesman at the end of the game was waving for a handball against that fat ex RS Adams when the ref decided to give him a free kick instead, luckily he blew his whistle just as he took it.

Barkley also looked to have gotten the ball cleanly when he was carded.

Andy Crooks
15 Posted 30/03/2013 at 20:25:45
Ian, Barkley came on desperate to impress, much the way Vaughan used to do. He'll end up getting injured and it's no good for him. Judge him when he gets a couple of starts. Good win against a difficult, ugly side.
Ian Bennett
16 Posted 30/03/2013 at 20:31:15
James Vaughan. I remember his first game against Palace. He could've been sent off within 3 seconds, and then went on to score to break Rooney's record. Gutted he never made it with us.
John Nelson
17 Posted 30/03/2013 at 20:35:51
Get in. 3 points, clean sheet and a cracking goal against a fucking disgrace of a football team - job done.
Steve Guy
18 Posted 30/03/2013 at 20:26:57
Ian, sorry matey but how can you say that about Barkley ? It's precisely because he gets 10 minutes every 20 games that he makes mistakes. That's the problem, Moyes shows no faith in these lads and its reflected in how they play when they do come on. The most I would "accuse" Barkley of is trying too hard.

Moyes waited for ages before he brought him on ( he was warming up forever) and it took Mirallas getting a knock to force Moyes hand.

We have some great young tent being held back by Moyes. He has said himself the squad is old and yet he won't play the lads who would lower the average age by 5 years overnight.

I thought the team played well today in an unfamiliar formation, but I said to my son with 30 minutes to go "I bet he takes Mirallas off" ....negative .....negative negative ....and I feared the worst when they got that free kick in the last 30 seconds, taking off the attacking threat always invites the opposition to have a go and luckily for once the substitution didn't backfire. After 11 years Moyes' substitutions continue to baffle both as to personnel and timing.

Brent Stephens
21 Posted 30/03/2013 at 20:53:29
Steve, Mirallas was injured, wasn't he?!
Steve Guy
22 Posted 30/03/2013 at 20:59:03
Brent, he had a knock but looked more winded than anything, but with ten minutes to go DM finally decided to put Barkley on to replace him, but you could tell it was killing him to do it (Barkley had been warming up for at least ten minutes before that).

My money was already on Mirallas coming off as DM has done it a few times now to general bewilderment. It doesn't take away from my point in any case, Moyes seems to hate playing young talent and only does so in extremis.

Paul Gladwell
23 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:05:46
Here we go again Barkley miss places a pass or two and he's not good enough, just how on earth are we expecting him and other youngsters to come through when they are expected to show 100% pass completion to some people, talk about pressure.

Ian cast your mind back to Wigan the other week, I will guarantee you the man who made a pub football error in our biggest game of the season will start next week for us.

Steavey Buckley
24 Posted 30/03/2013 at 20:59:24
As I predicted, before anyone else mentioned, Everton went with 3 at the back and 2 wing backs to counter the obvious set pieces of Stoke, based on the aerial threat of Huth, Shawcross, Crouch and Jones. Other than that, Stoke are a very poor team in the final third without pace and craft to open a sold Everton back 3 of Heitinga, Jags and Distin with the close support of Gibson, Coleman and Baines. But without Mirallas's wonder goal, I had doubts if Everton could score from open play. Jelavic, sadly, lacks confidence to score any half chance that comes his way. And without a half of yard of extra piece, he is easily contained by opposing defences. No wonder he springs the offside trap so often to get away before anyone catches him.
Colin Glassar
25 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:08:58
Ian, you can't expect the lad to come on and do a Messi can yer? He's out to impress but to do that he needs game time. It's only by playing more that he will get the confidence to keep the ball and cut out the pointless flicks and tricks. I'd rather see a young lad like Barkley try and do something extraordinary and fail rather than see Naismith and Neville trying to do the ordinary and embarrass themselves.
Dean Adams
26 Posted 30/03/2013 at 20:57:07
Gav Ram

"that fat ex RS Adams". His name is Adam. Stop offending my name with these slanderous miss-spellings!!

The rest I agree with.

Paul Gladwell
27 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:12:12
By the way, why do you think Coleman has come on big time lately from his early season defensive lapses? It's called experience from playing, it's the only way players with great potential learn.
Kevin Tully
28 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:18:12
Had it from an impeccable source at the game today that the Fer transfer broke down because of a complete fuck up of an outgoing signing.

Absolutely nothing to do with any injury, all medical records were submitted in advance, before the player had landed at Goodison. The private jet was paid for by FC Twente. What does Lyndon think about that transfer now?

Wayne Smyth
29 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:18:52
Paul, I agree completely. There are 2 or 3 academy players who deserve a run too, in order to see if they can make it, and I'd also like to see Stones given a go at RB.

Ian, Barkley had 10 minutes. In that time, I saw Baines give the ball away, Osman give the ball away and Barkley also gave the ball away. Serious double standards are at work in your eyes and Moyes's eyes too I think.

What else did Barkley show? He showed fantastic long range passing with his crossfield ball to Coleman's feet, a technically sound performance with good composure when he received the ball. A willingness to get stuck in and win the ball with some very strong challenges against a physical Stoke side. He certainly didn't look out of place and I'd be happy to see him given a start in one of our remaining home fixtures if Mirallas needs to rest his hams.


David Greenwood
30 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:32:26
Ok Kev, I'll bite, tell us more...
Ian Edwards
31 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:42:53
Moyes going to Sunderland? Fingers crossed.
Phil Sammon
32 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:29:55
That's interesting Kevin. Any idea who it was?

Well, thats that one over with. Goodison was a bit flat I thought - these 5.30 kick - offs do that - but 3 points in the bag and a fairly accomplished performance.

For all the shit I've given Moyes about a lack of tactical ability, he did bloody brilliant today. I winced as I read the teamsheet, predicting Jags at RB and Coleman RW. Then I saw the shape we actually took and I winced again. Moyes had done his homework though. Without Etherington Stoke have no width and our three centre halves weren't stretched all evening. Just hail mary, after hail mary, which the three of them dealt with really well.

Coleman was FUCKING great! The pace he has when running with the ball is off the scale. Baines is underperforming at the moment and this new dimention on the right is just what we need. My MOTM, easy.

Great goal by Mirallas too. We've waited years for a player who can do that sort of thing. If I was young enough to get names printed on the back of shirts, I'd be ordering a Mirallas home short sleeve next year.

Get in!

Ian Edwards
33 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:43:36
Kevin Tully. That was on ToffeeWeb last week. We expected Fellaini to go to Chelsea. A fan said he was told this by Duncan McKenzie.
Paul Hughes
34 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:28:09
I thought both Jelavic and Anichebe put in a decent shift against the Munsters at the back for horrible Stoke.
The trio of Jagielka, Distin, and Heitinga coped admirably against the inevitable aerial bombardment.
Osman and Gibson both had games where their radars were awry, but a special mention goes to Coleman - who, for the second game in a row put in a Man of the Match performance.
It wasn't pretty but it is the first time we've beaten these anti-football merchants in a long while, so it is good enough for me.
Phil Sammon
35 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:44:26
And Steve Guy is spot on about Barkley.

The lad is trying too hard because he doesnt get on enough. He took his top off on 62 minutes and didnt come on til 79...when the decision was forced on Moyes.

My only gripe of the day.

Oh and Mucha deserved to start

Sam Hoare
36 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:40:33
Surprised that moyes really shook things up today and it just about worked to beat Stoke. Gonna have to play a lot better to get a result at WHL though obviously it will be a very different game.

As for Barkley, a lot of people seem totally convinced of his brilliance and hence moyes' folly in not playing him. Where does this conviction come from when he has played so little at top level. Is it not maybe possible that he still needs a little more fine tuning before being relied upon for starts in the first team?

Kevin Tully
37 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:48:11
Nothing to do with Fellaini, apparently the time left on the outgoing players contract was the problem, the club had fucked up by 12 months - sorry can't name the guilty parties.
Mike Webb
38 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:56:19
Kevin, sounds like Heitinga. From memory there was a thought he had a 12 month option which could be triggered by the club.
Tom Bowers
39 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:52:59
This was saying typical nervy performance against the usual dour Stoke team who could easily haveI gotten a draw with a bit of luck.

The Moyes team selection could have backfired especially knowing how they are solely reliant on the ariel game.

Next week. We may not be so lucky against Bale and company although we have had some good results at Spurs.

Phil Sammon
40 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:57:08
Sam

Who is asking for Barkley to start games?

Nobody.

We want him to be coming on regularly at 60 - 70 minutes.

And what do you mean, 'Where does this conviction come from when he has played so little at top level.'?

Thats the point! He has proved he is a class above the Reserves, week in week out. What is the next logical step?

Im afraid if you want to develop players you do have to get them on the football pitch

Ian Smitham
41 Posted 30/03/2013 at 21:49:15
Just warming up having got back from the Arena of coldness. What a stupid time for a game. But well done to the Players, I would have kept Mucha in goal, but Howard was excellent. The wing back idea did well, Leon is even getting a bit jiggly, Victor continues to please. Stoke don't just rollover and let you play to your strengths, not my cup of tea, but in fairness, they had a few chances today. The goal was brilliant.

Steve #915, of course he was injured, anyone could see it, and our best player was rightly subbed. As for it being baffling, I guess that is why Moyes is Manager a d we are not.

Noting the comments re Barkley, I want him to succeed as much as any fan, but I did notice he lost the ball three times in his first five mins notably when he tried the outrageous back heel with almost his first touch. Great thing for a tried and tested pro to do when we are four up in a friendly, but hanging on in the last ten one nil up against Stoke, no.

Ian Smitham
42 Posted 30/03/2013 at 22:01:43
Sorry, Osman, niggly
Ian Bennett
43 Posted 30/03/2013 at 22:14:55
Martin O'Neill has just been sacked.
Phil Sammon
44 Posted 30/03/2013 at 22:12:21
We were hardly 'hanging on' Ian.

Barkley did make some mistakes though and only experience will rid that from his game.

And as we all know, the best way to get experience is 90 minutes on the bench.

Gavin Ramejkis
45 Posted 30/03/2013 at 22:11:02
Fair play Dean, don't want to insinuate you are related to that horrible bloater cheat. I'm not sure what happened over the Barkley sub as he was ready to come on when Heitinga went down injured and suddenly Round and Moyes went into a conflab and he put his bib on again and went for another warm up so looked like he was lined up to come on much earlier but Moyes changed his mind.
Yusuf Bobat
46 Posted 30/03/2013 at 22:12:55
Martin O'neil been sacked. Moyes to Sunderland in summer if they don't get relegated???
Sam Hoare
47 Posted 30/03/2013 at 22:11:56
Phil, of you don't think anybody has been calling for Barkley to start games then you have not been on toffeeweb enough in the past couple of years.

As for him being a class above the reserves I'm not so sure. He has been playing better recently but I have seen quite a few games where he looked no better than the rest and has been outshone by the likes of junior and even gueye on occasions.

I'm all for him getting more game time but only if the coaches think he is ready and deserves it.

David Hallwood
48 Posted 30/03/2013 at 22:14:36
Gary Lineker once said that he'd rather watch Wimbledon on Ceefax; well if Ceefax would've been still around that's the way to watch Stoke. I don't wish relegation on any club but FFS they are a horrible team,and I've never seen them involved in an entertaining game.

All in all a good day's work.


Colin Smith
49 Posted 30/03/2013 at 22:15:49
Phil (934) ...Baines is underperforming.. a bit harsh I reckon. What did he do wrong? I thought he put in a solid 8/10 performance. Going forward Baines has such a fantastic understanding with Pienaar & never seems to get the great little inter-passing routines going when Pienaar is absent. It also has to be said that Coleman has been an absolute revolution over the past 4 or 5 matches & this deflected some of the attention away from Baines. Coleman's pace is too much for most defences to handle & he has stopped making stupid mistakes at the back.
Peter Cummings
50 Posted 30/03/2013 at 22:33:50
Another nailbiting finish. After dominating the first half, we once again let the opposition come at us for most of the second which was a real letdown after the heroics of last week v City. Stoke as usual were at their crappy best — just down-and-out spoilers and provokers. Jags was outstanding and needed to be. A great finish by Mirallas. So onwards and upwards.
Phil Sammon
51 Posted 30/03/2013 at 22:40:15
Colin

Underperforming by his standards. I'm rewatching the game now and he has actually put in some great crosses.

He's doing okay, maybe I'm being harsh, but we all know he has more quality than he's showing at the moment.

Jack Wilkinson
52 Posted 30/03/2013 at 22:36:49
Glad that's over to be honest - hate playing Stoke and wasn't looking forward to it with weakened team.

Regarding Barkley, I think people forget how young he is. I know that is pointing out the obvious and a lot of people won't like it but very few players appear much at such a young age, normally happens around 20/21. Nick Powell's only got 2 prem appearances at United and they're in a much safer position to play him (although they have a much larger squad). That being said it is frustrating that he doesn't have a bit more time on the pitch. I wouldn't be playing him every week or even every other week as others suggest, but more often certainly. We'd all love him to be a superstar every time he came on but in reality the balance has to be found and I think Moyes isn't that far off. On this note, I think McAleny is earning himself a chance as much as Ross is.

Ian Campbell
53 Posted 30/03/2013 at 22:32:20
Bit of a backlash there.

I never said I expected Messi but if barkley is coming on to impress then a needless backheel that ricocheted out of play is not the way to do it, the way to impress and Barkley should know this is to do the simple things and not give the ball away.

As for a few other comments - he'll wind up getting injured. One of the reasons why I suspect that Ross Barkley hasn't played more games is due to the fact that he broke his leg in 3 places and was out for almost a year. All he has seemed to do when he has played for us is long shots outside of the box and not a huge amount of end product.

To the comments that referenced Naismith or Neville just because I said I fully understand why Barkley doesn't start that doesn't mean that I want either of them 2 to play in MF just like if I were to say that Jelavic needs a rest it doesn't mean that i'd want Brett Angell up front again to replace him. Nice try though to enter into a nonsense discussion about them when that's irrlevant.

Good win and one down of the 2 games without Felli and Pienaar.

Ian Campbell
54 Posted 30/03/2013 at 23:33:22
Phil (950)

We were hardly 'hanging on' Ian.
Barkley did make some mistakes though and only experience will rid that from his game.


I'm sorry but since when can a team like everton that typically win by a goal here or there avoid to carry a player that makes mistakes - that sounds harsher than it was meant but if Barkley seriously wants to be considered for starting a game then he needs to be better in possession. My natural reaction to him on the ball was a little nervy.

We weren't hanging on but they had some decent chances - Jerome just wide, Shotton header, Huth header - they looked more like equalising than we did going 2-0.

Ernie Baywood
55 Posted 30/03/2013 at 23:34:08
The backheel was silly but other than that I thought he was neat enough and also had that double tackle that had Goodison on its feet. After all the shouting about the challenge and the yellow card he then goes head first into a bouncing ball on the edge of the box... that was him earning his stripes. Brave team stuff.

Thought Gibson was our best player. Neat, tidy, drives on at exactly the right times, and a big body in midfield makes a big difference. Really turning into more than value for money - he's been outstanding since he came back.

Phil Sammon
56 Posted 30/03/2013 at 23:37:16
Ian

So if Barkley doesnt start and Naismith and Neville don't get a game, our midfield will more than likely look like:

Pienaar - Osman - Fellaini - Gibson - Mirallas

Id say that around the 60 minute mark 3 of those players are starting to tire - Mirallas, Pienaar and Osman. In an ideal world, who would you like to bring on?

Barkley? Oviedo?

Moyes chooses neither. He will wait and wait and wait for the opposing manager to force his hand. And when he plays it, you just know it's going to be fucking Naismith.

He doesn't have a pro-active bone in his body.

And can we stop having a go at the young kid! I know its been a long time since we saw a youngster come through the ranks...but they all make mistakes. It's normal and it's part of their development.

Phil Sammon
57 Posted 30/03/2013 at 23:49:42
Ian

'since when can a team like everton that typically win by a goal here or there avoid to carry a player that makes mistakes '

Youve got to be fucking kidding me?!?!?!?!

Neville! Naismith! Heitinga!

Week after fucking week these guys have been abysmal, yet you have a go at a 19 year old lad who gets 10 minutes to prove his worth.

Jesus Christ, fella, submit your CV to David Moyes, theres a coaching job with your name on it. What a total pile of shite to come out with.

James Martin
58 Posted 31/03/2013 at 00:08:17
Ah classic Toffeeweb, even when we play 3-4-3/5-3-2 and win for the third time on the spin with one of the best goals seen at Goodison in ages, all anyone can be bothered to do is criticise Moyes for his handling of Ross Barkley. Not whether he came on or not, but the minute of the game that he came on... gross mis-management from Moyes there, completely overshadowed a good win, everyone at the ground just forgot the score line in those few minutes Ross was warming up, such was their anger.
Gareth Fieldstead
59 Posted 31/03/2013 at 00:07:43
Do you really think so Nick, or were you being sarcastic? We will need about 18 points, which means we can only afford one defeat or actually win at either Chelsea, Liverpool or Arsenal plus our remaining home games and at Sunderland who will have a new manager, huge task. I think we will end up in 6th. Tough game yesterday, detest Stoke, how former players who had bags of talent ie Merson can have any respect for them is beyond me. They are thugs, the modern equivalent of Wimbledon but with more fans. Great goal from Miralles, hopefully fit for next week.
Phil Sammon
60 Posted 31/03/2013 at 00:37:17
James

I see you conveniently forgot the Wigan game.

So it seems anyone can filter events to prove their point

Andy Crooks
61 Posted 31/03/2013 at 00:38:41
James, the comments made about Barkley were in response to a post by Ian Campbell which some disagreed with. I intended commenting on a good win against a tough side but responded to Ian first. You know, James not everything is an intended slight on Moyes. Today I thought he was bold and innovative.
Phil Sammon
62 Posted 31/03/2013 at 00:49:15
I've just rewatched from the 79th minute, when Barkley came on.

Please do the same and compare Barkley with Osman. Our experienced pro (who I happen to be a fan of) gave the ball away not only more frequently, but in more dangerous positions,

What do you make of that, Ian?

Ian Campbell
63 Posted 31/03/2013 at 00:35:37
Phil (982) -Youve got to be fucking kidding me?!?!?!?!

I'm not 'fucking' kidding you and you've completely missed the 'fucking' point, this is not about the merits of Heitinga, Naismith or Neville, I don't agree with how much they have played this year and Neville has been a disaster but thats not my point. My point is that if Moyes believes that Barkley (or indeed any player) is prone to mistakes then we shouldn't be giving them game time at the expense of the team or the result.

I'm not having a go at the young kid all I have said is that is easy to see why based on his actual appearances he hasn't played more.

I'm not saying that he isn't good enough that he won't be a great player etc so you can pack in your over defensive stance.

As for the 60 minute mark - players shouldn't be too tired but of course sometimes form will dip so it would be nice to have some quality to bring on, i'm not of the mindset that a change should be made for the sake of it, can't see Naismith changing the game so all that question you've posed has done has reinforced my opinion that we need more - if you're asking I would have Oveido on before Barkley.

Try not to be so melodramatic, you say i'm talking shite but when you go on about Naismith, Neville and Heitinga then you're the one talking shite because that's a different conversation to the one that i'm having.

Trevor Lynes
64 Posted 31/03/2013 at 00:42:18
None of our youngsters have looked good enough to start a game since Rodwell left and he did not really impress when he played. Rooney is the only real star we have produced for years. Why oh why do so many fans think that our youngsters are good enough to start when the manager and his aides who see them every time they play think otherwise?

We have a tiny squad of genuine Premier League class players without adequate substitutes. Barkley did not get a place in a poor Leeds Utd side. None of the youngsters we have released are doing very well except in the lower leagues.

If we produced a Wilshere, Walcott or any other young player who is playing regularly for the top teams we would certainly be playing him or them!!

Moyes would be delighted if we had reserve talent to pick from without needing to spend money. Players who warrant a game get games eg; Coleman and Anichebe. Obviously Barkley and Duffy are not considered up to it and while we are still playing for an outside chance of Europe we should play our tried and trusted first team when they are all available. We won a game today without Felli and Peanaar or Hibbo on the bench.

Almost every other team in the league has a stronger bench than we have and we have to play the same striker/s up front because we have no alternatives. Look at the bench FFS and smell the coffee.

Moyes has thrown the gauntlet down and wants money to buy fresh faces or he will resign. He has taken EFC as far as he can without money.

Si Cooper
65 Posted 31/03/2013 at 00:56:05
It isn't a different conversation Ian, as it is perfectly relevant to your attitude of "if Moyes believes that Barkley (or indeed any player) is prone to mistakes then we shouldn't be giving them game time at the expense of the team or the result."

How can you support the manager's limited use of Barkley if you don't agree with his use of Heitinga, et al?

You are singling out Ross Barkley for special criticism by saying that the same man who cannot see the failings of other (worse) players is the perfect person to make the decisions on how much game time the youngster gets.

You are not making sense and your bias is evident,

Ian Campbell
66 Posted 31/03/2013 at 00:55:20
Phil its not about a minute by minute comparison (well done for confirming to everyone on here what a complete dullard you are though).

Osman has the backing of the manager in the same way that Baines could score an horrific own goal and miss a penalty and still be picked the next game. Barkley hasn't got that yet so the point being about why he doesn't get more time still stands - he didn't give moyes any dilemma as to whether he should start ot not.

As for Andy (997) I agree was a good win and the Barkley thing was just my one observation towards the end of the game - wasn't looking for a pro/anti moyes debate and certainly not the suggestion that I want neville back in

Si Cooper
67 Posted 31/03/2013 at 02:03:02
"Barkley did not get a place in a poor Leeds Utd side."

Codswallop, Trevor! Check the full version of what Warnock said about dropping Ross Barkley. He couldn't play him in the FA Cup (he had been selected before that) and Warnock claimed that he then didn't want to upset the lads who had had a good result in the Cup.

He was obviously trying to get Everton to allow the lad to play for Leeds in the next round of the Cup as we wanted Ross to be playing regularly. It was brinksmanship, and plenty of Leeds United fans were disappointed he returned to us.

Si Cooper
68 Posted 31/03/2013 at 02:09:20
"Phil its not about a minute by minute comparison."

Ian, you are the one who started this by stating that Ross Barkley had apparently shown himself to be inferior to all the alternatives that the manager has preferred in the short amount of time he had on the pitch.

You made the comparison, others are just disagreeing with your assessment (and pointing out its inconsistencies).

Phil Sammon
69 Posted 31/03/2013 at 02:03:27
Trevor

'Why oh why does so many fans think that our youngsters are good enough to start when the manager and his aides who see them every time they play think otherwise.'

I see him play every week and I think he is good enough.

'Barkley did not get a place in a poor Leeds Utd side.'

He did get a place and he was without doubt their best player. He missed a cup game due to the terms of his loan and the next league game Warnock dropped him. This was met roundly with outrage from Leeds fans - I know because I live there - they couldn't believe they were giving up such a player and playing Michael Brown.

'None of the youngsters we have released are doing very well except in the lower leagues.'

Hope Akpan aside, most of the players weve released - Wallace, Forshaw, Baxter have gone on to star in lower league side and that is because they have talent. Once a blue moon you get a player in the ranks who is destined for the top. Messi, Ronaldo, even Rooney - these guys are going to the top no matter what. A level down for that you have kids who come through who 'could be' great. The clubs job is to either get them into the first team or sell them off to at least cover the cost of the academy.

If you honestly think that we are doing the best with what our academy delivers then you had better see a doctor.

In the last 11 years Moyes has recieved a multitude of talented 16 - 17 year olds and has done the square root of fuck all with them.

Ian Campbell
70 Posted 31/03/2013 at 02:07:04
Si you're making an assumption - at no point did I say that I would use Barkley the exact same way Moyes does - he probably could have more game time when times have allowed it - cant recall if he was on the bench but 3-0 at reading he could've come on earlier.

All my initial point was in support of Barkley not starting that doesn't mean that I want Neville or Heitinga to start instead or that I feel we shouldn't blood Barkley in when appropriate.

Just to confirm my strongest 11 would be as follows;

Howard
Coleman, Distin, Jags, Baines
Mirrallas Osman Fellaini, Gibson, Pienaar
Jelavic/ Anichebe (Anichebe on current form)

Subs most likely to use depending on cover needed - Jelavic/Anichebe, Oviedo, Heitinga.

Ian Campbell
71 Posted 31/03/2013 at 02:18:45
Si no inconsistency - as previously stated some players are established - others aren't.

Barkley isn't and in my opinion hasn't done anything to suggest Moyes should start him.

Feel free to go off on a tangent again

Ian Campbell
72 Posted 31/03/2013 at 02:23:57
And Si I did not make any comparisons to Barkley and others just looked at Barkley only
Phil Sammon
73 Posted 31/03/2013 at 02:23:23
Ian

'he probably could have more game time when times have allowed it'

The exact point you have been arguing against all evening.

Ian Campbell
74 Posted 31/03/2013 at 02:28:46
No I said I can see why he doesn't start or we don't play him more regularly - I fully support playing him when we are 2 or 3 up.

Few beers yeah - must be because you're arguing with the intellect of a 10 year old.

Si Cooper
75 Posted 31/03/2013 at 02:25:49
It is not a tangent Ian as it is you who have stated that if any player is prone to mistakes then they shouldn't be getting played. That has to be applied to all players equally, no matter whether they are established or not.

To suggest that the manager is right in only applying this criteria to a youngster (who has to learn in a game situation what he can get away with or not) rather than established players is applying different and unreasonable standards.

That is wholly inconsistent and you are showing a positive bias to a manager who you think regularly gets things wrong (unless you actually think he has no alternative all the times he has selected Phil Neville) and a negative bias to a player you have not seen enough of to make a properly informed opinion of.

You can't look at Barkley only, you have to consider all of our players equally or your opinion has no validity.

If you can't understand that then you are an idiot.

Phil Sammon
76 Posted 31/03/2013 at 02:34:35
Ian

I think you'll find I'm arguing with someone who's intellect falls well below that of a ten year old.

Ok, back to the very basics here. How, in your eyes, do we make Barkley the great player that Cahill, Sheedy, Stubbs, Sharp, Moyes et al have already touted as the best young prospect they have seen in 10 years?

Tony J Williams
77 Posted 31/03/2013 at 02:19:16
Did we win? From the comments on here you would think we lost. I thought the ref was absolutely atrocious today. The fella couldn't count past six when lining up their wall but could count to about twelve when doing ours. Give a free kick to them after the keeper chased him and moaned and booked Barkley for a great tackle.

Barkley gave the ball away a fair bit again but hopefully he will make it. Coleman, Distin and Jags all played well.

Three points well earned, two behind Chelski, six behind Spurs with a game in hand. Five points less than last season with eight games to go. Not bad for a manager who is technically inept.

Ian Campbell
78 Posted 31/03/2013 at 03:16:22
Si - where did I say that? I did not, all I am saying is that if a peripheral player (Barkley) wants game time then he can't come in and give the ball away.

Fellaini was shite against Wigan, stormed off the pitch etc yet started against City and rightly so - someone in Barkley's position couldn't do that - he's not established and needs to perform when given the opportunity. Players like Baines, Fellaini etc have banked enough good performances to carry a poor one - Barkley hasn't so to suggest it has to be applied 'to all players equally, no matter whether they are established or not' is quite frankly a load of bollocks.

Phil back to basics Cahill came to us aged 24/25 not 19 and played in the Championship first, Sheedy was 23 and played lower league first, Stubbs turned pro in the 3rd division (out of interest why did you choose stubbs). Thats even if Barkley can cut it - who knows yet but its not realistic to 'gamble' as we chase europe.

Good point Tony Williams, trying to get away from the Barkley debate but seems all of his extended family are on here.

Jack Okell
79 Posted 31/03/2013 at 03:33:31
He was pretty good that Phil Cahill.
Phil Sammon
80 Posted 31/03/2013 at 03:46:31
Ian

Put down your sherry and read my post again.

I await a completely different answer...

Ian Campbell
81 Posted 31/03/2013 at 03:54:47
Ok I see your point - its not my job to look at developing talent and the best way to do it. I have my level 2 badge which is a million miles away from the qualifications of those that count.

All I can say which repeats myself is that Barkley hasn't done enough to force his way into the team but i'm not of the opinion that we should start him now just because he may prove to be better than what we have - he needs to prove it when he gets 10, 20, 30 mins and give Moyes that selection headache.

Phil Sammon
82 Posted 31/03/2013 at 04:45:45
Thats just it Ian, he's never given 30 minutes.

That is what everyone is asking for. I don't think anyone would have Barkley starting in their ideal 11. He needs to prove himself, you're absolutely right, but Moyes won't give him the chance.

Robin Hunuki
83 Posted 31/03/2013 at 05:04:16
Surely the first time I've seen the line up change from 4-2-3-1 / 4-4-1-1 which I assume was to put Pullis and his team off... how refreshing.

I know it wasn't a corner, but looking back at the replay of Mirallas's goal I thought what the hell is he doing out of the box and not defending the set play, he's going to get it at half-time!

I agree re doing the little things right would be much more beneficial to him making more appearances rather than the spectacular (i.e. back-heel to no one).

However, the 10 mins or so would have done him good, bit of exp. against a tough / solid Stoke side. A few more cameos like that – preferably earlier, depending on how the game pans out – would see (assuming/hoping) why he's so highly regarded.

Paul Gladwell
84 Posted 31/03/2013 at 08:14:06
I spent a good bit of the game watching Anichebe off the ball; aside from that end defensive burst which he received a big applause for, I thought his work rate was very poor.

Time and again, Jelavic would be running past him doing all the closing down up front. If the lad wants it he needs to put in what he did last week every week

Paul Andrews
85 Posted 31/03/2013 at 08:35:49
David has in my opinion listened to fans, he knows what is being said about his tactics by the fans and indeed the players.

For him to make a dramatic U-turn in tactics by playing that formation yesterday is unbelievable. He even left a player outside the box when they had a corner.

I think the openness of the game will have burnt his head out. Be interesting to see what happens tactically when Pienaar and Fellaini return. Credit where it's due, he played the attacking formation and got the 3 points.

Kevin Day
86 Posted 31/03/2013 at 09:40:56
Are Fellaini and Pienaar banned for the Spurs game? Or was it just a one-game ban each? Fellaini for mounting up 10 yellows and Pienaar's sending off an automatic one-game ban.

The pair of then should be nicely rested having 2 weeks off.

Paul Gladwell
87 Posted 31/03/2013 at 10:28:17
Both out next week too, Kevin. I'd be surprised if we get anything there, we need far more than they showed yesterday. Spurs will waltz through that midfield. I can see Neville being thrown in there without a shadow of doubt.
Kevin Day
88 Posted 31/03/2013 at 10:54:11
Without them both it will be difficult I must admit Paul, and as much as Neville shouldn't be near the first team on a regular basis, he always does a job on Bale, if we can stop him we have a chance of getting something. Here's hoping anyway.
Gavin Ramejkis
89 Posted 31/03/2013 at 11:11:19
Ian, the "hasn't done enough to force his way into the first team" is surely a poor subjective statement, unless you watch every single minute of both the stiffs games and first team games and any loan game appearances he has made and draw your conclusions from all of them. Barkley hasn't had enough time on the pitch to be able to draw any conclusions.

Again subjectively, his time on loan isn't a genuine comparison to how he could potentially play for the first team as it's been against different opposition and without a single other first team player at his side.

Paul Dark
90 Posted 31/03/2013 at 12:30:43
Playing with three at the back didn't really work. We were very exposed. If we play like that against Spurs, we'll lose 3-0 or 4-0. The formation also gave Stoke a lot of room in midfield, oddly enough. No-one really knew where they were playing.

I thought Victor was immense yesterday and possibly our MotM. Ross's booking should be rescinded.

We need to win all our home games and get the defence sorted out. If we can keep three clean sheets away from home, we'll be there or thereabouts, but that'll be very hard.

Amit Vithlani
91 Posted 31/03/2013 at 12:25:32
I will take 1-0 v Stoke anytime and frankly don't care who played or how they played as, against these bag of footballing vagabonds, any win will do.

The game was interesting, however, in the manner in which our tactics panned out. We started 3-4-3, as expected took 20 mins to settle, and when we did, had a purple patch during which the goal came. We then saw out to half-time but in the second half Stoke came out and pushed us back, this became a 5-4-1 with Jelavic looking horribly isolated.

Barkley looks ready for the first team. He gave the ball away a couple of times, sure, but then so did the more experienced heads such as Osman and Gibson. It was that type of game. He was also playing out of position on the left. When he was central and facing the play, he picked out a superb pass for Coleman.

With more game time for the likes of Barkley, Duffy, Oviedo and Vellios, we will have players who can step up and replace some of the old guard. They need to be given enough time to settle into the first team. Sitting on the bench isn't the way.

Paul Dark
92 Posted 31/03/2013 at 12:36:32
By the way: Stoke disgust me. They are dirty to a fault (or sin), go down very easily and have NO sense of fair play. They injure opposition players and then bleat like little children: ugly, very ugly.

The euphemism that they are 'well-organized' hides many evils. Wenger has, as so often, been the only one to say it how it is with that shower.

Shane Corcoran
93 Posted 31/03/2013 at 12:40:53
Anyone think Jelavic was terrible yesterday? I mean I'm sure he worked hard but his layoffs were woeful. I reckon Moyes was just about to bring Barkley on for him on the hour and then he got his head on a cross and he was left on.
Brent Stephens
94 Posted 31/03/2013 at 12:45:02
All the debate about whether or not Barkley should play just shows how slim the squad is. We're debating a guy who is possibly good enough and / or who might possibly be good enough if he gets game time.
Mike Powell
95 Posted 31/03/2013 at 13:00:54
Well done, Moyes, you got it spot on today. I was glad to see Howard back in the team; Mucha as done okay but he his an accident waiting to happen. I thought Distin, Coleman, Big Vic and supper Kev were all brill yesterday. Stoke are a horrible side to play against, they just kick anyone who moves and, if you have a go back, they go crying to the ref.
Gary Poole
96 Posted 31/03/2013 at 13:22:11
Well said Tony (021). I thought it was a solid performance yesterday and we got the job done. The goal was outstanding.

Spurs will be a different game – they will play footy unlike Stoke. They will let us players though.

If we can stay tight at the back we can do it.

COYB!

Ian Campbell
97 Posted 31/03/2013 at 13:38:56
Gavin (065) your entire point is nonsense.
All I said was, based on his appearances for the first team, he hasn't done enough to force his way into the starting 11.

I don't have to watch every minute of the stiffs because the stiffs and the first team aren't alike for like comparison, are they?

Everyone that has argued against me is making a pretty basic assumption. Just because I don't feel that he has done enough to start doesn't mean that I don't think we should use him when we can and I'm not suggesting we sell him or that he won't be good enough a little later down the line.

Phil Sammon
98 Posted 31/03/2013 at 14:07:57
Paul Dark:
'Playing with three at the back didn't really work. We were very exposed. If we play like that against Spurs, we'll lose 3-0 or 4-0. The formation also gave Stoke a lot of room in midfield, oddly enough. No-one really knew where they were playing.

I thought Victor was immense yesterday and possibly our MotM.'

What on Earth are you talking about?!

I sincerely doubt Moyes will play that formation against Spurs as they have good width, but against a Stoke side without Etherington and Pennant, three centre backs was a good tactic.

And Anichebe was fantastic was he? What game were you at? Did you accidentally watch the Man City game instead? He was lethargic all evening and never posed a threat. He won a few headers and that's about it – a very average performance from a guy who can be top class when he puts the effort in.

Peter Bell
99 Posted 31/03/2013 at 14:21:29
For some posters on this website, Anichebe only has to put one leg in front of another and they go into orgasm, and yet Jelavic worked his socks off yesterday but still gets criticised.
Paul Gladwell
100 Posted 31/03/2013 at 14:49:12
Peter, time after time Jelavic was running across the Stoke back four closing them down, a few of the times actually running past Anichebe in the process. The lad worked his bollocks off against Man City but yesterday he had that attitude again, holding his groin, pulling gobs and falling over. He did do some good stuff but I'm sorry, aside from that chase back near the end, he let Jelavic do all the defending from the front. If he wants to do it, he has to chase like he did against Man City and I don't think he did yesterday.
Si Cooper
101 Posted 31/03/2013 at 15:18:35
Ian Campbell - went to bed before your reply at 023.

Check your own post at 000 to see where you say what you think you didn't say.

D'Oh!

Peter Bell
102 Posted 31/03/2013 at 15:23:11
I watched Anichebe playing for under 16s at the old Netherton academy. He was lazy when he was 15 and for me will never change. Running your socks off twice a season is not the criteria required to be an Everton player.
Ian Campbell
103 Posted 31/03/2013 at 15:26:56
Si, that was in response to a post about starting Barkley or playing him loads more so that he can improve - my response was that Everton are not in a position to gamble and blood Barkley in just because its good for his development.

Well done on the nitpicking though and your suggestion (019) about mistakes that it has to be applied 'to all players equally, no matter whether they are established or not' was laughable.

Neville hasn't featured since the Wigan game after the awful mistake he made in gifting them the second goal – if Fellaini or Baines had made that pass are you suggesting that they should lose their place in the team for reasons of consistency????

Gavin Ramejkis
104 Posted 31/03/2013 at 15:34:17
Ian you are so full of shite even your arguments contradict themselves, you claim he hasn't done enough to earn a first team appearance, when challenged how you claim so you can't even answer it posturing some twaddle instead. Answer the question or justify the abstract behind your claim what hasn't he done to earn game time? You come across as if you know why but haven't a clue beyond Moyes doesn't so it must be gospel, you'd be great as an employee - a subservient cap doffer that never questions.

The younger players need to be getting game time somewhere if they have any chance of developing, you've had plenty of responses to why he didnt get any time at Leeds, the same goes for the other prospects at the club. Remove sentiment which should be for greetings cards and not business and if an employee - in this case player isn't good enough, they get shipped off the books, if they are going to be good enough but need experience give them it when they need it, otherwise they won't develop, make the mistakes they are going to make and learn from and improve.

Ian Campbell
105 Posted 31/03/2013 at 15:46:54
Full of shite?

How have I contradicted myself. I have just said that based on his first team appearances (yes admittedly they have been few) he hasn't done enough to start games. You can mention how he played at Leeds, in the reserves, how good e's looked in training but its not comparable is it.

Are you so dumb that you can't even understand my basic point - in the few times that Barkley has played he hasn't really enhanced his case for a place in the starting 11. I have already said that I would like him to have some more game time when we can allow it - at home to reading when we're 2-0/3-0 up.

I never even said anything about him not playing at Leeds but if you want a comment on that then Leeds play in a different division so being good enough for Leeds isn't the same as being good enough for Everton.

Michael Kenrick
Editorial Team
106 Posted 31/03/2013 at 16:04:10
Okay, can you both calm down please and stop the childish name-calling. It's possible to have differing opinions....
James Flynn
107 Posted 31/03/2013 at 15:24:25
Well, since this has turned into a Barkely discussion, I thought he did well yesterday. Certainly didn't appear intimidated by that bunch. Can't wait to see more of him.

And that tackle he was carded for, wasn't even a foul. If that was Neville or, once upon a time, Cahill, I bet the ref would've done nothing. But young snotty gets a card.

Si Cooper
108 Posted 31/03/2013 at 16:10:54
Ian - If a player (established or not) regularly puts in poor performances he does not deserve to play no matter how much goodwill he has banked prior to that. That is good management and you seem to agree with it in principle.

In application, however, it seems you hold a different view. When people reply to your post on RB that other players have regularly played as poorly or even worse (and they have) but seem immune to the same sanctions, you claim not to be able to see the double standards in operation because you fully endorse the manager's decision.

Your failure to see the tautology in your own reasoning is what is laughable, not anything I have posted to point out your confusingly mixed messages.

Paul Dark
109 Posted 31/03/2013 at 16:12:29
Phil: I thought we looked very vulnerable at the back, and they could've scored more than once easily. We were shapeless and lucky to win in the end - despite superior possession.

I suppose I was taken by VA's effort in the second half. I thought Jelly played intelligently (as always), but he looks lacklustre atm. I'm still a great fan.

Si Cooper
110 Posted 31/03/2013 at 16:22:41
Once more for the record Ian.

I have never suggested that a player should be dropped for an isolated incident, the only consistency I look for is that each performance is judged on its merits and any sanctions are applied proportionally.

Phil Neville didn't deserve to get dropped for one mistake because no player should. The fact is he shouldn't have even been on the pitch because his performance has been well below what is required / expected from him for months on end.

Ian Campbell
111 Posted 31/03/2013 at 16:24:08
Si (118) the problem is that when people talk about Heitinga, Neville etc they assume that I am on board with those decisions and that I think Moyes is infallible. That is not the case

It is perfectly consistent of me to hold the view that Barkley shouldn't be in our starting 11 whilst also holding the view that someone that plays poorly regularly (Neville, Heitinga etc) also shouldn't start. It's not a double standard because they are not intrinsically linked, putting RB on the bench doesn't mean that PN has to start. The Naismith, Neville, Heitinga conversation has no bearing on RB and is irrelevant to any conversation about his number of starts.

I even felt the need to cite my preferred starting 11 because people on here incorrectly assumed that I want those 3 to start every game.

I don't even know what mixed messages I have put out or how anyone could deem them to be confusing. My feeling is that people saw a slight criticism of RB and went completely overboard and have tried to incorporate points into the argument that aren't even slightly relevant.

Ian Campbell
112 Posted 31/03/2013 at 16:36:38
Si,

I agree with your point 120 entirely.

Neville has been poor and so him being dropped could be justified by anyone of numerous mistakes.

Fellaini/Baines/Jags etc – consistently high performers so one mistake shouldn't affect them too much.

Barkley – because he doesn't get much playing time when he does he has to be solid and mistakes will cost him playing time.

Not trying to have a chicken and the egg type argument, I know that if Barkley doesn't get enough time on the pitch then he can't be viewed in the same way as Fellaini/Baines/Jags but when he does play he needs to come in do the simple things well (not backheels, fancy tricks) and then he should get more time, then he can be as indispensable as those mentioned and be afforded mistakes here and there – he's not there yet.

Phil Sammon
113 Posted 31/03/2013 at 16:38:11
Ian

It's quite simple.

You said that yesterday Barkley showed us exactly why Moyes is reluctant to start him.

Everyone else is saying that it's because he gets no time on the pitch that he tries to force the issue when he comes on. He should be given more half-hour run-outs as its the only way a young player is going to improve. We have had opportunities to bring him on but Moyes is too scared – it's his major flaw in my eyes.

You seem happy with the way Moyes is bringing him along. I'm saying if this lad is going to develop, he needs to play more first-team football.

Ian Campbell
114 Posted 31/03/2013 at 16:46:38
Phil,

Maybe it is a vicious cycle - Barkley trying to hard and Moyes therefore reluctant to start him.

I would like Barkey to play when it is safe but there has to be an onus for him to be responsible too. I'm not saying he did this but if Barkley is desperate to impress at the expense of doing the right things on the pitch then maybe he isn't ready - you have to be mature.

You seem happy with the way Moyes is bringing him along.

I don't know enough about this - all I know is what I see on the pitch when Barkley comes on.

Si Cooper
115 Posted 31/03/2013 at 16:44:41
Okay Ian.

You seem to be saying that RB needs to be better than the players around him in order to justify getting regular game time in games that aren't already all over bar the shouting.

People have responded to that statement saying that he is certainly no worse, and may even already be better, than some players who have played either regularly or have been used in preference to the lad from the bench.

Unless you whole-heartedly disagree with other people's assessment of some of the other players (which you state that you don't) then you are in effect supporting a double-standard where he has been excluded from the team on account of his fallibility when other players haven't. Again, I am not interested in one-offs, just sustained levels of poor play.

If Ossie flags badly in the final quarter of games (which he is prone to) then his level of performance dips below what we could potentially get from Ross (who I expect to improve as he gets more experience).

Surely an inexperienced player needs more leeway than someone already established not less. If Ross makes mistakes through poor judgement rather than lack of ability, then it is most likely that experience will teach him.

Ray Roche
116 Posted 31/03/2013 at 17:12:56
I've read some of the offerings above, and there is some crap being written so, in view of the fact that I can write as much crap as anyone... here goes:

Barkley will never improve if he gets 10-15 minutes max in any game, let alone one involving that anti-football shower of shite, Stoke City. He needs either to start or to come on at half time.

You could see his desire to prove himself in the, as usual, tiny cameo he was offered but that's not the way to get the best out of him. He needs time to settle into a game and not be expected to change the match immediately he crosses the white line. OK, so he gave the ball away a couple of times, but he made a great effort to get it back.

Gibson lost possession time and time again, in fact it was the worst I've seen him play in relation to giving the ball away, and Osman, Jags etc., all conceded possession but as soon as RB does it he's deemed "not ready" for the first team.

If RB is going to make it as a Prem player for Everton he has got to be given the chance. Still, it was 3 points against a rough, alehouse team who could argue that they deserved a point. I wouldn't necessarily agree with them but they could try.

Eugene Ruane
118 Posted 31/03/2013 at 17:45:08
Ray (135) - "Gibson lost possession time and time again, in fact it was the worst I've seen him play in relation to giving the ball away, and Osman , Jags etc., all conceded possession but as soon as RB does it he's deemed "not ready" for the first team"

Agree completely and it really is odd (to me) how many appear fixated on any mistakes made by RB, yet seem blind when it comes to many of our experienced players who I see give possession away over and over and over again.

Excuses can (and should) be made for RB's mistakes due to his inexperience and for getting, as he does, only fleeting glimpses of the first team.

It's many of the rest of them I find hard to excuse.

Phil Sammon
119 Posted 31/03/2013 at 17:57:32
Not to change the argument here - but I actually thought Gibbo did very well yesterday. Always calm and composed on the ball and nine times out of ten he keeps possession.

Been a great signing in my opinion.

Ray Roche
121 Posted 31/03/2013 at 18:22:09
Phil Sammon @ 145

Phil, I'm not saying Gibbo, had a BAD game, just that he gave the ball away much more than usual. Some parts of his play were excellent and he is a shoo in for the midfield spot. I'd just like RB to be given some leeway to allow for his inexperience, that's all.

Eugene, good post.

Tom Bowers
122 Posted 31/03/2013 at 18:41:04
Only one or two players are playing as well as they did before Xmas. There are far too many mistakes being made by most of the team and not just in yesterday's match.

What has Anichebe got that makes him so superior to Vellios? For that matter what have several others got that the likes of Barklay, Duffy and Oviedo don't? The answer is Moyes's preference and nothing else. He starts them and prays they get the right result and over the last few weeks they have except the Wigan game.

Until Moyes leaves (if ever), things won't change but the benchwarmers will get more frustrated (just like us fans) and probably leave. Despite the Premier League wins recently Everton have looked very shaky and next week's six pointer against Spurs has come at the wrong time. Moyes will start the "usual suspects" and it will be another nail-biting game.

Thomas Newton
123 Posted 31/03/2013 at 18:50:13
Just watched the 20 mins highlights on the OS, how they cobbled together that much from the game is a miracle. I managed to be on holiday the last couple of seasons when we've played them; not so lucky this time...

Always go into games with an optimism but, every time we play them, reality bites. Any win against them and there abhorrent style of football is more than welcome, talking to the girl who sits next to me who rightly pointed out not even in the darkest days of Walter did we stoop to that level? Even their tattoo-branded Staffordshire Bull-terrier owning fans have had enough.

As for Barkley, if ever a young player needed a special moment, as Rooney, Anichebe and Vaughan managed, it's him. I'm still not convinced, as I never was by Rodwell, but dearly hope he can prove me wrong.

Steavey Buckley
124 Posted 31/03/2013 at 22:10:05
Young Ross Barkley needs playing time to get up to speed, not just physically, but mentally as well. Although he could help himself self a lot more, football wise, if he put himself about a bit more. Then the confidence will start to show through his undoubted skills. It's about grabbing the first chance to show the manger what he can really do. That goes for the other subs as well, who have not featured much this season.
David Booth
125 Posted 31/03/2013 at 22:16:38
Trevor Lynes (002)

Mindful of Michael's comment about all behaving on here, I must take personal issue with you about your repeated assertion that "Barkley did not get a place in a poor Leeds side'.

You made exactly the same assertion a month ago – and several of us pointed out the inaccuracy of such a profound statement.

You are talking absolute, ill-informed, biased rubbish – and for your benefit, I will repeat what I said to you on that occasion, as you seemingly missed it, or, more likely, have just chosen to ignore it:

* * * * *

Trevor (935), what an unfair dismissal of Barkley.

He played in all four league games during his spell his spell at Leeds: three from the start and one as sub, in his last eligible match. The other three games during his stay were cup ties.

And, may I add, as a resident of Leeds (sadly), he got rave reviews from friends of mine who saw him play, in a side struggling for form at the time of his loan.

Spouting inaccurate information like that mystifies me. Why make it up and for what purpose? It's like all those internet experts on here who said Coleman couldn't defend. Ill-informed rubbish.

From what I have seen, he's definitely worth a place on the bench at the very least and offers a lot more threat, strength, pace and an eye for a pass/shot than Osman.

* * * * *

I am aware that we must not herald Barkley as the new messiah, but, on the limited evidence I have seen – which is as much as any other Evertonian – the lad has got some real potential (my comments in the previous paragraph about Osman apply).

And as one of my fellow contributors on here pointed out, Baines and Osman also 'gave the ball away' during the time Barkley was on the pitch.

Limited to crazy cameos of no more than 10 minutes on very rare occasions, what else is the lad going to do other than try and impress? And good for him for having the courage to go for it. That's what we all scream for on here isn't it?

Trevor, no future post with your name attached to will now be regarded by me as anything but factless twaddle. I'm all for contrasting opinions on here but why did you make up such nonsense? It's simply a lie.

Graham Mockford
126 Posted 31/03/2013 at 23:23:24
P30 W13 D12 L5

What a fucking disaster, what a complete tool of a manager

James Flynn
127 Posted 01/04/2013 at 00:35:28
Well David - I think young Barkley should get some game time. Even now, when there's all the pressure coming these last few games.

He played well in his 10 minutes or so. He flubbed a pass or 2? So what? Just made him like the other 19 field players.

What about those tackles? Stuck in more over his few minutes than many Stoke opponents won't over the full 90.

I see him getting more minutes during the run-in. Yesterday's game was critical, and Moyes put the kid in. Didn't hurt us.

And if that back heel to himself worked, he was into space going forward. Liked him trying it.

Paul Andrews
128 Posted 01/04/2013 at 09:18:04
Graham 199

Bit strong of you there, but I can see your point.

I think there are only two teams in the Prem who have drawn as many games as us. A lot of them draws we're due to the manager's tactics, dropping deep when we were winning 1-0, taking attackers off instead of going for the game-killing second goal etc.

Peter Bell
129 Posted 31/03/2013 at 15:23:11
I watched Anichebe playing for under 16s at the old Netherton academy. He was lazy when he was 15 and for me will never change. Running your socks off twice a season is not the criteria required to be an Everton player.
Colin Smith
130 Posted 01/04/2013 at 10:46:12
Phil (961) Agree he hasn't been putting in the 9/10 performances of a little while ago, but its still performing more consistently than anybody else. The Barkley debate is interesting. I don't think he's really put forward a compelling case to be a starter so far, but its not easy to do that when all you're getting is a 15 minute cameo every now & again.

One of things that puzzles me about Moyes is his inconsistency with subs. Against Man City, when we're under a bit of pressure, on trots Naismith; we get a journeyman striker playing on the right wing against Stoke, similar scenario & Moyes opts for Barkley. In both cases you had a journeyman defensive midfield player, Hitzlsperger, on the bench who would have been a more obvious choice. For me, Barkley's best position is Osman's & as Osman is playing well at the moment, so it's not easy to give him a start unless Osman is pushed forward into Fellaini's slot.

James Martin
131 Posted 01/04/2013 at 11:03:41
Paul #230, a lot of those draws were also due to the players inability to keep the ball out of the net in the first two minutes of the match. Add in to the mix Jelavic and Fellaini missing some sitters and some amateurish concentration from our defenders and that is where a lot of the draws have come from. If you're away from home and going one or two down straight away then you're often looking at a draw.

There were some games Moyes did mess up, but I would actually class these as the Norwich away game, Southampton away game, Aston Villa at home and some others were the general attitude of the team wasn't right from the start and some of the subs were made too late. Others I would lay the blame elsewhere. I mean after the Newcastle game people criticised him for not bringing a defender on, he does that in the Fulham game and gets ripped for doing it. Ultimatley you'd expect your CBs to defend a long punt down the middle but they didn't.

The players have to take a lot of the blame for some of these draws. If the strikers are missing a lot of the chances and your defenders only concentrate for the middle 80 minutes of matches then every game is going to be tense. Recently we've looked a lot more solid (although the Stoke chance in the first minute is a prime example of what I've just spoken about) and have had a few more clean sheets, lets hope it continues.

Paul Andrews
132 Posted 01/04/2013 at 11:52:42
James,
Norwich at home as well.
Your general point is right though.We have a manager with a defensive mind set who can't coach his team to defend.
James Martin
133 Posted 01/04/2013 at 11:57:54
I'm not sure that was my point Paul but I would add Norwich at home to the list. Over the last few seasons we've been solid defensively but limited up front. This season has seen a role reversal but perhaps it was always going to be that way with very few teams outside of Manchester able to marry defense and attack well together.

What is so frustrating is that our defense usually plays perfectly from about 10 to 80 minutes each game with Howard barely making a save yet look like Championship players in the first and last 10 minutes. At least teams with really bad defenses are poor throughout the 90.

Perhaps once again it comes down to mindset: when it's happened enough times in the past, the players start to get worried it will happen again, these players who have been here a long time only have a history of choking, Man Utd's players have a history of incredibly 'lucky' wins happening form even the darkest of situations so expect it.

Maybe after holding out against Man City and Stoke City, our defense will finally start showing the grit to see games out if the attack has failed to build up a big enough lead.

John Malone
134 Posted 01/04/2013 at 23:01:38
Just read though some of the points above and I can totally see wher Ian is coming from I wish I come on after the game Saturday. For me Barkley is way off a first team start or even a half time sub, you can see he's got ability and looks quite strong and agile but I think what he lacks is the mental strength, he still looks like a kid who feels the pressure and makes rash decisions and doesn't fully believe in himself.

My opinion in the best way to bring him on would be to get him back out on loan, let him build up his confidence, realise his strengths and weaknesses, hone his decision making playing in a lower league then bring him back and bring him on late in games that we are winning and play him in the final third not in front of defence were any mistakes are more likely to be punished.

Tony J Williams
135 Posted 02/04/2013 at 00:01:26
How is Norwich at home his fault? The ref gives a free kick to is fella who trips himself up and the Howard decides to let the ball bounce inside his six yard box........ in his fucking six yard box! You can't predict a fuck up of that size in the final seconds of a match.
Anthony Flack
136 Posted 02/04/2013 at 08:57:24
Lovely post from my old man

"Son if I lived in Stoke and their season tickets were £10 a season I would not watch them"

Peter Bell
137 Posted 02/04/2013 at 12:42:00
I think Moyes's quote after the Norwich away game was: "We should have had enough to see the game out." This is against a team who, if I remember at the time, had not won for 10 games scoring about 4 goals, even a non-league team had gone there and just won.

Therefore, you can see what his mindset was from the moment Osman put us ahead on the half-hour mark. Play for the last hour to see out the game. I don't think it is what the fans who travelled all the way to Norwich want to hear and this negativity must pass on to the players.

Jagielka's recent comments, asking the manager to be positive for the last 9 games, says it all.

Danny Jones
138 Posted 02/04/2013 at 13:45:56
I think that, if Mucha had a future at Everton, he may have kept his place. As he hasn't, there isn't much point in keeping him sweet.

Cap doff to Moyes for a good tactical display. Barkley was probably due to replace Mirallas a bit earlier on but Victor got a knock which delayed the decision. Once he had run it off the change was made.

I'd like to see more of Barkley but I suspect the professionals know more about it than I. And they think he isn't ready. I don't buy the theory that Moyes doesn't like kids in his team. We'll see more of him next year whoever the manager is.

I am worried about Jelavic though.

Eugene Ruane
139 Posted 02/04/2013 at 13:59:31
David Booth (194) - Spot on.
Harold Matthews
140 Posted 02/04/2013 at 17:49:26
Didn't like the 4-4-2. Gaps in midfield and Osman having to fetch and carry over too great an area.

Ovieda has signed for the wrong club. Hope it doesn't ruin a promising career.

Colin Glassar
141 Posted 02/04/2013 at 18:12:06
Harold, I feel gutted for Oviedo tbh. He's done absolutely nothing wrong when he's played. In fact, he's always looked creative and confident with the ball. I suppose with Moyes if your face doesn't fit, you don't play. I feel sorry for him, Duffy, Vellios etc... None of them have let us down when given a chance. Remember when Bainsey signed for us? Moyes refused to play him until Kilbane or Naismith got injured.
Peter Bell
144 Posted 04/04/2013 at 00:02:46
Getting fed up with Blues coming on this forum and talking rubbish. Colin Glassar, can you please explain for me how Moyes left Baines out until either Kilbane or Naysmith (please spell it right) were injured, when both players had left the club before Baines arrived?

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads

© ToffeeWeb