Barkley heads up England trio

, 29 June, 71comments  |  Jump to most recent
Four of Everton's contingent featured in for England in their final group game of the U20 World Cup but they couldn't prevent a 2-0 defeat to Egypt that condemned them to an early exit from the competition in Turkey.

Ross Barkley almost put England Under-20s ahead in the first half of their final Group A match against bottom-dwellers Egypt in Fifa's U20 World Cup. He started alongside Luke Garbutt and John Stones, with John Lundstram on the bench, and had the best chance of the goalless first half.

The Everton contingent increased to four as Chris Long came on with instructions to score the winning goal that would take England through but the tenacious Egyptians had other idea, Trezeget beating Liverpool's Coady and powering an unstoppable shot past England keeper Johnston.

The Egyptians restricted England with a well-disciplined defence and in the end, got a second goal in stoppage time, sending England's overall rather poor young hopefuls home early from the competition.  



Reader Comments (71)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Paul Ferry
1 Posted 29/06/2013 at 18:54:03
Gonna try and forget about Teary Billy for a bit as the U-20s are about set to kick off with Ross, Stones, and Garbutt all starting! Lundstram on the bench.

And not at all disappointed that Ross was the only one not to sing along to our nice national anthem.

I wonder if our globe-trotting Engerland fan – Mr Hudson – is there?

Paul Ferry
2 Posted 29/06/2013 at 19:00:21
Ha (764) — Great cross min from Garbutt there!
David Greenwood
3 Posted 29/06/2013 at 19:11:48
Missed the start... who is Germany's, sorry England's No 9? (Those strips!) Looks dreadful.
James Elworthy
4 Posted 29/06/2013 at 19:36:30
The England number 9 is Kane of Spurs... he is shite

Stones looks classy.

Paul Ferry
5 Posted 29/06/2013 at 19:42:14
Ross is having a nice game – nice touches – rarely does a pass go missing.

I agree James, Stones looks very good indeed, especially going forward.

Kane has missed two sitters.

Colin Glassar
6 Posted 29/06/2013 at 19:47:15
Stones is making Stubbsy very happy by all accounts.
David Greenwood
7 Posted 29/06/2013 at 19:48:43
Ah Colin, you have to tell us more, don't leave it there.
Patrick Murphy
8 Posted 29/06/2013 at 19:47:49
I think Stones has got a lot of potential, but what has happened to people taking the defenders on and getting a cross in? When any of them cross they always hit the first man on most occasions. That other Cole is also doing my swede in he gets in good positions and then spoils it with the wrong choice.

BTW Bill get back in your box and leave the football side to RM until he needs you to sign some cheques.

RE and BK - Penny-wise and Pound Foolish what a dynamic duo.

Jamie Barlow
9 Posted 29/06/2013 at 19:27:02
What are you watching the Under-20s game on, anyone?
David Greenwood
10 Posted 29/06/2013 at 19:54:24
Jamie, Eurosport.
Patrick Murphy
11 Posted 29/06/2013 at 19:54:14
Eurosport, Jamie, although I think you can get it from ESPN as well.
Michael Winstanley
12 Posted 29/06/2013 at 19:59:50
Jamie.
http://firstrowuk.eu/watch/193327/1/watch-egypt-vs-england,-u20---wct-2013.html
Michael Kenrick
13 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:06:58
And they just mentioned Eric Dier too.... is he still in Portugal?
Ian Bennett
14 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:12:43
Commentator said he played 14 games for Sporting Lisbon. Conor Cody from Liverpool looks decent.
Michael Kenrick
15 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:17:21
Wow... 14 games he would never had got if he'd remained with the Everton Academy!
Peter Thistle
16 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:18:22
England are pretty bad at all levels of football. No imagination or dynamic play, all boring slow build up that goes nowhere. Barkley looks ok but the rest are totally unimpressive.
Michael Kenrick
17 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:18:10
Barkley falls over again!
Michael Kenrick
18 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:21:10
Jesus, what a waste of a free-kick.
Ian Bennett
19 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:18:41
Agreed. Sadly. He looks a decent player who should make it. Looks really composed on the ball, Portugal is certainly a good place for him to learn his trade.
Michael Kenrick
20 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:22:25
Oooo... off the bar from Eric Dier!
David Greenwood
21 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:21:38
For me the problem with football in this country sticks out a mile with the big donut from spurs up front.

He probably scored shit loads of goals when he was at school, stood out a mile because of his size, build etc,

Absolutely pish all technique, touch, movement, awareness etc.

Still, can we not knock it...

Patrick Murphy
22 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:28:04
It's beginning to get on my nerves now they can't pass it forward, sideways and backwards yes ok but forward balls aaaaghh.
Wayne Smyth
23 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:29:51
There will soon be 4 Everton players on the pitch....
Paul Ferry
24 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:19:11
4 Everton players on the pitch right now.

Perhaps we should use the Academy lads a
little bit more often now that Ginger is on
his way out?

Michael Kenrick
25 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:30:06
Barkley looked for all the world like Cristiano Ronaldo there...until he hit his shot!

Four Everton players (and Dier) On the park now...

Patrick Murphy
27 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:30:22
Beauty ...wrong end though. See the power of individual talent rather than regimented straight lines.
Michael Kenrick
28 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:35:36
Good defending there by the Red Shite Coady.... NOT!
Ian Bennett
29 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:22:49
Top goal. I take my comment about Conor Coady back.
Paul Ferry
30 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:39:52
Ah I see MK thx
Michael Kenrick
31 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:37:26
No worries, Paul... I didn't want you.... er... playing with yourself over there!
Michael Kenrick
32 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:37:26
Another incredible miss!!!
Patrick Murphy
33 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:40:48
what a miss!!!!
Wayne Smyth
34 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:39:39
is Kane really the best we can do?
David Greenwood
35 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:42:49
I'm missing the match day live forum.

Wayne, is he fuck, but the people coaching, training and then employing youngsters in this country need to take a long hard look at themselves.

Paul Ferry
36 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:40:15
Well at least the lads will link up with Bobby Monday and get some decent friendly time.

Ross has faded last 10 or so, but my he has a ring of class about him.
I think, too, that Stones is one to watch.

Worry?

Someone coming in for Ross this window?

Chelsea are long admirers.

Wayne Smyth
37 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:43:20
With Coleman doing really well at RB, does anyone think we should try to use stones in the middle? Think I read somewhere he played there a bit at some point.

Seems a waste now that we have one good right back and one promising one who may not get much playing time.

Ian Bennett
38 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:37:02
Too much from Ross - again.
Paul Ferry
39 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:46:42
Long looks a lot sharper than Kane
Paul Ferry
40 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:48:42
Oh Dear Luke Garbutt

Taylor out

TOB

Patrick Murphy
41 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:49:31
oh well there's always the next Tournament
Paul Ferry
42 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:49:53
Ha (828)
Al Philby
43 Posted 29/06/2013 at 20:54:20
Stones is going to be a world class player for sure. And this Pritchard must be related to Naismith: aimless runs, does not know how to cross the ball, misses a three-yard pass, and so on.
Sam Hoare
44 Posted 29/06/2013 at 21:01:08
The England future looks pretty bleak if that's anything to go by. Look forward to seeing Barkley get some game time next season though I think the other blue lads in that squad may have to wait a bit longer, I can't see Stones ousting Coleman or Jags any time soon.
Harvey Miller
45 Posted 29/06/2013 at 21:07:00
There is a parallel to Everton in the way England U-20 went down.
I saw the all England U-20 games and in every games they were the better team ( ok, Chile had the upper hand in the first half).
Still, England draw two ( the other being two up for 70 mins) and lost the last one.
Why is that? well anybody could see the "the manager mr. taylor was playing Moyes' tactics: start carefully with the 4-5-1, let's see the storm trough and hit them with counter attacks.
It did not work. Like with Everton it did work sometimes against good teams but it sure as hell don't work against teams like Wigan or Norwich or Iraq or Egypt or whatever weaker team you are playing.
I trust Mr. Martinez will opt for a different way of play. Winning at home is all-important. Drawing is losing ,except at the four named (you know) places. Winning 4-3 is so much better than 1-0.
We want good football (well, most of us, I think) even if there will be hard times before that. I think we are somewhere between 15 and bottom in November.
Harold Matthews
46 Posted 29/06/2013 at 21:27:40
Typical robotic England performance.

Barkley looked weary throughout but he'll definitely be a player one day.
As will Stones. A classy two-sided, tall, slim lad who will need to strengthen up.
Garbut was poor and Long came on late and hardly featured.

Kane and Conor Coady were awful but the keeper has a big future.

My God, I hope Martinez can add a bit of Spanish flair to the Finch Farm training sessions. The English coaching manual is 50years out of date.

Patrick Murphy
47 Posted 29/06/2013 at 22:20:01
I agree Harold, wouldn't it be so much better to play a more enterprising style of football for the under 20s - it's not as if the results have been good that's something near to 20 games since they won a WC group match at that level.

As for Barkley and Stones they seemed to have a good understanding with each other, but I'm still not sure that Barks has the temperment to cope at the highest level, let's hope the coaches at Finch Farm can work on that because he does have a good skill set, it just needs harnessing properly.

Raymond Fox
48 Posted 29/06/2013 at 22:40:33
My god, it's been the same failing for the last 30+ years... our players haven't enough basic skills, ball control...

It's embarrassing.

Ian Bennett
49 Posted 29/06/2013 at 22:30:22
My perspective of England was the passing and final ball is pretty poor, despite shading possession and territory. On balance they should have come away with better results, but the cheapness of the passing and final ball is all too frequent.

Barkley was trying to much. He is a class player, but he would be better playing a simpler game and shifting the ball rather than trying the spectaular all the time. Which takes me to 4-5-1. I am sorry, but with Brett Angel up front you need to play a different way. England needed to change their shape earlier.

Barry Rathbone
50 Posted 29/06/2013 at 22:52:05
Ray Fox, couldn't agree more – Hoddle was the last good English player.
Mark Frere
51 Posted 29/06/2013 at 23:18:17
Ever heard of Paul Gascoigne, Barry? Don't think you could call his skills that basic, although he didn't do us any favours being 10 years past his best.
Barry Rathbone
52 Posted 29/06/2013 at 23:26:50
Sorry, Mark, Gazza was like Rooney – decent for the standard in this country – but, in another league where skill wasn't such a rarity, not so clever.

Before his injury at Lazio, he wasn't tearing up any trees in Italy.

But even allowing for a difference of opinion, one name since Hoddle is hardly a counter-point.

Ernie Baywood
53 Posted 30/06/2013 at 01:42:54
We produce plenty of technically gifted players. It's just unfortunate that their exposure is either in the lower leagues or playing in England youth/reserve sides. 442, big man/small man forward lines. The same shite we've been pushing for decades.

By the time they are old enough to play in the multicultural premier league with players of real talent to learn from they've missed years of development.

Ross has to get games for us. If he's not playing at the top level his education and development is not coming from the right people.

Derek Thomas
54 Posted 30/06/2013 at 07:43:30
We, and the rest of the pool from which the England squad is drawn from, are spending up large on their Acadamies and all we can come up with is two draws and a loss vs teams who, unless some one can prove different, are not throwing anywhere near the amounts we do.

Does this show that, at home and now on the International stage, the money is being thrown at the Acadamies in a shotgun way that, if we fire enough rounds, we are bound to hit something way?

The coaches are only passing on what they were taught, The Hoard Wilkinson "kick dead fast, run dead hard, Route 1, lowest common denominator, if you're not built like a brick shithouse at 15 don't bother... It's the Prem lads, it's pace, power, sprint and jog 8000 m in 90 mins, if we want skill we'll get a fancy dan foreigner," it's what they do, you stick to what you know.

All the Anglo Countries – England, Australia, New Zealand – finished bottom of their groups.

Ian Bennett
55 Posted 30/06/2013 at 08:38:12
Nearly all of those England players would have benefitted by signing for a Championship team, to play more meaningful games. Sadly they are all earning £100-£250k plus per annum, playing stiff, no-mark football.

The foreign lads are earning a lot less. They have to continue working to make a decent living, and they have the chances of playing if they perform.

Dier is a great example, how many Premier League teams would play a class young centre half 14 games last season at his age? I think the answer is none.

Harold Matthews
56 Posted 30/06/2013 at 10:16:24
Yes, lads. This Anglo country lack of technical expertise is a real mystery. I honestly don't know the answer. Smarter guys than me don't know the answer.

We're not comfortable with the ball. We treat it like a hot potato. Whereas players like Messi, Iniesta, Berbatov and hundreds of other non-Anglos can't get enough of it.

Some say that away from the game they kick a ball about while our lads play golf, snooker and video games. There's probably a bit of truth in that. Is the love of football being erased on the training ground? Why do they prefer to spend hours doing something else?

Patrick Murphy
57 Posted 30/06/2013 at 12:02:14
There is also a problem that professionals don't like showboating, remember the stick Rooney got for taking the mick out of WBA at Goodison in his early days. The only tool they have to use is the ball and they don't seem to be able to control it properly on a regular basis.

I wish I knew the answer because it would be worth a considerable amount of money if I did. But I suppose it comes down to getting children as young as possible to learn how to control the ball through practice, practice and more practice.

Most of the lads my age used to play with a tennis ball and that helps hone skills, well for most people it did; I still managed to toe poke the thing on most occasions.


Ernie Baywood
58 Posted 30/06/2013 at 12:28:41
Back in my day, we got picked up based on our performances in full-size pitch games (size 5 footy too). That was at age 10.

Madness. All they got was the biggest and strongest into their "Centres of Excellence".

The Brazillian clubs were already hosting camps, playing small-sided games and selecting on technique.

I think that flaw has now been acknowledged but how long does it take for the coaches and scouts to adapt? After all, they were part of the flawed system.

Brian Harrison
59 Posted 30/06/2013 at 12:16:58
Yet again another failure by an England team, they were matched with Egypt and Iraq (both war-torn countries) and Chile. Yet, like the Under-21s before them, failed to win a single game. Might be interesting to hear how much the other group players get paid by their clubs... not a quarter of what our kids are paid, I guess.

These failures have been going on for decades yet nothing is done to address the problem. Most Premier league teams have less than 30% of English players in their starting line-ups and that figure reduces the more successful the club. Then, if you see how many Under-21 English players are playing in the Premier League on a regular basis, it gives an insight into the problem.

You only have to look at Oxlaide-Chamberlain – he is hardly more than a substitute for Arsenal so how is he supposed to improve his game with virtually no game time? I cant imagine another business that could employ so few Nationals and not cause major questions being asked.

I don't know how we make more Premier League clubs play English and young English players but, if we don't address the problem the England manager of the future will be mainly selecting players from the Championship.

Also, why is the problem not the same in Spain and Italy and Germany where high wages are paid, so we can't say its because our clubs can afford to buy the best players.

Also, back in the 70s, we were told when Holland were doing particularly well that we should follow their lead and start letting our clubs have access to kids from the age of 10. Well we have gone down that route of letting clubs have access to kids even younger than 10 and we are producing fewer good young players than we did 40 years ago.

Wayne Smyth
60 Posted 30/06/2013 at 12:23:30
Patrick, I think there is a difference between performing skills with the ball, and standing there with hands on hips as Rooney did to the WBA player. Most professionals probably respect talent or skill, they probably don't like arrogance and attitude, especially from a snotty teenager who had achieved very little at that point.

I think the core of the problem with the national side is basically that the pool of players we have to choose from has shrunk. The amount of money that has flowed into the English game means that the clubs are picking up more and more foreign talent, which is squeezing out our own players from academies and from the first team.

We might get one or two players with some talent coming through, but we'll never achieve critical mass to get a talented national side where we have 8 or 9 quality players. There will always be 5 or 6 James Milner's who'll try hard, but who shouldn't be near the national team.

Coaches like Moyes who aren't willing to give youth a chance don't help. Look back a couple of seasons and remember Stracq. The guy tried, but was awful. We had players like McAleny who'd played a few minutes here and there and looked promising, but couldn't get a look in because Moyes would rather play a foreigner who wasn't very good and was not going to be at the club at the end of the season. It's that kind of short-term attitude which means that our young players don't develop.

Barkley has been given the same lack of opportunity and is probably a few years behind where he could be. It might explain his desire to try too hard and do too much, because he feels the need to impress every time he's picked for non-reserve football.

The other thing that I notice is work-rate. I wonder if the guys from Iraq and Chile going abroad for an international tournament and representing their country (even at U20) is a pinnacle of their careers. They're probably genuinely proud to represent their country and work their bollocks off.

Whereas for our lads I suspect many are motivated more by money at club level than the actual football. Going to a U20 tournament with a few thousand in the crowd is probably a step down compared to getting a Premier League game in many respects.

James Martin
61 Posted 30/06/2013 at 13:01:42
What about Scholes, Barry? Cruelly sidelined by English coaches in favour of the bruising talents of such luminaries as Batty, Redknapp Ince and of more recent times the 'we can only play with a whole team built aorund us' brothers Gerrard and Lampard? He's often been recognised by all the top players as one of the best midfielders of his generation.
Norman Merrill
62 Posted 30/06/2013 at 13:01:55
I watched the U21 competition earlier in the month, and I just feel the England teams (U20, U21 & Roy's outfit) all play the same system, pass back, sideways, but nothing positive; with the exception of Barkley, no-one looks comfortable on the ball.

Let's see how the big boys shape up in their three World Cup matches, as they will use the same boring passing system. Maybe 3rd time lucky, but they won't worry class sides.

Ben Hayes
63 Posted 30/06/2013 at 13:19:25
One answer could be to start playing Creole... Messi used to play it and says it's why he is as skilful as he is as it gets your touch better and gets you used to having the ball under pressure.

We need to start looking at players who aren't 6 foot and can run all day but smaller players as well who have skill.

Just because these players win games when they are 12 and 13 as they play on bigger pitches doesn't mean it's the answer; the smaller, more skilful players come through later and clubs reject them and play hoofball and run as much as possible.

We need to change things from Under-7s up and get all players used to having the ball and being able to pass it about. Being able to get the ball with a man on you and being comfortable with it, if we did that, we would start being better but it is a long process... hopefully its already started though.

Tom Bowers
64 Posted 30/06/2013 at 14:04:54
From the first minute when useless Kane missed a sitter of a header off a great ball by Garbutt, you sensed it could be a bad day.

The Everton players all acquitted themselves well and only shoddy finishing and some great goalkeeping kept Egypt in it. Sadly the inevitable happened as we have seen many times before when a win was on the line.

Some of these players should never have started this game. Players like Kane and Cole are rubbish with Coady fading after a bright opening 15 minutes. Barkley looks the class act when he decides to get involved. He looked at times like his mind was elsewhere. Definitely has a concentration problem but when he gets going looked like the one to turn it around.

Peter Taylor is a bust. Looks like a good job for Phil Neville.

Phil Sammon
65 Posted 30/06/2013 at 14:37:05
Harold Matthews

Interesting point there about many young players not actually 'loving' football.

I certainly agree. These days, with Twitter etc, you get more of an insight than ever into the players lives and I must say, it's rather depressing in many respects. Nandos, tattoos and golf seem to rank higher than football when it comes to priorities. I understand that it's their job and everyone needs a break, but I do feel there is a distinct lack of love for the game.

Ross Edwards
66 Posted 30/06/2013 at 14:51:26
Well, just as we thought English football couldn't slide even further down the sewage we get humiliated 2-0 by the Egyptians.

I didn't watch the whole of the game but I switched on just before Trezeget's goal, he certainly took it well didn't he?

You can tell that the young players can't be arsed about the game, mainly because they would rather tweet about having a bacon and egg butty for lunch and going round in their Ferrari hanging their Rolex watches out the window than playing football.

Once we lower wages, their interest will go up again. They are millionaires even before they reach 20 and that surely isn't right.

Again we play football 20 years out of date, playing static 4-4-2 or something near to that. Peter Taylor, well he's years past his sell by date and a typical yes man.

I've also heard today that the Wally with a Brolly is on the list for the Under-21 job!

Desperate or what?

Tim O'Connell
67 Posted 30/06/2013 at 17:07:23
The few bright points that came from it were mainly our lads. I thought Ross, John Stones and Cole in combination looked very impressive until Cole ran out of steam after an hour, resulting in Stones being less effective. Ross does look a class act, but still needs to concentrate throughout. Garbutt had some good crosses but is a long way from Baines, but he still has time.

As is in a prior post, unfortunately for England, Harry Kane was dreadful, but as he is only a youngster; we shouldn't criticise too much.

Mike Oates
68 Posted 30/06/2013 at 17:22:39
Barkley has to be a much better decision maker for Premiership games. He is undoubtedly great at times but absolutely awful at other times, most notably when he tries to beat one too many and invariably we get caught on the counter attack. As I said earlier in the week I don't think he'll fit in easily as his only true position is in the hole behind one or two forwards. He isn't a good defender at all, coupled with his problem of loosing the ball I don't think Martinez (like Moyes) will want him near our own box.
Mike Oates
69 Posted 30/06/2013 at 17:34:02
Just to finish I was disappointed in Garbutt, I thought 18 months ago that he would be pressurising Bainsey by now, but he seems to be going backwards. Stones does again look as though he could mke it sometime in future, but we have a habit of not developing the lads to PL standard.
Derek Thomas
70 Posted 01/07/2013 at 00:47:05
Brian #953 the thig was that in the 70's the Dutch ere teaching them about skill and movement off the ball. Were as we are teaching them to be middle distance runners who can ( sometimes ) kick a ball.

As aways, It ain't what you do, It's the way that you do it.

Harold Matthews
71 Posted 01/07/2013 at 10:08:17
Phil. Interesting points. Thanks. Quite sad really.
Geoff Edwards
72 Posted 01/07/2013 at 14:59:44
Mike #038, the only way he can become a better decision maker is by getting more games. Hopefully he will under Martinez.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads

© ToffeeWeb