After reading the "Red Bull Looking for English Club to buy" story this morning, and noticing a high percentage of comments suggesting that the injection of cash would be a good thing, I decided to register with ToffeeWeb (long time lurker) and explain exactly why I think the purchase would be fundamentally bad for our club, and why any such purchase must be resisted strongly until we get certain reassurances from the potential buyer. Well talk about those later.
First, lets examine motives. Why would Red Bull want to purchase a team in its entirety, rather than just sponsor the shirt? To answer that, lets consider whats made Red Bull such a success over the years: marketing. Think about it, the drink is like medicine left out in the sun for too long. So how do they sell so many cans? Its the power of the brand. Red Bull is a well recognized, global brand, associated with high octane pursuits, youth, energy, and being pissed out of your face in a nightclub on a Saturday night. So their motive for buying the team, rather than just sponsoring the shirt, is that their brand is too powerful to subtly blend into the background. They are not like AON, associating themselves vicariously with success — they *are* the success. Success is their brand. And Everton FC and its history would only get in the way of that, hence the reason that they need to control the club in its entirety, so that they can morph it into Red Bull FC from the inside out.
"Why is it different to Chang Beer?" — many ask. Well, its very different. Its different because Chang Beer are only associating themselves with Everton FC; Everton, as a brand, is something that Chang want to be part of. Our club, our history, our shirt, our struggle. But Red Bull dont want to be associated with us or anybody: they want a Team Red Bull in the EPL and in the UCL. To put it simply: one is a mutually beneficial business partnership; the other is a hostile takeover
Others have already brought up the sad case of Austria Salzburg. If you are not familiar with this team, please look into it right now and read about how the fans there were crushed with an arrogance usually only seen in dictators and traffic wardens. This was everything that has happened to Cardiff and worse: changed colours, changed name, lifelong fans banned. Do we really want this at Goodison Park? (Or The Red Bull Fun Field as they may wish to rename it.) How about playing in Blue and Red? How about the spirit of St. Domingos trampled into the dirt to such an extent wed make MK Dons look like National Heritage in comparison?
The very threat of this hostile takeover has me looking jealously over the park at those whinging Kopites and their benefactors at Fenway Sports Group. Because, yes, even with the cringe-worthy talk of "the franchise", the unintended comic gold of Brenda Rogers Brentarian turn in "Being Liverpool", and half their fan base coming from Norway, at least FSGs chief interest is in building up the "Liverpool FC" brand above all else. They do this so that they may take advantage of corporations wishing to associate themselves with a successful sports club. This is the opposite of Red Bull, who are a corporation seeking to take advantage of a successful sports club in a vulnerable position.
Think about any other club in the top six: Arsenal (well run, lucky to be in the capital), Man City (sold their souls to oil interests but at least they keep their name/identity), Chelsea (rich sugar daddy but again no impact on name/shirt/identity), Spurs (never were that classy to begin with and lucky with the Bale money), Man Utd (owned by blood sucking yanks, were lucky to have had Fergie, and may well soon find how low things can get when empire crumbles). All of these clubs owners are interested in the brand power of the club itself. This is compatible with the wishes of the fans, who also want to see the club succeed and be lauded above all else. Any of these options — as undesirable as some, or even all, bar Arsenal, are — are still a lot better than what Red Bull has to offer: which is nothing short than the destruction of our football club.
Yes, Everton need investment. But not this kind. I support Everton Football Club — not some marketing monster from the country whos two greatest achievements are to have convinced the world that Hitler was German and Beethoven was Viennese. Hell, Id rather have Agent Johnson back than put up with these Red Bull clowns. But luckily, we dont need to contemplate such horrors (yet) while Bill Kenwright is still in charge. I know that he gets a lot of stick here at ToffeeWeb, but you cant argue with the fact that hes stabilized the club over the last decade. Hes made good choices with managers, and if you dont think he listens to fans, why dont you look into how many online questionnaires, votes, and fan consultation processes Red Bull put into place before stripping Austria Salzburg of their identity? (Their one concession to the fans: having the keeper wear violet socks for one of the home games.)
OK, not everyone sees BK in the same light as me. And some may see this Red Bull chance as a one-time opportunity that Everton cant afford to pass up on. "Evolve or die" is the mantra. Fine, thats a valid point of view. (I can imagine miserable gets like me writing angry letters to the local paper back when Everton went professional...) But my purpose of writing this article is to ask that we fans get behind a set of conditions that all prospective owners must agree to if they are to our enjoy our backing in buying and running the club. Something like the following:
1: The name Everton FC must never be changed.
2: The club crest must not incorporate any other letter or symbols than the NSNO motto, Prince Ruperts Tower, club name, founding date, and laurel leaves.
3: Not all elements need to be present on the crest, but the fans should be consulted before the design is changed.
4: Goodison Park may not be renamed (although naming rights to a new stadium could in principle be sold).
5: The club must never be relocated outside of Liverpool.
6: The home kit will always be royal blue and white. This includes the sponsors logo.
This Red Bull story will likely turn out to be nonsense. With any luck, theyll buy the Kopites, and we can all enjoy seeing them run out in their new blue and red kit, as "FC Red Bull Liverpool", with their pre-match rendition of YNWA replaced by the Red Bull eXtreme power anthem. But regardless, now is a great time to be gathering our thoughts and opinions as fans. Everton are on the up, as we know, and must be a target for investment by one of the behemoth branding machines out there on the global market. We must communicate this to the current and any potential future regime. We must speak loudly, in one voice. We need investment. We need a buyer. We deserve the right investors. We deserve the right buyers.
Reference reading:
Against Red Bull FootballModern Football and the Death of History (thanks to Brian Waring for posting this in the comments of the original story).
Naming Rights – the next step. Could clubs incorporate sponsorship in their name?
Reader Comments (63)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 14/10/2013 at 15:16:49
I read the Austria Salzburg piece and these guys are only after a marketing vehicle, i.e. a club in the permiership and CL who can market red bull for them - everything else is not relevant for them. They don't and won't care about any history and will change everything so that the whole clube is simply a walking advert for red bull, at all times.
Every club, not just EFC, in England should tell them to do one if they come knocking. If they do end up buying a club in England, then that will be a truly sad day for English football, as that will be the beginning of the end fear. The sport has already gotten commercial enough with naming rights and strips being changed etc.
Anyway, hopefully this will turn our to be nothing but unfotunately money talks and the red bull owner is worth a few billion!
4 Posted 14/10/2013 at 15:18:36
I don't think that the type of takeover you describe, would be good for Everton FC or indeed for the corporation that decided to purchase the club.
I can see a stadium being built by a corporation and leased out to the club, with all the logo's signage etc being that of the corporations rather than the club's. That may in itself be too much for some traditionalists.
Whoever buys the club - if anybody ever does - they will have to earn the trust of the fan-base over a period of time, however, whatever the initial motives of a potential buyer no-one can be sure that their ideas won't change over time.
There is no way that Bill Kenwright can assure himself or the fan-base that a potential buyer ticks all of his boxes on behalf of the club. It's a gamble that eventually will have to be taken, Bill won't be around for ever.
We obviously don't want the club to jump into bed with the first interested suitor who waves a wad of cash, but we don't want the club to be left high and dry on the shelf for the rest of its natural life either.
5 Posted 14/10/2013 at 15:29:03
They would want to re-brand the whole club from top to bottom. Our appeal is our proud history, and I for one would not want this great club to be an advertising vehicle for some European soft drink manufacturer.
Of course we need more sponsorship (and new owners) but there is a limit on how much of our history we would have to sacrifice for corporate millions. This company would definitely be a bridge too far.
I would also add that the club is probably unsaleable anyway, when you look at the asking price, the many mortgages, and the long term finance & sponsorship deals that are already in place.
6 Posted 14/10/2013 at 15:54:55
A great leveller for many is the consideration that, as Red Bull Everton or whatever the name would be, they could be sat watching "us" play Barcelona in the CL a few years from now or maybe even winning the PL. How long can a team live off its history before it needs to win at any cost? Will fans still be singing "if you know your history" in 20 years time if most of them have never experienced first-hand the success that the song refers to?
For those of us old enough to have seen the Club win trophies and titles the idea, once properly considered, seems abhorrent. For younger Toffees however I can see it holding real appeal. A super-rich "new Everton" with contemporary branding and the potential for on-pitch success. What would they care for the past if the future seemed so very, very bright? This is obviously what Red Bull would be banking on.
I think the reality is that (thankfully) Everton wouldn't be right for them. It would make more sense for them to buy Fulham and re-brand as London Red Bull. That would be one hell of an advert for their inexplicably popular drink. If they were to buy us then my biggest fear is that we would be renamed (gulp) Liverpool Red Bull...
7 Posted 14/10/2013 at 16:29:46
I think we are all agreed that provisos need to be put in place but what power to resist change once a buyout is complete? Not much. If there is a commercially viable stadium site just outside Liverpool, then your line in the sand will move quickly enough.
But we cannot live on our history, we cannot survive indefinitely on not winning anything. Keep telling yourself we can... but we can't. Ask Burnley, Sheffield, Leeds, Blackpool, Bolton, Notts County. Is it glorious has-beens that you want our grandchildren to know us by or is it RB Everton in the Champions League?
Many worry about keeping our identity. Everton FC is already long changed from its original identity. The Everton FC I grew up with wins competitions, buys the best players or at least challenges seriously for both and did so for the first 100 years of its existence. The Everton FC we have now does not and hasn't for coming up to 20 years. THAT part of our identity is long gone. Do we want that back or is it the labels that connect us with a glorious past? The past is lovely, safe, unchanging. unchallenging – hey, we can always cling on to 'the second longest amount of time anyone has played in the top division'.
The sort of team we were now plays in the Championship (perhaps that is where some would like us to be), the game at the top has changed forever. We have yet to challenge for the Premier League. And there is only one way to win the Premier League.
Glory hunter? Perhaps there is a little of that, even after 20 years of nothing with regular doses of humiliation thrown in. Isn't getting our share of glory what all this is about? I have been lucky enough to shout 'Champions' at our team more than once, I want it for my children too.
8 Posted 14/10/2013 at 16:29:46
I think we are all agreed that provisio's need to be put in place but what power to resist change once a buyout is complete? Not much. If there is a commercially viable stadium site just outside Liverpool then your line in the sand will move quickly enough.
But we cannot live on our history, we cannot survive indefinitely on not winning anything. Keep telling yourself we can but we can't. Ask Burnley, Sheffield, Leeds, Blackpool, Bolton, Notts County. Is it glorious has-beens that you want our grandchildren to know us by or is it RB Everton in the Champions League?
Many worry about keeping our identity. Everton FC is already long changed from its original identity. The Everton FC I grew up with wins competitions, buys the best players or at least challenges seriously for both and did so for the first 100 years of its existence. The Everton FC we have now does not and hasn't for coming up to 20 years. THAT part of our identity is long gone. Do we want that back or is it the labels that connect us with a glorious past? The past is lovely, safe, unchanging. unchallenging - hey we can always cling on to 'the second longest amount of time anyone has played in the top division'.
The sort of team we were now plays in the Championship (perhaps that is where some would like us to be), the game at the top has changed forever. We have yet to challenge for the Premiership. And there is only one way to win the Premiership.
Glory hunter? Perhaps there is a little of that, even after 20 years of nothing with regular doses of humiliation thrown in. Isn't getting our share of glory what all this is about? I have been lucky enough to shout 'Champions' at our team more than once, I want it for my children too.
9 Posted 14/10/2013 at 17:02:43
We need a new ground and it's a shame that Kirkby never came off as Tesco were going to be the main provider of finance. They're in a mess so that's not going to happen again as an option.
We're stuck with the old ground and look at this what would we have to moan about on TW without the lack of investment?
Looking forward to Hull – it's my first game since a bad ankle break.
10 Posted 14/10/2013 at 17:17:21
11 Posted 14/10/2013 at 17:22:39
"Others have already brought up the sad case of Austria Salzburg. If you are not familiar with this team, please look into it right now and read about how the fans there were crushed with an arrogance usually only seen in dictators and traffic wardens"...
...
my career's teacher warned me off becoming a dictator but I did have designs on becoming a traffic warden before I finally retire - now you've ruined that dream for me.
12 Posted 14/10/2013 at 17:38:52
Tesco?
Linda Morrison?
13 Posted 14/10/2013 at 17:57:10
http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com/nl/bdodgers/brooklyn.html
14 Posted 14/10/2013 at 18:14:08
Please — "It's a shame Kirkby didn't come off!"
As I and many have stated, anything that the luvvie says just will not happen:
NTL Fortress Sport the docklands project — is that money still ring fenced? We are stuck with him and all his cliches of "My blood runs blue" and "when I was in the Boys Pen". I feel my blue blood boil every time I see him or even hear him.
Remember when RM first arrived and he went on about he says he will get us in the Champions league! Or more distasteful his remark about feeling raped after someone went to the press about a comment he made.
The guy is not to be trusted or admired.
15 Posted 14/10/2013 at 18:23:59
Yes, we may well be rebranded, but if it means being one of England's leading clubs again rather than pretending to be one, lying back on our 1980s glory days, then I'd go for it.
We need money, and if they are interested, then I'm sure Bill will lay out what his criteria is.
16 Posted 14/10/2013 at 18:04:33
I don't want us to become the circus that City did for a couple of seasons. I don't want Everton to be seen in the same light as City and Chelsea who have become overnight sensations simply by throwing money about. Yes, Utd or Arsenal can and will spend 40m on one player, but both clubs have worked hard over a number of years and have earned the right to be seen as a top club. The word pedigree jumps out at me.
17 Posted 14/10/2013 at 18:37:53
Only kidding...
If our name, kit colour and crest remains the same and our history honoured I would be glad of the investment...
We only need 4 or 5 quality signings to make the CL...as we all know
18 Posted 14/10/2013 at 18:45:48
19 Posted 14/10/2013 at 18:47:04
Of course, I understand WHY many didn't/wouldn't read the inquiry on keioc - that could have lead to facts getting in the way of uninformed alehouse-lawyer waffle.
20 Posted 14/10/2013 at 18:54:14
21 Posted 14/10/2013 at 19:38:21
Our history will always be there no one can change that, The problem is our trophy winning history is getting to the point where lots of blues can't even remember winning anything.
Give me investment and a PL title and champions league games against top European teams any day, I can take a name change or ground renaming we will still be Everton, we will still have the history, but me might just start winning something.
22 Posted 14/10/2013 at 19:53:36
23 Posted 14/10/2013 at 19:57:28
I want us to be the best team in England, and if that means being taken over by Red Bull and face possible rebranding, then that's fine.
I don't like the fact we have been kidding ourselves for 20 years that we are one of the biggest clubs in the country, and the reality is that we aren't, and probably won't be for some time yet without investment.
I mean, even Southampton have had investment. The last time they won anything was in 1976.
24 Posted 14/10/2013 at 20:02:29
I know what I'd prefer, even if we were rebranded.
This "Oh, we can't get taken over by them because it's got 'red' in the name" is pathetic and childish.
26 Posted 14/10/2013 at 20:25:03
27 Posted 14/10/2013 at 20:25:30
28 Posted 14/10/2013 at 20:40:51
I'm with Thomas Lennon: we need to move with the times as history is history and we can't keep living in the past. Do Man City fans yearn for days of Peter Swailes to be back?
I don't care who own us as long as they put us back where we should be. Kenwright has been with us for years, it's time for a change, sadly I don't think it's coming.
29 Posted 14/10/2013 at 20:45:53
Do you see what I mean?
We were successful, we were one of the best teams in this country, we still think we are, but we won't be until we bite the bullet and get rid of Kenwright and move forward.
30 Posted 14/10/2013 at 20:44:24
Possibly I'm in the minority and possibly that since I've seen the great team of the early sixties I look at things differently. It pisses me off to hear about the only way forward is to sell our soul. Why should we?? Too many people have been brainwashed into believing we are some sort of small team.... What the fuck!!
Why is it every time we speak of takeover the first thing brought up is a new stadium that somehow appears to cost between £100 million and £5 trillion!!
We don't need a trillionaire or some arseholes like Red Bull! What we need is proper management working to a proper long term plan
31 Posted 14/10/2013 at 20:40:45
If we could get the money with a stadium name change and a partially changed club name, I would swallow it.
If what happened to Salzberg happens to us, I would find it very hard to take this. How could I still call myself an Everton fan if the club was called Red Bull Merseyside, how could I not be embarrassed by the 'razzamatazz' and the pyrotecnics and the extreme sports merchandising.
The thing is though, football fans are some of the most fickle people on the planet. If Red Bull Merseyside suddenly won two league titles in a row and a couple of domestic cups, would my interest in the club suddenly come back to me?
Another thing is that if we don't do something soon, we are going to become an over-achieving mid table club in all senses of the word. We really can live off reputation, history and past glories for so long before it just becomes pathetic. The level of debt, operating at a loss year upon year and the cost of a stadium are genuine concerns for fans, even if we can't agree on figures. Investment will become more and more of a pipe dream the bigger the debt, the longer we operate at a loss and the older the stadium gets. Sooner or later, it will take something drastic to drag us back up to where we belong. Red Bull Merseyside may not be that far away.
32 Posted 14/10/2013 at 20:44:55
I don't think for a moment that this deal will happened but if it did then every supporter(supporter, not Evertonian) who entered the Red Bull arena would with every chant be a willing participant in a cynical, commercial destruction of what, for many, is more than a trophy acquiring machine for providing boasting rights.
The long predicted death of this club hasn't happened yet. There's a way to go and much to happen before our decline is terminal. Red Bull could kill us much more quickly.
In my view there is much, much more to being a football supporter than gloating over expensively purchased silverware.
33 Posted 14/10/2013 at 21:07:11
I'm sure the rebranding isn't high on the list. The chief exec or whoever it was said they wanted to take over an English club to get them in the Champions League.
Why would they waste money on rebranding when they could spend it on an new stadium and players.
Bill would make that quite clear if a deal materialised.
34 Posted 14/10/2013 at 21:16:03
Obviously it's very different with Everton. Even if they agreed not to mess with the name/crest, they would still splash the red bull logo across the shirt, which just wouldn't mesh well with royal blue. But that's a small price to pay, I guess.
35 Posted 14/10/2013 at 21:04:09
Those who understand need no explanation. Those who don't understand don't matter... Red Bull doesn't matter and neither does their money.
36 Posted 14/10/2013 at 21:25:09
37 Posted 14/10/2013 at 21:18:34
Does Destination Kirkby ring a bell?? Bill came in as a mercenary and please don't be surprised if he leave as one!
Why would any short-term investor – and I mean Red Bull – want to spend any sort of cash improving the infrastructure of the Club when they can weigh in with mega millions in the short-term to gain great exposure then move on?
The only way forward is long-term structure and planning. Any business worth it's salt (a) believes in itself and (b) goes into it in the long term with honesty and credibility. Sadly lacking in our circumstances, I'm afraid.
38 Posted 14/10/2013 at 22:34:09
A European super league will happen and sooner rather than later.
Where will Everton be when it happens?
Looking in from the outside I guess......... Unless???
39 Posted 14/10/2013 at 23:22:48
Regarding other comments, Kirkby would have been a wrong turn in our history (I voted NO). King's Dock was the missed opportunity and still brings me out in a cold sweat to this day.
We are a great club that seemingly lacks a vision. Perhaps BK has even rejected a few "offers" from potential suitors based on them being unsuitable (i'm quickly donning a tin hat after that comment but who knows?)
(On another tangent, I was on the phone to a Sheffield United mate of mine last night and I came off feeling like a big time Charlie - so it's all relative. I told him we were having a crap season too as we're only 7th in the Prem and might only be 4th on Saturday night. Can't wait tip this international shite is out if the way and back to the proper stuff).
40 Posted 15/10/2013 at 00:45:20
41 Posted 15/10/2013 at 01:07:42
Slightly off piste, I disagree with Ian Hollingworth (#499) about the inevitability of a European super league in that it would all depend on what form it took. if it was just a league with no relegation or promotion, IMHO would signal the death of football.
Like all leagues there would only be 4-5 contenders for the title and therefore a game between for example, Anderlect and Lazio would be turned into a meaningless pre season game with nothing at stake.
Compare that to our domestic league in which practically every team has got something to play for until the final game.
A European super league is a (non-football loving)bean counters dream, and hopefully will never see the light of day.
42 Posted 15/10/2013 at 01:06:13
However, I have just had a vision of football in 25 years time, when the top 4 of the EPL reads "1. Red Bull Rotherham, 2. McDonalds Mansfield, 3. Coca-Cola Colchester, 4. Nike Northampton", all playing in packed-out 80,000 all-seater intergalactic stadiums, while we look on (years after Bill has taken us into administration), and think "that could have been us".
43 Posted 15/10/2013 at 00:47:29
People like to cite Cardiff as a precedent. Fine, but they're now playing in the Premier League. In red. Is that not better than playing in the Champo (or worse) in blue? Wouldn't it still be sweet to see Ross Barkley lift the Champs League trophy wearing a royal blue shirt even if he was wearing red shorts?
I am not saying it would be ideal, but it is a question you need to ask yourself if you're going to dismiss a possible chance at Everton FC finally getting the financial muscle they've lacked for over 20 years.
44 Posted 15/10/2013 at 01:40:34
45 Posted 15/10/2013 at 06:42:02
in the long term it goes without saying that we need some sort of investment in order to progress.
However, in saying that, what we have scandalously lacked in the past and continue in the present, is some sort of management and strategy which may well have seen us in the last couple of seasons actually obtaining Champions League football.
I cannot believe that in all the years The Worlds Greatest Evertonian has been at the helm we have never had a legitimate offer of either buyout or investment in the Club.
46 Posted 15/10/2013 at 07:59:02
47 Posted 15/10/2013 at 09:53:05
48 Posted 15/10/2013 at 11:54:03
49 Posted 15/10/2013 at 12:17:25
Second, an excellent and well written article - some might say a brilliant debut!
You make an excellent impassioned plea. However . . .
I must say that Scott 447 and Thomas 454 put up excellent thought provoking posts.
However, like John 480, I go back a long way and the history is hugely important to me as it will be to many others and the sort of takeover Dom speaks of is not for my liking one bit.
However, it is a long time since we've seen a piece of silverware and maybe times they are a changin'
50 Posted 15/10/2013 at 12:53:16
Ross, how much of the club could you amputate and still follow the "Everton" Red Bulls? Is there a line the rebranding shouldn't cross?
51 Posted 15/10/2013 at 14:32:40
52 Posted 15/10/2013 at 14:59:13
This is 99% true but there is one factor that it doesn't take into consideration.
Us.
Or more accurately our response to what KIND of takeover it might be.
Because as powerful as the money men are, we would, at least theoretically, actually have it in OUR hands to dictate terms.
How?
Well let's imagine the very worst.
Bill flogs us to Red Bull and our new owners immediately announce the following.
"Goodison will now be the Red Bull Arena, Everton FC will become Red Bull Everton and though the shirts will stay blue, they'll be Red Bull blue worn with red shorts and red socks'
Question, what happens if 36,000 say 'I'm staying away until they've fucked off or given us our identity back'?
The Red Bull totally empty arena?
I said theoretically, because in practice Everton supporters (generally) have shown they are prepared to put up with and swallow all sorts of shite, but the fact remains if they/we were organised and prepared to threaten and BACK our threats, we might find we actually have a bit more power than we think.
Remember, when 22500 said 'stick that beehive badge up your arse!' an apology was issued and redesigns began.
Everton supporters taking REAL action in the face of a 'hostile' takeover is improbable, but NOT impossible.
A cliché I know, but without the supporters, there really is..nothing.
53 Posted 15/10/2013 at 15:21:27
54 Posted 15/10/2013 at 17:43:41
Here's a thought. what will stop the supporters of, say, Burton Albion, stop going|? Are they better supporters than us? Have we some sort of right to have higher aspirations?
In my view, to aspire is an end in itself.
55 Posted 15/10/2013 at 18:40:20
56 Posted 15/10/2013 at 22:00:43
57 Posted 16/10/2013 at 01:10:41
That said, I would not only agree with your concern but add a point previously unmentioned here... Red Bull's overpowering takeover at Salzburg roughly mirrors what they did in New York. The team name, color, crest and branding were completely changed. The old MetroStars didn't have what any European team would consider tradition, but Red Bull did come in like a Bull in a china shop and break everything up.
Red Bull isn't stupid... and I can't believe they'd be foolish enough to try this sledgehammer approach with Everton... but I'm with the consensus here that lots of conditions would have to be attached to any investment by this company.
58 Posted 16/10/2013 at 13:34:09
I would want a similar type of takeover as Man City had but I think, no matter who comes along, it will take a long time to find the right buyer.
59 Posted 16/10/2013 at 19:18:49
Let's have Man Utd supporters delight in Kenwright, Green, and them and we suffer the Glazers... I'm ready to take my chances.
60 Posted 16/10/2013 at 22:05:49
61 Posted 17/10/2013 at 02:05:21
62 Posted 17/10/2013 at 13:38:09
63 Posted 17/10/2013 at 23:13:49
What we lack, and have done for a fair few years before the start of the PL, is leadership and vision, from those in charge.
The one opportunity we truly had, was missed, as a certain someone did not want to give up his toy...
A viable business plan could allow us to have the funds to pump into the team. The success this could/ would bring, would allow us to redevelop the stadium.
As some have mentioned, all that is needed is a long term plan. Currently the only plan Everton have is to sell anything not nailed down, to stop the banks from "killing us" NSNO.
64 Posted 18/10/2013 at 13:20:49
Seeing as there's nobody else that we are aware of queueing up to take us over (and this might well be a "creative post by a hack,) it's Red Bull who are supposedly in the frame.
Personally, I think we need a takeover to bring us anywhere near a level playing field with the teams we aspire to challenge, for European and Domestic honours.
Red Bull though? Well, its scary, having read some of the posts on here about their previous foray into club ownership.
From what I read, it was mentioned that they might be looking for a club who would be challenging for the Champions League and our name was mentioned along with Liverpool's, as likely candidates. Liverpool of course, would be eminently suited to a name change. "Red Bull" is what they're full of.
I'd love us to be taken over. Especially as Man City were, or even a big Company who had pots of money and were prepared to invest plenty of it.
And I'd love the shower we have in charge now, to be booted out and give this club a chance to grow.
I wouldn't fancy Red Bull though, as I can't see them dropping the name and the logo, which is after all, their company symbol.
I agree with Andy above, that we need a business plan but, we'll never get one with this crew. We'd also need a lot of money to put those plans into fruition.
So come on Arab sheiks, get down to Goodison and get shut of
"Blue Bull."
PS,
Linda. Where did you get the idea Tesco were going to be the major investors in the new stadium?
65 Posted 18/10/2013 at 15:07:13
I understand we can't just have anybody taking over the Club; "Be careful what you wish for", etc. I wasn't in when Kenwright and them took over, but I'd bet many, many supporters were happy when they did. And here we are. It's not so much about Red Bull.
We need an ambitious group to run the Club. One that understands a club makes the most money when it wins. In Red Bull's case, the club in the most-watched league on earth winning. And what that means for Red Bull being known around the planet. All because some football club, they own, wins.
If it's Red Bull or any other, I don't care. We need an alternative to what we have now. I'm ready to take my chances.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.



1 Posted 14/10/2013 at 15:16:20